娛樂滿紛 26FUN's Archiver

151515 發表於 2006-1-30 09:42 PM

**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****

機密 發表於 2006-1-30 09:44 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]151515[/i] at 2006-1-30 21:42:
} \^pd\&I3H9u:f
]`9o_L P@8O8BIX^ but 鄧艾and陸遜have 10 pts,姜維only9 [/quote]
:i&L2{$m g$|;a0V 2l.Xl?"i^ v$gV b
But I don't think鄧艾and陸遜 is really better than 姜維. Even they are clever, 姜維 was taught by  諸葛亮.  He learnt ~90% from 諸葛亮.Lb g3_o J^

2X8s%b6wjt [[i] Last edited by 機密 on 2006-1-30 at 09:45 PM [/i]]

151515 發表於 2006-1-30 09:45 PM

**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****

機密 發表於 2006-1-30 09:46 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]151515[/i] at 2006-1-30 21:45:
q/@.d)\sO
F+{!jt3K9Jd
(KL#e V'?dBA)tjWj why?
;m;^;t}NCI8q A IST!Q3Wh
其實他們實力差不多,很難比較:o [/quote]5k&V3](s/[0m&u

Y @,va/ys1djj see #22 Thus`!_-TLi4WI9n9m T
5O \8Km?u4vs;q
智慧: 諸葛亮-->司馬懿--->陸遜--->姜維--->鄧艾--->
t9giu1N2| O#N%A0gR8[
軍事才能:諸葛亮-->司馬懿--->陸遜~鄧艾~姜維RW)\.XA)k6s?

-e5K$bg%a3hT X cN YV 政治才能:<--- actually I forgot the details.
~ Nawy'X"y 2KBC#a'ZQ4[8i
打:姜維--->鄧艾--->司馬懿--->陸遜--->諸葛亮

機密 發表於 2006-1-30 09:50 PM

In addition, a merit for 姜維 you haven't consider for him.  姜維's fascination is better than the others because he was the only student of  諸葛亮.
Jj.Ztu.DR}m qy#_*~ZR.f?
[[i] Last edited by 機密 on 2006-1-30 at 09:56 PM [/i]]

151515 發表於 2006-1-30 09:51 PM

**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****

機密 發表於 2006-1-30 09:55 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]151515[/i] at 2006-1-30 21:51:'N.FWm8B-bf"o,n

3o!W%I8Q?2Y3WN7z W WvGiP~
他比孔明更偉大 [/quote]
;ZQTG$LL R_&W
[w_(li$o Agree.  Both of them were extremely loyalty.  However, he was more great because he was in more poor situation.  He could maintain a same loyality to his boss.

151515 發表於 2006-1-30 09:58 PM

**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****

機密 發表於 2006-1-30 10:03 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]151515[/i] at 2006-1-30 21:58:
"B,M:B;J B'@Xpr ZA"Vd[

}+R%yst'b3N 他支撐了蜀國三十年,雖然孔明也有27年(207-234),但那時的人材比姜維時期的好很多,五虎已屈機 [/quote](V+a*U9t\:o
yes, that's the point.:)

151515 發表於 2006-1-30 10:20 PM

**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****

機密 發表於 2006-1-30 10:29 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]151515[/i] at 2006-1-30 22:20:
(|v/l'@(w)V LG
1lP3N8m$l t k,L {N.x;jS!|
陸遜也偉大,但不得善終...... [/quote]x"l_2H"KL*B
Many '3 countries' peoples 不得善終 too:D

151515 發表於 2006-1-30 10:32 PM

**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****

CHECSS 發表於 2006-1-31 12:21 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]151515[/i] at 2006/1/30 21:32:
9O)~0siU Yo3y
d7~$IhI tP7F K
)r/q%r!RN-G but i think智慧: 諸葛亮-->司... [/quote]sh-m%?{l
why you think司馬懿 and 陸遜 are good at fight than 諸葛亮 ?????????????

nashisthebestpg 發表於 2006-1-31 01:07 AM

聽聞真正的history上,諸葛亮的軍事能力未如三國演義般吹得咁勁.........
o j y.WR4g#m fE 佢勁係勁在治國能力............
x/E%g8lG|+vEv g4Hg%@,Nn.g ^
係咪如此?

benny0105 發表於 2006-1-31 01:46 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]nashisthebestpg[/i] at 2006-1-31 01:07 AM:
EP"Y+[A"QZ!{.m j 聽聞真正的history上,諸葛亮的軍事能力未如三國演義般吹得咁勁.........
D7C)X__[ JC 佢勁係勁在治國能力............
7n.c z,P I+n
%dz+v&uP8N)Ls 係咪如此? [/quote]7U$XXr^Yd

3k0}"A5A]w
R:Foh+Hp.FZI
5rk)i{ ?3Z'`/V 其實又有幾多人真係睇過三國志丫...
,@;Rg?W6Eho-JDhb 好多人只不過睇完神化既「三國演義」就信以為真

nashisthebestpg 發表於 2006-1-31 01:58 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]benny0105[/i] at 2006-1-31 01:46 AM:&h^qA2U3Y-S
,f XBP%pd+tw'x
'K5d MBt0k8y1b:Tw

:z{QSO;a'}
B m)p;iU 其實又有幾多人真係睇過三國志丫...
.Xegr e2It} 好多人只不過睇完神化既「三國演義」就信以為真 [/quote]
gA4u6O{&}_ e)F$T 我嗰次係三聯見到本三國志,入面係逐個人物講, t4?9Jm"@,^r!\i3L2^
唔係好似三國演義好似故事咁講出黎........({9qZLjkT1Z0M p
-z r ~l*k&u*`
三國志真係咁ga? 咁咪無咁好睇........

nashisthebestpg 發表於 2006-1-31 02:01 AM

呢個網係講有關三國正史~
+il?An[(`3k0eC 不過我諗好多人都有睇過~^7ECbC4TI
[url]http://k-fung.net/han/real.htm[/url]

發表於 2006-1-31 02:05 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]nashisthebestpg[/i] at 2006-1-31 01:07 AM:if@%I.nOu5?0e1|
聽聞真正的history上,諸葛亮的軍事能力未如三國演義般吹得咁勁.........
E/~u+o,Ff 佢勁係勁在治國能力............
DJA yn*TK1} u
QV{Hx"k&G 係咪如此? [/quote]L3_W)c2v"\_'C
歷史中諸葛亮的軍事能力的確沒演義中那麼屈機,但也算不俗,始終對司馬懿也
(W'Dovjr\"A9_ 沒有佔下風:)

發表於 2006-1-31 02:09 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]nashisthebestpg[/i] at 2006-1-31 02:01 AM:
H[;O,|8i0@9D7Z`r 呢個網係講有關三國正史~ {@S;G[xRU*[l2h
不過我諗好多人都有睇過~+W0c.^$?yo~;ql*}
[url]http://k-fung.net/han/real.htm[/url] [/quote]f*rn2]:s
正史中張松只有110cm?:o
GV Da Mtj 侏儒?

step025 發表於 2006-1-31 07:13 AM

你睇演義定火鳳? 你又點知佢地打得?
}H6j,v*L3C@ g*qq 阿壽寫打鬥一向草草了事, 姜維鄧艾無一次唔係不相佰仲, 點分邊個勁?
@E)} I9g0I Qv9W3G2}N
1Qp K?8x }o D 諸葛亮係上述當中絕對唔係最好嘅軍事家, 用人亦只用文人如楊儀, 馬謖等紙上談兵之輩, 可來成功?
!Z%P3{yG(L,|9l)u V P/_O:Y-?/W
相反司馬懿係對負孟達充份表現出打仗最重要的機動性, 諸葛亮即使有再多人力物力也不能做到, 以他謹慎的做人態度
5[$k5|(|z vH lX$vd8d!Wr
有人話諸葛亮最勁, 因為佢死在, 蜀就完全唔掂
BVJF3{*J_0FP 聽完更加覺得諸葛亮唔掂, 死前唔陪養多D有用嘅人用(有一大堆文人嘅), 有魏延如此勇猛的人又唔重用......可憐自己個仔一野就比鄧艾打爆......
z P(NdONY 司馬懿兩個仔都至高無上, 個孫司馬炎仲統一埋......
8g9BBv1WX1B 陸遜個仔都係大都督,同羊祜更惺惺相惜......T {+PZUf6? N
諸葛亮!!!你做的事顯出你特別, 更加, 無敵偉大啊!!!
1Y C$Ype;F9I
mC3v_!~b*` 講番姜維鄧艾, 他倆各方面都不分上下(兩人亦往往是同僚針對的人), 但在政革方面, 鄧艾全勝, 他的團田制帶來足夠糧草以應付任何對戰, 相反姜維在政治方面差不多是沒有的aC{2w&D!o'u8h*Se
@#Y!M!lEk&k-h+\
我講完依堆野之後, 想講嘅係諸葛亮死後最厲害既人物係 ------- [b]李世民[/b]:P

頁: 1 [2] 3

Powered by Discuz! Archiver 7.0.0  © 2001-2009 Comsenz Inc.