**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****
[quote]Originally posted by [i]151515[/i] at 2006-1-30 21:42:
PX2|)T8wfA
but 鄧艾and陸遜have 10 pts,姜維only9 [/quote]Ht ]9?4i D
p/q P/z ]BT?
But I don't think鄧艾and陸遜 is really better than 姜維. Even they are clever, 姜維 was taught by 諸葛亮. He learnt ~90% from 諸葛亮.D+^:C'H i
[[i] Last edited by 機密 on 2006-1-30 at 09:45 PM [/i]]
**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****
[quote]Originally posted by [i]151515[/i] at 2006-1-30 21:45:L6g4j&?m)n
6Ub?S/bq0d&mL5\2z
p*pG&P] `yQUQ
why?
其實他們實力差不多，很難比較:o [/quote]
v'v f1t
p!U/f
NjR
see #22 Thus#V{&kt!F:m!e
智慧: 諸葛亮-->司馬懿--->陸遜--->姜維--->鄧艾--->y4p6U#Ar:t#]"M;gm!H F
.e9_ ~C sw{%MG
軍事才能：諸葛亮-->司馬懿--->陸遜~鄧艾~姜維
q(V[5af `4F)W-C;~)BR
政治才能：<--- actually I forgot the details.1]6A-E%y4x5zg*P9f Q
打：姜維--->鄧艾--->司馬懿--->陸遜--->諸葛亮
In addition, a merit for 姜維 you haven't consider for him. 姜維's fascination is better than the others because he was the only student of 諸葛亮.
'\]u,fq'E5IeN
B
[[i] Last edited by 機密 on 2006-1-30 at 09:56 PM [/i]]
**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****
[quote]Originally posted by [i]151515[/i] at 2006-1-30 21:51:{gA-R(_d3}F
他比孔明更偉大 [/quote]
r i%oS,r [I)V o2t
Agree. Both of them were extremely loyalty. However, he was more great because he was in more poor situation. He could maintain a same loyality to his boss.
**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****
[quote]Originally posted by [i]151515[/i] at 2006-1-30 21:58:2Yi,h m%e$u+^ g
l vk4B'd
他支撐了蜀國三十年，雖然孔明也有２７年（２０７－２３４），但那時的人材比姜維時期的好很多，五虎已屈機 [/quote]
yes, that's the point.:)
**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****
[quote]Originally posted by [i]151515[/i] at 2006-1-30 22:20:
%V]@r:^ b m}-`
&}E"g+N _ Z9[h
陸遜也偉大，但不得善終...... [/quote]
Many '3 countries' peoples 不得善終 too:D
**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****
[quote]Originally posted by [i]151515[/i] at 2006/1/30 21:32: @xX | q
zx(E
];R\ ]*cH
but i think智慧: 諸葛亮-->司... [/quote]
why you think司馬懿 and 陸遜 are good at fight than 諸葛亮 ?????????????
聽聞真正的history上,諸葛亮的軍事能力未如三國演義般吹得咁勁.........'kH/V_*X7yr
\Vj
佢勁係勁在治國能力............4Q
z.z!x/waQ
係咪如此?
[quote]Originally posted by [i]nashisthebestpg[/i] at 2006-1-31 01:07 AM:| [5m K ~
聽聞真正的history上,諸葛亮的軍事能力未如三國演義般吹得咁勁.........
佢勁係勁在治國能力............
係咪如此? [/quote]?q@^Z7k"]
9D3H];@2c9gg5j
S&{&~A|`g/W
其實又有幾多人真係睇過三國志丫...$JV(C"L%WD9t-PD
好多人只不過睇完神化既「三國演義」就信以為真
[quote]Originally posted by [i]benny0105[/i] at 2006-1-31 01:46 AM:
y3k A,n6| Q$f w
其實又有幾多人真係睇過三國志丫...^e@ [4B-`+m
好多人只不過睇完神化既「三國演義」就信以為真 [/quote] NHRs,D
我嗰次係三聯見到本三國志,入面係逐個人物講,:\ Xq} G0H2XU`c
唔係好似三國演義好似故事咁講出黎........XZ8M;g*x(dF}
C^Z
三國志真係咁ga? 咁咪無咁好睇........
呢個網係講有關三國正史~
不過我諗好多人都有睇過~
[url]http://k-fung.net/han/real.htm[/url]
[quote]Originally posted by [i]nashisthebestpg[/i] at 2006-1-31 01:07 AM:5i;@%~t)Zv d
聽聞真正的history上,諸葛亮的軍事能力未如三國演義般吹得咁勁.........
佢勁係勁在治國能力............]L[f t ^A
YVT%^&IGVg
係咪如此? [/quote]
歷史中諸葛亮的軍事能力的確沒演義中那麼屈機,但也算不俗,始終對司馬懿也
沒有佔下風:)
[quote]Originally posted by [i]nashisthebestpg[/i] at 2006-1-31 02:01 AM:
呢個網係講有關三國正史~-X ^_e6Z2L.^2I9`6H
不過我諗好多人都有睇過~
[url]http://k-fung.net/han/real.htm[/url] [/quote]
正史中張松只有110cm?:o3se.V5e ?+k4a
侏儒?
你睇演義定火鳳? 你又點知佢地打得?
m5P:}{.d'h
阿壽寫打鬥一向草草了事, 姜維鄧艾無一次唔係不相佰仲, 點分邊個勁?
L(x"I|6S[z
諸葛亮係上述當中絕對唔係最好嘅軍事家, 用人亦只用文人如楊儀, 馬謖等紙上談兵之輩, 可來成功? F i%Km:If A
e
3}
l.p0s*]H'k
相反司馬懿係對負孟達充份表現出打仗最重要的機動性, 諸葛亮即使有再多人力物力也不能做到, 以他謹慎的做人態度h6fDF6K'Q5L$] f-V"`0dc
有人話諸葛亮最勁, 因為佢死在, 蜀就完全唔掂3o)o_ B6N#zB
聽完更加覺得諸葛亮唔掂, 死前唔陪養多D有用嘅人用(有一大堆文人嘅), 有魏延如此勇猛的人又唔重用......可憐自己個仔一野就比鄧艾打爆......
司馬懿兩個仔都至高無上, 個孫司馬炎仲統一埋......
陸遜個仔都係大都督,同羊祜更惺惺相惜...... K2cNE|
KuG
諸葛亮!!!你做的事顯出你特別, 更加, 無敵偉大啊!!!
5m5Q t
th7F8e$v;^7?
講番姜維鄧艾, 他倆各方面都不分上下(兩人亦往往是同僚針對的人), 但在政革方面, 鄧艾全勝, 他的團田制帶來足夠糧草以應付任何對戰, 相反姜維在政治方面差不多是沒有的
我講完依堆野之後, 想講嘅係諸葛亮死後最厲害既人物係 ------- [b]李世民[/b]:P