**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****
[quote]Originally posted by [i]151515[/i] at 2006-1-30 21:42:%x9p-?}Lhbe
but 鄧艾and陸遜have 10 pts,姜維only9 [/quote]
But I don't think鄧艾and陸遜 is really better than 姜維. Even they are clever, 姜維 was taught by 諸葛亮. He learnt ~90% from 諸葛亮.;M)Jh3k]
XG)U1q6cdo`.|a
[[i] Last edited by 機密 on 2006-1-30 at 09:45 PM [/i]]
**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****
[quote]Originally posted by [i]151515[/i] at 2006-1-30 21:45:
why? e fM(v&`2Z K
Zw1^Xg/I/O0T-p
其實他們實力差不多，很難比較:o [/quote]!p(Z,\LD/[
see #22 Thus9dKk.P j0T
智慧: 諸葛亮-->司馬懿--->陸遜--->姜維--->鄧艾--->l/[z*iK
軍事才能：諸葛亮-->司馬懿--->陸遜~鄧艾~姜維
s
dLg ]l
政治才能：<--- actually I forgot the details.P"W(q8tL;? VN y
打：姜維--->鄧艾--->司馬懿--->陸遜--->諸葛亮
In addition, a merit for 姜維 you haven't consider for him. 姜維's fascination is better than the others because he was the only student of 諸葛亮.
q&_&n
H1_
[[i] Last edited by 機密 on 2006-1-30 at 09:56 PM [/i]]
**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****
[quote]Originally posted by [i]151515[/i] at 2006-1-30 21:51: }p)n TR O&g p
\#ml'}$y/n'Y*a*b
他比孔明更偉大 [/quote]El3_-B6Tk
Agree. Both of them were extremely loyalty. However, he was more great because he was in more poor situation. He could maintain a same loyality to his boss.
**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****
[quote]Originally posted by [i]151515[/i] at 2006-1-30 21:58:x2F8[)?ob8@B
他支撐了蜀國三十年，雖然孔明也有２７年（２０７－２３４），但那時的人材比姜維時期的好很多，五虎已屈機 [/quote]
yes, that's the point.:)
**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****
[quote]Originally posted by [i]151515[/i] at 2006-1-30 22:20:
DF$N6{ T+r(B%n'm a
陸遜也偉大，但不得善終...... [/quote]4h#S C uLmq3_+A J
Many '3 countries' peoples 不得善終 too:D
**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****
[quote]Originally posted by [i]151515[/i] at 2006/1/30 21:32:
but i think智慧: 諸葛亮-->司... [/quote]
why you think司馬懿 and 陸遜 are good at fight than 諸葛亮 ?????????????
聽聞真正的history上,諸葛亮的軍事能力未如三國演義般吹得咁勁.........
佢勁係勁在治國能力............
係咪如此?
[quote]Originally posted by [i]nashisthebestpg[/i] at 2006-1-31 01:07 AM:
聽聞真正的history上,諸葛亮的軍事能力未如三國演義般吹得咁勁......... P,R o7A+QA4C
佢勁係勁在治國能力............
係咪如此? [/quote]b;f U0DI5N
D w/Gg/v
k1e/[4FA
w2wD%BC3U]
其實又有幾多人真係睇過三國志丫...
好多人只不過睇完神化既「三國演義」就信以為真
[quote]Originally posted by [i]benny0105[/i] at 2006-1-31 01:46 AM:
&oBh fD4G{
其實又有幾多人真係睇過三國志丫...&~6UY S3U(`/} \\
好多人只不過睇完神化既「三國演義」就信以為真 [/quote]0eCC D6\6i7m} q
我嗰次係三聯見到本三國志,入面係逐個人物講,oCV,?8B
X#Z
~V
唔係好似三國演義好似故事咁講出黎........Z7_#b0D'x"H}']
三國志真係咁ga? 咁咪無咁好睇........
呢個網係講有關三國正史~&u*W7N!O \#Z5dD
不過我諗好多人都有睇過~
[url]http://k-fung.net/han/real.htm[/url]
[quote]Originally posted by [i]nashisthebestpg[/i] at 2006-1-31 01:07 AM:
聽聞真正的history上,諸葛亮的軍事能力未如三國演義般吹得咁勁.........
佢勁係勁在治國能力............?(a:kL ?9T5_J.].O
J^M ?(s:eUv H*p
係咪如此? [/quote]0~%E^6yu6^5?9E,E
歷史中諸葛亮的軍事能力的確沒演義中那麼屈機,但也算不俗,始終對司馬懿也'h l/fL%N d
沒有佔下風:)
[quote]Originally posted by [i]nashisthebestpg[/i] at 2006-1-31 02:01 AM:
呢個網係講有關三國正史~
不過我諗好多人都有睇過~
[url]http://k-fung.net/han/real.htm[/url] [/quote]
正史中張松只有110cm?:o:@ l;` l1H3K
侏儒?
你睇演義定火鳳? 你又點知佢地打得?-Q;g8gG m.xv&{9V5@+^
阿壽寫打鬥一向草草了事, 姜維鄧艾無一次唔係不相佰仲, 點分邊個勁?!b KU A d ]
2V/r{ K o*K U(K
諸葛亮係上述當中絕對唔係最好嘅軍事家, 用人亦只用文人如楊儀, 馬謖等紙上談兵之輩, 可來成功?
相反司馬懿係對負孟達充份表現出打仗最重要的機動性, 諸葛亮即使有再多人力物力也不能做到, 以他謹慎的做人態度
S!m`4j-u
有人話諸葛亮最勁, 因為佢死在, 蜀就完全唔掂2zIir6d
聽完更加覺得諸葛亮唔掂, 死前唔陪養多D有用嘅人用(有一大堆文人嘅), 有魏延如此勇猛的人又唔重用......可憐自己個仔一野就比鄧艾打爆......
司馬懿兩個仔都至高無上, 個孫司馬炎仲統一埋......
陸遜個仔都係大都督,同羊祜更惺惺相惜......*^*J6R2FVh~ g2Yvq
諸葛亮!!!你做的事顯出你特別, 更加, 無敵偉大啊!!!
8Y? J+}2|(S
講番姜維鄧艾, 他倆各方面都不分上下(兩人亦往往是同僚針對的人), 但在政革方面, 鄧艾全勝, 他的團田制帶來足夠糧草以應付任何對戰, 相反姜維在政治方面差不多是沒有的
~
Q8R k-},cpE Z D
我講完依堆野之後, 想講嘅係諸葛亮死後最厲害既人物係 ------- [b]李世民[/b]:P