**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****
[quote]Originally posted by [i]151515[/i] at 2006-1-30 21:42:
but 鄧艾and陸遜have 10 pts,姜維only9 [/quote]4o ?H"Q Q^)O
7o3EF$g1BmB
But I don't think鄧艾and陸遜 is really better than 姜維. Even they are clever, 姜維 was taught by 諸葛亮. He learnt ~90% from 諸葛亮.
[[i] Last edited by 機密 on 2006-1-30 at 09:45 PM [/i]]
**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****
[quote]Originally posted by [i]151515[/i] at 2006-1-30 21:45:
why?@Eopw
7q3hyy3n?y2W$Pi
其實他們實力差不多，很難比較:o [/quote]/a O9u
~"T{
cl
see #22 Thus
智慧: 諸葛亮-->司馬懿--->陸遜--->姜維--->鄧艾--->6w3Z8xz"n:Q.M
Q*r/_.b&a l
軍事才能：諸葛亮-->司馬懿--->陸遜~鄧艾~姜維"I Q-sV-|
-G7t_ u%w/e y
政治才能：<--- actually I forgot the details. nG)C"R5]#t0Dk
c&t
L!]9zbo a$v
打：姜維--->鄧艾--->司馬懿--->陸遜--->諸葛亮
In addition, a merit for 姜維 you haven't consider for him. 姜維's fascination is better than the others because he was the only student of 諸葛亮.|U b0_ B mMdE
[[i] Last edited by 機密 on 2006-1-30 at 09:56 PM [/i]]
**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****
[quote]Originally posted by [i]151515[/i] at 2006-1-30 21:51:
^;Rd ~2_4Oq
.R-Sw@-?"p4N B2Bz
他比孔明更偉大 [/quote]
6^mDL"B F*r!\
Agree. Both of them were extremely loyalty. However, he was more great because he was in more poor situation. He could maintain a same loyality to his boss.
**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****
[quote]Originally posted by [i]151515[/i] at 2006-1-30 21:58:#r JbOV
XD;X m{ to
他支撐了蜀國三十年，雖然孔明也有２７年（２０７－２３４），但那時的人材比姜維時期的好很多，五虎已屈機 [/quote]
yes, that's the point.:)
**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****
[quote]Originally posted by [i]151515[/i] at 2006-1-30 22:20:
$| {%lA hqt[1G0\
陸遜也偉大，但不得善終...... [/quote] @J#Ba},a{\.^
Many '3 countries' peoples 不得善終 too:D
**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****
[quote]Originally posted by [i]151515[/i] at 2006/1/30 21:32:
/ZW p%?5h
but i think智慧: 諸葛亮-->司... [/quote]
why you think司馬懿 and 陸遜 are good at fight than 諸葛亮 ?????????????
聽聞真正的history上,諸葛亮的軍事能力未如三國演義般吹得咁勁......... e
E CPf\%O-X9H`
佢勁係勁在治國能力............[4T9~J*` r%?
係咪如此?
[quote]Originally posted by [i]nashisthebestpg[/i] at 2006-1-31 01:07 AM:
聽聞真正的history上,諸葛亮的軍事能力未如三國演義般吹得咁勁.........
佢勁係勁在治國能力............SH ^ v&O8m s*NQ/`
z OP#?D'zY
係咪如此? [/quote]
_3d+a2CU0e|
'ec3[{j
其實又有幾多人真係睇過三國志丫...,A1tB nu5{;Y"m
好多人只不過睇完神化既「三國演義」就信以為真
[quote]Originally posted by [i]benny0105[/i] at 2006-1-31 01:46 AM:
v0q6X.Hw _
其實又有幾多人真係睇過三國志丫...
好多人只不過睇完神化既「三國演義」就信以為真 [/quote]T:MASi*z
我嗰次係三聯見到本三國志,入面係逐個人物講,
唔係好似三國演義好似故事咁講出黎........
7`3d0CQO-Q
三國志真係咁ga? 咁咪無咁好睇........
呢個網係講有關三國正史~
不過我諗好多人都有睇過~ V2LB(C E)G fs
l
[url]http://k-fung.net/han/real.htm[/url]
[quote]Originally posted by [i]nashisthebestpg[/i] at 2006-1-31 01:07 AM:Q8lt#|3n8H
聽聞真正的history上,諸葛亮的軍事能力未如三國演義般吹得咁勁.........)m8r OY%f-B,c
佢勁係勁在治國能力............
係咪如此? [/quote]
歷史中諸葛亮的軍事能力的確沒演義中那麼屈機,但也算不俗,始終對司馬懿也
沒有佔下風:)
[quote]Originally posted by [i]nashisthebestpg[/i] at 2006-1-31 02:01 AM:1\ G,Fp Z
呢個網係講有關三國正史~-k2S'VJ'i j w
不過我諗好多人都有睇過~
[url]http://k-fung.net/han/real.htm[/url] [/quote] BAQ3|-Md2^H%`
正史中張松只有110cm?:o
}+@t7LB`|4{ rBy
侏儒?
你睇演義定火鳳? 你又點知佢地打得?/Q-W8t)Y7q{ |"m*F
阿壽寫打鬥一向草草了事, 姜維鄧艾無一次唔係不相佰仲, 點分邊個勁?(rm(U)jG c;ys
諸葛亮係上述當中絕對唔係最好嘅軍事家, 用人亦只用文人如楊儀, 馬謖等紙上談兵之輩, 可來成功?
'L"e i
{
j ~2}.q/]
相反司馬懿係對負孟達充份表現出打仗最重要的機動性, 諸葛亮即使有再多人力物力也不能做到, 以他謹慎的做人態度
有人話諸葛亮最勁, 因為佢死在, 蜀就完全唔掂/DO
y/k$a_R r6r
聽完更加覺得諸葛亮唔掂, 死前唔陪養多D有用嘅人用(有一大堆文人嘅), 有魏延如此勇猛的人又唔重用......可憐自己個仔一野就比鄧艾打爆......
司馬懿兩個仔都至高無上, 個孫司馬炎仲統一埋......0CZ3W5{ vh^-\
陸遜個仔都係大都督,同羊祜更惺惺相惜......
諸葛亮!!!你做的事顯出你特別, 更加, 無敵偉大啊!!!
講番姜維鄧艾, 他倆各方面都不分上下(兩人亦往往是同僚針對的人), 但在政革方面, 鄧艾全勝, 他的團田制帶來足夠糧草以應付任何對戰, 相反姜維在政治方面差不多是沒有的
我講完依堆野之後, 想講嘅係諸葛亮死後最厲害既人物係 ------- [b]李世民[/b]:P