**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****
[quote]Originally posted by [i]151515[/i] at 2006-1-30 21:42:0ExG4FW&J
but 鄧艾and陸遜have 10 pts,姜維only9 [/quote]H#u(np3m.U*E:uv
)_vz_4^J1{
But I don't think鄧艾and陸遜 is really better than 姜維. Even they are clever, 姜維 was taught by 諸葛亮. He learnt ~90% from 諸葛亮.tnB6Y,qi
[[i] Last edited by 機密 on 2006-1-30 at 09:45 PM [/i]]
**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****
[quote]Originally posted by [i]151515[/i] at 2006-1-30 21:45:
/kF!Xh#n4l7p^7z
why?
其實他們實力差不多,很難比較:o [/quote]E*P]$YC3i
;ZH'AP)K2Je,s
see #22 Thus
Z[Zr}+R
智慧: 諸葛亮-->司馬懿--->陸遜--->姜維--->鄧艾--->6e:X9x\RE[
軍事才能:諸葛亮-->司馬懿--->陸遜~鄧艾~姜維}7g)z2Z9Jec
{ f&Z{jw
政治才能:<--- actually I forgot the details.W
a,[f}\!r~
打:姜維--->鄧艾--->司馬懿--->陸遜--->諸葛亮
In addition, a merit for 姜維 you haven't consider for him. 姜維's fascination is better than the others because he was the only student of 諸葛亮.$roS-}Mr$n{
[[i] Last edited by 機密 on 2006-1-30 at 09:56 PM [/i]]
**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****
[quote]Originally posted by [i]151515[/i] at 2006-1-30 21:51:
1E |5E%_;oFBS,A
他比孔明更偉大 [/quote];F;a.fM3Lk
Agree. Both of them were extremely loyalty. However, he was more great because he was in more poor situation. He could maintain a same loyality to his boss.
**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****
[quote]Originally posted by [i]151515[/i] at 2006-1-30 21:58:
他支撐了蜀國三十年,雖然孔明也有27年(207-234),但那時的人材比姜維時期的好很多,五虎已屈機 [/quote]&x\xiaF)F6_2r8~je
O
yes, that's the point.:)
**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****
[quote]Originally posted by [i]151515[/i] at 2006-1-30 22:20:(e `'X!Ek
#Ikh6f0T^ Gki9U
陸遜也偉大,但不得善終...... [/quote]
Many '3 countries' peoples 不得善終 too:D
**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****
[quote]Originally posted by [i]151515[/i] at 2006/1/30 21:32:
,anaKt e rH{B(\
;O6SPZ"q;m
but i think智慧: 諸葛亮-->司... [/quote]AD{6K3F)yf
why you think司馬懿 and 陸遜 are good at fight than 諸葛亮 ?????????????
聽聞真正的history上,諸葛亮的軍事能力未如三國演義般吹得咁勁.........
佢勁係勁在治國能力............yU,MCJ8?*K!a
係咪如此?
[quote]Originally posted by [i]nashisthebestpg[/i] at 2006-1-31 01:07 AM:
聽聞真正的history上,諸葛亮的軍事能力未如三國演義般吹得咁勁.........
佢勁係勁在治國能力............a1[SZ)l:S
係咪如此? [/quote]c0nV.F J
MH/y+_l
其實又有幾多人真係睇過三國志丫...
好多人只不過睇完神化既「三國演義」就信以為真
[quote]Originally posted by [i]benny0105[/i] at 2006-1-31 01:46 AM:C9g)}/mZ*y-d
+S!~-g:U0d5oh&A)V
_u mM"Wg0Q cd
5U%h4J#V0Ht
其實又有幾多人真係睇過三國志丫...
好多人只不過睇完神化既「三國演義」就信以為真 [/quote]
我嗰次係三聯見到本三國志,入面係逐個人物講,
_ j V!Z(Z Y TV ZC
唔係好似三國演義好似故事咁講出黎........g){Q/H#sK
三國志真係咁ga? 咁咪無咁好睇........
呢個網係講有關三國正史~
不過我諗好多人都有睇過~
[url]http://k-fung.net/han/real.htm[/url]
[quote]Originally posted by [i]nashisthebestpg[/i] at 2006-1-31 01:07 AM:)_ b4s4R:DY^S
聽聞真正的history上,諸葛亮的軍事能力未如三國演義般吹得咁勁.........
佢勁係勁在治國能力............c+VYac~
Eg)E/A c
係咪如此? [/quote]
歷史中諸葛亮的軍事能力的確沒演義中那麼屈機,但也算不俗,始終對司馬懿也
沒有佔下風:)
[quote]Originally posted by [i]nashisthebestpg[/i] at 2006-1-31 02:01 AM:(X(J%M;W$HL_ {
呢個網係講有關三國正史~
不過我諗好多人都有睇過~6eUEZkA
[url]http://k-fung.net/han/real.htm[/url] [/quote]
正史中張松只有110cm?:o
侏儒?
你睇演義定火鳳? 你又點知佢地打得?
阿壽寫打鬥一向草草了事, 姜維鄧艾無一次唔係不相佰仲, 點分邊個勁?