**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****
[quote]Originally posted by [i]151515[/i] at 2006-1-30 21:42:
but 鄧艾and陸遜have 10 pts,姜維only9 [/quote]igeQ ADX
b
But I don't think鄧艾and陸遜 is really better than 姜維. Even they are clever, 姜維 was taught by 諸葛亮. He learnt ~90% from 諸葛亮.Ml1O.E E
~9Tk
[[i] Last edited by 機密 on 2006-1-30 at 09:45 PM [/i]]
**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****
[quote]Originally posted by [i]151515[/i] at 2006-1-30 21:45:
B7rL5j
cX%V
why?Bi.P4t)U!^v4] m`#`
其實他們實力差不多，很難比較:o [/quote])n0Zs#I*o Yw
W([
'of-D%Z vt
see #22 Thus~%e/I/T!]4E)S9f
智慧: 諸葛亮-->司馬懿--->陸遜--->姜維--->鄧艾--->
軍事才能：諸葛亮-->司馬懿--->陸遜~鄧艾~姜維9Mm.C O H7gP"e ^*Q
政治才能：<--- actually I forgot the details.?2q'\X7C q2\
打：姜維--->鄧艾--->司馬懿--->陸遜--->諸葛亮
In addition, a merit for 姜維 you haven't consider for him. 姜維's fascination is better than the others because he was the only student of 諸葛亮.(Y S t
K-`
[[i] Last edited by 機密 on 2006-1-30 at 09:56 PM [/i]]
**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****
[quote]Originally posted by [i]151515[/i] at 2006-1-30 21:51:
;S y#F u4b
gS{-K$d7R v
他比孔明更偉大 [/quote]
i;`X5U|ou
Agree. Both of them were extremely loyalty. However, he was more great because he was in more poor situation. He could maintain a same loyality to his boss.
**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****
[quote]Originally posted by [i]151515[/i] at 2006-1-30 21:58:G3us5l!msV'v
E t? p y r
e9c `Nk,xW$v
他支撐了蜀國三十年，雖然孔明也有２７年（２０７－２３４），但那時的人材比姜維時期的好很多，五虎已屈機 [/quote];e8F
Z ? o O;C0f
yes, that's the point.:)
**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****
[quote]Originally posted by [i]151515[/i] at 2006-1-30 22:20:
m W&U't]#[ TZ
%_po-F\wL6u
陸遜也偉大，但不得善終...... [/quote]
Many '3 countries' peoples 不得善終 too:D
**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****
[quote]Originally posted by [i]151515[/i] at 2006/1/30 21:32:_}E9]~ _
D%Y.l+~ L!eui-E g
but i think智慧: 諸葛亮-->司... [/quote]$h3EO | w c!OPR/q
why you think司馬懿 and 陸遜 are good at fight than 諸葛亮 ?????????????
聽聞真正的history上,諸葛亮的軍事能力未如三國演義般吹得咁勁.........
佢勁係勁在治國能力............+e P-w w$I2A,}uL
係咪如此?
[quote]Originally posted by [i]nashisthebestpg[/i] at 2006-1-31 01:07 AM:R'{P(Y w6f7B;@Bl6N
聽聞真正的history上,諸葛亮的軍事能力未如三國演義般吹得咁勁.........
佢勁係勁在治國能力............
係咪如此? [/quote]%[NB ^ E
m:E1^r3EU R;o
8M Q,i"nM6YZ?|![
其實又有幾多人真係睇過三國志丫...
好多人只不過睇完神化既「三國演義」就信以為真
[quote]Originally posted by [i]benny0105[/i] at 2006-1-31 01:46 AM:
g w&| R _#G
!^1tN5N*Y w)lx y
其實又有幾多人真係睇過三國志丫...
好多人只不過睇完神化既「三國演義」就信以為真 [/quote]l/zB!d GZ6O8tB
我嗰次係三聯見到本三國志,入面係逐個人物講,
唔係好似三國演義好似故事咁講出黎........!X@n0Z4R3kAl0R5Z
三國志真係咁ga? 咁咪無咁好睇........
呢個網係講有關三國正史~
不過我諗好多人都有睇過~
[url]http://k-fung.net/han/real.htm[/url]
[quote]Originally posted by [i]nashisthebestpg[/i] at 2006-1-31 01:07 AM:
聽聞真正的history上,諸葛亮的軍事能力未如三國演義般吹得咁勁.........Aw+SC&n
x8z1p
佢勁係勁在治國能力............
3T6m$|[v w:Ki`
係咪如此? [/quote]
歷史中諸葛亮的軍事能力的確沒演義中那麼屈機,但也算不俗,始終對司馬懿也:M6x$gup?7I2V
沒有佔下風:)
[quote]Originally posted by [i]nashisthebestpg[/i] at 2006-1-31 02:01 AM:
呢個網係講有關三國正史~
不過我諗好多人都有睇過~pBs M A?,E
[url]http://k-fung.net/han/real.htm[/url] [/quote]9MG6[] rd
a1A U,^ D
正史中張松只有110cm?:o
l p~\"L/AL+d
侏儒?
你睇演義定火鳳? 你又點知佢地打得? p'@W9m5{ Ko v
阿壽寫打鬥一向草草了事, 姜維鄧艾無一次唔係不相佰仲, 點分邊個勁?
諸葛亮係上述當中絕對唔係最好嘅軍事家, 用人亦只用文人如楊儀, 馬謖等紙上談兵之輩, 可來成功?
相反司馬懿係對負孟達充份表現出打仗最重要的機動性, 諸葛亮即使有再多人力物力也不能做到, 以他謹慎的做人態度Q&G3^V P&x
有人話諸葛亮最勁, 因為佢死在, 蜀就完全唔掂+j0p9m8Cm$p
聽完更加覺得諸葛亮唔掂, 死前唔陪養多D有用嘅人用(有一大堆文人嘅), 有魏延如此勇猛的人又唔重用......可憐自己個仔一野就比鄧艾打爆......
司馬懿兩個仔都至高無上, 個孫司馬炎仲統一埋......!R _3^c4fY.U]3`5e
陸遜個仔都係大都督,同羊祜更惺惺相惜......
諸葛亮!!!你做的事顯出你特別, 更加, 無敵偉大啊!!!
+Z
W-?*L[1Kg
講番姜維鄧艾, 他倆各方面都不分上下(兩人亦往往是同僚針對的人), 但在政革方面, 鄧艾全勝, 他的團田制帶來足夠糧草以應付任何對戰, 相反姜維在政治方面差不多是沒有的F ^(_~EH"F y.p2o,b
我講完依堆野之後, 想講嘅係諸葛亮死後最厲害既人物係 ------- [b]李世民[/b]:P