娛樂滿紛 26FUN's Archiver

151515 發表於 2006-1-30 09:42 PM

**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****

機密 發表於 2006-1-30 09:44 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]151515[/i] at 2006-1-30 21:42:
9]Z)@"Ca"t_ w lm "I1Ld:bF^l2[(c
but 鄧艾and陸遜have 10 pts,姜維only9 [/quote]E-Fs||pl@$t
|"s1EI*c\|e
But I don't think鄧艾and陸遜 is really better than 姜維. Even they are clever, 姜維 was taught by  諸葛亮.  He learnt ~90% from 諸葛亮.BKH;\+Qe7z
?&a6]4\T\ F }P7C&A3z
[[i] Last edited by 機密 on 2006-1-30 at 09:45 PM [/i]]

151515 發表於 2006-1-30 09:45 PM

**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****

機密 發表於 2006-1-30 09:46 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]151515[/i] at 2006-1-30 21:45:$_;H|7~*o sA
`.gNO0e+nc

{)C1lqCk[9m{ why?9]'qY,F%V$CHt2Df
'P8i1Z5|,{xr:W
其實他們實力差不多,很難比較:o [/quote]
(K S h|'U+O~
`}6ln+WC+p see #22 Thus
-J-D9bAVo9Le L u t(R9Sk
智慧: 諸葛亮-->司馬懿--->陸遜--->姜維--->鄧艾--->
w%y+t6zL K7n#e\[
sWB8Vvid5`+Q;C 軍事才能:諸葛亮-->司馬懿--->陸遜~鄧艾~姜維
4QQP1c,nT%iM_"@ 'Q&\Pl C%z
政治才能:<--- actually I forgot the details.B6r ZE2fe Yn
`Li"sD V-~2s-P
打:姜維--->鄧艾--->司馬懿--->陸遜--->諸葛亮

機密 發表於 2006-1-30 09:50 PM

In addition, a merit for 姜維 you haven't consider for him.  姜維's fascination is better than the others because he was the only student of  諸葛亮.
bXg:s&O2b Bk r c
$@y rQv!?!N/A G [[i] Last edited by 機密 on 2006-1-30 at 09:56 PM [/i]]

151515 發表於 2006-1-30 09:51 PM

**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****

機密 發表於 2006-1-30 09:55 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]151515[/i] at 2006-1-30 21:51:
SC"{8cvYc~ j;iZB D5S._&v:_1}j

y`'Ny#ZR 他比孔明更偉大 [/quote]
uH5Z3{w#|)m2n )_0~'b?E
Agree.  Both of them were extremely loyalty.  However, he was more great because he was in more poor situation.  He could maintain a same loyality to his boss.

151515 發表於 2006-1-30 09:58 PM

**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****

機密 發表於 2006-1-30 10:03 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]151515[/i] at 2006-1-30 21:58:
:L3Y MsWg2^(m,O wER!Xo0e.w.Q

7N5I:}e!Z 他支撐了蜀國三十年,雖然孔明也有27年(207-234),但那時的人材比姜維時期的好很多,五虎已屈機 [/quote]L&bp,nh8jWjKY
yes, that's the point.:)

151515 發表於 2006-1-30 10:20 PM

**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****

機密 發表於 2006-1-30 10:29 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]151515[/i] at 2006-1-30 22:20:MyG-Y+cSX1SxA
kAoW _ r

t:WkfJ,h 陸遜也偉大,但不得善終...... [/quote]
:Es6h9U*gNP;| Many '3 countries' peoples 不得善終 too:D

151515 發表於 2006-1-30 10:32 PM

**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****

CHECSS 發表於 2006-1-31 12:21 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]151515[/i] at 2006/1/30 21:32:
$x'v2S7[H }[ f y)d
9K6N"}lu
^f F%q IXVR but i think智慧: 諸葛亮-->司... [/quote]
n/y.[5E,u \r O R why you think司馬懿 and 陸遜 are good at fight than 諸葛亮 ?????????????

nashisthebestpg 發表於 2006-1-31 01:07 AM

聽聞真正的history上,諸葛亮的軍事能力未如三國演義般吹得咁勁.........2LCT*aRiexI8@
佢勁係勁在治國能力............[email protected]^5| O9B|"]5} z
_:[3b a+bT l Y"F
係咪如此?

benny0105 發表於 2006-1-31 01:46 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]nashisthebestpg[/i] at 2006-1-31 01:07 AM:
f6UP+sK.e 聽聞真正的history上,諸葛亮的軍事能力未如三國演義般吹得咁勁.........
j%}8Z ^'g i7hW1G 佢勁係勁在治國能力............
in}m&nc]M %Mv;q'zR G9k
係咪如此? [/quote]
3@"}I^2YH nk9k5H N!rK

nq.v*|!E(Fa M1W O6n{Jv9nQ|C&z
其實又有幾多人真係睇過三國志丫...
6Ka\C:f4h 好多人只不過睇完神化既「三國演義」就信以為真

nashisthebestpg 發表於 2006-1-31 01:58 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]benny0105[/i] at 2006-1-31 01:46 AM:9@K&D3k$X]
?S9e:Q J

#Yt/^*a}L`;};i)m8{/L+]
5IaW!B{/f6A+Z (T)YI3HoG U
其實又有幾多人真係睇過三國志丫...
i@ HN/z/cbow$M 好多人只不過睇完神化既「三國演義」就信以為真 [/quote]
0}#D%^-FrPXP D I 我嗰次係三聯見到本三國志,入面係逐個人物講,L#T4K:WB0D,Y
唔係好似三國演義好似故事咁講出黎........z fj"n n8Y

;Oa*j5F4b-C 三國志真係咁ga? 咁咪無咁好睇........

nashisthebestpg 發表於 2006-1-31 02:01 AM

呢個網係講有關三國正史~
{bu\W3|'o 不過我諗好多人都有睇過~{%Vuir!@,NJ9e4@C.d
[url]http://k-fung.net/han/real.htm[/url]

發表於 2006-1-31 02:05 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]nashisthebestpg[/i] at 2006-1-31 01:07 AM:[?|4N+Ct Q a-O
聽聞真正的history上,諸葛亮的軍事能力未如三國演義般吹得咁勁.........
V1jy6c2H8XI~$A!Q 佢勁係勁在治國能力............
6`1\g mhh ~
g F({]E 係咪如此? [/quote]|[r slI
歷史中諸葛亮的軍事能力的確沒演義中那麼屈機,但也算不俗,始終對司馬懿也
1@ r xm)q;Q%fl 沒有佔下風:)

發表於 2006-1-31 02:09 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]nashisthebestpg[/i] at 2006-1-31 02:01 AM: W*@QLR
呢個網係講有關三國正史~
/LnCD[6vC6XA$Y-b 不過我諗好多人都有睇過~
~0Qgn$] N [url]http://k-fung.net/han/real.htm[/url] [/quote]
6g:`Vh;]] 正史中張松只有110cm?:o$eh?8Q,V@J7x6p
侏儒?

step025 發表於 2006-1-31 07:13 AM

你睇演義定火鳳? 你又點知佢地打得?
.v5l d6r+cp7o 阿壽寫打鬥一向草草了事, 姜維鄧艾無一次唔係不相佰仲, 點分邊個勁?
uibqNm 2}%Z,_$WK:Uh
諸葛亮係上述當中絕對唔係最好嘅軍事家, 用人亦只用文人如楊儀, 馬謖等紙上談兵之輩, 可來成功?+um3wl'y5unwVE
7Nd!I2k e#e5F(g U d+M
相反司馬懿係對負孟達充份表現出打仗最重要的機動性, 諸葛亮即使有再多人力物力也不能做到, 以他謹慎的做人態度#I @y:u~C]T6a!n^

:wW |:`jM-m$o 有人話諸葛亮最勁, 因為佢死在, 蜀就完全唔掂SC Ypg!S6yDS
聽完更加覺得諸葛亮唔掂, 死前唔陪養多D有用嘅人用(有一大堆文人嘅), 有魏延如此勇猛的人又唔重用......可憐自己個仔一野就比鄧艾打爆......b9h9KHZh:]~p*p i8RN[
司馬懿兩個仔都至高無上, 個孫司馬炎仲統一埋......
%S-WgID-q 陸遜個仔都係大都督,同羊祜更惺惺相惜......5W-p&]_(XG+N'mAz!@
諸葛亮!!!你做的事顯出你特別, 更加, 無敵偉大啊!!!
q.KUJUWvw t"H+j
2c({%Z.W7qG!Z 講番姜維鄧艾, 他倆各方面都不分上下(兩人亦往往是同僚針對的人), 但在政革方面, 鄧艾全勝, 他的團田制帶來足夠糧草以應付任何對戰, 相反姜維在政治方面差不多是沒有的 _LAm5GN^

1?;I(]x5v\g 我講完依堆野之後, 想講嘅係諸葛亮死後最厲害既人物係 ------- [b]李世民[/b]:P

頁: 1 [2] 3

Powered by Discuz! Archiver 7.0.0  © 2001-2009 Comsenz Inc.