**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****
[quote]Originally posted by [i]151515[/i] at 2006-1-30 21:42:
(T)\'t4Gz M;|&U
but 鄧艾and陸遜have 10 pts,姜維only9 [/quote].q'I/zi8y|c \O
But I don't think鄧艾and陸遜 is really better than 姜維. Even they are clever, 姜維 was taught by 諸葛亮. He learnt ~90% from 諸葛亮.
[[i] Last edited by 機密 on 2006-1-30 at 09:45 PM [/i]]
**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****
[quote]Originally posted by [i]151515[/i] at 2006-1-30 21:45:
why?
:v0d,F-Z$ZE9H
其實他們實力差不多，很難比較:o [/quote]j/y]G4RJ/[2F8U8}
see #22 Thus b7m_ _8N5A
智慧: 諸葛亮-->司馬懿--->陸遜--->姜維--->鄧艾--->y-W\4tj
軍事才能：諸葛亮-->司馬懿--->陸遜~鄧艾~姜維w#v(e7eJ C7p6iB?
政治才能：<--- actually I forgot the details.
打：姜維--->鄧艾--->司馬懿--->陸遜--->諸葛亮
In addition, a merit for 姜維 you haven't consider for him. 姜維's fascination is better than the others because he was the only student of 諸葛亮.
[[i] Last edited by 機密 on 2006-1-30 at 09:56 PM [/i]]
**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****
[quote]Originally posted by [i]151515[/i] at 2006-1-30 21:51:-t!EHAF~"@ W
bq_4wQ(Mo
M Q4[(HXH
他比孔明更偉大 [/quote]/\m+I4EF&|xW3@
&B U M&DE q6cV
Agree. Both of them were extremely loyalty. However, he was more great because he was in more poor situation. He could maintain a same loyality to his boss.
**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****
[quote]Originally posted by [i]151515[/i] at 2006-1-30 21:58:
L.bv+J)N*e3Ta
W3~ VxmW(zw Bw1]
他支撐了蜀國三十年，雖然孔明也有２７年（２０７－２３４），但那時的人材比姜維時期的好很多，五虎已屈機 [/quote]`} p v u"P
yes, that's the point.:)
**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****
[quote]Originally posted by [i]151515[/i] at 2006-1-30 22:20:,WypQ E*h
a ?f/?
y;v5PL4jv }|
陸遜也偉大，但不得善終...... [/quote]
Many '3 countries' peoples 不得善終 too:D
**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****
[quote]Originally posted by [i]151515[/i] at 2006/1/30 21:32:
but i think智慧: 諸葛亮-->司... [/quote];@
jk_&L.|
why you think司馬懿 and 陸遜 are good at fight than 諸葛亮 ?????????????
聽聞真正的history上,諸葛亮的軍事能力未如三國演義般吹得咁勁.........
佢勁係勁在治國能力............I9BI8pp:O)nX
S s/x~ t Q@q3pf ]
係咪如此?
[quote]Originally posted by [i]nashisthebestpg[/i] at 2006-1-31 01:07 AM:@8f3f*}
z/w d
聽聞真正的history上,諸葛亮的軍事能力未如三國演義般吹得咁勁.........
佢勁係勁在治國能力............fi-_N
i
r a
^?!d\7g])k
b+G
係咪如此? [/quote]
?UU6e1R{%X
PN^Y%t(L P
其實又有幾多人真係睇過三國志丫...
好多人只不過睇完神化既「三國演義」就信以為真
[quote]Originally posted by [i]benny0105[/i] at 2006-1-31 01:46 AM:XB:D4v-o
h+} ]s0F@5yN
#`H ]
w
gD H1T
,C d M^+@ {
)gE/x I.e2S7CA4Ue
其實又有幾多人真係睇過三國志丫...w$b$B2N4eBvZ
好多人只不過睇完神化既「三國演義」就信以為真 [/quote]
我嗰次係三聯見到本三國志,入面係逐個人物講,9E [2k6Gz n{
唔係好似三國演義好似故事咁講出黎........
(p3U4Z,c'Vcw w8T({:a
三國志真係咁ga? 咁咪無咁好睇........
呢個網係講有關三國正史~ r;f hkG$M
不過我諗好多人都有睇過~n VP }0p7{
[url]http://k-fung.net/han/real.htm[/url]
[quote]Originally posted by [i]nashisthebestpg[/i] at 2006-1-31 01:07 AM:-P6dq)k n(^P
聽聞真正的history上,諸葛亮的軍事能力未如三國演義般吹得咁勁.........
佢勁係勁在治國能力............
0c F6h5J9H!Xs
係咪如此? [/quote]$o-Q+E-G_g-^
歷史中諸葛亮的軍事能力的確沒演義中那麼屈機,但也算不俗,始終對司馬懿也
沒有佔下風:)
[quote]Originally posted by [i]nashisthebestpg[/i] at 2006-1-31 02:01 AM:
呢個網係講有關三國正史~O1r }(CBiH`.H W
不過我諗好多人都有睇過~
[url]http://k-fung.net/han/real.htm[/url] [/quote]
正史中張松只有110cm?:o Qv.^WK8EC
侏儒?
你睇演義定火鳳? 你又點知佢地打得?
阿壽寫打鬥一向草草了事, 姜維鄧艾無一次唔係不相佰仲, 點分邊個勁?
.V _ Y&d9mf
諸葛亮係上述當中絕對唔係最好嘅軍事家, 用人亦只用文人如楊儀, 馬謖等紙上談兵之輩, 可來成功?!vMQ_,]/y
?&CU7{
相反司馬懿係對負孟達充份表現出打仗最重要的機動性, 諸葛亮即使有再多人力物力也不能做到, 以他謹慎的做人態度
有人話諸葛亮最勁, 因為佢死在, 蜀就完全唔掂
聽完更加覺得諸葛亮唔掂, 死前唔陪養多D有用嘅人用(有一大堆文人嘅), 有魏延如此勇猛的人又唔重用......可憐自己個仔一野就比鄧艾打爆......
司馬懿兩個仔都至高無上, 個孫司馬炎仲統一埋......k yA*_#Gr;l
w
陸遜個仔都係大都督,同羊祜更惺惺相惜......0X,` NKm)A7Iiq
諸葛亮!!!你做的事顯出你特別, 更加, 無敵偉大啊!!!
講番姜維鄧艾, 他倆各方面都不分上下(兩人亦往往是同僚針對的人), 但在政革方面, 鄧艾全勝, 他的團田制帶來足夠糧草以應付任何對戰, 相反姜維在政治方面差不多是沒有的 A?F v4I I8b
UX$aGO['S R
我講完依堆野之後, 想講嘅係諸葛亮死後最厲害既人物係 ------- [b]李世民[/b]:P