娛樂滿紛 26FUN's Archiver

151515 發表於 2006-1-30 09:42 PM

**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****

機密 發表於 2006-1-30 09:44 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]151515[/i] at 2006-1-30 21:42:I%Ofv`Z3W#D6au.d
*Fbiv Bhi%r rY"T
but 鄧艾and陸遜have 10 pts,姜維only9 [/quote]iu#S^9r5O@J.hP
}U5Jn9[*{z V
But I don't think鄧艾and陸遜 is really better than 姜維. Even they are clever, 姜維 was taught by  諸葛亮.  He learnt ~90% from 諸葛亮.Mj1q8|1vt2aG

3Q*`OH#]k+A [[i] Last edited by 機密 on 2006-1-30 at 09:45 PM [/i]]

151515 發表於 2006-1-30 09:45 PM

**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****

機密 發表於 2006-1-30 09:46 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]151515[/i] at 2006-1-30 21:45:
+b:T Nl i`O!DIq
P K$Y_,y)Ex9bx
/KTa!b4b"R.F;q#q9Ab why?
h,YNf0A3M&rm
`uk,[1u 其實他們實力差不多,很難比較:o [/quote][jCE1z`$Kd

6Cp)V/y,f#Q_ see #22 Thus
#b$~,l Ig`
UE Jd2J 智慧: 諸葛亮-->司馬懿--->陸遜--->姜維--->鄧艾--->7}mP6e%wQm2KT

:Q(J,sp0a'G 軍事才能:諸葛亮-->司馬懿--->陸遜~鄧艾~姜維
5}mx+OB]#JH :A4pS0@_ Mq~.]n+^` |
政治才能:<--- actually I forgot the details.
7V^-QA8{b-ZXCO
w st SV rt} 打:姜維--->鄧艾--->司馬懿--->陸遜--->諸葛亮

機密 發表於 2006-1-30 09:50 PM

In addition, a merit for 姜維 you haven't consider for him.  姜維's fascination is better than the others because he was the only student of  諸葛亮.^h@ z&L t?
!?gRL-y2PK-Q
[[i] Last edited by 機密 on 2006-1-30 at 09:56 PM [/i]]

151515 發表於 2006-1-30 09:51 PM

**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****

機密 發表於 2006-1-30 09:55 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]151515[/i] at 2006-1-30 21:51:'T#Zc^:j&|N

8E JFUY1v GQ#\
%NP8\q a"]lm 他比孔明更偉大 [/quote]
O_O3r:d
ox%\`ZCM#} h$H Agree.  Both of them were extremely loyalty.  However, he was more great because he was in more poor situation.  He could maintain a same loyality to his boss.

151515 發表於 2006-1-30 09:58 PM

**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****

機密 發表於 2006-1-30 10:03 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]151515[/i] at 2006-1-30 21:58:
|x_0O V7UHa ~
zW,CsIk
T0`}$X)D4d 他支撐了蜀國三十年,雖然孔明也有27年(207-234),但那時的人材比姜維時期的好很多,五虎已屈機 [/quote]`*dD+Guv`*W
yes, that's the point.:)

151515 發表於 2006-1-30 10:20 PM

**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****

機密 發表於 2006-1-30 10:29 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]151515[/i] at 2006-1-30 22:20:&RZ"w"se ke}4S
uj } O.k"y

@B i Z2N 陸遜也偉大,但不得善終...... [/quote]{s9N m+[.BsW0mjL_
Many '3 countries' peoples 不得善終 too:D

151515 發表於 2006-1-30 10:32 PM

**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****

CHECSS 發表於 2006-1-31 12:21 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]151515[/i] at 2006/1/30 21:32:(p3X {4R|)e

(X!c2QIJ :gz5c Rb,Yx:n&O9o
but i think智慧: 諸葛亮-->司... [/quote]!U3]Cn+jk
why you think司馬懿 and 陸遜 are good at fight than 諸葛亮 ?????????????

nashisthebestpg 發表於 2006-1-31 01:07 AM

聽聞真正的history上,諸葛亮的軍事能力未如三國演義般吹得咁勁.........
I MIL{5~-G9c4^j 佢勁係勁在治國能力............
!pm3kr!Z;K'a ]gws6HY6e(~'f
係咪如此?

benny0105 發表於 2006-1-31 01:46 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]nashisthebestpg[/i] at 2006-1-31 01:07 AM:,b Y r_ _Z(G
聽聞真正的history上,諸葛亮的軍事能力未如三國演義般吹得咁勁.........*Y-[;~C7g GU*v
佢勁係勁在治國能力............
:UP;? C~
OR E#BhL3I 係咪如此? [/quote]-\7d#PTI+@
UU#Sq&D#g
I~ Bo B f&b
d8gb:E8}xR
其實又有幾多人真係睇過三國志丫...N F6E \B\3~&di
好多人只不過睇完神化既「三國演義」就信以為真

nashisthebestpg 發表於 2006-1-31 01:58 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]benny0105[/i] at 2006-1-31 01:46 AM:
sMf;D1W&v4a+o d.fWjB5I8C

6N.?x6X g4lG6n
%]Q-gbRl3U$[ma
#?;F)n:X_FHF[K } 其實又有幾多人真係睇過三國志丫...;Bx!NCa]e(f2\
好多人只不過睇完神化既「三國演義」就信以為真 [/quote]
"o1s/g8I7c#F8bpi 我嗰次係三聯見到本三國志,入面係逐個人物講,DC(r9[ M:h
唔係好似三國演義好似故事咁講出黎........jh _){O;Unz
0^!fMAm%O/TU'x
三國志真係咁ga? 咁咪無咁好睇........

nashisthebestpg 發表於 2006-1-31 02:01 AM

呢個網係講有關三國正史~
ADK t1B.] Af Q 不過我諗好多人都有睇過~
9p;r&K8L8}5Fz [url]http://k-fung.net/han/real.htm[/url]

發表於 2006-1-31 02:05 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]nashisthebestpg[/i] at 2006-1-31 01:07 AM:
%u w+j n7v Z0W cg 聽聞真正的history上,諸葛亮的軍事能力未如三國演義般吹得咁勁.........)uGQ|P
佢勁係勁在治國能力............
y@0p%nRtN9}C%U ~ !| nxN4^^
係咪如此? [/quote]
yN)NrAx 歷史中諸葛亮的軍事能力的確沒演義中那麼屈機,但也算不俗,始終對司馬懿也
Y;pKX_.Ngm l 沒有佔下風:)

發表於 2006-1-31 02:09 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]nashisthebestpg[/i] at 2006-1-31 02:01 AM:/PxL3y1[ q(e+W4V
呢個網係講有關三國正史~"{^6fN"n6X,}
不過我諗好多人都有睇過~
E_6u!Y,{Jz [url]http://k-fung.net/han/real.htm[/url] [/quote] Nx BgU6a6G$g
正史中張松只有110cm?:o4](w2iReF'Ncz
侏儒?

step025 發表於 2006-1-31 07:13 AM

你睇演義定火鳳? 你又點知佢地打得?
6X |4jI(mC'W{ 阿壽寫打鬥一向草草了事, 姜維鄧艾無一次唔係不相佰仲, 點分邊個勁?
Kl4^V!f
5\Cx`*A$N 諸葛亮係上述當中絕對唔係最好嘅軍事家, 用人亦只用文人如楊儀, 馬謖等紙上談兵之輩, 可來成功?
o7oY mFP4Y3{7U
_I[mk\ 相反司馬懿係對負孟達充份表現出打仗最重要的機動性, 諸葛亮即使有再多人力物力也不能做到, 以他謹慎的做人態度
2z5d\m7UcnI ]^1F N6jEk7@K
有人話諸葛亮最勁, 因為佢死在, 蜀就完全唔掂-| o9H B]/H)P,g%oC\*R
聽完更加覺得諸葛亮唔掂, 死前唔陪養多D有用嘅人用(有一大堆文人嘅), 有魏延如此勇猛的人又唔重用......可憐自己個仔一野就比鄧艾打爆......
,ra;E NmD![x 司馬懿兩個仔都至高無上, 個孫司馬炎仲統一埋......
ta8cZ+k.w8Z&^9j"R)x 陸遜個仔都係大都督,同羊祜更惺惺相惜......
3F(d)n1VTAG:t 諸葛亮!!!你做的事顯出你特別, 更加, 無敵偉大啊!!!
"x&?^F$I"\ nOzA n9fq
講番姜維鄧艾, 他倆各方面都不分上下(兩人亦往往是同僚針對的人), 但在政革方面, 鄧艾全勝, 他的團田制帶來足夠糧草以應付任何對戰, 相反姜維在政治方面差不多是沒有的
/xe*[7c zL HC)F[8[ g4b
我講完依堆野之後, 想講嘅係諸葛亮死後最厲害既人物係 ------- [b]李世民[/b]:P

頁: 1 [2] 3

Powered by Discuz! Archiver 7.0.0  © 2001-2009 Comsenz Inc.