**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****
[quote]Originally posted by [i]151515[/i] at 2006-1-30 21:42:
but 鄧艾and陸遜have 10 pts,姜維only9 [/quote]
2l.Xl?"i^
v$gV b
But I don't think鄧艾and陸遜 is really better than 姜維. Even they are clever, 姜維 was taught by 諸葛亮. He learnt ~90% from 諸葛亮.Lb
g3_o J ^
[[i] Last edited by 機密 on 2006-1-30 at 09:45 PM [/i]]
**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****
[quote]Originally posted by [i]151515[/i] at 2006-1-30 21:45:
why?
AIST!Q3Wh
其實他們實力差不多,很難比較:o [/quote]5k&V3](s/[0m&u
see #22 Thus`!_-TLi4WI9n9m
T
5O \8Km?u4vs;q
智慧: 諸葛亮-->司馬懿--->陸遜--->姜維--->鄧艾--->
O#N%A0gR8[
軍事才能:諸葛亮-->司馬懿--->陸遜~鄧艾~姜維RW)\.XA)k6s?
政治才能:<--- actually I forgot the details.
2K BC#a'ZQ4[8i
打:姜維--->鄧艾--->司馬懿--->陸遜--->諸葛亮
In addition, a merit for 姜維 you haven't consider for him. 姜維's fascination is better than the others because he was the only student of 諸葛亮.
qy#_*~ZR.f?
[[i] Last edited by 機密 on 2006-1-30 at 09:56 PM [/i]]
**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****
[quote]Originally posted by [i]151515[/i] at 2006-1-30 21:51:'N.FWm8B-bf"o,n
WvGiP~
他比孔明更偉大 [/quote]
Agree. Both of them were extremely loyalty. However, he was more great because he was in more poor situation. He could maintain a same loyality to his boss.
**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****
[quote]Originally posted by [i]151515[/i] at 2006-1-30 21:58:
ZA"Vd[
他支撐了蜀國三十年,雖然孔明也有27年(207-234),但那時的人材比姜維時期的好很多,五虎已屈機 [/quote](V+a*U9t\:o
yes, that's the point.:)
**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****
[quote]Originally posted by [i]151515[/i] at 2006-1-30 22:20:
{N.x;j S!|
陸遜也偉大,但不得善終...... [/quote]x"l_2H"KL*B
Many '3 countries' peoples 不得善終 too:D
**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****
[quote]Originally posted by [i]151515[/i] at 2006/1/30 21:32:
but i think智慧: 諸葛亮-->司... [/quote]sh-m%?{l
why you think司馬懿 and 陸遜 are good at fight than 諸葛亮 ?????????????
聽聞真正的history上,諸葛亮的軍事能力未如三國演義般吹得咁勁.........
佢勁係勁在治國能力............
g4Hg%@,Nn.g
^
係咪如此?
[quote]Originally posted by [i]nashisthebestpg[/i] at 2006-1-31 01:07 AM:
聽聞真正的history上,諸葛亮的軍事能力未如三國演義般吹得咁勁.........
佢勁係勁在治國能力............
係咪如此? [/quote]7U$XXr^Yd
其實又有幾多人真係睇過三國志丫...
好多人只不過睇完神化既「三國演義」就信以為真
[quote]Originally posted by [i]benny0105[/i] at 2006-1-31 01:46 AM:&h^qA2U3Y-S
,f
XBP%pd+tw'x
'K5dMBt0k8y1b:Tw
其實又有幾多人真係睇過三國志丫...
好多人只不過睇完神化既「三國演義」就信以為真 [/quote]
我嗰次係三聯見到本三國志,入面係逐個人物講, t4?9Jm"@,^r!\ i3L2^
唔係好似三國演義好似故事咁講出黎........({9qZLjkT1Z0M p
-zr ~l*k&u*`
三國志真係咁ga? 咁咪無咁好睇........
呢個網係講有關三國正史~
不過我諗好多人都有睇過~^7E CbC4TI
[url]http://k-fung.net/han/real.htm[/url]
[quote]Originally posted by [i]nashisthebestpg[/i] at 2006-1-31 01:07 AM:if@%I.nOu5?0e1|
聽聞真正的history上,諸葛亮的軍事能力未如三國演義般吹得咁勁.........
佢勁係勁在治國能力............
係咪如此? [/quote]L3_W)c2v"\_'C
歷史中諸葛亮的軍事能力的確沒演義中那麼屈機,但也算不俗,始終對司馬懿也
沒有佔下風:)
[quote]Originally posted by [i]nashisthebestpg[/i] at 2006-1-31 02:01 AM:
呢個網係講有關三國正史~
{@S;G[xRU*[l2h
不過我諗好多人都有睇過~+W0c.^$?yo~;ql*}
[url]http://k-fung.net/han/real.htm[/url] [/quote]f*rn2]:s
正史中張松只有110cm?:o
侏儒?
你睇演義定火鳳? 你又點知佢地打得?
阿壽寫打鬥一向草草了事, 姜維鄧艾無一次唔係不相佰仲, 點分邊個勁?
諸葛亮係上述當中絕對唔係最好嘅軍事家, 用人亦只用文人如楊儀, 馬謖等紙上談兵之輩, 可來成功?
V
P/_O:Y-?/W
相反司馬懿係對負孟達充份表現出打仗最重要的機動性, 諸葛亮即使有再多人力物力也不能做到, 以他謹慎的做人態度
lX$vd8d!Wr
有人話諸葛亮最勁, 因為佢死在, 蜀就完全唔掂
聽完更加覺得諸葛亮唔掂, 死前唔陪養多D有用嘅人用(有一大堆文人嘅), 有魏延如此勇猛的人又唔重用......可憐自己個仔一野就比鄧艾打爆......
司馬懿兩個仔都至高無上, 個孫司馬炎仲統一埋......
陸遜個仔都係大都督,同羊祜更惺惺相惜......T {+PZUf6? N
諸葛亮!!!你做的事顯出你特別, 更加, 無敵偉大啊!!!
講番姜維鄧艾, 他倆各方面都不分上下(兩人亦往往是同僚針對的人), 但在政革方面, 鄧艾全勝, 他的團田制帶來足夠糧草以應付任何對戰, 相反姜維在政治方面差不多是沒有的aC{2w&D!o'u8h*Se
@#Y!M!lEk&k-h+\
我講完依堆野之後, 想講嘅係諸葛亮死後最厲害既人物係 ------- [b]李世民[/b]:P