[quote]Originally posted by [i]清揚[/i] at 2006-3-11 11:36 PM:
你唔得乖巧咪唯有實際low,就系咁簡單:dev: [/quote]
有時末必係唔得，卡卡實識花巧野，但你有幾可見佢插過花？？極少。托迪都識，列基美都識，但極少插花。
仲有，比利、告魯夫都唔鐘意玩插花，鐘意利用速度爆人。
[quote]Originally posted by [i]Kian76[/i] at 2006-3-11 23:46:
有時末必係唔得，卡卡實識花巧野... [/quote]
乖巧並不代表插花,好似Zola,紐維利咁叫乖巧,一盤一傳甚至一射都可以乖巧:dev:
我又覺得柏度講o既野不無道理喎
身為英超勁旅, 當然會有多d資源去培訓本土o既年青球員啦
就好似 holland 咁, 就係因為 ajax等傳統勁旅著重培訓, 先令 holland 不斷有新兵擁現
manu 亦都係一個表表者, 而家亦都不斷俾機會 richardson, bradsley 等人上場
而車仔亦都話黎緊一兩年會簽少d外援, 會出多d england人去踢, 隊波未來都傾向英國化
但 arsenal 而家都只係淨係一個england必然正選, 比 liverpool 仲少(carragher, gerrand, crouch), 所以俾人話都唔奇呀
[quote]Originally posted by [i]艾力克[/i] at 2006-3-12 12:31 AM:
我又覺得柏度講o既野不無道理喎
身為... [/quote]
車仔後備起碼都有SWP,卡頓高爾呢兩個英格蘭球員先,相反阿仙奴就冇咩,不過雲加都唔會理嫁啦~
英超...實施工作證制度只係將自己聯賽水平表面上提高吧
每個新簽番黎o既球員都要係國家隊上陣一定百分比
咁即係一個1年1度o既mix版世界盃
但係英式傳統踢法就搞到同球員格格不入.....
你睇樸次茅夫...一個轉會窗簽左7個球員...
咁大人事變動...邊會打得好...
反之西甲限死3個,意甲1年只可簽1個o既非歐盟球員
咁樣某程度上可以將自己聯賽特式保留吧
[quote]Originally posted by [i]mr_jac_kan[/i] at 2006-3-11 07:57 PM:
曼聯其實係大球會入面都算有好多本土... [/quote]
that's y man utd is more popular than arsenal in both england and worldwide...
u know, arsenal only win 2 league titles with their foreign squad, compared with man utd, arsenal just looks tiny :D
[quote]Originally posted by [i]清揚[/i] at 2006-3-12 12:14 AM:
乖巧並不代表插花,好似Zola,紐維利咁叫乖巧,一盤一傳甚至一射都可以乖巧:dev: [/quote]
不認為車路士缺乏乖巧的人，如洛賓。林柏特也是，雖較硬橋硬馬，但他的技巧運用的時機掌握得很好，如遠射、直線等。
[quote]Originally posted by [i]abc123aa[/i] at 2006-3-12 01:03 AM:
車仔後備起碼都有SWP,卡頓高爾呢兩個英格蘭球員先,相反阿仙奴就冇咩,不過雲加都唔會理嫁啦~ [/quote]
阿仙奴真正既青訓基地在非洲。
[quote]Originally posted by [i]艾力克[/i] at 2006-3-12 12:31 AM:
我又覺得柏度講o既野不無道理喎
身為... [/quote]
但係我又覺得有d野唔係話有就有,好似巴西同荷蘭咁,佢地會有好多又年青又勁0既球員,除左佢地有潛質之外,本身成個國家入面0既球會都有傳統,球會有把握當佢地擺錢落去青訓之後,一定會有幾個好球員出到...呢樣野0係英格蘭可能做到,但班球員0既質素始終未到頂級,你無理由明知唔夠勁都用佢架麻,真係好勁0個d又永遠唔係大球會0既出品...到成左名就買親都幾千萬...
其實好多大球會都開始重視青訓,例如開足球學校,不過唔0係本土ja ma
[quote]Originally posted by [i]skjeiw[/i] at 2006-3-12 07:39 AM:
但係我又覺得有d野唔係話有就有,... [/quote]
但厄遜點睇都穩過辛達路斯、施根N倍。
彭拿治也不比龍格堡差好遠。
泰萊係好有潛質既門將但雲格唔肯用。
[quote]Originally posted by [i]艾力克[/i] at 2006-3-12 12:31 AM:
我又覺得柏度講o既野不無道理喎
身為... [/quote]
阿仙奴已經將賓納特，賓特利，謝菲斯等本土好野浪費左．．．．．．
[quote]Originally posted by [i]iknow[/i] at 2006-3-12 03:44 PM:
阿仙奴已經將賓納特，賓特利，謝菲斯等本土好野浪費左．．．．．． [/quote]
所以我一直都唔認為雲格是一個眼光出眾的領隊，就是因為他買的很多所謂平價貨其實所有在球壇都很有知名度，總是掛著新xxx之名加盟的新星。
而且雲格亦不敢去提升青訓產品或本土年青球員，可能佢覺得呢班人在國內也非最Top，倒不如在其他國家找最Top的新星更有保障吧？？哈哈！！
反而在非洲分部的兩大新星托尼和伊布爾就有機會，這也難怪，第一真的有實力，第二就是這二人是非洲分部最Top的兩個，那裡可是極多人的啊！！肯定比英國本土青訓的收生多很多倍。
[[i] Last edited by Kian76 on 2006-3-12 at 05:20 PM [/i]]
[quote]Originally posted by [i]iknow[/i] at 2006-3-12 17:44:
阿仙奴已經將賓納特，賓特利，謝菲斯等本土好野浪費左．．．．．． [/quote]
Frances Jeffers is not a good player at all... (where is him now?!)
J. Peannet.. remember he's out of contract last year........ so I am not suprised that Arsene sold him last year...
But David Bentley... um... I get no idea why Arsenal didn't extend his contract...........
[quote]Originally posted by [i]brightlee[/i] at 2006-3-12 09:48 PM:
Frances Jeffers is not a good pla... [/quote]
謝菲斯好似o係格流......
賓特利真係好勁......
賓納特私生活唔好, 布魯士都煩緊佢呢個問題
我覺得問題是點解本土球員比外援貴???
[quote]Originally posted by [i]sagaman[/i] at 2006-3-14 09:50 PM:
我覺得問題是點解本土球員比外援貴??? [/quote]
好問題~~d本土球員人工又高,身價又高
[quote]Originally posted by [i]Kian76[/i] at 2006-3-11 10:29 PM:
咁平心而論若正選陣容一個本土球員都... [/quote]
唔係得不到重用
而係融入唔到隊波:(
仲有,我唔覺得雲格係浪費人材囉
佢浪費就唔會賣啦
唔似車仔,咁多錢買個後備番黎
比較有名個d又貴
有時想買都比車仔頂到衡
[quote]Originally posted by [i]abc123aa[/i] at 2006-3-12 01:03 AM:
車仔後備起碼都有SWP,卡頓高爾呢兩個英格蘭球員先,相反阿仙奴就冇咩,不過雲加都唔會理嫁啦~ [/quote]
哥哥仔, 雲加唔想要SWP咩? 人地用2千1百萬鎊搶番黎做後備咋~~ 點買呀?