輸左唔緊要
但以後一定要贏阿仙奴
[quote]Originally posted by [i]abc123aa[/i] at 2006-3-21 12:37:
我都唔係車仔迷,點解我會咁講呢?因... [/quote]
有o羊野問題呀.........
[quote]Originally posted by [i]iknow[/i] at 2006-3-21 06:56 PM:
杜奧巴球波根本就係手球ｌａ，富咸去... [/quote]
就係因為上次對西布朗車仔球員因為對方既雙腳攔截車仔球員所以去投訴,賽後比足總話唔可以有超過三個球員圍住球證,今次富咸點止三個呀............
[quote]Originally posted by [i]abc123aa[/i] at 2006-3-22 01:42 AM:
就係因為上次對西布朗車仔球員因為對方既雙腳攔截車仔球員所以去投訴,賽後比足總話唔可以有超過三個球員圍住球證,今次富咸點止三個呀............ [/quote]
都唔知會唔會罰住......
同埋可能o係語氣上o既唔同掛....(我都唔知點解會咁)
摩連奴佢本人實在太過出位 以前雲利亞利教果時邊係咁架 依家個個都留意住車仔
我覺得好多球迷同英足總都會o係車仔賽後 捉佢地痛腳
對比起其他隊 對車仔的確較嚴
純熟個人意見:dev:
[quote]Originally posted by [i]terryjog06[/i] at 2006-3-22 02:46 AM:
都唔知會唔會罰住......
同埋可能o... [/quote]
我諗應該唔會罰既:o
[quote]Originally posted by [i]cfccfcc[/i] at 2006-3-21 08:35 PM:
理論無問題......不過問題係
點...
...而事實上係兩隊都同樣有做左相同的事
點解會有不同的對待???[/quote]
因為:
富咸 d人圍住裁判話: "有冇搞錯! 佢犯手球在先呀! 唔信問下旁證啦~~"
車仔 d人圍住裁判話: "有冇搞錯! 我地咁有錢都趕我地出場? 信唔信我叫油王請人殺你全家吖嗱!!!"
:P:P:P
其實圍球証都會有好多種唔同嘅情況~
我諗最重要嘅係當時班球員嘅態度....同埋每個球証嘅接受情度都唔同...唔可以一概而論~
球証問旁証我就更加覺得無問題...球証睇唔清楚就梗係會問吓旁証架啦...唔係要個旁証嚟做咩~
呢場波個問題係個旁証根本就唔係太肯定係手球...如果唔係就一早舉咗旗啦...但係睇到都唔奇...起碼我睇直播睇得好清楚係手球...重喺度諗緊球証點會睇唔到...有時唔一定話要好清楚睇到個球員手球先判...因為有時個波離哂身咁都控到其實經驗豐富嘅球証都會判斷到係唔係手球~
我記憶所及今季有一場波就真係離哂大譜喇...嗰場巴路士用手控個波落嚟先射....慢鏡所見球証拉利重要兜口兜面咁跑緊埋去巴路士度....
點解又話d球証針對車仔呢~?
我又好唔明...今季泰利三番四次禁區手球都無判12碼喎...今次加拿斯嗰球根本就唔係要波~
重有我今場發現一樣嘢...就係車仔唔知係咪唔慣輸波...今場輸得好無品...先有林伯想打人咁樣...之後再有加拿斯要腳唔要波...
最後想講唔知大家覺唔覺得其實摩連奴都應該睇到手球...係咁叫d球員返中圈開波...好似作賊心虛咁好搞笑~
[quote]Originally posted by [i]iMacc[/i] at 2006-3-22 10:26 AM:
最後想講唔知大家覺唔覺得其實摩連奴都應該睇到手球...係咁叫d球員返中圈開波...好似作賊心虛咁好搞笑~[/quote]
教練一定係幫自己球隊嫁啦........:haha:
[quote]Originally posted by [i]iMacc[/i] at 2006-3-22 10:26 AM:
其實圍球証都會有好多種唔同嘅情況~
我諗最重要嘅係當時班球員嘅態度....同埋每個球証嘅接受情度都唔同...唔可以一概而論~
球証問旁証我就更加覺得無問題...球証睇唔清楚就梗係會問吓旁証架啦...唔係要個旁証嚟做咩~
呢場波個問題係個旁証根本就唔係太肯定係手球...如果唔係就一早舉咗旗啦...但係睇到都唔奇...起碼我睇直播睇得好清楚係手球...重喺度諗緊球証點會睇唔到...有時唔一定話要好清楚睇到個球員手球先判...因為有時個波離哂身咁都控到其實經驗豐富嘅球証都會判斷到係唔係手球~
我記憶所及今季有一場波就真係離哂大譜喇...嗰場巴路士用手控個波落嚟先射....慢鏡所見球証拉利重要兜口兜面咁跑緊埋去巴路士度....
點解又話d球証針對車仔呢~?
我又好唔明...今季泰利三番四次禁區手球都無判12碼喎...今次加拿斯嗰球根本就唔係要波~
[color=Red]重有我今場發現一樣嘢...就係車仔唔知係咪唔慣輸波...今場輸得好無品...先有林伯想打人咁樣...之後再有加拿斯要腳唔要波...[/color]
最後想講唔知大家覺唔覺得其實摩連奴都應該睇到手球...係咁叫d球員返中圈開波...好似作賊心虛咁好搞笑~[/quote]
細哨輸緊波都搵個頭撞人啦,細哨係大家眼中咁神聖都會咁做咯,更何況係其他球員呀:agree:
依家既問題係話球證去問旁證梗係唔清楚既情況下先問嫁啦,咁既然係場內既球證都睇唔清楚咁場外既旁證點會清楚?難道球證經驗就唔豐富?只不過依家球證係判得o岩,根本冇錯判
[quote]Originally posted by [i]abc123aa[/i] at 2006-3-22 10:32:
細哨輸緊波都搵個頭撞人啦,細哨係大家眼中咁神聖都會咁做咯,更何況係其他球員呀
依家既問題係話球證去問旁證梗係唔清楚既情況下先問嫁啦,咁既然係場內既球證都睇唔清楚咁場外既旁證點會清楚?難道球證經驗就唔豐富?只不過依家球證係判得o岩,根本冇錯判[/quote]
我就覺得細哨有球味但唔係話好踢得好乾淨嗰隻我都唔小次見佢踢人後腳....如果講乾淨我諗非連尼加莫屬...我就覺得唔係話輸波就有權發脾四~
好難講嘅...有時係角度問題...有時又會有人遮住...唔一定話球証一定睇得清楚過球証嘅....只不過球証可以好主動咁走去跟住個波啫~
[quote]Originally posted by [i]abc123aa[/i] at 2006-3-22 10:28:
教練一定係幫自己球隊嫁啦........:haha: [/quote]
佢心態我好明白不過嗰一刻佢個表情真係好搞鬼~:D
[quote]Originally posted by [i]iMacc[/i] at 2006-3-22 11:10 AM:
我就覺得細哨有球味但唔係話好踢得好乾淨嗰隻我都唔小次見佢踢人後腳....如果講乾淨我諗非連尼加莫屬...我就覺得唔係話輸波就有權發脾四~
好難講嘅...有時係角度問題...有時又會有人遮住...唔一定話球証一定睇得清楚過球証嘅....只不過球証可以好主動咁走去跟住個波啫~[/quote]
細哨球味係有,不過唔夠大哨咁乾淨囉,冇乜邊d球員可以做到大哨咁,比人剷都唔出聲:D
咁又係~但球證咁做好難唔令人覺得奇怪囉:o
[quote]Originally posted by [i]iMacc[/i] at 2006-3-22 11:11 AM:
佢心態我好明白不過嗰一刻佢個表情真係好搞鬼~:D [/quote]
哈哈:D
[quote]Originally posted by [i]abc123aa[/i] at 2006-3-22 11:12:
細哨球味係有,不過唔夠大哨咁乾淨囉,冇乜邊d球員可以做到大哨咁,比人剷都唔出聲:D
咁又係~但球證咁做好難唔令人覺得奇怪囉:o [/quote]
大哨唔出聲係因為而家掂一掂佢都會跌....唔嘈得咁多...:haha::D
其實爭拗係話點解兩個球証即時都無反應...但之後傾完個共識係手球呢~?
我就覺得大家都無親眼睇到係手球...但係兩個人一齊都判斷到個波個位置係唔係幾可能用心口攞個波落嚟先判手球...但我覺得一定唔關班球員圍球証事...因為如果判錯咗...你話個賽後報告點寫...:haha:
[quote]Originally posted by [i]iMacc[/i] at 2006-3-22 11:33 AM:
其實爭拗係話點解兩個球証即時都無反應...但之後傾完個共識係手球呢~?[/quote]
我覺得係[color=Red]「之後傾完個共識係手球呢」[/color]
我又覺得球証無做錯
由頭到尾佢都無指過中圈,即係話佢都無判過入波...呢個係最大0既point去support佢
你話佢兩頭蛇,指完呢邊指0個邊就話jeh~~~
不過問題係....車仔vsWBA時圍完球証
Fa話要罰....原因係球証係唔可以咁樣樣比人圍,點解第2d人圍又無事?
唔關圍的原因事,而係一圍就要罰....罰係無錯,但係點解罰一個唔罰第二個.......
如果你話係因為佢圍的reason,更加無理.....記唔記得liverpool vs arsenal 沙比仔的第2個黃牌?佢只不過係冼親先鏟到對方球員,都要照樣比人罰yellow card~~~
我都承認Jose唔係好服輸,成日賴呢樣賴0個樣.....
不過呢次真係要討番個公道
唔係有錢就要被人蝦
[quote]Originally posted by [i]iknow[/i] at 2006-3-21 06:56 PM:
杜奧巴球波根本就係手球ｌａ，富咸去... [/quote]
最錯係球證，當時點只得一個富咸球員跟杜夫爭波(麻煩你睇番重播！)，係兩個球員夾住杜夫，球證理應即時吹停，因為已出現不公平狀態(兩個夾一個，仲已經係跌底0左！)，加拿斯相信係基於球證0吾吹，看見自己友被圍攻而又無公平判決，所以忍0吾住先被迫犯錯，著實情有可原！:cry:
[quote]Originally posted by [i]MingLai[/i] at 2006-3-25 16:45:
最錯係球證，當時點只得一個富咸... [/quote]
加拿斯嗰腳要腳唔要波都叫情有可原....:haha:
[quote]Originally posted by [i]MingLai[/i] at 2006-3-25 04:45 PM:
最錯係球證，當時點只得一個富咸... [/quote]
ok,就當我睇漏左個人,咁佢都唔使咁樣攞腳ar fa...
[quote]Originally posted by [i]MingLai[/i] at 2006-3-25 18:45:
最錯係球證，當時點只得一個富咸... [/quote]
I get no idea what you are talking about...!!!