施仙奴同碧咸兩個夾得好好 [/quote]
係呀 施仙奴今年至加盟皇馬, 佢其實已經算好快溶入球隊. 雖然佢有時真係上得滯, 但係比多小小時間佢夾番隊波既話應該可以再改善 [quote]Originally posted by [i]brightman[/i] at 2006-3-22 12:15 PM:
施仙奴今年至加盟皇馬, 佢其實已經算好快溶入球隊. 雖然佢有時真係上得滯, 但係比多小小時間佢夾番隊波既話應該可以再改善 [/quote]
佢既打法要溶入皇馬好易,下年應該會好好多嫁喇~ 碧咸d長傳係每場都好有用 [quote]Originally posted by [i]bigfish[/i] at 2006-3-21 11:52 PM:
咁出施仙奴打右閘都得掛...
今季皇馬... [/quote]
皇馬唔係打佢一個。希望你明白足球係團體運動，冇人能保證剛傷完既球員能發揮正常，皇馬咁多出色的攻擊球員，點解仲要勉強出一個末必有態既球員？？你話冇人能代替他就話，但而家大大個施仙奴o係度，點解仲要用末必有態既碧咸？？
而且你話皇馬班前鋒唔生性令碧咸少左好多助攻，咁我又諗倒倒轉黎睇，如果唔係皇馬班前鋒把握倒佢既傳中，碧咸唔會咁多助攻。冇前鋒係可以100%把握機會的。一場波有時射門24-30次，咪最多奇跡地俾你入8球？？？咁其餘既失機又係咪要當作為責任呢？？可以諗下，同埋碧咸既傳中係咪一定可以避過晒對方後衛呢？？除左要睇前鋒把唔把握倒外，仲要睇對方後衛清唔清倒架！！！再要睇埋對方門將。好多因素！！！
[[i] Last edited by Kian76 on 2006-3-22 at 06:35 PM [/i]] [quote]Originally posted by [i]tkk2p[/i] at 2006-3-22 02:06 AM:
施仙奴同碧咸兩個夾得好好 [/quote]
睇黎沙加度都可以賣走 la, 無謂坐o係 bench 度等運到 la [quote]Originally posted by [i]bigfish[/i] at 2006-3-23 02:18 AM:
睇黎沙加度都可以賣走 la, 無謂坐o係 bench 度等運到 la [/quote]
你冇野呀,沙加度攞黎做替補嫁 [quote]Originally posted by [i]abc123aa[/i] at 2006-3-23 02:35 AM:
你冇野呀,沙加度攞黎做替補嫁 [/quote]
但我諗祖記可能會搶佢番去祖記踢。 [quote]Originally posted by [i]Kian76[/i] at 2006-3-23 11:50 AM:
但我諗祖記可能會搶佢番去祖記踢。 [/quote]
皇馬都未必會放走佢啦=3=" [quote]Originally posted by [i]abc123aa[/i] at 2006-3-23 12:23 PM:
皇馬都未必會放走佢啦=3=" [/quote]
世界盃後先知～其實皇馬買入施仙奴，都係做好準備，後備仲有美查，文拿比斯可以踢右後衛～ [quote]Originally posted by [i]abc123aa[/i] at 2006-3-23 12:23 PM:
皇馬都未必會放走佢啦=3=" [/quote]
佢本人可能想走。 [quote]Originally posted by [i]abc123aa[/i] at 2006-3-23 02:35 AM:
你冇野呀,沙加度攞黎做替補嫁 [/quote]
季前都講明, 如果沙加度出場次數唔到一定數目, 下季會離隊
何況我覺得佢實力同施仙奴, 碧咸差太遠, 夾唔來, 又走緊下坡, 梗係趁佢仲賣得好價錢時放走 la [quote]Originally posted by [i]tkk2p[/i] at 2006-3-23 12:37 PM:
世界盃後先知～其實皇馬買入施仙奴，都係做好準備，後備仲有美查，文拿比斯可以踢右後衛～ [/quote]
美治亞都係踢中堅算啦,佢踢中堅都唔錯啊~ [quote]Originally posted by [i]bigfish[/i] at 2006-3-23 11:50 PM:
季前都講明, 如果沙加度出場次數唔... [/quote]
點解搵沙加度同碧咸比? 兩者位置唔一樣.
至於沙加度同施仙奴比較, 兩者各擅其長. 施仙奴侵略性強, 沙加度防守力同拚勁較強. [quote]Originally posted by [i]brightman[/i] at 2006-3-24 01:51 AM:
點解搵沙加度同碧咸比? 兩者位置唔一樣.
至於沙加度同施仙奴比較, 兩者各擅其長. 施仙奴侵略性強, 沙加度防守力同拚勁較強. [/quote]
施仙奴同沙加度各有長處,我就唔希望佢走囉~ [quote]Originally posted by [i]brightman[/i] at 2006-3-24 01:51 AM:
點解搵沙加度同碧咸比? 兩者位置唔一樣.
至於沙加度同施仙奴比較, 兩者各擅其長. 施仙奴侵略性強, 沙加度防守力同拚勁較強. [/quote]
唔係直接同佢比, 係比較佢地三個之中出邊兩個最好, 明顯地施仙奴同碧咸o既組合係最強o既, 又最有星味, 如果施仙奴肯專心打防守, 一定唔會差過沙加度囉, 你睇佢d 路數就知 la seems everyone is arguing with you....
But the TRUTH is, Reyes was KO 施仙奴....................
If 施仙奴 is that GOOD, he won't be on the bench in 2nd round.... [quote]Originally posted by [i]brightlee[/i] at 2006-3-24 05:58 AM:
seems everyone is arguing with you....
But the TRUTH is, Reyes was KO 施仙奴....................
If 施仙奴 is that GOOD, he won't be on the bench in 2nd round.... [/quote]
第二回合卡路就係睇到呢點,先至唔出施仙奴,而且新會長馬田剛剛上任當然會將巴西幫先放後備啦.........施仙奴打閘果時係唔識得將攻守平衡啫.........:o
[[i] Last edited by abc123aa on 2006-3-24 at 09:17 AM [/i]] [quote]Originally posted by [i]brightlee[/i] at 2006-3-24 05:58 AM:
seems everyone is arguing with you....
But the TRUTH is, Reyes was KO 施仙奴....................
If 施仙奴 is that GOOD, he won't be on the bench in 2nd round.... [/quote]
齋計速度同腳法, reyes 唔會好過施仙奴, 不過施仙奴接到領隊 order 要多助攻, 務求主場狂數阿記, 所以就成日返唔切黎, 照計卡路應該吩咐左沙治奧拉莫斯補位, but ramos failed to do so
頁:
1
[2]