[quote]Originally posted by [i]brightlee[/i] at 2006-4-4 03:45 PM:
我好想問一個問題好耐....
你地到底... [/quote]
講得好！:clap::clap::clap::clap::clap::clap::clap:
[quote]Originally posted by [i]leeyanta[/i] at 2006-4-4 10:23:
賠率:dev: [/quote]
今次講既係正經嘢
從來都不覺這個1.9倍有問題
[quote]Originally posted by [i]Kian76[/i] at 2006-4-4 17:48:
講得好！:clap::clap::clap::clap::clap::clap::clap: [/quote]
Thanks, I want to say this for ages!!!
To tell everyone, how stupid if they are gambling in Soccer or in Horse Racing.........
[quote]Originally posted by [i]bigfish[/i] at 2006-4-4 04:51:
呢個唔單止我認為, 就算郭家明, key... [/quote]
英格蘭全部好球員?
碧咸對施蒙尼做過啲乜?
心照
[quote]Originally posted by [i]brightlee[/i] at 2006-4-4 03:45 PM:
我好想問一個問題好耐....
你地到底... [/quote]
絕到爆呀老豆,我心入面既說話比你講晒出黎:D:clap:
[quote]Originally posted by [i]brightlee[/i] at 2006-4-4 04:01 PM:
英格蘭全部好球員?
碧咸對施蒙尼做過啲乜?
心照 [/quote]
咪係.........:haha:
講真...做波事件就真係會有...
lee d 係一定既事實...
馬會個倍率都差唔多一定低於歐洲倍率...
可以講係抽水...但係最後果個大莊食麥個個都識抽水...
受馬會果個...點死呀?
而且踢波果個都係人...人係有感情,有貪念,你估無球員睹錢咩...
香港賽馬? 韋達都可以幾次跑第四比你睇啦...
而且講真lee 個世界係有錢既人控制...
股市都可以受人控制升唔升啦...
無做波我就真係唔信無...
問題一定唔係場場都做...
而且做都唔係一定係做主客和啦...
做你讓球,波膽都夠做啦...
做左你都唔知啦...
d 緊勝...大勝...你覺得無做假球咩...唔一定呀...
唔好諗到d 球賽個個都係君子先得ga...
球証,球員,唔一定係成隊做假球ja...
一兩個球員都夠做啦...
所以最後總結我都唔支持賭波...
[quote]Originally posted by [i]abc123aa[/i] at 2006-4-4 04:59 PM:
咪係.........:haha: [/quote]
哈哈，唔知點解我諗起加斯居尼在國家隊賽事中故意想撞開對手，係打側身成份飛埋去，搏頭行先，擺明就係想得到對手飛開，點知人算不如天算，一撞的一刻加斯居尼自己脫骹！！！哈哈！！笑死我！！！
[quote]Originally posted by [i]kaing[/i] at 2006-4-4 06:54 PM:
講真...做波事件就真係會有...
lee d... [/quote]
你叫人地唔好成日諗人地係君子,咁你地d人都唔好成日諗人地係衰人先得嫁,假波一定會有,但係唔係一定會出現水高級聯賽入面先?係唔係經常會有先?
出現係高級聯賽既假波又有幾多呀?出現係低級聯賽同高級聯賽既假波邊個多d呀?:haha::haha::haha:
[quote]Originally posted by [i]abc123aa[/i] at 2006-4-4 08:59 PM:
你叫人地唔好成日諗人地係君子,咁你... [/quote]
高水平假波：15，低水平假波：16
哈哈！！真係15、16喇！！哈哈！！
[quote]Originally posted by [i]Kian76[/i] at 2006-4-4 09:13 PM:
高水平假波：15，低水平假波：16
哈哈！！真係15、16喇！！哈哈！！ [/quote]
哈哈:D
[quote]Originally posted by [i]abc123aa[/i] at 2006-4-4 08:59 PM:
你叫人地唔好成日諗人地係君子,咁你... [/quote]
假波一定有, 高水平聯賽一定有, 低水平聯賽一樣有
如果諗住計兩個比率真係愚不可及, 你永遠唔知邊場真, 邊場假, 邊位球員收錢, 邊位球證冇
[quote]Originally posted by [i]bigfish[/i] at 2006-4-4 10:04 PM:
假波一定有, 高水平聯賽一定有, 低水平聯賽一樣有
如果諗住計兩個比率真係愚不可及, 你永遠唔知邊場真, 邊場假, 邊位球員收錢, 邊位球證冇 [/quote]
算啦你,你都係唔好睇波喇,既然你覺得場場都係假波的話,唔好再用你對眼去污辱足球:nogood:
我只可以話你淨係識諗人地衰果面,你既言論有幾「全面」,有幾「中肯」,真係全體育版版友都見証過晒:clap::clap::clap::clap::clap:
[quote]Originally posted by [i]bigfish[/i] at 2006-4-4 10:04 PM:
假波一定有, 高水平聯賽一定有, 低水平聯賽一樣有
如果諗住計兩個比率真係愚不可及, 你永遠唔知邊場真, 邊場假, 邊位球員收錢, 邊位球證冇 [/quote]
咁又要請你解釋一下假波既定義我知，我到今時今日都唔識分假波同真波既分別，假波係咪要金錢利益下先叫假波？？咁大家冇金錢交易各取所需賽和既波又係咪假波？？定係兩種都係？？咁又點知人地玩默契？？玩默契波又係咪單睇一兩場利益呢？？係咪長線既假波既開頭睇唔出破綻？？？我實在諗到頭都大，真希望你能解答我，因為你好熟悉德、意、西既假波，相信你都有所研究喇。
[quote]Originally posted by [i]Kian76[/i] at 2006-4-4 22:45:
哈哈，唔知點解我諗起加斯居尼在... [/quote]
that's FA Cup Final 1991.. Tottenham Hotspurs vs Nottingham Forest.......
[quote]Originally posted by [i]abc123aa[/i] at 2006-4-4 10:07 PM:
算啦你,你都係唔好睇波喇,既然你覺... [/quote]
你都好勁喎, 可以夾硬屆我話覺得場場都假波:good::good::clap::clap:
kian76兄, 我的假波定義: 踢之前有球員/球證/領隊收受利益內定賽果, 另外不嬲我都唔會話丹麥對瑞典係假波, 默契波同假波, 我唔會當埋同一樣野囉
[quote]Originally posted by [i]bigfish[/i] at 2006-4-5 03:48 AM:
你都好勁喎, 可以夾硬屆我話覺得場... [/quote]
好明顯你係咁啦~:dev::D
[quote]Originally posted by [i]abc123aa[/i] at 2006-4-5 03:52 AM:
好明顯你係咁啦~:dev::D [/quote]
明顯...算喇, 真係唔夠你勁:agree::hitwall::giveup::giveup::giveup:
反正你本身完全唔信, 冇乜好拗
[quote]Originally posted by [i]bigfish[/i] at 2006-4-5 03:55 AM:
明顯...算喇, 真係唔夠你勁:agree::hitwall::giveup::giveup::giveup:
反正你本身完全唔信, 冇乜好拗 [/quote]
唔係完全唔信,係唔會好似你咁「迷信」:D
[quote]Originally posted by [i]abc123aa[/i] at 2006-4-3 03:28 AM:
巴塞果個就真係奇怪左d..........
今次呢個球証咪同巴塞對皇馬果個一樣,判錯12碼
至於你話1.9倍里賈納vs錫耶納和波1:1就真係怪左d...........=3=""""
我自己本身都唔信有打假波或者造波呢d事.........
[/quote]
當我睇錯了:giveup::giveup: