娛樂滿紛 26FUN's Archiver

Kian76 發表於 2006-4-5 01:54 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]bigfish[/i] at 2006-4-5 03:48 AM:

你都好勁喎, 可以夾硬屆我話覺得場... [/quote]

原來係咁,那麼意甲多場和局為何你又要出言說意甲多假波??看來更像默契波。

adamjacky123 發表於 2006-4-5 05:41 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]Kian76[/i] at 2006-4-4 10:24 PM:


咁又要請你解釋一下打假波既定義我... [/quote]
有時打假波未必for money,記得上年意甲季尾羅馬0:0拉素,兩隊好似練波咁....(因為羅馬同拉素輸波有機降班...),一人一分,對兩隊最安全...

不過你話假波既定義....冇= =
睇你點睇je...
有d球隊為護級放棄d杯,
有d球隊為d杯留力聯賽,
有d球隊幫友隊(Manu help W.Brom last season...),
又算唔算呢?

好主觀.........:)

bigfish 發表於 2006-4-5 05:51 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]Kian76[/i] at 2006-4-5 01:54 PM:


原來係咁,那麼意甲多場和局為何你又要出言說意甲多假波??看來更像默契波。 [/quote]
意甲多假波, 唔係話場場都假波
有時球員/老闆/領隊收左錢, 事先講明邊隊贏/和, 呢d 咪假波囉
82 年西德對奧地利, 04 年丹麥對瑞典咪默契波囉

bigfish 發表於 2006-4-5 05:52 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]adamjacky123[/i] at 2006-4-5 05:41 PM:

有時打假波未必for money,記得上年... [/quote]
我都認同你o既講法, 冇客觀定義
但亦會有人死撐話唔信有, 或者佢o既定義與眾不同 la:naughty::D:D

abc123aa 發表於 2006-4-5 06:19 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]bigfish[/i] at 2006-4-5 05:52 PM:

我都認同你o既講法, 冇客觀定義
但亦會有人死撐話唔信有, 或者佢o既定義與眾不同 la:naughty::D:D [/quote]
係你信[size=5]經常有[/size]啫:D:good:

brightlee 發表於 2006-4-5 06:29 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]bigfish[/i] at 2006-4-5 19:51:

意甲多假波, 唔係話場場都假波
有時球員/老闆/領隊收左錢, 事先講明邊隊贏/和, 呢d 咪假波囉
82 年西德對奧地利, 04 年丹麥對瑞典咪默契波囉 [/quote]
Chi Sin!

默契波?

丹麥對瑞典...你有冇睇波?!
沒帶眼鏡
帶返對正確既眼鏡去睇返場波啦!

默契既話
丹麥在贏2比1就唔去鬥攻啦!
而且有機會係3比1

90分鐘比人追和
自己又出線
你會否去攻啊, 大佬!

依啲叫默契波......................!@!!!!!!!

:mad::mad::mad::mad::mad::mad::mad::mad::mad::mad:
:fight::fight::fight::fight::fight::fight::fight::fight::fight::fight::fight::fight:
:angry::angry::angry::angry::angry::angry::angry::angry::angry:

brightlee 發表於 2006-4-5 06:31 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]bigfish[/i] at 2006-4-5 19:52:

我都認同你o既講法, 冇客觀定義
但亦會有人死撐話唔信有, 或者佢o既定義與眾不同 la:naughty::D:D [/quote]

係你既例子有問題
說服唔倒人

點解adamjacky123有分加,而你無?

abc123aa 發表於 2006-4-5 06:33 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]brightlee[/i] at 2006-4-5 06:31 PM:


係你既例子有問題
說服唔倒人

點解adamjacky123有分加,而你無? [/quote]
o岩呀:D

Kian76 發表於 2006-4-5 07:52 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]bigfish[/i] at 2006-4-5 05:51 PM:

意甲多假波, 唔係話場場都假波
有時球員/老闆/領隊收左錢, 事先講明邊隊贏/和, 呢d 咪假波囉
82 年西德對奧地利, 04 年丹麥對瑞典咪默契波囉 [/quote]

咁你有冇証據証明意甲多假波??

Kian76 發表於 2006-4-5 07:55 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]brightlee[/i] at 2006-4-5 06:29 PM:

Chi Sin!

默契波?

丹麥對瑞典... [/quote]

咁又唔認同,默契波唔代表唔可以打得精彩,只要到最後個龍門放水或認真撲就己經可以改寫紀錄,我見倒既最後追成2:2一球,實在太假......有乜理由一直唔去逼??成班人睇人表演??

bigfish 發表於 2006-4-5 09:51 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]brightlee[/i] at 2006-4-5 06:31 PM:


係你既例子有問題
說服唔倒人

點解adamjacky123有分加,而你無? [/quote]
要用例子說服板主加分, 我晨早知冇可能
因為我一直話信有假波, 佢就屈我話信"經常有", 夾硬天真地相信世上冇假波的人可能加爆分添:clap::clap:

2:2 大家唔攻等出線咪默契波囉, 唔通仲死攻爛攻咩?! 我已經解釋左, 或者你唔明 la, 不過你無謂再"解釋"多次 la

bigfish 發表於 2006-4-5 09:52 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]Kian76[/i] at 2006-4-5 07:52 PM:


咁你有冇証據証明意甲多假波?? [/quote]
自己 search
曝光o既都好多單, 你唔信d news 我就無話可說

abc123aa 發表於 2006-4-5 09:57 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]bigfish[/i] at 2006-4-5 09:51 PM:

要用例子說服板主加分, 我晨早知冇... [/quote]
係你屈我話唔信啫,我信有假波,但我唔信會經常有(仲要係高水準聯賽果隻),講極你都唔明~

abc123aa 發表於 2006-4-5 09:58 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]bigfish[/i] at 2006-4-5 09:52 PM:

自己 search
曝光o既都好多單, 你唔信d news 我就無話可說 [/quote]
夾硬係要話人唔信.........:haha:

Kian76 發表於 2006-4-5 09:59 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]bigfish[/i] at 2006-4-5 09:52 PM:

自己 search
曝光o既都好多單, 你唔信d news 我就無話可說 [/quote]

我只知好多單都唔關意甲事,係意乙。

abc123aa 發表於 2006-4-5 09:59 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]Kian76[/i] at 2006-4-5 09:59 PM:


我只知好多單都唔關意甲事,係意乙。 [/quote]
我都係:D

brightlee 發表於 2006-4-6 01:58 AM

正如德乙
意甲是經濟出問題

頁: 1 2 [3]

Powered by Discuz! Archiver 7.0.0  © 2001-2009 Comsenz Inc.