[quote]Originally posted by [i]bigfish[/i] at 2006-4-5 03:48 AM:
你都好勁喎, 可以夾硬屆我話覺得場... [/quote]
原來係咁，那麼意甲多場和局為何你又要出言說意甲多假波？？看來更像默契波。
[quote]Originally posted by [i]Kian76[/i] at 2006-4-4 10:24 PM:
咁又要請你解釋一下打假波既定義我... [/quote]
有時打假波未必for money,記得上年意甲季尾羅馬0:0拉素,兩隊好似練波咁....(因為羅馬同拉素輸波有機降班...),一人一分,對兩隊最安全...
不過你話假波既定義....冇= =
睇你點睇je...
有d球隊為護級放棄d杯,
有d球隊為d杯留力聯賽,
有d球隊幫友隊(Manu help W.Brom last season...),
又算唔算呢?
好主觀.........:)
[quote]Originally posted by [i]Kian76[/i] at 2006-4-5 01:54 PM:
原來係咁，那麼意甲多場和局為何你又要出言說意甲多假波？？看來更像默契波。 [/quote]
意甲多假波, 唔係話場場都假波
有時球員/老闆/領隊收左錢, 事先講明邊隊贏/和, 呢d 咪假波囉
82 年西德對奧地利, 04 年丹麥對瑞典咪默契波囉
[quote]Originally posted by [i]adamjacky123[/i] at 2006-4-5 05:41 PM:
有時打假波未必for money,記得上年... [/quote]
我都認同你o既講法, 冇客觀定義
但亦會有人死撐話唔信有, 或者佢o既定義與眾不同 la:naughty::D:D
[quote]Originally posted by [i]bigfish[/i] at 2006-4-5 05:52 PM:
我都認同你o既講法, 冇客觀定義
但亦會有人死撐話唔信有, 或者佢o既定義與眾不同 la:naughty::D:D [/quote]
係你信[size=5]經常有[/size]啫:D:good:
[quote]Originally posted by [i]bigfish[/i] at 2006-4-5 19:51:
意甲多假波, 唔係話場場都假波
有時球員/老闆/領隊收左錢, 事先講明邊隊贏/和, 呢d 咪假波囉
82 年西德對奧地利, 04 年丹麥對瑞典咪默契波囉 [/quote]
Chi Sin!
默契波?
丹麥對瑞典...你有冇睇波?!
沒帶眼鏡
帶返對正確既眼鏡去睇返場波啦!
默契既話
丹麥在贏2比1就唔去鬥攻啦!
而且有機會係3比1
90分鐘比人追和
自己又出線
你會否去攻啊, 大佬!
依啲叫默契波......................!@!!!!!!!
:mad::mad::mad::mad::mad::mad::mad::mad::mad::mad:
:fight::fight::fight::fight::fight::fight::fight::fight::fight::fight::fight::fight:
:angry::angry::angry::angry::angry::angry::angry::angry::angry:
[quote]Originally posted by [i]bigfish[/i] at 2006-4-5 19:52:
我都認同你o既講法, 冇客觀定義
但亦會有人死撐話唔信有, 或者佢o既定義與眾不同 la:naughty::D:D [/quote]
係你既例子有問題
說服唔倒人
點解adamjacky123有分加,而你無?
[quote]Originally posted by [i]brightlee[/i] at 2006-4-5 06:31 PM:
係你既例子有問題
說服唔倒人
點解adamjacky123有分加,而你無? [/quote]
o岩呀:D
[quote]Originally posted by [i]bigfish[/i] at 2006-4-5 05:51 PM:
意甲多假波, 唔係話場場都假波
有時球員/老闆/領隊收左錢, 事先講明邊隊贏/和, 呢d 咪假波囉
82 年西德對奧地利, 04 年丹麥對瑞典咪默契波囉 [/quote]
咁你有冇証據証明意甲多假波？？
[quote]Originally posted by [i]brightlee[/i] at 2006-4-5 06:29 PM:
Chi Sin!
默契波?
丹麥對瑞典... [/quote]
咁又唔認同，默契波唔代表唔可以打得精彩，只要到最後個龍門放水或認真撲就己經可以改寫紀錄，我見倒既最後追成2：2一球，實在太假......有乜理由一直唔去逼？？成班人睇人表演？？
[quote]Originally posted by [i]brightlee[/i] at 2006-4-5 06:31 PM:
係你既例子有問題
說服唔倒人
點解adamjacky123有分加,而你無? [/quote]
要用例子說服板主加分, 我晨早知冇可能
因為我一直話信有假波, 佢就屈我話信"經常有", 夾硬天真地相信世上冇假波的人可能加爆分添:clap::clap:
2:2 大家唔攻等出線咪默契波囉, 唔通仲死攻爛攻咩?! 我已經解釋左, 或者你唔明 la, 不過你無謂再"解釋"多次 la
[quote]Originally posted by [i]Kian76[/i] at 2006-4-5 07:52 PM:
咁你有冇証據証明意甲多假波？？ [/quote]
自己 search
曝光o既都好多單, 你唔信d news 我就無話可說
[quote]Originally posted by [i]bigfish[/i] at 2006-4-5 09:51 PM:
要用例子說服板主加分, 我晨早知冇... [/quote]
係你屈我話唔信啫,我信有假波,但我唔信會經常有(仲要係高水準聯賽果隻),講極你都唔明~
[quote]Originally posted by [i]bigfish[/i] at 2006-4-5 09:52 PM:
自己 search
曝光o既都好多單, 你唔信d news 我就無話可說 [/quote]
夾硬係要話人唔信.........:haha:
[quote]Originally posted by [i]bigfish[/i] at 2006-4-5 09:52 PM:
自己 search
曝光o既都好多單, 你唔信d news 我就無話可說 [/quote]
我只知好多單都唔關意甲事，係意乙。
[quote]Originally posted by [i]Kian76[/i] at 2006-4-5 09:59 PM:
我只知好多單都唔關意甲事，係意乙。 [/quote]
我都係:D
正如德乙
意甲是經濟出問題