有冇人有著有AIR既打波鞋???
我想問著有AIR既打波鞋係咪會加彈力??加得又多唔多???
同埋係咪好舒服?? 我諗多數人都著有air o既波鞋打波架啦,彈力又唔會話增加o既
舒唔舒服見仁見智啦,不過點都舒服過冇air少少o既 [quote]Originally posted by [i]arwu[/i] at 2006-4-6 22:34:
我想問著有AIR既打波鞋係咪會加彈力??
加得又多唔多???
同埋係咪好舒服?? [/quote]
1. 唔會,理論上... 係反而矮左
2. 同上
3. 係會舒服 d... 呢個係賣點
附加:會易 d 咬柴 係唔會跳得高D既
AIR只不過係一個緩震的系統
用途就係係你落地時減輕你雙腳所受既衝力同埋加強係你落地再起動時既反應性 nothing special about air
it just makes your feet more comfortable 咁係咪除左自己本身既彈跳力....著有air既鞋or其他鞋都唔會增加彈跳力???
咁有冇話air鞋比普通波鞋增加彈跳力好dd
[[i] Last edited by arwu on 2006-4-7 at 08:07 PM [/i]] [quote]Originally posted by [i]Chenjinnan[/i] at 2006-4-6 10:54 PM:
1. 唔會,理論上... 係反而矮左
2. 同上
3. 係會舒服 d... 呢個係賣點
附加:會易 d 咬柴 [/quote]
反而矮左??
你自己既感覺??
事實係會高d架喎
air會易d咬柴?咁唔係air咪仲易囉? [quote]Originally posted by [i]樑少[/i] at 2006-4-7 08:32 PM:
反而矮左??
你自己既感覺??
事實係會高d架喎
air會易d咬柴?咁唔係air咪仲易囉? [/quote]
我認為跳o既高度應該冇分別,因為air收縮及擴張o既幅度好少,擴張o既速度及力度都不足以增加一個人o既彈跳力;或者彈弓鞋可以令人跳高少少,不過我冇著過:haha:
拗柴以乎唔關air事,一般高筒鞋都冇咁易拗柴,你著有air o既跑鞋打波都好易拗柴架 咁樣著個d air會唔會有少少呢?? [quote]Originally posted by [i]樑少[/i] at 2006-4-7 20:32:
反而矮左??
你自己既感覺??
事實係會高d架喎
air會易d咬柴?咁唔係air咪仲易囉? [/quote]
AIR "些" 力避震,落地所以會舒服 d;同樣道理,當你用力跳時,佢又幫你 "些" 咁 d 力,點會跳得高左?唔信你可以試下着 AIR MAX 跳一野,然後赤腳跳一野,睇下邊野高 d。
AIR "些" 力避震,原理係落地時 AIR 吸震 (被壓縮),而令腳爭由下跌至完全靜止既時間延長,將腳爭受力既一刻化為一段時間分散吸收,而達到援震之效,但同時亦增加腳爭在完全靜止之前移位既可能,所以會易 d 咬柴。 about 咬柴......
it just depends on the decide of your shoe......
not the fault of air......
also, if there is no air, it will easier for u to get hurt because your body absorb all the contact force...... but with air, it will help u to do it......
about the experiment of jumping, u will find that there is no difference for u to jump one or two times...... but if u jump 100 times, u will find that with air u can jump higher because u feel more comfortable...... [quote]Originally posted by [i]Chenjinnan[/i] at 2006-4-8 12:01 AM:
AIR "些" 力避震,落地... [/quote]
oo...好詳細 [quote]Originally posted by [i]jkidd[/i] at 2006-4-8 00:33:
about 咬柴......
it just depends o... [/quote]
Please give theories for backing up your points, just like I did.
The 100 times thing is a good way for experiment, but I am sure the result is opposit to your estimation, as I already did that many years ago.
頁:
[1]