[quote]Originally posted by [i]艾力克[/i] at 2006-4-30 11:53 PM:
pts: james
reb: shaq
ast: billups (次次都估中nash, 今次應該唔係喇掛):P [/quote]
點解billups...冇pistons ge賽事wo...:haha:
[quote]Originally posted by [i]queenly[/i] at 2006-5-1 10:31 AM:
wizard win 佐騎士, 東岸既比賽真係好... [/quote]
pistons照計可以3-1 ge... 上場佢地打到冇乜心機咁... 都唔知做乜
[quote]Originally posted by [i]kgkgkg212121[/i] at 2006-5-1 10:51 AM:
點解billups...冇pistons ge賽事wo...:haha: [/quote]
:help::confused::giveup:
[quote]Originally posted by [i]Kian76[/i] at 2006-5-1 10:39 AM:
一早講過拿殊唔係巨星級球員，冇左兩... [/quote]
唔係ge
佢唔係一個搶分型ge球員,為隊友製造機會,跟戰術做野je,呢個係D'Antoni ge問題
唔通stockton唔係巨星級球員咩~~
不過suns ge打法,幾年前由mavericks証明左o係playoffs係冇用...
但suns就連打2年...其實今年佢地都唔想,不過冇左amare同kurt thomas,打唔出d咩防守
[[i] Last edited by kgkgkg212121 on 2006-5-1 at 11:02 AM [/i]]
[quote]Originally posted by [i]kgkgkg212121[/i] at 2006-5-1 10:52 AM:
pistons照計可以3-1 ge... 上場佢地打到冇乜心機咁... 都唔知做乜 [/quote]
話唔定活塞被 Redd 射死, 爆大冷呢 :dev:
[quote]Originally posted by [i]kgkgkg212121[/i] at 2006-5-1 10:57 AM:
唔係ge
佢唔係一個搶分型ge球員,為... [/quote]
唔係Kurt Thomas :confused:
[quote]Originally posted by [i]FRANCISE[/i] at 2006-5-1 10:59 AM:
話唔定活塞被 Redd 射死, 爆大冷呢 :dev: [/quote]
暫時我唔敢講... 因為pistons上場失準,唔係發揮到應有水準都輸
[quote]Originally posted by [i]FRANCISE[/i] at 2006-5-1 11:02 AM:
唔係Kurt Thomas :confused: [/quote]
o岩o岩edit左~~:kiss:
Bonzi Wells係咪路ga... 打guard咁多板...
king上半場打得幾好, 有機會win spur, 到時就真係好睇
[quote]Originally posted by [i]queenly[/i] at 2006-5-1 11:29 AM:
king上半場打得幾好, 有機會win spur, 到時就真係好睇 [/quote]
係~我都想~~:good::good:
佢地game 2都打得好好,輸加時ja ma
冇左spurs,mavs殺入final更易~:lol:
[[i] Last edited by kgkgkg212121 on 2006-5-1 at 11:38 AM [/i]]
[quote]Originally posted by [i]kgkgkg212121[/i] at 2006-5-1 11:35 AM:
係~我都想~~:good::good:
佢地game 2都打得好好,輸加時ja ma [/quote]
如果齋計kings常規賽最後果二十場既power, 絕對係聯盟之冠
[quote]Originally posted by [i]kgkgkg212121[/i] at 2006-5-1 11:20 AM:
Bonzi Wells係咪路ga... 打guard咁多板... [/quote]
彈弓人:lol: ! 他上一場仲顛- 搶了10個進攻籃扳 :eek:
但也因為o甘所以成日都傷。B MILLERo甘廢架﹐打到而家先得1個reb又沒助攻...
[[i] Last edited by Xtravagant on 2006-5-1 at 11:44 AM [/i]]
[quote]Originally posted by [i]kgkgkg212121[/i] at 2006-5-1 10:57 AM:
唔係ge
佢唔係一個搶分型ge球員,為... [/quote]
只是拿殊的助攻係建基於內線既強大得分能力，先會咁成功，若內線唔係咁強，個人質素咁好既兩隻怪物，拿殊邊得黎咁多助攻？？換轉係傑特黎太陽打，太陽肯定更強。
同埋拿殊在太陽係經常有Open shot，原因都係因為內線太強，太陽唔需要得分力超強的後衛，只需要默默助攻的後衛，就算唔係拿殊打，換轉係比納斯、傑特、彼頓、添士利呢d，都一樣可以打得好，因為內線攻擊力(防守力唔計)實在太可怕，你唔使俾靚波入面，只要個波成功落在他們手中，D+A+m就己經可以幫你將個波射入去。但而家得番m，俾人圍死左，你呢個n就係搶分，你身邊的b就冇乜空位射三分，準蠅下降，情況變成同以前小牛差唔多，拿殊在沒有星級內線的保護下打回原形，不再是被人吹捧到上天的""助攻之神""，只是一個命中率一般助攻一般出錯極多防守黑洞的中上級PG。
[[i] Last edited by Kian76 on 2006-5-1 at 11:48 AM [/i]]
[quote]Originally posted by [i]Kian76[/i] at 2006-5-1 11:40 AM:
只是拿殊的助攻係建基於內線既強... [/quote]
support:good: 太陽時的Kidd冇咁強內線:hitwall:
[quote]Originally posted by [i]FRANCISE[/i] at 2006-5-1 11:48 AM:
support:good: 太陽時的Kidd冇咁強內線:hitwall: [/quote]
當時擺明係冇內線咁濟添啦！！！哈哈！！
[quote]Originally posted by [i]kgkgkg212121[/i] at 2006-5-1 10:51 AM:
點解billups...冇pistons ge賽事wo...:haha: [/quote]
睇錯左 :cry:
[quote]Originally posted by [i]Xtravagant[/i] at 2006-5-1 11:38 AM:
彈弓人:lol: ! 他上一場仲顛- 搶... [/quote]
14個籃扳la:lol:
考眼光.......:haha::haha:
真係2比2喇, 剩番5分鍾, lead緊20分, kings你係得既。
[quote]Originally posted by [i]FRANCISE[/i] at 2006-5-1 12:13 PM:
14個籃扳la:lol:
考眼光.......:haha::haha: [/quote]
係18個籃板。