娛樂滿紛 26FUN's Archiver

kgkgkg212121 發表於 2006-5-25 10:38 PM

Pts: Wade (呢場冇foul trouble ge話, 應該可以拎到高分)
Reb: B. Wallace (籃板都係佢ga la)
Ast: Wade (拎到分之餘仲成日交到靚波)

艾力克 發表於 2006-5-25 10:39 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]Xtravagant[/i] at 2006-5-25 10:30 PM:
[color=Red]Heats @ Pistons ~ [/colo... [/quote]
pts: wade (得分主力)
reb: ben (籃板王)
ast: wade (助攻能手, billups 次次都令我失望:mad:)

睇好+支持熱火
活塞場場都用同一隊波,一個字...攰

[[i] Last edited by 艾力克 on 2006-5-25 at 10:42 PM [/i]]

Xtravagant 發表於 2006-5-25 10:46 PM

如果話NASH係最近最hot既PG我相信沒人會懷疑。我剛剛從ESPN到搵到D資料同大家分享-將NBA歷史以來最TOP 既 10 名 PG list 左出來。 大家應該估到誰是no.1 PG right ? 沒錯就係Magic Johnson la ~ have look :

                   Years  PPG   RPG  APG   Vote
M. Johnson    13      19.5   7.2   11.2  128
O. Robertson  14      25.7   7.5   9.5    109
I. Thomas     13      19.2   3.6    9.3    84
J. Stockton     19      13.1   2.7   10.5   81
B. Cousy        14      18.4   5.2    7.5   76
W. Frazier      13      18.9   5.9    6.1   60
J. Kidd           12      14.6   6.5    9.2   57
T. Archibald    13      18.8   2.3    7.4   37
S. Nash         10      13.5   2.8    7.1   34
G. Payton      16      16.9   4.1    6.9   23


原來同NBA歷史比較﹐NASH都只係入到TOP10咋:o﹐Top-five裡面D人個個都好勁~ (J.Stockton :D :D)

I just think to avg a NBA career with 15+ pts 7+rebs and 10+ assists is really amazing...M.Johnson deserves to be no.1 PG with no doubt :good:

[[i] Last edited by Xtravagant on 2006-5-25 at 10:49 PM [/i]]

Xtravagant 發表於 2006-5-25 10:50 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]艾力克[/i] at 2006-5-25 10:39 PM:

pts: wade (得分主力)
reb: ben (... [/quote]
Pistons have strong bench like A.Mcdyess, T.Delk ... but Heat has G.Payton and A.Walker :D :D , I think Heat's bench are stronger than Pistons.

Kian76 發表於 2006-5-25 11:05 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]Xtravagant[/i] at 2006-5-25 10:46 PM:
如果話NASH係最近最hot既PG我相信沒人... [/quote]

彼頓既數據俾近年拉低晒啦,如果唔係拿殊邊會高分過佢??

俾拿殊打多6年,佢既平均分好可能會跌破20。

[[i] Last edited by Kian76 on 2006-5-25 at 11:07 PM [/i]]

Xtravagant 發表於 2006-5-25 11:11 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]Kian76[/i] at 2006-5-25 11:05 PM:


彼頓既數據俾近年拉低晒啦,如果... [/quote]

你講得沒錯﹐但好明顯PAYTON已經吾係因為想表現自己而打NBA﹐拒係想完成自己既對NBA冠軍既渴望先繼續打...拒呢份堅持都幾:good::good:...

看番數據其實NASH真係好一般...但他真係有帶領一隊波打得好D既能力 - 呢樣野數據看吾到既。

038886 發表於 2006-5-25 11:17 PM

有冇人知sun 32 果位人兄出得場打味呀~~?

Xtravagant 發表於 2006-5-25 11:23 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]038886[/i] at 2006-5-25 11:17 PM:
有冇人知sun 32 果位人兄出得場打味呀~~? [/quote]

who is #32 ??? Amare Stoudemire ??

he is out for the season wor

FRANCISE 發表於 2006-5-25 11:39 PM

[color=Red]pts ~ Wade[/color] [color=Blue](Shaq開始走下坡)[/color]
[color=Red]rebs ~ Haslem[/color] [color=Blue](Shaq開始走下坡)[/color]
[color=Red]asts ~ Wade[/color][/color] [color=Blue](估)[/color]

[color=Green]Heats第1場休息左咁耐,Pistons輸體力,下場會加強防守,Heats好難再有50%以上命中率;
Shaq開始走下坡,唔可以長時間作賽,一旦失準,咁就好易受制於Pistons內線防守[/color]......;)

kgkgkg212121 發表於 2006-5-25 11:53 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]Xtravagant[/i] at 2006-5-25 11:11 PM:


你講得沒錯﹐但好明顯PAYTON已經... [/quote]
係,如果唔係,都冇可能打到入黎
仲贏左mavs一場tim...

Xtravagant 發表於 2006-5-26 12:01 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]FRANCISE[/i] at 2006-5-25 11:39 PM:
[color=Red]pts ~ Wade[/color] [colo... [/quote]

哈, 你講甘多﹐但係都吾加多句講明邊隊贏gor wor... :D:D

今日o甘遲開 guess, 搞到好少人玩添。 我仲等緊你開 :D:D

FRANCISE 發表於 2006-5-26 12:16 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]Xtravagant[/i] at 2006-5-26 12:01 AM:


哈, 你講甘多﹐但係都吾加多句講明邊隊贏gor wor... :D:D

今日o甘遲開 guess, 搞到好少人玩添。 我仲等緊你開 :D:D [/quote]
Pistons大機會D,but支持Heats,
Wade多左3分之後,又會難mark左好多:haha:
Pistons打法好悶:sleep:,Heats add oil :gun:

Kian76 發表於 2006-5-26 12:39 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]Xtravagant[/i] at 2006-5-25 11:11 PM:


你講得沒錯﹐但好明顯PAYTON已經... [/quote]

其實叫得做球星,就一定有帶好隊波既能力,只係效果大與小既問題。

但現今NBA太多偽球星,打一兩年好波就俾人捧上神檯,但他們係咪真係咁配稱為球星??就係太多偽球星,所以先會多左個巨星呢個稱號,在以上10人入面,才是PG界中的巨星,但其實還有如卡素爾這些數據唔高實力極高的球星沒有人起眼的。

其實一個球星最強都只會係十年既時間,除左某些例外之外,十年會係一個最正常既高潮期,若真的要計算這些數據,就應該把一個球員最光輝的十年來計算,這才算公平,若果不是的話,打得愈諗球星既數據肯定愈差,出場時間係一個致命關鍵。

Xtravagant 發表於 2006-5-26 12:43 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]Kian76[/i] at 2006-5-26 12:39 AM:


其實叫得做球星,就一定有帶好隊... [/quote]

what you said is true, but it also explains why ppl like J.Stockton are legend of the best... played 19 years of NBA, but still seem better stats than Nash's 10 yr of NBA ...

RahXephon 發表於 2006-5-26 12:44 AM

Points: Wade (進攻重心)
Rebs: Ben Wallace (主要靠佢搶)
Assist: Billups (成對heats的assist都唔多,我買佢)

至於10大point guard,其實我覺得O.Roberson 最勁... 佢試過一季平均數字是triple double,問你服未

Xtravagant 發表於 2006-5-26 12:49 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]RahXephon[/i] at 2006-5-26 12:44 AM:
Points: Wade (進攻重心)
Rebs: Ben ... [/quote]

But Magic Johnson can be argued to be the only player in NBA history who is better than Michael Jordan.

Magic Johnson is capable of playing ALL positions (from PG - C )... he started at Center for the injured Kareem Abdur Jabarr in a game and scored 42 pts, 15 rebs 7 asts  :eek::eek:

Kian76 發表於 2006-5-26 12:49 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]Xtravagant[/i] at 2006-5-26 12:43 AM:


what you said is true, but it also explains why ppl like J.Stockton are legend of the best... played 19 years of NBA, but still seem better stats than Nash's 10 yr of NBA ... [/quote]

哈哈!!我其實講左好多離題既野,但興之所至爆左出黎(而家唔講會唔記得左講),哈哈!!

我覺得時間係好關鍵,要打出短時間既好成績唔難,但要打出十年甚至二十年既好成績就好難。

RahXephon 發表於 2006-5-26 01:08 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]Kian76[/i] at 2006-5-26 12:49 AM:


哈哈!!我其實講左好多離題既野... [/quote]

同意,咁其實Malone咪仲勁,打廿年都咁勁,如果唔係kobe激走佢我諗佢實過到渣巴總得分最高的紀錄。

不過nash分波同切入真係有佢獨到之處,以佢咁的身型,可以成日切入到攞分,勁!

28083003 發表於 2006-5-26 01:11 AM

[color=Red]Points: Wade
Rebs: Ben Wallace
Assist: Billups [/color]

Kian76 發表於 2006-5-26 01:59 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]RahXephon[/i] at 2006-5-26 01:08 AM:


同意,咁其實Malone咪仲勁,打廿... [/quote]

其實拿殊既身型好差咩???起碼算係一個中上高度既PG......相比起AI呢d僅僅6尺既PG黎講,拿殊己經算高。哈哈!!其實拿殊係咪6尺3??好似係,但唔記得喇。

我好驚AI會狀態急跌,佢打G,對速度既要求非常大,老人轉身慢都仲有硬骨頭頂住,但打後衛既佢用唔著d硬骨頭,實在非常擔心佢會出現體能急跌這現像,一個人既體能幾時會去到盡頭從而急跌冇人會預計得到,正如彼頓在湖人的季初非常出色,狀態還在高水平,但一踏入季尾,他便出現老態,身體能力急跌......身體係唔會同你講人情的,身體唔會知道幾時係第幾季,唔會同你一年年咁計,而係會每分每秒咁計,體能急跌這必會出現的事實其實只要踏入30歲就任何時候都會發生,即使是如日方中的AI,也有可能會在最光輝的時刻立即跌落地獄......所以我實在很擔心AI下季既表現......我看得太多運動員的急跌了,足球尤其多,高爾、約基、巴迪高、韋利、尼維特呢d全部都係在最高峰期下,無神神變成第二個人一樣,並不是慢慢地退下來......籃球的看到了彼頓這例子。

頁: 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 [65] 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74

Powered by Discuz! Archiver 7.0.0  © 2001-2009 Comsenz Inc.