娛樂滿紛 26FUN's Archiver

brightlee 發表於 2006-4-26 12:13 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]細驚[/i] at 2006-4-26 02:04:
我都相信有人會認為今次事件係冇體育... [/quote]
that's why the goal will be allowed, but the sportmenship is dead..
that's a bad effect for many things in future........


may GOD bless this situation won't be going to be worst.....

細驚 發表於 2006-4-26 12:14 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]brightlee[/i] at 2006-4-26 00:12:

sorry, in FIFA rules..
the referee couldn't stop the game like this unless he got head injury......

aiya... lucky I study the Fifa referee course now...... [/quote]

即係頭部受傷球證先可以即時吹停球賽?
見紅係咪都可以?

細驚 發表於 2006-4-26 12:19 AM

我反而擔心如果呢件事成為熱刺被猛烈批評的話
會有球隊用呢d方法窒礙打亂對方球隊進攻節奏
咁日後會唔會需要立多條例叫互撞插水
咁以後做球證就辛苦

brightlee 發表於 2006-4-26 12:20 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]細驚[/i] at 2006-4-26 02:14:


即係頭部受傷球證先可以即時吹停球賽?
見紅係咪都可以? [/quote]

Blood, No if that's not affect the match


remember in the previous posts?
for the goal of Di Canio?

if you have time, please watch it.......
the GK was laying down

By rules, the referee couldn't stop the match
that's why Di Canio watched that incident and caught the ball to stop the game.

brightlee 發表於 2006-4-26 12:25 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]細驚[/i] at 2006-4-26 02:19:
我反而擔心如果呢件事成為熱刺被猛烈... [/quote]
i got what you mean...
that's why I still add so many points to everyone

:)

but that situation, it's really bad example for fair play.. that FIFA tries to promote for more than 10 years+.........
of cos, youcould see some situation, like some South American players, they just lay down for whatever tackles.......

but if you see the whole incident, the reaction from Micahel Carrick, Martin Jol..
Ebobe was laying down after the goal was allowed by the referee... (I am sure he had treatment after the goal was scored.. cos the medical team could come into the field after the game was stopped)

you may have different point of views.

brightlee 發表於 2006-4-26 12:32 AM

i.e. if you are Arsenal fans, you couldn't blame referee Steve Bennant, he did absolutely right, i.e. he allowed the game would be stopped after the goal was allowed.........

細驚 發表於 2006-4-26 12:39 AM

所以體育精神可以話係有辣有唔辣
我以前睇波都會覺得有球員出左場邊療傷10人打11人
對方係咪都應該暫時少返個人先公平
尤其是個受傷球員係被對方蓄意整傷

其實倫敦打比都預左激
估唔到呢件事會成為更激烈既討論

brightlee 發表於 2006-4-26 12:55 AM

yes, taht's why the situation turns to boil....
that's why i feel Martin Jol did stupid things.....

there will be ... a long long long story...........................

you may think, this may be running few years, people will forget about this

But did you see Sol Campbell?

He was signing Gunners from Tottenham for more than 5 years,

Spurs fans still say he's Judas

stereo 發表於 2006-4-26 01:02 AM

其實英國那邊對這件事談論不多,當日的電視評述員認為熱刺的做法正確,阿倫漢臣(前利物浦中堅)則呼籲雲加對之前向祖爾的批評道歉,輿論普遍傾向熱刺。

係知名網站ESPN Soccernet 4萬4千多人既投票結果當中有63%人都係話熱刺無錯,只得37%人選熱刺係錯。[url]http://soccernet.espn.go.com/index?cc=4716[/url]

另外睇埋球証[color=Blue] Steve Bennett [/color]同[color=Blue] Arsenal chairman Peter Hill-Wood [/color]既發言,我諗依件事都無謂爭論落去;應該告一段落。

The referee Steve Bennett, said: "Two Arsenal players went into each other and I assessed the situation. No one was in any danger. There was no head injury, so therefore the game could go on. It's as simple as that." (The People)

Arsenal chairman Peter Hill-Wood admitted: "[color=Blue]I didn't feel that Tottenham did anything wrong[/color]. He (Carrick) saw the collision (between two Arsenal players off the ball) and as far as I could tell, Davids was looking ahead, down the wing." (Daily Telegraph)

細驚 發表於 2006-4-26 01:03 AM

我都約莫聽過下呢兩隊既恩恩怨怨
真係一匹布~~~~~~

abc123aa 發表於 2006-4-26 01:11 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]細驚[/i] at 2006-4-26 01:03 AM:
我都約莫聽過下呢兩隊既恩恩怨怨
真係一匹布~~~~~~ [/quote]
之前睇書睇過,真係估唔到係咁:o:D

brightlee 發表於 2006-4-26 01:12 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]abc123aa[/i] at 2006-4-26 03:11:

之前睇書睇過,真係估唔到係咁:o:D [/quote]
hai ah
similar as Everton and Liverpool........

the history is....


:nogood::nogood::nogood::nogood:

brightlee 發表於 2006-4-26 01:13 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]stereo[/i] at 2006-4-26 03:02:
其實英國那邊對這件事談論不多,當日... [/quote]
I am not trying to argue with you...

but soccernet, that's more american website........

ie. not many England people will go there...

anyway, it may be a good time to close this case.....

I agree with you!!!!


:):):)

abc123aa 發表於 2006-4-26 01:14 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]brightlee[/i] at 2006-4-26 01:12 AM:

hai ah
similar as Everton and Liverpool........

the history is....


:nogood::nogood::nogood::nogood: [/quote]
愛華頓同利物浦既就未聽過:o

brightlee 發表於 2006-4-26 01:17 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]abc123aa[/i] at 2006-4-26 03:14:

愛華頓同利物浦既就未聽過:o [/quote]

one example:
if you are in Liverpool, (I mean in the city of Liverpool)
when you take a taxi...
please dont say you are fans of Liverpool or Everton.
If the taxi driver is supporting other team (like youare fans of Liverpool, he loves Everton)
you may get kick out of the taxi....



:o:o:o:o:o

abc123aa 發表於 2006-4-26 01:21 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]brightlee[/i] at 2006-4-26 01:17 AM:


one example:
if you are in Liv... [/quote]
唔好啩,你係唔係話如果你係利物浦市搭的士,如果你話自己係利記fans既話個司機係愛華頓fans會唔被你搭佢架的士?:o

brightlee 發表於 2006-4-26 01:23 AM

yes, bingo

細驚 發表於 2006-4-26 01:24 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]brightlee[/i] at 2006-4-26 01:17:


one example:
if you are in Liv... [/quote]

咁似幾年前台灣大選藍綠的士司機:D:D:D:D:D

abc123aa 發表於 2006-4-26 01:25 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]brightlee[/i] at 2006-4-26 01:23 AM:
yes, bingo [/quote]
哇~乜咁嫁:haha:

abc123aa 發表於 2006-4-26 01:25 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]細驚[/i] at 2006-4-26 01:24 AM:


咁似幾年前台灣大選藍綠的士司機:D:D:D:D:D [/quote]
哈~好彩香港冇呢d野:D

頁: 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7

Powered by Discuz! Archiver 7.0.0  © 2001-2009 Comsenz Inc.