娛樂滿紛 26FUN's Archiver

hermit 發表於 2004-8-11 09:36 AM

NBA News Updated (11-8)

1.
Twolves signed a 6-year contract that will pay T-Hudson $4.9 million in 2004-05. The deal will average $6 million a year

2.
Rick Fox files for divorce from actress Vanessa Williams

3.
The Cleveland Cavaliers waived center Steven Hunter

4.
Clippers will give a second tryout to former Arkansas G Kareem Reid on September 1. He has plenty of experience in leagues like the NBDL, CBA and USBL

5.
Thorn is expecting to sign coach Lawrence Frank to 3-year contract

6.
Nets are expected to  exercise the $1M buyout to Lucious Harris

7.
PF Mario Austin, a Bulls second-round draft pick in 2003, is expected to sign a contract with Italian League entry Lauretana Biella

8.
USA 80-68 Turkey
USA-->
A.Iverson - 13pts, 5ast
S.Marbury - 1pts, 7ast
T.Duncan - 25pts, 11rebs, 4blk
L.Odom - 8pts, 4rebs
R.Jefferson - 11pts
D.Wade - 2pts, 2ast
C.Boozer - 4pts, 5rebs
C.Anthony - 1stl
L.James - 4pts, 5rebs, 4ast
E.Okafor - 2pts
S.Marion - 10pts, 3rebs
A.Stoudemire - Sick
Turkey-->
M.Okur - 6pts, 7rebs, 3ast
H.Turkoglu - 9pts, 3rebs

Anonymous 發表於 2004-8-11 11:42 AM

a trading rumour......岩岩係 d newsgroup 見到
Peja <---> Carter
Kurt THomas <--> Szczerbiak.....

Anonymous 發表於 2004-8-11 11:43 AM

係 d newsgroup 見到

甘國武 發表於 2004-8-11 12:56 PM

**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****

wai214 發表於 2004-8-11 01:48 PM

唔係丫,都幾好。

Kings 都係時侯郁下啦。"差少少就係差少少"。既然唔換得coach, 甘就要係球員到著手。 Kings係要一D剷到籃既球員,甘carter都會幾fit隊波,令到隊波可以Dynamic d。至於損失左Peja既3分能力,只要係free agent到搵番D shooter番黎加上carter都有少少3分,甘我覺得對Kings係有利。其實最應該郁既係Webber.

至於Toronto佢地唔郁唔得啦,carter真係隨時走人架窩,難得而家有個甘fair既deal,真係要稔稔佢。假切rose可以好似佢係bird時代甘出色,又剷得,又傳得,on paper,toronto會係playoff contenter.  如果carter真係走,甘rose就可以玩晒,加peja, bosh 同marshall,Mo P off bench, 重有個 William, Toronto應該真係ok。隨時可以好似舊年既Heat甘,細細笠,
係東岸殊下殊下殊左入四強。

Wolves換Thomas都可以理解。佢地簽番Hudson後,個team既offense己經好夠,加上Szczerbiak無論位置同打法同spree都係同路,所以trade都唔出奇。換黎Thomas反而可以加強內線既防守,最重要係可以幫Garnett拉開D人。稔下,以往wolves都係得Garnett一人係籃底搵食都可以甘勁,如果換到Thomas番黎,Wolves真係攻守兼備。Duncan都要有個Robinson先可以發揮得甘好啦。

NY就無話可說,大富豪,乜Q都要架啦,最緊要個名夠響,價錢要夠貴,如果唔係影衰個班主。可能個班主係楊生,成日要D球星同佢去飯局,D 3,4 線既點帶出黎見人呀。

甘國武 發表於 2004-8-11 01:59 PM

**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****

Anonymous 發表於 2004-8-11 02:29 PM

KG 推返落去打小前鋒囉.....

kakueeken 發表於 2004-8-11 02:47 PM

[quote][quotefrom="wai214"]唔係丫,都幾好。

Kings 都係時侯郁下啦。"差少少就係差少少"。既然唔換得coach, 甘就要係球員到著手。 Kings係要一D剷到籃既球員,甘carter都會幾fit隊波,令到隊波可以Dynamic d。至於損失左Peja既3分能力,只要係free agent到搵番D shooter番黎加上carter都有少少3分,甘我覺得對Kings係有利。其實最應該郁既係Webber.

至於Toronto佢地唔郁唔得啦,carter真係隨時走人架窩,難得而家有個甘fair既deal,真係要稔稔佢。假切rose可以好似佢係bird時代甘出色,又剷得,又傳得,on paper,toronto會係playoff contenter.  如果carter真係走,甘rose就可以玩晒,加peja, bosh 同marshall,Mo P off bench, 重有個 William, Toronto應該真係ok。隨時可以好似舊年既Heat甘,細細笠,
係東岸殊下殊下殊左入四強。

Wolves換Thomas都可以理解。佢地簽番Hudson後,個team既offense己經好夠,加上Szczerbiak無論位置同打法同spree都係同路,所以trade都唔出奇。換黎Thomas反而可以加強內線既防守,最重要係可以幫Garnett拉開D人。稔下,以往wolves都係得Garnett一人係籃底搵食都可以甘勁,如果換到Thomas番黎,Wolves真係攻守兼備。Duncan都要有個Robinson先可以發揮得甘好啦。

NY就無話可說,大富豪,乜Q都要架啦,最緊要個名夠響,價錢要夠貴,如果唔係影衰個班主。可能個班主係楊生,成日要D球星同佢去飯局,D 3,4 線既點帶出黎見人呀。[/quote]

如果係用 peja 換 carter, 我都覺得對kings 有利,事關carter 外圍都唔弱, one on one 能力更加係kings 好需要0既, 比之前傳過0既 artest 好。不過carter
0既人工應該貴過peja, 我唔知kings 應該搭邊個換carter 好。而且想要carter 唔止kings 掛, 之前傳過dallas 都有興趣, 我覺得成事機會唔太高。

wai214 發表於 2004-8-11 03:24 PM

Kurt係NY時係打5架窩。其實冇左shaq同dampier,西岸既一流中鋒得番Yao同Miller,而Miller既offense唔係甘sharp,安排kurt打5都ok

個人認為,如果trade左,starting line up 就會係:
Cassell, Hassell,Spree,KG, Kurt
Hudson, Hoiberg,kandi off bench
再加買Madsen,Ervin Johnson, Oliver Miller hack-a-shaq 我覺得呢個lineup夠羅champ,
on paper,凈係得番隊spurs有d隊型砌下,但係都係差半班。當然,舊年wolves係playoff走條線走得既靚,但係今年casell同KG 加強左默契,同咪d傷兵都出番晒黎,應該冇乜問題。唯一隱憂係spree重有冇貨打落去,舊年睇佢都一時時喇。

wai214 發表於 2004-8-11 03:34 PM

搭番Doug Christie俾Toronto

甘國武 發表於 2004-8-11 05:17 PM

**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****

kakueeken 發表於 2004-8-11 05:27 PM

[quote][quotefrom="wai214"]搭番Doug Christie俾Toronto[/quote]

有無咁荀0交易? 最好俾埋 j.rose kings, 等兩位他同 webber 2位大學拍檔故劍重逢。

kakueeken 發表於 2004-8-11 05:37 PM

[quote][quotefrom="甘國武"][quote][quotefrom="wai214"]Kurt係NY時係打5架窩。其實冇左shaq同dampier,西岸既一流中鋒得番Yao同Miller,而Miller既offense唔係甘sharp,安排kurt打5都ok
[/quote]
西岸d前鋒高好多喎(KT得6呎9)...
我唸佢打4or5都會多辛苦...NY正FxxK,人地搏命幫佢頂左4年禁區(而且績效唔錯),e家一唔該換走人?![/quote]

Kurt THOMAS 0既故事真係 「飛鳥盡, 良弓藏」, 其實去WOLVES 重好la, 起碼有機會爭下冠軍。講真, 而家nba有幾多個中鋒係勁, 得shaq 同 yao 有d殺傷, 其他都係工兵型球員。 THOMAS 呢d 4、5號位球員已經好好用la, 起碼強過舊年0既e.johnson

Lap Hui 發表於 2004-8-11 06:42 PM

2 人地離婚都關事:?:

wai214 發表於 2004-8-12 04:55 AM

甘有KG,Kurt都係幫下手拉開D人架姐。佢地重有kandi麻,內線真係好deep.
甘兄講得冇錯,NBA好渴進攻型既中鋒,就算甘年既Okafor都係打Defense既,所以一D tough既大前鋒掉去打中鋒其實係得架。加上個人認為打Defense最緊要係勤力,唔洗講天份既。再唔係就打9D,食下腦,學下Malone個招,Yao一挨埋黎就即刻退後,成個Yao就甘PK左,好9但好有用。

hermit 發表於 2004-8-12 09:46 AM

but in fact...
Webber cant be traded (4years $80M left lor)
VC is "easy injuiry man" haha.....
K.Thomas wont be traded in NewYork....

wai214 發表於 2004-8-12 10:46 AM

幻想下嗟。哈哈
最好係3 teams trade.將Kurt送去Houston, Juwun Howard 送去Kings, Webber送去NY. 甘就掂啦,Peja 又唔晒走,Housont D defense又強左,NY 又可以要佢地D大牌球星。Starbury + Crawford+Webber 應該幾得。

加埋cap上去既話,NY 可以搭 Shandon Anderson/Tim Thomas/Jerome Williams/Allan Houston黎換Webber. (其實我覺得NY sign 得 Crawford,Allan Houston 走既成數都既高)

Kings羅番Howard同 T.Thomas/Houston,其實整體上隊波係強左,雖然'Howard頂唔足Webber,但係都足夠有如啦。加埋T.Thomas/Christie off bench, 應該掂啦。

至於Houston既進攻就會更加集中係T-Mac 同Yao身上。既然T-Mac要羅30分一場,甘將Howard既分灘分,Yao都有22分啦。Kurt又可以分擔Yao既工作,減低佢既Foul Trouble.  就好似Ewing身邊有個Oakley一樣。

我覺得呢個幻想對3隊波都有利。哈哈

hermit 發表於 2004-8-13 10:33 AM

[quote][quotefrom="wai214"]幻想下嗟。哈哈
最好係3 teams trade.將Kurt送去Houston, Juwun Howard 送去Kings, Webber送去NY. 甘就掂啦,Peja 又唔晒走,Housont D defense又強左,NY 又可以要佢地D大牌球星。Starbury + Crawford+Webber 應該幾得。

加埋cap上去既話,NY 可以搭 Shandon Anderson/Tim Thomas/Jerome Williams/Allan Houston黎換Webber. (其實我覺得NY sign 得 Crawford,Allan Houston 走既成數都既高)

Kings羅番Howard同 T.Thomas/Houston,其實整體上隊波係強左,雖然'Howard頂唔足Webber,但係都足夠有如啦。加埋T.Thomas/Christie off bench, 應該掂啦。

至於Houston既進攻就會更加集中係T-Mac 同Yao身上。既然T-Mac要羅30分一場,甘將Howard既分灘分,Yao都有22分啦。Kurt又可以分擔Yao既工作,減低佢既Foul Trouble.  就好似Ewing身邊有個Oakley一樣。

我覺得呢個幻想對3隊波都有利。哈哈[/quote]

hard to trade A.Houston la..

expensive and injuries issue

頁: [1]

Powered by Discuz! Archiver 7.0.0  © 2001-2009 Comsenz Inc.