娛樂滿紛 26FUN's Archiver

rayyipas 發表於 2006-5-8 11:53 AM

[加分題]各位同意做了壞事的人會有報應的嗎?

純粹好奇沒有任何宗教問題的q iR%Q4b1\5r4p2I%y
K6Gr.y0S
[[i] Last edited by 月月鳥 on 2006-5-10 at 09:11 PM [/i]]

chansuper123 發表於 2006-5-8 12:36 PM

No, Absolute No

機密 發表於 2006-5-8 12:46 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]rayyipas[/i] at 2006-5-8 11:53:5^xIM T1h\
純粹好奇沒有任何宗教問題的 [/quote]
8zz}Fcy k O 海潚兩公婆已經話了你知!遲來早來問題而已!:D

chanhoyingap 發表於 2006-5-8 02:16 PM

無得咁講 V$V#~ hb"C/K
無論你做左好事定壞事
nBO9b&GB 都有好同唔好事發生

155220 發表於 2006-5-8 02:20 PM

坦白講,小弟覺得唔會,不過如果人人都覺得會的話,就不會有人再去做壞事,世界也會變得美麗

機密 發表於 2006-5-8 03:07 PM

好簡單, V1I2gw^p rw
$~p9}WVSy3`R _E%]
你幫助人,人地就自然內心會感激你,覺得你份人好。呢種已經是最起碼的好報。 o!s;qri;[!h @
掉轉,你害人,你心裡自然有種犯罪感,久而久之,你起碼都唔會敢話自己是好人。 被人害過的人又會恨你。呢種已經是起碼的報應。
c G!P[$x6h)Y
O&na;hJ[%t&d o4u 咁仲有疑問?

FishyR 發表於 2006-5-8 04:28 PM

其實, 同唔同意, 和報應出唔現, 好容易攪亂. p/wDq3s3{c

s)F URi-F;sh h 現實中, 報應未必出現, 又或者同所犯罪唔多相稱; 更再者是犯錯重有好報, 受害者得唔到公道重要喺追究過程中衰多d.v$_})B!Y6d7F[q:V?

;CNg g2z6N 我係同意做了壞事的人應該得到報應. 現實中, 只要極惡極小心, 報應絕對唔會出現.

機密 發表於 2006-5-8 06:02 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]FishyR[/i] at 2006-5-8 16:28:0G'~"p"\ Z L1?.b(MC3S
其實, 同唔同意, 和報應出唔現, 好容... [/quote]
r@W%b o.e 不過如果用佛教道理去睇就好公平。 因為佛法是通過去現在未來三世。 所以就可以解釋了點解有人好運有人唔好!8l h F_([
就拿海潚夫婦來講,他們一定是過去救過人,所以海潚都死不去。 這是善果。VN3Do~ ^ gh]E
但騙財就一定有惡果,所以被人告!
f'vX*J.?,[xb 因果非常公平!

everybody 發表於 2006-5-8 06:21 PM

我淨係知做好事會早死...0l:_3n if%s
你睇下三國誌就知嫁la...

FishyR 發表於 2006-5-8 11:59 PM

機密兄, 我絕對尊重彿學導化人心靈的意志. 但我只是凡人一個. 沒有宗教信養. 不信前生後世. 只在乎活在今下. 睇來我短短幾十年都睇唔住, 莫講睇住下世前生果幾十年. 更或根本就沒前生後世?
K GWx0\JR 拿海潚夫婦來講, 我覺得佢唔夠小心同冷靜, 自己身有屎,死唔去,重咁揚. 唉! 我睇怕重有d同呢兩公婆一樣的人捉唔到, 真係等下世啦! 報唔報等d有下世的人去證實啦.!ls)`z ]-~&fE/z-S
既然我唔信前生後世, 呢d人只要小心d, 對我來講就無一定無報應. 對機密兄就或者係解釋成報應未到啦.{:{}PMZ7y"?!m@
歷史話比我知, 報應係唔會發生喺d有權勢, 夠惡又小心的人. 呢個係現實. 但為求個心好過d, 信有下世都無妨.

機密 發表於 2006-5-9 12:07 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]FishyR[/i] at 2006-5-8 23:59:
|#m"?&HI\| 機密兄, 我絕對尊重彿學導化人心靈的... [/quote]
(BdI:ir$u 當你唔信有前世今生。v,o9en"p{0i`oL5v

{7K!`4| cf_ 就拿做完壞事要好小心來說:DW!sg \ e

m#p9zK2oA 1. 無做壞事就心靈自在,海潚過後喜歡點都得,上電視點講都得,大事宣揚兼慶祝都得;
Z+AR&Wr |A4QO lm FjE$\
2. 做完壞事就成日怕穿煲,做小船頭怕鬼船尾怕賊,做事畏首畏尾。每件事都要諗過會不會穿煲被人捉。 死唔去又上唔得電視。
+yqk.c%V5C$_
~)EV:{^ 咁,你話呢種不是報應之一嘛!:D 起碼相對無做壞事的人來說,他們就肯定無咁自在囉!係咪?:kiss:

ThomasKoon 發表於 2006-5-9 12:42 AM

我係覺得會有﹐不過唔係必然...

打狗棒 發表於 2006-5-9 12:59 AM

我覺得不會, 因為全世界99%的有錢人都是或多或少的曾做過壞事........:haha:

slwong3 發表於 2006-5-9 06:35 AM

I think it doesn't matter at all.3\*ww4V Jh8P9T"c!j u]

Z9T,yOWQc If a person has done a bad thing on you, even he is going to get his 報應 in the future.  It still won't affect you.
E z8HlR Ex. A person cut your finger before and eventually got into jail.  Maybe going into jail is his 報應, but it still wouldn't help you grow back your finger.M2P.H#L}8M-y"Fh'p
g.T!^{?Pg:Rf-tK+P
The only thing is that when you see that person got into jail, you might feel better inside of you.

機密 發表於 2006-5-9 02:41 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]slwong3[/i] at 2006-5-9 06:35:
&Pj*zqU(r:C8p I think it doesn't matter at all.9R)lr3F/~ [,rmtE
... [/quote].oAU"ZG [&p
According to the rule of 'Cause' & 'result', you had cut the guy's finger before.  Thus you will be cut by him in this time.  However, he cut your finger is a sin, he is jailed.

anttiniemi2000 發表於 2006-5-10 05:00 PM

yes there will be, but you don't know it had happened actually.
`k;|?^;pr+n@q for example, you stole $100 from somebody, u maynot have to give it back to that person.  however one day, you will lose something worthes $100.

hold_find 發表於 2006-5-10 09:35 PM

一定會有
Zie,Wv&vapW1u&Qe~ 總有一日,做壞事的人會因自己做的壞是有報應$Y%S![~L3U4j$a#V
最簡單,你害了一個人,總有一日,他/他的家人會「報仇」|sH`(Y
就算佢地原諒你,你都會一生唔安樂,不停問自己「點解我要害佢(原本的人)?」,這也是纏擾你一生的報應(如果你冇改過,你就唔會咁諗,但他/他的家人亦唔會原諒你,就會回到第一個情況)

76 發表於 2006-5-10 10:04 PM

做壞事不會有報應除非犯左法....
4~%de(`5o+E
\q8JEFW:b3r%p9j 做壞事有報應lei個諗法..好多時都係小學教育...religion 用lei 教育之用....lei 句說話只係一個手段

Jk 發表於 2006-5-11 04:36 AM

雖然我絕對同意做了壞事的人係應該會有報應,不過應該還應該,實際上做了壞事的人未必一定會得到報應,我認為兩者並無關連!5EVm8DV-TQ]1N
p;cA m7C2r
壞事---HMP9z V&A
淨係hk班"有錢佬"都唔方做得少啦~~K+hC+{R5O+MR
z4|BYA3GSs9r
[[i] Last edited by Jk on 2006-5-11 at 04:42 AM [/i]]

pangpang2066 發表於 2006-5-11 04:55 PM

我覺得最多係自己唔開心(通常人都唔會) 同 得罪人o \{zA]k
如果得罪人之後,俾人報復 都可以叫報應既......

頁: [1] 2 3 4

Powered by Discuz! Archiver 7.0.0  © 2001-2009 Comsenz Inc.