唔係龍門要做的嗎?:giveup:
講真,其實唔係好明:haha: [/quote]
即是這個例子,他踢底伊度而阻止一個直接入球機會
因為伊度當時係直接射鬥而被踢低,所以球証紅牌!
但如果佢俾得益
那會阻止進攻機會?
何來會有牌?
佢那個犯規又不屬危險犯規 [quote]Originally posted by [i]brightlee[/i] at 2006-5-18 09:32 PM:
即是這個例子,他踢底伊度而阻止一... [/quote]
其實以阿仙奴的打法,好似列文比人逐仲好 [quote]Originally posted by [i]YUEN_LOUIS[/i] at 2006-5-18 09:40 PM:
其實以阿仙奴的打法,好似列文比人逐仲好 [/quote]
打少個對阿仙奴防守無影響, 但係大大減低左進攻火力...本來亨利係前場攞波個陣巴塞一定要有兩個後衛包位至可以mark到佢[尋晚佩奧爾比亨利ko], 咁樣後上皮里斯入楔會好有機會...但係打小一個之後皮里斯調出. 前面單靠亨利就困難好多, 因為變左佩奧爾同馬古斯一齊睇亨利..亨利好難突破, 而後面法比加斯又無咁快上到黎, 變左阿仙奴既快攻同小組好少機會可以打到出黎. [quote]Originally posted by [i]YUEN_LOUIS[/i] at 2006-5-18 08:45 PM:
我覺得係雲格有d抵死~點解呢?
大家諗... [/quote]
唔覺得campell同cole打得唔好, 佢地算打得唔錯...但係對手係攻力強勁既巴塞..加上打小一個人差唔多成80分鐘同埋落大雨. 失波非戰之罪 [quote]Originally posted by [i]brightlee[/i] at 2006-5-18 09:32 PM:
即是這個例子,他踢底伊度而阻止一... [/quote]
個球證話佢有可能俾得益+黃牌
[url]http://soccernet.espn.go.com/news/story?id=368318&cc=3436[/url]
[quote]'The match started well, then obviously there was the incident with the sending-off. At this point I would have liked to have taken a few more seconds before I made my decision.'
Hauge, who will not referee at this summer's World Cup in Germany, put this haste down to the fact he was 'incredibly focused.'
'The ideal thing would have been to wait a few seconds,' he continued.
'If I'd done that, I could have given the goal and eventually given a yellow card. Of course everyone wants a goal, so this was a key situation.'
[/quote] [quote]Originally posted by [i]brightman[/i] at 2006-5-18 10:05 PM:
唔覺得campell同cole打得唔好, 佢地算打得唔錯...但係對手係攻力強勁既巴塞..加上打小一個人差唔多成80分鐘同埋落大雨. 失波非戰之罪 [/quote]
佢地係運的問題~a,高爾幾下剷波都靚 後防太年輕依個pt唔成立啦:haha:
點都只計到eboue,不過sol同coe打得比佢還衰 [quote]Originally posted by [i]night[/i] at 2006-5-18 10:11 PM:
後防太年輕依個pt唔成立啦:haha:
點都只計到eboue,不過sol同coe打得比佢還衰 [/quote]
阿仙奴靠後生防線入決賽嘅~
所以,阿仙奴有的是機會 係喎~無線係咪話列文係第一個係決賽拎紅牌的人? [quote]Originally posted by [i]srfqt1[/i] at 2006-5-18 10:07 PM:
個球證話佢有可能俾得益+黃牌
[url]http://soccernet.espn.go.com/news/story?id=368318&cc=3436[/url]
[/quote]
:fight:還掂都死,列文應該剷球證
[[i] Last edited by YUEN_LOUIS on 2006-5-18 at 10:20 PM [/i]] this referee is wrong, I read that article too..
shouldn't be yellow.....
=.= [quote]Originally posted by [i]brightlee[/i] at 2006-5-18 10:26 PM:
this referee is wrong, I read that article too..
shouldn't be yellow.....
=.= [/quote]
好彩佢唔係WC referee:haha: [quote]Originally posted by [i]brightlee[/i] at 2006-5-18 10:26 PM:
this referee is wrong, I read that article too..
shouldn't be yellow.....
=.= [/quote]
唔該晒你既ans
咁應該慶幸佢冇得去2006wc [quote]Originally posted by [i]BSnake[/i] at 2006-5-18 03:32 PM:
我睇過慢鏡好多好多次,經詳細研究後,都幾肯定冇越位! [/quote]
我買重飛一定有越
其實球証冇得益係做得好好,crazy!
[quote]Originally posted by [i]寧靜[/i] at 2006-5-18 04:46 PM:其實球証冇得益係做得好好,我自己覺得... [/quote]
........................ [quote]Originally posted by [i]donald15[/i] at 2006-5-18 09:11 PM:
我覺得佢仲有樣野好賤
唔知仲有冇... [/quote]
第一,踢少個仲可以踢進攻波????世界上任何一隊都唔會啦!!!!!
第二,雲格講嘅係聯賽,而家踢嘅係歐聯,失一球就無咖啦,我承認阿記贏維拉利爾的確贏得好核突,但你有無睇對祖記???皇馬???贏緊1:0都仲係有攻有守
第三,你知唔知穩守特擊同死守嘅分別????
睇一兩場波就話人???
有無睇季尾反勝曼城???贏緊一球照攻點知後面失波,臨尾前面先入番兩球
對米堡7:0,對維拉5:0,最後一場贏韋根4:2
成季有幾多場死守
賤咩???
我只係不滿佢出a cole唔出flamini Nothing to argue, referee is always right. Nothing can do about to change his judgement.
Referee had only got 2 choices in front of him:1. Red card
2. Goal given
He had chosen the first one, which came straight from his mind after the foul and nothing wrong with that.
Perhaps Ronaldinho didnt perform sharply during the whole match but his through pass was vital. The affect of a team with one player less at this level of competition could be significant. For the first Barce's goal I think the goalkeeper should be responsible for that he could have saved the near pole. The second goal might got a little of help of the rain. Unlucky for the keeper. Anyway, Larsson deserved his credit.
And I have to comment, Arsenal's performance with one man down was great:good:. I can see that Henry did try his best. [quote]Originally posted by [i]28083003[/i] at 2006-5-19 01:08 AM:
第一,踢少個仲可以踢進攻波????世界... [/quote]
1.打9-0-1 都可以有守有攻gei姐......................................
對巴塞隆納個場佢地打9-0-0 都有守有攻啦.............................
睇o左咁多場阿記一入波就肯定死守
人地見你死守就只好狂攻
又做就o左有空位比阿記攻.........................
有守有攻唔代表唔係死守...............................
2.[quote]有無睇季尾反勝曼城???贏緊一球照攻點知後面失波,臨尾前面先入番兩球[/quote]
贏緊一球,唔通真係玩單刀橫傳咩:haha:....................................
你攻唔攻同你失唔失波無咩關係
巴塞係下半場咩又狂攻唔通又要失波
阿記都唔係攻緊又失兩粒
我都好同意你講一場波唔代表o的咩
3.[quote]對米堡7:0,對維拉5:0,最後一場贏韋根4:2[/quote]
其實車仔大炒比阿記仲多.......................................
但係唔明雲格點解要話人姐....................................
打聯賽有咁多弱隊(仲要踢成38場)
緊係多好多機會攻啦
不過我覺得,阿記對強隊會著重防守多過攻擊姐 nothing to argue
chelsea scored 72 goals, arsenal 68 兩邊都踢得好~
阿記打少個~贏緊1:0
一定係會注重守~
巴塞大部份時間都踢得好~
你地話細哨表現差!?一般啦~但無可否認~佢係球場~係一個危險人物~阿記一家要搵人mark實佢~你唔好理佢有冇表現~
咁兩隊都交足貨~阿記打少個,仕氣不減仲先開紀錄~一定無丟到英超架!!!!
球証大哂~宜家話佢判得岩同錯都改變唔到結果~
下年希望兩隊有機會再相遇