娛樂滿紛 26FUN's Archiver

kgkgkg212121 發表於 2006-5-23 09:58 PM

香港訂造西裝邊度最平?? (唔係買,係造)

之前聽人講話荷里活廣場好似有,但係唔係度身訂造??
W.e4K/f|9jOhN or其他地方有而又平呢??
k8~E1i9yuCJ:H 同埋手工如何??
1q y&Ts!Q7Np4U thz~~:photo:?h5L7u Q2^t;S'b
XL-H7Ux
p.s.本身我想返大陸造,因為平,但我老豆話造得好差:eek::eek:

seafireson2 發表於 2006-5-23 10:34 PM

係造的,造貴d,d料好d,6@#F.y-{(j)\
d平野一濕0左會縮水,會"巢"ga~

kenny0708 發表於 2006-5-23 11:00 PM

天后好似有~~但不知詳情~~啊~~~

kgkgkg212121 發表於 2006-5-24 12:22 AM

唔該晒大家~
2ZV,{CHi7@/L 咁又係,橫掂係做,做靚d lor

qweqweqwe 發表於 2006-5-24 04:41 AM

**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****

kgkgkg212121 發表於 2006-5-25 06:49 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]qweqweqwe[/i] at 2006-5-24 04:41 AM:
\/A)c^IL 買la Kg.....much much better......... [/quote]
6_9~q@Xcl 買現成果d??

kgkgkg212121 發表於 2006-5-25 06:50 PM

頭先上網睇話兆萬有得訂造, $600有交易, 而家仲有冇??

RahXephon 發表於 2006-5-26 01:00 AM

做一定好過買... 小弟從事金融行業,公司很住重儀表,千祈唔好買G2000的西裝,用料差,又貴。 其實如果你想要現成的話,我建議你去playlord (又一城或德福都有)買,但一定要等佢做減價,大約七折到至好買,大約要$1000套。
uc0B&TTb n#l7s 其實我會建議你去做,價錢約800-1000,千祈唔好去荷理活廣場買,價錢雖平,但會比人一眼睇出係平嘢,反而影響人地對你的first impression。 不過我唔係叫你買幾千蚊套嗰的,一般訂造1000蚊的都已經幾好,兆萬1樓轉左(G/F上一層)有一間叫A1的西裝舖,老闆好似叫Billy,佢手工都幾好,一套大約要1000元,我都係o係佢度做衫。 入到去佢會叫你選布料同個款,如果你冇preference就叫佢幫你揀。
7xVfu jb'N9W1^R |p 記住一分錢一分貨,如果為左省百多蚊而做左套唔得體的西裝就仲衰。

機密 發表於 2006-5-26 01:40 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]kgkgkg212121[/i] at 2006-5-23 21:58:
R#Q7E8Tl(Y ^ 之前聽人講話荷里活廣場好似有,但係唔... [/quote]
H3[#g'Wb6Fdrg 買塊布自己造啦!最平啦!:D

clkgtr 發表於 2006-5-26 02:58 AM

我覺得如果係後生仔, 我就唔太建議去做西裝, 買現成既會比較好
x } D6c/r7]6Kze Of
8|.]C$C#{_ 因為如果件西裝個cutting唔夠年青, 就算比件「阿媽黎」你都唔會著得好睇
q'Me*QQ[
*R7RKjf8J{*E t4] 而普遍黎講訂做果d西裝既cutting都係比較成熟 W.p6Fr(bU
如果後生仔著左會好顯得好老兼好似衣不稱身, 如果cutting唔好的話, 更加會似waiter
vT0y` i.E`7Qb2L hK^3CV*m/V!X3I
而好似旺角等果一類既做西裝店, 雖然我無買過, 但有時經過呢d店既門口見到
#i`TZ}!QeV!~ 雖然佢地show出黎果d西裝既cutting係仿效年青既做法, 但係就非常之MK looky i*[J&? x'E
-L emUS9~f
如果佢地照番classic既做法, cutting又會好老, 所以我就唔係好建議嚮呢d地方做西裝
s4vIAUF$Z
8p5k/{b2uW;X ~ 反而好似RahXephon兄咁講, playlord既西裝的確唔錯, d cutting好岩後生仔^#o.P7}.o9P-J
兼且我見佢地, 一年12個月, 大減價足9個用咁樣 fP"f-h U%V]"DFaS4^5l

t4X O#Y tr_.F0hd (以上見解純粹以[color=Red]非常Formal[/color]既角度去講, 唔好話什麼mix & match可以著得好睇d)w;Iq1{a({&B
x} |De(F c0kB
[[i] Last edited by clkgtr on 2006-5-26 at 03:18 AM [/i]]

(~^o^~). 發表於 2006-5-26 10:13 AM

頭先上網睇話兆萬有得訂造, $600有交易, 而家仲有冇??
.a`CE7eF8^Y*B tm_Jc9M F Z8s0}
No, 兆萬 is $499 !  (~^o^~)

iMacc 發表於 2006-5-26 10:17 AM

其實真係睇你係咪成日著~
l VZ,l9S.}`
3x2@!p^&] K&r'AJ-SJ 兆萬果d係平...但質料會比較差...造西裝真係一分錢一分貨架~f`L[VQ

6u{B*eXf G 我就造多過買...其實樓上個bro所講我唔多同意~:k9O7_1rVS"a:e!l

hS+]os x 本人覺得造比買多數都會靚好多...最起碼會啱身先...款嗰方面話明造就即係你想點就點~ L1Lh1B"_,w#Q W
9W-|l l$VJb S |M
想型又得...老實平凡d亦得...視乎你表唔表達到俾個師傅聽~

clkgtr 發表於 2006-5-26 12:53 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]iMacc[/i] at 2006-5-26 10:17 AM:QNMgB`V
其實真係睇你係咪成日著~ g ls+x[7hUCL2h

#^o.o:D?d)K;?fu 兆萬果d... [/quote]
0I xhu+r`/D9J%p E;P!J5VJ [?X,f l
但係因為西裝既cutting就係太簡單, 手工同剪裁差少少就會變得差好遠
^;{!q*r6G 特別係年青cutting, 腰位一定有少少slim cut, 好難做得靚
(i0g`2m#f.B(c$b 但係剪裁得唔好, 一係就變左臘腸狗, 一係就MK Look
? G0JTJE W$] 件衫有幾fit身都無用

kgkgkg212121 發表於 2006-5-26 07:12 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]RahXephon[/i] at 2006-5-26 01:00 AM:
5~2H||$q2h5L4D uBe,~ 兆萬1樓轉左(G/F上一層)有一間叫A1的西裝舖,老闆好似叫Billy,佢手工都幾好[/quote]wq-k ej'w(aj
造出黎young唔young?? 會唔會老餅
\Fs1Ch!tYU3Z M(W,n 因為我唔知點ge cutting先young,我見d fit身ge好型,腰位少少slim cut咁p#XLs k@
定係我可以同佢講造得young d?

clkgtr 發表於 2006-5-27 01:29 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]kgkgkg212121[/i] at 2006-5-26 07:12 PM:.|Kp%nIi#HF.ES
$w4Bz8a*A9@gH
造出黎young唔young?? 會唔會老餅$xII$DQYW%f,w
因為我唔知點ge cutting先young,我見d fit身ge好型,腰位少少slim cut咁7VVtFUuv
定係我可以同佢講造得young d? [/quote]NevLB X*Ar
$w2[n&A9o'z7A+]2|
胸位唔好太過挺, 但係又唔可以唔挺
,E$Z/W3T9j ['z'J{]-r 否則, 太過挺等於classic cutting, 亦等於老餅, 如果唔挺, 又會變左垃圾一件
vb%|2[,zA-U:T
5?(Uw\+lt[ B 腰位要少少slim cut, 但係又唔可以太slimG&eh%B-^g1@;\1b
否則, 太slim會變左mk look或者臘腸狗, 唔slim既又等於classic cutting, 亦等於老餅[$sB8rYmW}7}!b

&xm;}'JQ 所以, 手工差少少既係好難做得好, 如果要訂做, 就真係要膽博膽 oA-T/K0_X
佢做得好既就當然好, 否則.......................

kgkgkg212121 發表於 2006-5-27 10:44 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]clkgtr[/i] at 2006-5-27 01:29 AM:
9v'l];f'bi+Gk
T!`;^P d1H%G#a` :Zi9z f B(xww-i*v
胸位唔好太過挺, 但係又唔可以唔... [/quote]
?\ \(z1`2iA icic... 唔該晒:agree:
OK7NX:Y Rc:u.w#U 仲有時間比我搵ge,或者搵d貴少少手工好d ge

頁: [1]

Powered by Discuz! Archiver 7.0.0  © 2001-2009 Comsenz Inc.