iguana 發表於 2006-6-6 08:35 PM
請問有無人有瑞典對英格蘭戰績。
無記錯既話,佢係英既剋星。
幾十年來,英格蘭近年才贏過一兩次。
維京人既體質,碰上英格蘭從來都佔優。
真係吾覺英格蘭抽到好籤。
andy020290 發表於 2006-6-6 08:38 PM
[quote]Originally posted by [i]DEATHMAN[/i] at 2006-6-6 08:30 PM:
你鐘意D咩人關我屁事,我話之你溝個... [/quote]
咩你咁偉大會理人感受嫁咩??你好假喎~d人聽到咩感受~用番abc果句啦~公道真係自在人心~我有咩言語會教壞細路??講黎聽聽~黎黎去去講緊一個男人玩完應該識番屋企姐...你要明白如果一個男人搞完婚外情跟住走佬~仲更加唔負責任啦~自己諗下啦哥哥~
你唔明可以比例子你~
brightlee 發表於 2006-6-6 08:38 PM
[quote]Originally posted by [i]iguana[/i] at 2006-6-6 22:35:
請問有無人有瑞典對英格蘭戰績。
無... [/quote]
That's what I think England may not win in group stage...
I never think Paragray and Sweden are weak teams.......
:good::good::good:
DEATHMAN 發表於 2006-6-6 08:42 PM
[quote]Originally posted by [i]iguana[/i] at 2006-6-6 20:35:
請問有無人有瑞典對英格蘭戰績。
無... [/quote]
北歐眾國最講團結,且佢地性格謙厚,不愛太多花巧野,個個肯搏肯撞,呢D系法、英兩軍欠缺既原素---實而不華
brightlee 發表於 2006-6-6 08:43 PM
[quote]Originally posted by [i]DEATHMAN[/i] at 2006-6-6 22:42:
北歐眾國最講團結,且佢地性格謙厚,不愛太多花巧野,個個肯搏肯撞,呢D系法、英兩軍欠缺既原素---實而不華 [/quote]
yes, similar as Danish, and Norway.... (from players skills, Norwegians are the weakest....)
DEATHMAN 發表於 2006-6-6 08:52 PM
[quote]Originally posted by [i]andy020290[/i] at 2006-6-6 20:38:
咩你咁偉大會理人感受嫁咩??你好假喎~d人聽到咩感受~[color=Red]用番abc果句啦~公道真係自在人心~[/color][color=Blue]我有咩言語會教壞細路??講黎聽聽~黎黎去去講緊一個男人玩完應該識番屋企姐...[/color]你要明白如果一個男人搞完婚外情跟住走佬~仲更加唔負責任啦~自己諗下啦哥哥~
你唔明可以比例子你~[/quote]
[color=Red]佢根本就唔公道,叫佢同我講公道???慳D la~[/color]
系ar,我成日話碧咸ar,咁又點???我有冇搬D歪理出黎講成好事先???冇喎~
[color=Blue]"男人玩完應該識番屋企姐",仲唔系教壞細路??,D細路吸收左呢句跟住弟時成家立室又"男人玩完識番屋企就ok".老婆知後問佢地仲乜要去玩女,佢答"我學碧咸堵",跟住散家,個鑊系咪你同ABC孭???[/color]
andy020290 發表於 2006-6-6 09:20 PM
我都冇話係好事黎~我只係講緊一個男人應該玩完就識番屋企~始終男人係貪新鮮既~做錯左最緊要係認錯~碧咸有認到錯~咁有咩問題?我冇話婚外情係好野~由頭到尾都冇講過~唔夠人講唔好屈我喎~
唔認同你就唔公道~認同你就十分之公道??
你自己既想法唔一定係岩~如果個個都覺得自己既想法係岩既~
要討論區黎托咩??根本就唔會有呢樣野存在啦~個個講自己~仲有咩意義?
你成日係度自己吹d野出黎係度講...好9唔塔8~離哂題~真係吹你唔起囉~
我唔知你正身係邊個~但我肯定無論你用幾多個分身~
講d野都係白痴嫁囉~
人地搞唔搞婚外情都唔關我地事啦~有咩權去理人地去話人地??
你自己做得好好嗎??你會做到好爸爸嗎??
未做好自己就唔好話人地~
NO PERSONAL ATTACK IN HERE!
SPECIAL WARNING!
NEXT TIME YOU WILL HAVE HEAVY PENALTY!
:mad::mad::mad::mad::mad::mad::mad::mad::mad::mad::mad::mad:
:angry::angry::angry::angry::angry::angry::angry::angry::angry::angry::angry:
:fight::fight::fight::fight::fight::fight::fight::fight::fight::fight:
[[i] Last edited by brightlee on 2006-6-7 at 12:12 AM [/i]]
DEATHMAN 發表於 2006-6-6 09:30 PM
[quote]Originally posted by [i]andy020290[/i] at 2006-6-6 21:20:
我都冇話係好事黎~我只係講緊一個男人... [/quote]
[color=Red][size=6]嘩~你而家鼓吹"玩完女識返屋企就冇問題"喎[/size][/color]
成日話我屈你,你先唔夠我講喎好似,又話我攻擊公眾人仕私生活,公眾人仕系榜樣,每件事都要好睇,包二奶公開Say sorry係好事黎,但冇需要有D死硬派去講好聽D,呢D叫辯駁,唔系好事
,搞得唔好D細路一樣學樣條數點先???
pc20001103b 發表於 2006-6-6 09:32 PM
[quote]Originally posted by [i]brightlee[/i] at 2006-6-6 20:43:
yes, similar as Danish, and Norway.... (from players skills, Norwegians are the weakest....) [/quote]
巴拉圭技術層面上唔似南美球隊
反而有似d北歐球隊,
加上英格蘭既組織唔見得好細膩
要win呢d較硬既球隊都比較難,我估多數和
DEATHMAN 發表於 2006-6-6 09:32 PM
[quote]Originally posted by [i]andy020290[/i] at 2006-6-6 21:20:
你自己既想法唔一定係岩~如果個個都覺得自己既想法係岩既~
要討論區黎托咩??根本就唔會有呢樣野存在啦~個個講自己~仲有咩意義?
你成日係度自己吹d野出黎係度講...好9唔塔8~離哂題~真係吹你唔起囉~
我唔知你正身係邊個~但我肯定無論你用幾多個分身~
講d野都係白痴嫁囉~
[/quote]
系咪唔夠講玩人身攻擊ar?????
andy020290 發表於 2006-6-6 09:33 PM
[quote]Originally posted by [i]DEATHMAN[/i] at 2006-6-6 09:32 PM:
系咪唔夠講玩人身攻擊ar????? [/quote]
唔係呀~邊會唔夠你講呢?我在明你在暗呀嗎~你未答我問題喎哥哥~你夠有人身攻擊我啦..有咩權話我姐..
[[i] Last edited by andy020290 on 2006-6-6 at 09:35 PM [/i]]
andy020290 發表於 2006-6-6 09:34 PM
[quote]Originally posted by [i]DEATHMAN[/i] at 2006-6-6 09:30 PM:
[color=Red][size=6]嘩~你而家鼓吹&... [/quote]
對唔住唔係公開sorry~係同老婆仔女sorry~外人關咩事呢??鼓吹婚外情??哈哈!真心相愛的才不會這麼易比人鼓吹呢..你肯定個個婚外情都話關碧咸事??婚外情雙方都有責任嫁~了解咩叫婚姻先啦~
DEATHMAN 發表於 2006-6-6 09:35 PM
[quote]Originally posted by [i]andy020290[/i] at 2006-6-6 21:33:
唔係呀~邊會唔夠你講呢?我在明你在暗呀嗎~你未答我問題喎哥哥~ [/quote]
版務區見la~:D
FRANCISE 發表於 2006-6-6 10:08 PM
[quote]Originally posted by [i]DEATHMAN[/i] at 2006-6-6 09:30 PM:
[color=Red][size=6]搞得唔好D細路一樣學樣條數點先 [/quote]
:agree::agree::agree::good::good::good:
清揚 發表於 2006-6-6 10:12 PM
有心想 Sports討論版好的人請去版務區講句公道話
brightman 發表於 2006-6-6 10:16 PM
[quote]Originally posted by [i]andy020290[/i] at 2006-6-5 02:48 AM:
老實講Lampard同謝拉特佢地係有水準~... [/quote]
老實講你係咪只係睇到碧咸既好處而乏略左Lampard同謝拉特既長處 ? 以近期既能力黎講, 林柏同謝拉特無論係組織攻勢同防守方面,甚至係遠射, 一定係碧咸之上. 碧咸最多可以話係長傳同死球方面略勝一籌..至於話防守方面, 你可以話碧咸走動多, 但係佢攔截太鍚身, 五五波佢成日唔攞, 比起攔截勇捍既林柏同謝拉特一定比了下去.
仲有唔好忘記林柏特係euro04入左4球..以中場球員黎講呢個紀錄係非常之好. 所以我認為因為國際賽經驗唔夠呢一點就話靠碧咸好過靠佢地唔合理.
bigfish 發表於 2006-6-6 10:22 PM
[quote]Originally posted by [i]andy020290[/i] at 2006-6-6 09:34 PM:
對唔住唔係公開sorry~係同老婆仔女s... [/quote]
其實碧咸都出左名係好老公好爸爸 la
有人總係要o係佢氷挑剔先安樂
相比於有眾多私生子o既比利, 肥馬, 同埋坐過監o既 iverson, 碧咸o既私生活真係好好 ga la, 何況碧咸要做壞男人o既條件一定超過比利同肥馬 la, 起碼靚仔過佢地, 有錢過佢地 la, 但碧咸都好循規道矩 wor
bigfish 發表於 2006-6-6 10:24 PM
[quote]Originally posted by [i]brightman[/i] at 2006-6-6 10:16 PM:
老實講你係咪只係睇到碧咸既好處而... [/quote]
o係世界盃大舞台, 謝, 林二人o既遠射未必時時可以發揮作用, 相反碧咸o既傳中球就可以利用高治身高優勢同奧雲仔搶點能力, 最少博到角球 la
我唔係話謝, 林二人唔重要, 不過踢國際賽點都係咸哥穩定性高d
清揚 發表於 2006-6-6 10:32 PM
[quote]Originally posted by [i]brightman[/i] at 2006-6-6 22:16:
老實講你係咪只係睇到碧咸既好處而... [/quote]
知音人:good:
林伯特/謝拉特成日系球會征戰歐聯,歐聯咪算大賽low,且在國家隊也不算新人,又試過多次挽救球隊,大賽經驗根本充足~
Xtravagant 發表於 2006-6-6 10:36 PM
[quote]Originally posted by [i]清揚[/i] at 2006-6-6 10:32 PM:
知音人:good:
林伯特/謝拉特成日系球會征戰歐聯,歐聯咪算大賽low,且在國家隊也不算新人,又試過多次挽救球隊,大賽經驗根本充足~ [/quote]
:agree::agree: support Lam8 and Ger Ger ~ haha