iMacc 發表於 2006-6-19 02:37 PM
[quote]Originally posted by [i]babo[/i] at 2006-6-19 14:18:
仲有加納~~ [/quote]
重有隊怪d..沙特阿拉伯就擅下風波打唔到上風波~:D
038886 發表於 2006-6-19 02:38 PM
bigfish我可能知點解你唔中意巴西同阿根廷~
1.佢地俾england勁~
2.佢地係98同02把england踢走~係唔係呢?
babo 發表於 2006-6-19 02:42 PM
[quote]Originally posted by [i]038886[/i] at 2006-6-19 02:38 PM:
bigfish我可能知點解你唔中意巴西同阿根廷~
1.佢地俾england勁~
2.佢地係98同02把england踢走~係唔係呢? [/quote]
話時話..06既英格蘭逐件秤真係幾好睇
但整體發揮來講...我覺得98果屆好好多
babo 發表於 2006-6-19 02:42 PM
[quote]Originally posted by [i]iMacc[/i] at 2006-6-19 02:34 PM:
我因為第2日要見工先睇唔到~
我家陣返工都會日日睇~
老墨嗰場都ok架~
見到伊朗班友好搏命~ [/quote]
好彩已經放假@@
有時做下part time..所以都會睇@@
iMacc 發表於 2006-6-19 02:50 PM
[quote]Originally posted by [i]038886[/i] at 2006-6-19 14:38:
bigfish我可能知點解你唔中意巴西同阿根廷~
1.佢地俾england勁~
2.佢地係98同02把england踢走~係唔係呢? [/quote]
我記得上年我2隊愛隊對壘..
俾奧雲一吓妙到豪顛嘅插水踢咗出局...:crybye:
038886 發表於 2006-6-19 02:51 PM
[quote]Originally posted by [i]babo[/i] at 2006-6-19 02:42 PM:
話時話..06既英格蘭逐件秤真係幾好睇
但整體發揮來講...我覺得98果屆好好多 [/quote]
希望swender win englad~
等佢同得國踢~到時等得國踢走佢:kicking:
iMacc 發表於 2006-6-19 02:51 PM
[quote]Originally posted by [i]babo[/i] at 2006-6-19 14:42:
話時話..06既英格蘭逐件秤真係幾好睇
但整體發揮來講...我覺得98果屆好好多 [/quote]
可能真係中間太塞車~
希望大力臣搞得掂啦~
iMacc 發表於 2006-6-19 02:52 PM
[quote]Originally posted by [i]babo[/i] at 2006-6-19 14:42:
好彩已經放假@@
有時做下part time..所以都會睇@@ [/quote]
羨慕死...我日日都得半條人命返工....:help:
iMacc 發表於 2006-6-19 02:59 PM
[quote]Originally posted by [i]038886[/i] at 2006-6-19 14:51:
希望swender win englad~
等佢同得國踢~到時等得國踢走佢:kicking: [/quote]
咁又唔係咁講喎~
其實英格蘭最好就係對強隊俾佢哋打穩守突擊~
叫佢攻人哋唔得...但我覺得佢打穩守突擊會好掂~
所以英格蘭打強隊反而未必蝕抵...
可能打返d又係打穩守突擊球隊先會老鼠拉龜~:)
babo 發表於 2006-6-19 03:04 PM
[quote]Originally posted by [i]iMacc[/i] at 2006-6-19 02:51 PM:
可能真係中間太塞車~
希望大力臣搞得掂啦~ [/quote]
係既話應該早幾年就搞掂左=.=
lookityourself 發表於 2006-6-19 03:23 PM
[quote]Originally posted by [i]abc123aa[/i] at 2006-6-19 01:11 PM:
好難講,你唔比跟住會有特別事發生?:... [/quote]
我係捷克fans
我冇講過ar....
fake2005 發表於 2006-6-19 04:13 PM
無心機好仔細咁睇哂d回覆,
只係想講三樣野,
1.用比數去判斷一隊波得唔得係唔合理,
因為有好多實力以外既因素可以影響,
我比較buy用"過程"去睇,
而呢兩場阿根廷係比賽中既合作,走位,組織,球員發揮都好好,
亦一定比英格蘭同巴西好好多.
2.用過去對賽成績去判斷更唔合理,
愈遠既比賽參考價值愈低,
九世前既野關依家隊波鬼事!?
3.篇野話比人睇通呢個point直情係廢話!
一隊波真係咁易比人睇通?
睇通又一定阻到?
球場上走位組織千變萬化,
以阿根廷為例,
你睇到以列基美發動,
咁佢會傳俾邊個定過你?定係扮傳再過你?
如果再加上沙維奧拿同美斯都可以策動呢?
一隊波會比人真係睇通,
好多時因為進攻板斧少同簡單,
以上次德國炒沙特為例,
都係一味斬俾高路斯,
炒到只因沙特真係太屎......
呢個亦証明比數唔係一切,
"過程"比較睇到多野.
艾力克 發表於 2006-6-19 04:46 PM
[quote]Originally posted by [i]bigfish[/i] at 2006-6-19 01:46 PM:
其實平心靜氣咁理性討論, 我都覺得... [/quote]
[color=Red]"冠軍球隊一定要識打逆境波"[/color]
或者係啦
不過點解會有逆境波o既出現先?
俾人入左波? 打少個? 自己攻極都攻唔入? 人地踢得好過你?
以上種種原因都應該係打逆境波o既cause, 咁即係本身隊波有d問題啦
所以如果你話冠軍球隊一定要有鬥心, 我實buy你 :)
20001160 發表於 2006-6-19 05:02 PM
[quote]Originally posted by [i]艾力克[/i] at 2006-6-19 04:46 PM:
[color=Red]"冠軍球隊一定要識... [/quote]
冇錯
可能阿根廷 狂風掃落葉 場場6:0
所以冠軍球隊未必要識
cpccpc 發表於 2006-6-19 06:06 PM
我都認為太早顯哂d 實力 難羸冠軍
bigfish 發表於 2006-6-19 06:07 PM
[quote]Originally posted by [i]艾力克[/i] at 2006-6-19 04:46 PM:
[color=Red]"冠軍球隊一定要識... [/quote]
艾力克兄, 你講鬥心都得
但有鬥心, 踢得亂冇章法的話, 一樣唔擅打逆境波
艾力克 發表於 2006-6-19 06:39 PM
[quote]Originally posted by [i]bigfish[/i] at 2006-6-19 06:07 PM:
艾力克兄, 你講鬥心都得
但有鬥心, 踢得亂冇章法的話, 一樣唔擅打逆境波 [/quote]
點解一定要講逆境波呀? :o
你入倒人地幾球o既話, 仲邊會有逆境波呀? :D
除非你射極都射唔入, 又或者要死守一球姐, 但有實力o既話好少遇倒依個情況 :haha:
bigfish 發表於 2006-6-19 06:50 PM
[quote]Originally posted by [i]艾力克[/i] at 2006-6-19 06:39 PM:
點解一定要講逆境波呀? :o
你入倒... [/quote]
冇運o既野控制唔到
意大利失誤擺烏龍, 捷克又唔覺意落後, 呢d 野係冇運o既表現, 正常係唔會發生o既
我幾肯定如果阿根廷落後, 佢地實破唔到密集, 因為佢地冇高佬, 冇死球傳中戰術
iMacc 發表於 2006-6-19 07:08 PM
[quote]Originally posted by [i]bigfish[/i] at 2006-6-19 18:50:
冇運o既野控制唔到
意大利失誤擺烏龍, 捷克又唔覺意落後, 呢d 野係冇運o既表現, 正常係唔會發生o既
我幾肯定如果阿根廷落後, 佢地實破唔到密集, 因為佢地冇高佬, 冇死球傳中戰術[/quote]
你主觀到我都唔知點講~
你見唔見巴西成日兩翼出波中間高佬去"擁"~
人哋5屆世界冠軍都係打小組入滲~
高Q大棍代表可以破到密集....
我都唔知我究竟係咪同你睇埋同一個世界盃~:confused:
艾力克 發表於 2006-6-19 07:12 PM
[quote]Originally posted by [i]iMacc[/i] at 2006-6-19 07:08 PM:
你主觀到我都唔知點講~
你見唔見巴... [/quote]
:D
得你re佢 :P