斬波唔準
d人成日話今界世界盃個波輕左, 遠射入波多左, 入波多好睇左;但係, 有無人發覺連斬波都有影響, 偏大力, 影響左組織, 反而令球賽無咁好睇!
好似底線傳中咁, 十球有七八球都過埋遠柱, 真無"引"
而且遠射易左, 連巴西都少左d組織足球...
個人感覺不太喜歡今次呢個波! [quote]Originally posted by [i]rubbish[/i] at 2006-6-21 04:10 PM:
d人成日話今界世界盃個波輕左, 遠射入... [/quote]
But there were more amazing long shot to see.....
I think long shots are more interesting........:D [quote]Originally posted by [i]adamjacky123[/i] at 2006-6-21 04:14 PM:
But there were more amazing long shot to see.....
I think long shots are more interesting........:D [/quote]
I'd rather see more organizational ball,
long shots some how is to test the goalkeepers' react:haha: **** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 **** 我覺得大部份球隊合作上都唔係好好, 所以緊湊o既浸入攻勢都做唔到. 好多時都係靠個人突破. 突破又好多時係高速落底線, 咁要斬得好唔容易. 突破唔到, 好多時就變成遠射搏一搏.
咁就變成斬波偏大力, 同成日靠遠射la.
比較有球味o既球隊, 我鍾意Ecuador. 希望佢可以去到下個圈啦. 最多長傳
[232] 荷蘭 Netherlands
[232] 瑞典 Sweden
[225] 英格蘭 England
[216] 美國 USA
[215] 哥斯達黎加 Costa Rica
=============
呢五隊應該係斬波最好o個五隊 我個認為粒波既設計係比人入波易,點解
因為好多Keeper如列文咁都話,個波好sin手,由其Rain個陣最危險.
個波易射左,但Keeper守門就更辛苦
但係我睇第一場德國呢拿姆同分 0 斯 個兩球都係lo盡keeper既左上各拿姆個球重撞埋柱入,
分0斯明顯係楣同柱ge各入,其實關唔關個波事呢 [quote]Originally posted by [i]sunmanman[/i] at 2006-6-21 19:01:
我個認為粒波既設計係比人入波易,點解... [/quote]
應該關....大部份人都話個波飄
所以遠射d角度攞起上黎好多都好靚 [quote]Originally posted by [i]bigfish[/i] at 2006-6-21 06:45 PM:
最多長傳
[232] 荷蘭 Netherlands
[232] 瑞典 Sweden
[225] 英格蘭 England
[216] 美國 USA
[215] 哥斯達黎加 Costa Rica
=============
呢五隊應該係斬波最好o個五隊 [/quote]
咁都得？？呢個係最多長傳，唔係最多成功長傳wor！！！:D:D你是但斬一腳上去都算架！！哈！ [quote]Originally posted by [i]Kian76[/i] at 2006-6-22 00:13:
咁都得？？呢個係最多長傳，唔係最多成功長傳wor！！！:D:D你是但斬一腳上去都算架！！哈！ [/quote]
以我所知溫布頓可能係英格蘭所有聯賽入面最叻斬波嘅球隊~:naughty: [quote]Originally posted by [i]iMacc[/i] at 2006-6-22 10:02 AM:
以我所知溫布頓可能係英格蘭所有聯賽入面最叻斬波嘅球隊~:naughty: [/quote]
溫布頓改左名叫 MK Dons 啦!!! [quote]Originally posted by [i]rubbish[/i] at 2006-6-22 12:03:
溫布頓改左名叫 MK Dons 啦!!! [/quote]
我驚講出嚟都唔係咁多人知~
溫布頓出名d嘛~
重有出名cut電線~:naughty: [quote]Originally posted by [i]iMacc[/i] at 2006-6-22 12:21 PM:
我驚講出嚟都唔係咁多人知~
溫布頓出名d嘛~
重有出名cut電線~:naughty: [/quote]
好解釋！！！哈哈！！
頁:
[1]