[quote]Originally posted by [i]abc123aa[/i] at 2006-6-26 01:34 AM:
咪得囉,係唔係全部踢到識飛但贏唔到波先叫做好呀:help: [/quote]
當然贏波係最重要,我都唔想英格蘭要到逆境,先踢到好波,
好似對千里達o個場,雖然下半場踢左35min好波,但到83min先入到,
真係驚到有得震無得訓
[quote]Originally posted by [i]brightman[/i] at 2006-6-26 01:42 AM:
如果你係英格蘭球迷可能會咁諗, 但... [/quote]
分組賽之後我已經唔會將個目光放咁遠放係冠軍度:)
我會放係每一場比賽度,佢地出到線我當然開心,但係出唔到線亦唔會傷心得去邊
屆屆國際賽我對英格蘭既期望都好高,但係今屆反而就冇咁高;)
[quote]Originally posted by [i]brightman[/i] at 2006-6-26 01:42 AM:
如果你係英格蘭球迷可能會咁諗, 但... [/quote]
係,中場大塞車
[quote]Originally posted by [i]scorerhk[/i] at 2006-6-26 01:45 AM:
當然贏波係最重要,我都唔想英格蘭要到逆境,先踢到好波,
好似對千里達o個場,雖然下半場踢左35min好波,但到83min先入到,
真係驚到有得震無得訓 [/quote]
咁樣唔係更好嗎???:o
久攻不下,攻到差唔多完場先黎入波係好正常,我就唔覺得有咩問題,好過冇得入先呀
有d人唔鍾意英格蘭但係又要睇英格蘭,英格蘭踢得唔好又話早之去訓覺,
咁點解唔一早去訓???自己決定唔訓係自己既事,其實應該一早預左場波係比較悶既波先o岩;)
因為英格蘭已經有前科嘛:kiss:
[quote]Originally posted by [i]20001160[/i] at 2006-6-26 01:44 AM:
你記住你的立場 相信第日對第二隊你會有唔同立場
其實呢道冇針對 只係因為有人成日死撐英格蘭
呢場波肯定係悶
但因為有人咁都要死撐話1:0 有入波唔悶
就係因為個個都對呢種死撐ga精神不滿而搞到有少少口角咁
我唔係針對英格蘭 我都幾鐘意英格蘭 所以特別留意多d
越留意越睇得多呢種死撐精神而令到對英格蘭漸漸失去果種情意結
如果某人繼續咁樣死撐 我相信只會引起更多口角[/quote]
奇實我都中意英格蘭的
我諗法同你差唔多
佢gei表現真係唔值得幫的
[quote]Originally posted by [i]20001160[/i] at 2006-6-26 01:44 AM:
你記住你的立場 相信第日對第二隊... [/quote]
下=.=無人覺得英倫呢場波今日踢得好喎-,-
你諗野係咪偏激左d??
我自己覺得win波就最緊要~踢得好唔好睇就係其次啦~
[quote]Originally posted by [i]abc123aa[/i] at 2006-6-26 01:46 AM:
分組賽之後我已經唔會將個目光放咁... [/quote]
可惜呢度有d唔係好似你咁諗, 尤其係一d海洋生物:haha:
[quote]Originally posted by [i]abc123aa[/i] at 2006-6-26 01:46 AM:
分組賽之後我已經唔會將個目光放咁... [/quote]
唉 euro04 同今年世界盃之前都好有期望
呢場未踢之前都係
仲諗住踢多幾場 變多d陣 會成功找出一個進攻系統
但係睇完呢場只係失望收場
如果以而家咁ga進步幅度睇
到呢班球員退休都未夠實力捧盃
[quote]Originally posted by [i]20001160[/i] at 2006-6-26 01:44 AM:
你記住你的立場 相信第日對第二隊... [/quote]
呢度得一個人係咁樣,你地唔理佢既話你認為佢會有位入嗎???
如果因為一個人既言論就當晒全世界既英格蘭迷都係盲目的話咁好唔公平囉;)
[quote]Originally posted by [i]brightman[/i] at 2006-6-26 01:50 AM:
可惜呢度有d唔係好似你咁諗, 尤其係一d海洋生物:haha: [/quote]
得一個人係咁諗,我地點解要理佢?;)
[quote]Originally posted by [i]andy020290[/i] at 2006-6-26 01:49 AM:
下=.=無人覺得英倫呢場波今日踢得好喎-,-
你諗野係咪偏激左d??
我自己覺得win波就最緊要~踢得好唔好睇就係其次啦~ [/quote]
係有:hitwall:
[quote]Originally posted by [i]brightman[/i] at 2006-6-26 01:50 AM:
可惜呢度有d唔係好似你咁諗, 尤其係一d海洋生物:haha: [/quote]
嗰d海咩生物,可能會認為冠軍永遠都係英格蘭
[quote]Originally posted by [i]brightman[/i] at 2006-6-26 01:50 AM:
可惜呢度有d唔係好似你咁諗, 尤其係一d海洋生物:haha: [/quote]
你...哈哈=.=最後果個我中意
[quote]Originally posted by [i]abc123aa[/i] at 2006-6-26 01:51 AM:
得一個人係咁諗,我地點解要理佢?;) [/quote]
唔係個個熟呢度, 所以搞下搞下搞到好多無謂爭論:haha:
[quote]Originally posted by [i]abc123aa[/i] at 2006-6-26 01:51 AM:
得一個人係咁諗,我地點解要理佢?;) [/quote]
唔理佢,佢咪會變孤獨精囉,好可憐ga .........:(
我冇對全世界既英格蘭迷都係盲目
比喻來說
一間學校有一個壞學生打家劫舍
你認為其他家長會對呢間學校點睇
但係其實入便都有好學生=]
[quote]Originally posted by [i]20001160[/i] at 2006-6-26 01:51 AM:
唉 euro04 同今年世界盃之前都好有... [/quote]
佢地各自為政得太利害了,你睇下德國隊,高路斯同普度斯基上場對厄瓜多爾先話佢地冇交流,到左16強就已經有交流了,點解會咁樣???就係因為佢地唔會各自為政,
英格蘭淨係為左隊長既問題已經係度嘈,唔好忘記,隊長係領隊決定的,唔關碧咸事,
如果領隊同碧咸講,隊長由其他人做的話,我相信碧咸都唔會介意,淨係個12碼邊個射碧咸都寧願交出黎,相反係林柏特經常射失,佢會唔會交出黎???冇人知:)
跟住,係場上林柏特同謝拉特又死都要做多d地面組織,有時佢地出d高波既質素又一般,點解唔可以學德國隊兩樣都做?
林柏特同謝拉特照做地面組織,祖高爾同碧咸繼續傳中,德國隊就係做到呢兩樣野先會有咁流暢既攻勢,唔會塞死晒係中場既位置.........:o
[quote]Originally posted by [i]abc123aa[/i] at 2006-6-26 01:51 AM:
得一個人係咁諗,我地點解要理佢?;) [/quote]
我都唔想理佢,但他的固執及對事物的看法,確實令人無法容忍.
其實我唔反對英格蘭踢得保守,講真唔係攻就係守,
主攻或主守都無問題,都係戰術踢法的一種,無好或壞的分別,只有適唔適合
[quote]Originally posted by [i]abc123aa[/i] at 2006-6-26 01:56 AM:
佢地各自為政得太利害了,你睇下德國... [/quote]
我覺得個領隊個勢太水
食唔住班球員
雖解艾力臣執教其間成績唔太差但係換下領隊可能係好事