[quote]Originally posted by [i]scorerhk[/i] at 2006-6-27 17:22:
其實都唔可以咁講ge!
意大利夠... [/quote]
I agree what you are talking about
this is Soccer!~!!
:)
[quote]Originally posted by [i]scorerhk[/i] at 2006-6-27 03:22 PM:
其實都唔可以咁講ge!
意大利夠... [/quote]
上半場意大利派路+迪比亞路+東尼既互相配合做得幾靚, 射到幾球好有威脅既射門,,就算射唔入都令人拍手掌, ...而澳洲成隊猜得好有耐性, 發揮得好好...可以講上半場兩隊球員打出佢地既水準..下半場就要駛講, 打少個令到場比賽變得膠著
反而英格蘭個場, 傳兩三球就甩, 可觀性就...
[quote]Originally posted by [i]Xtravagant[/i] at 2006-6-27 02:07 PM:
大家吾好吾記得澳洲對意大利呢場波吾... [/quote]
唔太認同你講法....
基拿甸奴下半場已經換走左....伊亞昆達點睇都唔係個夠級數ge前鋒
至於東尼...因為有紅牌而換走左
相反你睇返上半場，意大利係特意任你攞住個波黎攻
等唔習慣對強隊主攻ge弱隊唔適應，從而利用反擊去致勝
但下半場個紅牌的確係影響左部署
無可否認ge係澳洲球員有體能上ge優勢，所以意大利打少個會難打好多
我覺得澳洲表現唔錯，有時無左主力球員隊波未必會散哂，始終足球係踢11個
更何況Hiddink一向都係鐘意踢整體，足球唔係齋踢技術同級數，仲有戰術、合作性同體力等
Hiddink令到澳洲係e幾方面進步左好多，唔可以同厄瓜多爾比
但意大利上半場的確打出左個部署，反擊好有威脅，唔係對方門將好野已經入左波
完全係比英格蘭單調ge攻勢有過之而無不及，唔好唔記得英格蘭係主攻果隊
況且英格蘭11人鬥人地11人bo:P;)
不過...大家都要冷靜d :P:D
[[i] Last edited by MaxFigo on 2006-6-27 at 06:23 PM [/i]]
講到底，決賽仲留底既就係王者。
[quote]Originally posted by [i]Xtravagant[/i] at 2006-6-27 02:07 PM:
大家吾好吾記得澳洲對意大利呢場波吾... [/quote]
老實講，你又何必過份地弱化澳洲呢？？你認為澳洲真的沒有實力嗎？？他們中前場質素較高的球員多到出唔晒，連帕爾馬主力左翼鋒比斯安奴都要屈就打閘，攻力可想而知。
而厄瓜多爾又何嘗唔係牌面上弱過英格蘭呢？？講牌面，我肯定澳洲高班過厄瓜多爾囉。
雖然我肯定果球冇可能比12碼,但結果己經比左兼射入埋,
唯有講句澳洲唔好彩,不論對與錯,現實係冇得改判,
值得講講,反而係球証d水平,真係要訓練下至真,咪人人係
禁區到訓低就比12碼至得架~
[quote]Originally posted by [i]kuru[/i] at 2006-6-27 09:33 PM:
雖然我肯定果球冇可能比12碼,但結果己... [/quote]
其實馬達拉斯一腳都唔應該直接紅牌。
[quote]Originally posted by [i]kuru[/i] at 2006-6-27 23:33:
雖然我肯定果球冇可能比12碼,但結果己... [/quote]
yes. I agree about it
[quote]Originally posted by [i]Kian76[/i] at 2006-6-27 23:39:
其實馬達拉斯一腳都唔應該直接紅牌。 [/quote]
That's a red, no doubt about it
please read the Fifa rules.
[quote]Originally posted by [i]brightlee[/i] at 2006-6-27 10:22 PM:
That's a red, no doubt about it
please read the Fifa rules. [/quote]
但其實o個球末致於單刀，只是一個突破後受侵犯，一般情況下會出示黃牌了事，而且動作也不算太大。
[quote]Originally posted by [i]Kian76[/i] at 2006-6-27 11:17 PM:
但其實o個球末致於單刀，只是一個突破後受侵犯，一般情況下會出示黃牌了事，而且動作也不算太大。 [/quote]
個球好似係從後攔截,係就一定紅
[quote]Originally posted by [i]scorerhk[/i] at 2006-6-28 01:18 AM:
個球好似係從後攔截,係就一定紅 [/quote]
係側邊;)
Fifa Law 12, Fouls and Misconduct:
Sending off offence: Law 5
5. denies an obvious goalscoring opportunity to an opponent moving towards the player’s goal by an offence punishable by a free kick or a penalty kick
[url]http://www.fifa.com[/url]
It's not depending on the side kick or not............
[quote]Originally posted by [i]MaxFigo[/i] at 2006-6-28 01:53 AM:
係側邊;) [/quote]
無論係咩方位,總之係嚴重既攔截都係紅牌,好多時都係睇個球証..........;)
[quote]Originally posted by [i]abc123aa[/i] at 2006-6-28 05:48:
無論係咩方位,總之係嚴重既攔截都係紅牌,好多時都係睇個球証..........;) [/quote]
This red, it's not calling from dangerous tackles.
it's blocking clear goal scoring oppuntunity
that's why most of people getting confused.....
[quote]Originally posted by [i]brightlee[/i] at 2006-6-28 03:55 AM:
This red, it's not calling from dangerous tackles.
it's blocking clear goal scoring oppuntunity
that's why most of people getting confused..... [/quote]
所以我話好多時都係睇個球証..........;)
[quote]Originally posted by [i]abc123aa[/i] at 2006-6-28 06:01:
所以我話好多時都係睇個球証..........;) [/quote]
That's why I said it in here before
I am not surprised about this red card
cos that's a clear Red (even though you don't like this situation)
The rule is in there... no excuse...
you can say, that's harsh decision
but that's not wrong decision.....
I had this situation before and I sent someone off due to this
that player is still confused why I sent him off.
whether it was a 'clear scoring opportunity' is questionable...
[quote]Originally posted by [i]yamits[/i] at 2006-6-28 11:32 AM:
whether it was a 'clear scoring opportunity' is questionable... [/quote]
仲有個森保達係隔離隨時包到...;)
[quote]Originally posted by [i]MaxFigo[/i] at 2006-6-28 14:19:
仲有個森保達係隔離隨時包到...;) [/quote]
That's what I think it's a stupid, yes, I repeated, STUPID tackle
if he can wait for 3 seconds, nothing would have been happened....
Idiot!!!
:nogood::nogood::nogood::nogood::nogood::nogood::nogood:
p.s. I repeat, I support Italy.....
why did he do that stupid tackle?