night 發表於 2006-7-1 02:33 AM
[quote]Originally posted by [i]gundamman678[/i] at 2006-7-1 02:32 AM:
其實阿根廷後防上半場一直守得咁好,守到德國根本無位入,都唔明個教練做乜咁"劣"要急急換咁多人....... [/quote]
阿根廷輸就輸pkman
無謂怪人
supportMU 發表於 2006-7-1 02:33 AM
[quote]Originally posted by [i]kk33[/i] at 2006-7-1 02:28 AM:
其實旁證成日都係睇球證頭囉
好少自己話foul [/quote]
如果咁近睇到佢踢低人都唔舉旗......旁証要黎仲咩:haha:.....
night 發表於 2006-7-1 02:33 AM
[quote]Originally posted by [i]瑞比[/i] at 2006-7-1 02:33 AM:
明未呀 [/quote]
都話佢地唔會明啦
brightman 發表於 2006-7-1 02:33 AM
[quote]Originally posted by [i]night[/i] at 2006-7-1 02:31 AM:
咁就代替偏向德國???
球證唔可以錯???
不過我淨係知maxi果球做得岩
其他講多無謂 [/quote]
球証成場都偏住主隊:sleep:, 唔單止個一球 [唔比就算仲要比埋黃牌]
kk33 發表於 2006-7-1 02:34 AM
[quote]Originally posted by [i]night[/i] at 2006-7-1 02:31 AM:
咁就代替偏向德國???
球證唔可以錯???
不過我淨係知maxi果球做得岩
其他講多無謂 [/quote]
你成場淨係睇到maxi嗰球啫
真係講多無謂
night 發表於 2006-7-1 02:34 AM
[quote]Originally posted by [i]brightman[/i] at 2006-7-1 02:33 AM:
球証成場都偏住主隊:sleep:, 唔單止個一球 [唔比就算仲要比埋黃牌] [/quote]
咁講法我夠見到好多阿根廷有犯規球證夠無吹
瑞比 發表於 2006-7-1 02:35 AM
甘生打錯阿根廷個廷字^^
燒鬚啵^^
奇 發表於 2006-7-1 02:35 AM
[quote]Originally posted by [i]自由神[/i] at 2006-7-1 02:22 AM:
算啦!球證係德國既人! [/quote]
奇怪:confused:點解唔用中立球證
:angry:
night 發表於 2006-7-1 02:35 AM
[quote]Originally posted by [i]kk33[/i] at 2006-7-1 02:34 AM:
你成場淨係睇到maxi嗰球啫
真係講多無謂 [/quote]
而家你明唔明想討論梗乜
gundamman678 發表於 2006-7-1 02:35 AM
[quote]Originally posted by [i]night[/i] at 2006-7-1 02:33 AM:
阿根廷輸就輸pkman
無謂怪人 [/quote]
所以我話阿根廷係輸自己個教練,唔關自己球員事,亦唔關德國事。
night 發表於 2006-7-1 02:35 AM
[quote]Originally posted by [i]奇[/i] at 2006-7-1 02:35 AM:
奇怪:confused:點解唔用中立球證
:angry: [/quote]
你聽佢9up
brightman 發表於 2006-7-1 02:36 AM
[quote]Originally posted by [i]night[/i] at 2006-7-1 02:32 AM:
從何而來偏幫德國? [/quote]
迪華斯鏟中波無撞人都叫foul, 小豬個球攞明報復踢到人可以咩事都無.
038886 發表於 2006-7-1 02:36 AM
[quote]Originally posted by [i]night[/i] at 2006-7-1 02:33 AM:
都話佢地唔會明啦 [/quote]
咪係唔明sin討論lo..
night 發表於 2006-7-1 02:36 AM
[quote]Originally posted by [i]gundamman678[/i] at 2006-7-1 02:35 AM:
所以我話阿根廷係輸自己個教練,唔關自己球員事,亦唔關德國事。 [/quote]
依個就係問題所在
佢地仲未明白,唉
scorerhk 發表於 2006-7-1 02:37 AM
[quote]Originally posted by [i]奇[/i] at 2006-7-1 02:35 AM:
奇怪:confused:點解唔用中立球證
:angry: [/quote]
要點中立法呢?
brightman 發表於 2006-7-1 02:37 AM
[quote]Originally posted by [i]night[/i] at 2006-7-1 02:34 AM:
咁講法我夠見到好多阿根廷有犯規球證夠無吹 [/quote]
example?
night 發表於 2006-7-1 02:38 AM
[quote]Originally posted by [i]038886[/i] at 2006-7-1 02:36 AM:
咪係唔明sin討論lo.. [/quote]
總之一句
阿根廷唔好怪邊個邊個,怪就怪pkman換人既大問題
應該換messi多過cruz,pkman擺到明打反擊
更加唔應該換riquelme
zedpyma 發表於 2006-7-1 02:38 AM
too many illogical football gambler here.
Cant accept even a lost !
kk33 發表於 2006-7-1 02:38 AM
[quote]Originally posted by [i]supportMU[/i] at 2006-7-1 02:33 AM:
如果咁近睇到佢踢低人都唔舉旗......旁証要黎仲咩:haha:..... [/quote]
旁證始終係旁證,意大利嗰球都係要睇球證頭
嗰球唔畀,佢會唔會舉旗???我話唔會
038886 發表於 2006-7-1 02:39 AM
[quote]Originally posted by [i]night[/i] at 2006-7-1 02:36 AM:
依個就係問題所在
佢地仲未明白,唉 [/quote]
咪係唔明白sin討論lo!!