娛樂滿紛 26FUN » Sports討論版 » 【現場討論】德國 Vs 阿根庭

night 發表於 2006-7-1 02:39 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]scorerhk[/i] at 2006-7-1 02:37 AM:




要點中立法呢? [/quote]
中立意思:不是兩個國家的國藉的球證

brightman 發表於 2006-7-1 02:39 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]night[/i] at 2006-7-1 02:38 AM:

總之一句

阿根廷唔好怪邊個邊個,怪就怪pkman換人既大問題

應該換messi多過cruz,pkman擺到明打反擊

更加唔應該換riquelme [/quote]
唔比人講球証咩?

night 發表於 2006-7-1 02:40 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]038886[/i] at 2006-7-1 02:39 AM:

咪係唔明白sin討論lo!! [/quote]
再討論都多9魚

自己領悟啦,晒口水

liverpoolportug 發表於 2006-7-1 02:40 AM

球證,,,就係中立先叫球證
費高,迪高,文尼治/c7
         vs
高路斯,普多斯基,波歷克

night 發表於 2006-7-1 02:40 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]brightman[/i] at 2006-7-1 02:39 AM:

唔比人講球証咩? [/quote]
你地咪講囉
我夠話你地不理智

你有你講我有我講

038886 發表於 2006-7-1 02:41 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]night[/i] at 2006-7-1 02:40 AM:

再討論都多9魚

自己領悟啦,晒口水 [/quote]
你..打字係口水打..?
:good:

奇 發表於 2006-7-1 02:41 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]scorerhk[/i] at 2006-7-1 02:37 AM:




要點中立法呢? [/quote]
個球證德國人都叫中立:confused:我唔理十二碼問題,用番自己球證總會被人挑剔

brightman 發表於 2006-7-1 02:41 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]night[/i] at 2006-7-1 02:40 AM:

再討論都多9魚

自己領悟啦,晒口水 [/quote]
咁你慳d啦, 多多聲氣. 一味大大隻字以為好醒:nogood:

brightman 發表於 2006-7-1 02:41 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]038886[/i] at 2006-7-1 02:41 AM:

你..打字係口水打..?
:good: [/quote]
我地唔會明:hitwall:

supportMU 發表於 2006-7-1 02:42 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]kk33[/i] at 2006-7-1 02:38 AM:

旁證始終係旁證,意大利嗰球都係要睇球證頭
嗰球唔畀,佢會唔會舉旗???我話唔會 [/quote]
果球球証企得近過旁証架wo:giveup:

brightman 發表於 2006-7-1 02:42 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]奇[/i] at 2006-7-1 02:41 AM:

個球證德國人都叫中立:confused:我唔理十二碼問題,用番自己球證總會被人挑剔 [/quote]
not德國, but斯洛伐克

scorerhk 發表於 2006-7-1 02:42 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]night[/i] at 2006-7-1 02:39 AM:

中立意思:不是兩個國家的國藉的球證 [/quote]


下球証係德國人,唔會掛

kk33 發表於 2006-7-1 02:42 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]night[/i] at 2006-7-1 02:35 AM:

而家你明唔明想討論梗乜 [/quote]
你想討論咩呀?????

我咪討論你成場淨係見到maxi嗰球
偏向德國gei你冇睇到

都係嗰句,講多冇謂

night 發表於 2006-7-1 02:43 AM

[color=Red][size=6]阿根廷迷

當我得罪你地又好,落井下石又好

咪再不理智啦,適當既討論係好,不過有d就太過盲目

輸左就輸左,放眼未來啦

我都唔想有罵戰[/size][/color]

brightman 發表於 2006-7-1 02:44 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]night[/i] at 2006-7-1 02:40 AM:

你地咪講囉
我夠話你地不理智

你有你講我有我講 [/quote]
不理智,理據 ? 覺得球証有問題唔講得?

night 發表於 2006-7-1 02:44 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]brightman[/i] at 2006-7-1 02:41 AM:

咁你慳d啦, 多多聲氣. 一味大大隻字以為好醒:nogood: [/quote]
唔再討論啦
係球證偏幫德國啊
係我錯喇

kk33 發表於 2006-7-1 02:44 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]supportMU[/i] at 2006-7-1 02:42 AM:

果球球証企得近過旁証架wo:giveup: [/quote]
咁假如係近呢????
你幾時有見過球證唔畀十二碼,旁證舉旗丫
請怨我見識少

night 發表於 2006-7-1 02:45 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]brightman[/i] at 2006-7-1 02:44 AM:

不理智,理據 ? 覺得球証有問題唔講得? [/quote]
無話唔得
大家各恃己見....講多無謂

night 發表於 2006-7-1 02:45 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]038886[/i] at 2006-7-1 02:41 AM:

你..打字係口水打..?
:good: [/quote]
好好笑.avi

brightman 發表於 2006-7-1 02:45 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]night[/i] at 2006-7-1 02:44 AM:

唔再討論啦
係球證偏幫德國啊
係我錯喇 [/quote]
收水...玩賴皮, 最憎..初時巴巴閉話"盲都睇到啦","咪痴啦", 呢d叫討論 ?:hitwall:

查看完整版本: 【現場討論】德國 Vs 阿根庭