娛樂滿紛 26FUN » Sports討論版 » 【現場討論】德國 Vs 阿根庭

supportMU 發表於 2006-7-1 02:58 AM

仲有軒斯果幾野, 雖然佢係紅魔黎, 但有幾野真係應該有牌, 但球証都沒俾....咁又點計??

night 發表於 2006-7-1 02:58 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]abc123aa[/i] at 2006-7-1 02:58 AM:

點呀你,係唔係要我真係做野先得,人地say左sorry係唔係仲要出聲挑釁呀:mad:

一地say sorry你又出聲,咁點樣冷靜下去呢:o [/quote]
算啦:help:

kk33 發表於 2006-7-1 02:58 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]abc123aa[/i] at 2006-7-1 02:56 AM:

我唔係德國迷,我都唔覺得呢場波有偏... [/quote]
但你真係要睇真d,蘇連球黃牌,有犯規?????真係有???

038886 發表於 2006-7-1 02:59 AM

唉=.=e個post沉下去吧

abc123aa 發表於 2006-7-1 02:59 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]supportMU[/i] at 2006-7-1 02:58 AM:
仲有軒斯果幾野, 雖然佢係紅魔黎, 但有幾野真係應該有牌, 但球証都沒俾....咁又點計?? [/quote]
係呀,由荷蘭對葡萄牙既球証艾雲洛夫事件之後d球証比牌已經鬆左好多..........;)

brightman 發表於 2006-7-1 03:00 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]night[/i] at 2006-7-1 02:54 AM:

我承認我過火

sorry [/quote]
你可以唔同意,好多野都係觀點與角度, 講完就算. 未必有結論..但係唔好再用埋d不當詞語.
重申一次我係中立球迷....去睇波.

liverpoolportug 發表於 2006-7-1 03:00 AM

咪嘈喇都開波喇烏克蘭個場= =

kk33 發表於 2006-7-1 03:00 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]night[/i] at 2006-7-1 02:57 AM:

不是你
是k字頭那位會員 [/quote]
我???
我都係討論

但d人又紅字,又大大隻,我話係n字頭

supportMU 發表於 2006-7-1 03:00 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]kk33[/i] at 2006-7-1 02:56 AM:

我唔會唔信,但真的每個旁證都有咁gei膽量去做

真係唔驚畀人用波省咩(好似加納咁) [/quote]
如果因為驚俾人圍, e唔敢舉旗的話.....仲要球証旁証黎仲咩:confused:

abc123aa 發表於 2006-7-1 03:00 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]kk33[/i] at 2006-7-1 02:58 AM:

但你真係要睇真d,蘇連球黃牌,有犯規?????真係有??? [/quote]
蘇連果球波我唔記得左嚕:help:
但係球証都有人,一次半次實會有錯,但係整場波黎講,呢個球証算比較好了:)

abc123aa 發表於 2006-7-1 03:02 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]kk33[/i] at 2006-7-1 03:00 AM:

我???
我都係討論

但d人又紅字,又大大隻,我話係n字頭 [/quote]
紅字+大大隻字係論壇功能,任何人都可以用:)

冷靜下啦,去睇波吧:kiss:

kk33 發表於 2006-7-1 03:02 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]supportMU[/i] at 2006-7-1 03:00 AM:

如果因為驚俾人圍, e唔敢舉旗的話.....仲要球証旁証黎仲咩:confused: [/quote]
後尾嗰句係講笑,唔好咁認真

night 發表於 2006-7-1 03:03 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]brightman[/i] at 2006-7-1 03:00 AM:

你可以唔同意,好多野都係觀點與角度, 講完就算. 未必有結論..但係唔好再用埋d不當詞語.
重申一次我係中立球迷....去睇波. [/quote]
當你企係我果邊諗,身為德國fans

求先睇到d會員話

"德國死好命"
"妖!!!食屎啦德國"
加上用02年的南韓黎比喻德國

你會點諗????可能你就唔出聲
不過我就選擇左講出黎

night 發表於 2006-7-1 03:04 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]kk33[/i] at 2006-7-1 03:00 AM:

我???
我都係討論

但d人又紅字,又大大隻,我話係n字頭 [/quote]
討論用的字眼實在挑釁

kk33 發表於 2006-7-1 03:04 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]abc123aa[/i] at 2006-7-1 03:02 AM:

紅字+大大隻字係論壇功能,任何人都可以用:)

冷靜下啦,去睇波吧:kiss: [/quote]
算啦,都係等四年後啦

但始終有人挑釁,唔可以唔回應
我自問冇過火

night 發表於 2006-7-1 03:05 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]kk33[/i] at 2006-7-1 03:04 AM:

算啦,都係等四年後啦

但始終有人挑釁,唔可以唔回應
我自問冇過火 [/quote]
講得好

scorerhk 發表於 2006-7-1 03:05 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]kk33[/i] at 2006-7-1 02:58 AM:

但你真係要睇真d,蘇連球黃牌,有犯規?????真係有??? [/quote]


俾個公正係,蘇連個球睇replay應該冇犯規,不過之前有冇拉衫...唔知

gundamman678 發表於 2006-7-1 03:08 AM

意大利個邊開左波，仲入左一球啦~~

睇波啦~~

kk33 發表於 2006-7-1 03:08 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]night[/i] at 2006-7-1 03:03 AM:

當你企係我果邊諗,身為德國fans

求先睇到d會員話

"德國死好命"
"妖!!!食屎啦德國"
加上用02年的南韓黎比喻德國

你會點諗????可能你就唔出聲
不過我就選擇左講出黎[/quote]

當你企係我果邊諗,身為阿根廷fans

求先睇到d會員話

你地咪痴啦
你會點諗????可能你就唔出聲
不過我就選擇左講出黎

supportMU 發表於 2006-7-1 03:09 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]abc123aa[/i] at 2006-7-1 03:00 AM:

蘇連果球波我唔記得左嚕:help:
但係球証都有人,一次半次實會有錯,但係整場波黎講,呢個球証算比較好了:) [/quote]
果球蘇連"非"剷落去, 但剷唔到波, 剷左落去舒黎達架路線果度, 因為佢唔中波, 所以變左鞋低行先,"非"落去個勢右勇, 所以球証覺得危險動作, 俾黃, 好正路:)

查看完整版本: 【現場討論】德國 Vs 阿根庭