娛樂滿紛 26FUN's Archiver

BarristerSpring 發表於 2006-8-10 11:09 PM

致各會考生的政治不正確言論

[color=Green][size=5][b]轉貼一位網友"單打"的意見[/b][/size][/color]
e%k*[0u-x9l B !|6_)\'w~-OxF i
Zr"UuH?

_zS,pFG EI 致各會考生的政治不正確言論
Vkm@2`H 3}7rWB V's$`;@
o!VH,`ha)w^&QK
各位長佔道德高地既衛道之士,以下呢篇乃極度政治不正確既言論,唔岩聽的話煩請過主。因為思緒比較混亂,所以決定用點列方面表達出黎: nV@aY[9_ @|v
E yMR:D"Eo
1. 千祈唔好信埋哂d乜鬼野「求學不是求分數」或者「條條大路通羅馬」呢類花言巧語。「求學不是求分數」?你試下拎住一張唔夠八分既會考證書去其他中學敲門報預科,睇下企響門口個兩個prefect仔俾唔俾你入學校門口半步丫拿。考得會考就係要考一個好成績返黎,因為整個遊戲既玩法由始至終都只係「認分唔認人」,你話殘酷又好無情又好,現實就是這樣的。+L;\o.U y6N(xl-GP

yuyj0h 2. 如果今次因為成績唔理想而搵唔到傳統預科學位,千祈唔好信埋哂個堆唔知乜頭乜路既私人辦學團體呢輪推出既排山倒海式宣傳攻勢,響徬徨情急之下為求有書讀有人收留就落搭報埋哂個d學乜學物上至天文下至地理甚至有如社區中心興趣班般既乜鬼文憑或證書課程 (我今朝睇《頭條日報》至見到有間機構搞左個跳街舞證書咁上下既課程,有錯請指正),因為一來呢類課程質素毫無保證,大拿拿俾十皮八皮野都唔知師資同課程內容係點樣,二來呢類課程既認受性亦頗受質疑,宣傳上話讀三兩年就可以升海外大學,但細心睇下就會發現你升到上去既只係一間原來響美國排名第4,788,全香港都冇人識既野雞大學,到時你駛左一大舊錢事小,浪費左幾年青春至唔抵嘛,對不對?
_~4w)D7{"t&GE
%t3Onl2M/eo$m.U$gJ4y 3. 至於從副學士先修班駁去副學士再駁去學士學位雖然都係一個可考慮既選擇,不過響現時嚴重缺乏銜接配套既環境下,你要做好以下心理準備。第一,現時全港每年可以從副學士成功升讀本地學士學位課程既人數唔夠一千人,所以呢幾年間學校對你既成績要求一d都唔低,至怕你到時副學士畢業升唔到上去決定出黎搵工至發覺副學士既認受性根本唔高最終變成倔頭進士就兩頭唔到岸了;第二,由副學士先修班爬到上副學士既學費因為全屬自負盈虧既關係其實一d都唔平,到時讀唔上去半途而廢就「賠了夫人又折兵」。 T%@Br^;qY0b _7T
O(?H@B4sQ#p/|*zr
4. 或者你會話,你條友仔講到個個選擇都咁屎,咁你想我點先?我而家就話你知,如果你今次失手,我既建議就係:「重‧讀‧中‧五」,因為我始終覺得,目前響香港升學既途徑雖然五花八門,但正如先前所言,好多所謂既另類升學選擇其實都起碼有以下其中一個缺點:fgL/Y g

lX!E,Ic oL 陷阱處處s} xsv9e
前景模糊]J.if4F8o+rD-FnJ
可預期性太低
/dHZALW,A 認受性成疑X.Wz]!F-Llf){
花費高昂;]in*x[9v$Tq

B4RJ b/{-V)| rd/We~4r8Y6TD _X
5. 相反而言,我個人認為響「搏一鋪」既前提同「限米煮限飯」既制肘下,重讀中五已算是較為可取既升學途徑:第一,可預期性夠高,亦即「有路捉」也,皆因你夠十四分,你就幾乎肯定可以升讀中六 (雖然對留校重讀生黎講可唔可以原校升中六要視乎你既同學有幾叻叻);第二,效益夠高,只須多花一年時間 (當然假設你一take過搞掂啦) 就可以升中六;第三,認受性極高,因為會考乃本埠一行之已久既考試制度。
!@'LM3o!| s7x)~FdS rM Y tW+Y.D
6. 或者你會話,一定要讀得成書既咩,我出黎做野唔得咩,李嘉誠冇乜點讀書咪一樣搵大錢,但係我話你知,第一:香港只係得一個李嘉誠,你要發夢就唔該早d訓;第二,香港以前真係機會處處遍地黃金,好多目不識丁既小伙子真係可以單憑一對手加一份肯拚搏肯捱苦既工作態度就能打造一個又一個香港神話,但響現時強調知識、創意同管理技巧既全球化經濟環境下已經再冇呢支歌仔唱,而家連以往算得係天之驕子既大學畢業生既工作收入同發展前景都只係勉強過得去,你學歷又唔夠只係單靠一鼓牛勁只會創造出一個又一個笑話,唔該認命啦老友。 whINy

-n E4Q*HW` 6. 當然,我知道重讀中五呢一年係好難捱好惡啃,因為你唔單只要用一年黎應付中四中五兩年加埋既課程內容,而且你既心理壓力亦會好大添:一方面係「不成功便成仁」既考試壓力,另一方面既壓力係來自成績比你好既朋輩友儕既嘲笑同輕視眼光。但係我可以話你知,你現時面對既困境,相對於未來你要承受既壓力,無論響數量同程度上都只係「蚊脾同牛脾」,我敢寫包單,你如果挺得過呢一年,你以後亦一定能夠有辦法面對人生上既種種困難。由天真幼稚成長至成熟定性,就係由你重讀呢一年開始。當你老來回望你既一生,你更可能會多謝上天要你當年咁樣跌一交至開竅發憤向上都唔定的。點解我會咁清楚?因為,我都算係過來人囉。
?9U'nW'cr_ X
0y;LM0h1Z|WFIK$n 7. 又當然,如果閣下屋企有能力供你放洋留學,即係自恃「有後路」者,你大可以當我放屁教壞細路囉,早抖。DH~L5~Fs+S oD
\m&mufI'`1lB
[[i] Last edited by BarristerSpring on 2006-8-10 at 11:11 PM [/i]]

zz1988 發表於 2006-8-10 11:57 PM

totally agree...........that's filter-137ion6N1G\7M?4TL8a
v*RAkLr/L
my friends in IVe think they are so good now...

joeywong84 發表於 2006-8-10 11:57 PM

非常同意第一點

wind19831221 發表於 2006-8-11 01:03 AM

求學不是求分數???
-Es'y4YY6f#z-H"Wb 省省吧-eJK?|l
有名資深教育學家就曾經講過:"填鴨式既教育先系真正既教育!"1p Y&w6tEu4]bv

7{e4Q~-C)J K7U0j8\ 政府凈系單方面向學生宣傳分數不重要,卻根本無改變(或者話系無辦法改變)整個社會重分重文憑既心態,簡直系錯曬!!!!!!!

honeyfei 發表於 2006-8-11 01:08 AM

其實..學歷等如一張入場劵...
B)b:cSn-n` 佢俾你有多d機會去試唔同既post...8P(P2d PM X&g
wP.\6p5I
但開始覺得...學歷冇大家諗到咁重要....
S0c8_1gZ:d2nZ 只要博到上司好感..對自己工作負責任......
F^y&n:d? _%i1ed 做野又冇錯....已經好夠...

ronald001120 發表於 2006-8-11 01:53 AM

其實ive有沒用呢
O,nm;L.WW K FR 不過預科都係一條最快升上大學既途徑

pigcat 發表於 2006-8-11 02:22 AM

唔可以行返傳統條路意味住你要行一條一般人認為辛苦d ge路先去到同一個目的jei
Q/c9X#c'V&g wXI Y"Jpx*G TX3M6o

1|tl M;uE
nR)GRI$vOQ 但係我覺得有時d野...Ot(sOTaU
唔係真係好似作呢篇野位網友睇得咁悲...7SXt{]7X
如果真係咁..升唔到大學ge十幾萬人就=廢人??
+l j~|xXT
`}?+Ei|,^;EH &_"p~_&R |+^
同埋呢位人兄講ge..
U$v|e9\xP 好多人都心知肚明..
#HP#lC1C&FB&Pa 並唔係咩真知灼見...r[C)nA[6g2W3O
只係將個事實講返出黎..再加d個人觀點咁jei

acrux821 發表於 2006-8-11 02:25 AM

我先係 IVE 讀左兩年 Diploma , 之後讀多一年 High Diploma , 依家再讀多一年大學就有 Degree . 其實我覺得唔夠分升中六既話真係入 IVE 好過 (當然唔係什麼 4年制高級文憑 , 這是 IVE 呃錢既技倆) . 始終讀左幾年 IVE 出黎 , 拎住張 Dip / H-Dip , 都可以搵到工做 .HC t y,a(EC2N-D
PiUyNVGW
以我做例 , 我頭兩年讀 Diploma in Import and Export Studies , 出黎已經可以做 Merchandiser / Shipping 果 d 工 , 如果好似我咁讀多一年 Higher Diploma in International Business , 之後就可以入本港既大學 / 海外大學 / IVE 同海外合辦既Top-up Degree .;dsHu&~

r N7Bg0~)Hq PS : 你係 IVE 既成績好既話可以係本地既大學直入 Year 2 ka .

stockman 發表於 2006-8-11 09:10 AM

Unless you really want to go into 'professional' fields like Medicines, Laws, Accounting, what you learn in U doesn't really help you much in the real world (that's my own opinion).  This is especially true if you major in the Business field.3}#T$p wp$b%}T3oZ

#i0Yl/P| OM I majored in Marketing and is doing sales/marketing related job now.  99.9% of the skills and knowledge I use to do my job are learned on the job but not from school.  School doesn't teach you how to deal with people, handle office politics, how service clients.  Does it mean it's a waste of time to go to school?  Yes and no.  The time spent in those years may be wasted, but you earn the right to put 'U-grad' in your resume.
dty+w? {k.[
uZWsm&~5t;u{ But I agree that in today's global world, getting advanced education is more like a 'need' then 'plus' to get ahead in the society.  They are simply too many college educated people chasing similar jobs.  1 u-grad is not much different from the other u-grad, but it's like a minimum requirement to compete in the society if you want to have a decent job nowadays.

ronald001120 發表於 2006-8-11 10:05 AM

學歷始終係資本主義社會係必需
3nu(a$n!F8kz:C9r 始終有大學degree對前途都有保障D
+]Q#}:W9d5`-u} 我岩岩入左ive9Ja5U0d?'XG
其實ive幾分都收
0k`1]&ad Z+G a r*E 如果讀完個high dip會唔會對佢個認受性有影響?
/@0u.G_{x 不過其實唔係一定大學生人工先高既A;Pm#o Q1G3_o
有時都睇運B iprbN N
我個fd家姐前幾年中五畢業出來做野
9e c U @_!zxt R 而家都有萬3蚊人工
!r @l-x}"_Y/r 有D大學生出來做野^;f3W-mC9N
咪又係搵唔到工

12d3 發表於 2006-8-11 12:12 PM

Originally posted by [i]stockman[/i] at 2006-8-11 09:10 AM:Hn b+vj?I
Unless you really want to go into 'professional' fields like Medicines, Laws, Accounting, what you learn in U doesn't really help you much in the real world (that's [color=Red]the truth[/color]).  This is especially true if you major in the Business field.

頁: [1]

Powered by Discuz! Archiver 7.0.0  © 2001-2009 Comsenz Inc.