娛樂滿紛 26FUN's Archiver

bigfish 發表於 2006-9-4 12:03 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]cfccfcc[/i] at 2006-9-3 11:59 PM:
你地用曼聯呢個例子真係用得好
佢當... [/quote]
英超球員同球會有約在身, 梗係 pick 一d 英超以外o既球員啦
屈福特, 雷丁佢地有機會 pick 朗拿甸奴, 舒夫真高, 卡卡等
車仔, 曼聯咪要排隊囉, 或者佢地最多 pick 到雲達華治, 費蘭度托里斯呢d 冇咁搶手o既球員
每年佢地可以有 3-4 個 round 去 pick 英超以外球員

au212001 發表於 2006-9-4 12:08 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]skjeiw[/i] at 2006-9-3 10:22 PM:
好簡單...
足球同NBA唔同
你不如話... [/quote]
:dev::dev::dev:叫細哨用腳射3分波~~:D:D

Kian76 發表於 2006-9-4 12:08 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]babo[/i] at 2006-9-3 11:57 PM:


簡東拿加盟時的價=.=

比起堅尼375萬鎊來講..簡東拿算平-.-

[[i] Last edited by babo on 2006-9-4 at 12:01 AM [/i]] [/quote]

咁的確係。當時都應該係500萬左右既價錢吧??

chrislovegill 發表於 2006-9-4 12:08 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]bigfish[/i] at 2006-9-4 12:03 AM:

英超球員同球會有約在身, 梗係 pick... [/quote]

咁其他國家o既球會點算呀,pick番你C7同朗尼law
咪傻啦
根本nba o個套係唔可以套落足球度用
唯一可行的,勉強係薪酬上限,但都有好多野要修改

[[i] Last edited by chrislovegill on 2006-9-4 at 12:11 AM [/i]]

Kian76 發表於 2006-9-4 12:14 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]chrislovegill[/i] at 2006-9-4 12:08 AM:


咁其他國家o既球會點算呀,pick番... [/quote]

不如用地下搏擊一套,對手一日末失去知覺,軍醫、隊員、教練都唔可以入場。哈!!

babo 發表於 2006-9-4 12:15 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]Kian76[/i] at 2006-9-4 12:08 AM:


咁的確係。當時都應該係500萬左右既價錢吧?? [/quote]

500萬鎊....應該差唔多.

因為95年時曼聯以破英超紀錄800萬鎊買高爾..

singleung1956 發表於 2006-9-4 12:19 AM

朗拿甸奴肯唔肯去雷丁?當佢肯去,雷丁又比唔比得起錢?

依家職業足球唔係運動,係一種賺錢的行業,球員係一種可以賺很多錢的工作.

清醒D啦

lazialihk 發表於 2006-9-4 12:23 AM

NBA 轉會制度唔可以同足球比較
因為NBA球隊只負責選秀,
青訓係由中學,大學做
佢地從NBA聯盟入面選新人
成本主要用於球員薪金
但係足球就可以用轉會費買人
所以小球會會集中做青訓
將成名球員出售比大球會
咁小球會先可以繼續營運
慢慢發圍
亦可以保證新人唔會短缺

如果足球照抄NBA制度
咁就要國際足協統一全球ge足總
令到FIFA有權力可以控制所有球員GE轉會權
全世界球會都向FIFA選人

NBA得廿幾隊
但係一個國家已經有幾級聯賽
差唔多一百隊波
又有升降制度
所以每年足總都要培訓好多人俾球會選擇
唔通d球會球探又好似NBA咁
睇曬咁多人表現?
咁最好最有潛質ge球員就要打地區聯賽
最差ge就打英超
咁0米仲衰

唯一有可能行得通ge係NBA薪酬制度
有上限
如果過左上限就要俾同量罰金
咁可以平衡到各隊ge實力唔會相差得太遠----
----假設身家幾百億ge艾巴莫域治真係會介意俾多"少少"錢出0黎壟斷

MaxFigo 發表於 2006-9-4 12:28 AM

你e個draft pick制度...如果淨係英超用,根本唔可行
你認為強如皇馬、AC,會同你地屈福特癲,放自己d球員出黎比你任pick ?
如果係咁ge話,即係皇馬可以放個碧咸出黎,0轉會費比你d英超弱旅pick走
咁邊個去補償皇馬ge損失??
如果你係皇馬會長,你會唔會咁做?

除非英超真係吸引到世界級球員放棄其他聯賽高薪厚祿
接受個薪酬限制之下屈係屈福特踢
不過你話有冇可能?如果你係碧咸,你會唔會以咁ge方式返英超??

Kian76 發表於 2006-9-4 12:29 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]lazialihk[/i] at 2006-9-4 12:23 AM:
NBA 轉會制度唔可以同足球比較
因為N... [/quote]
咁老實講句,薪酬呢樣野睇你點呃既姐,你表面上係一份新人一樣的合約,勁低人工,但額外名義上請佢做埋茶水,但呢份工就巨額,咁唔知NBA吹唔吹得你脹??

hizaku 發表於 2006-9-4 12:52 AM

this is bullshit lol
can someone lock this topic, this make no sense at all
kthxbye

NO BAD WORDS IN HERE
:mad::mad::mad::mad::mad::mad::mad::mad:
:angry::angry::angry::angry::angry::angry::angry:
:nogood::nogood::nogood::nogood::nogood:
:fight::fight::fight::fight::fight::fight:

[[i] Last edited by brightlee on 2006-9-4 at 05:56 AM [/i]]

bigfish 發表於 2006-9-4 01:22 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]singleung1956[/i] at 2006-9-4 12:19 AM:
朗拿甸奴肯唔肯去雷丁?當佢肯去,雷丁又比唔比得起錢?

依家職業足球唔係運動,係一種賺錢的行業,球員係一種可以賺很多錢的工作.

清醒D啦 [/quote]
加素當初夠要加盟弱旅溫哥華灰熊啦
公鹿又 pick 左澳洲狀元保吉, 點解細哨唔可以去雷丁?
何況新制度之下, 雷丁隨時會好似快艇, 灰熊, 籃網咁, 取得大進步, 相反車仔玩錢就好似紐約人咁一沉不起
你係細哨, 你會加盟紐約人定快艇呢?

MaxFigo 發表於 2006-9-4 01:36 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]bigfish[/i] at 2006-9-4 01:22 AM:

加素當初夠要加盟弱旅溫哥華灰熊啦
... [/quote]


問題係....NBA對加素ge吸引力,遠比英超對細哨ge吸引力大
加素唔打NBA就要屈係其他較低層次ge聯賽度打
但細哨唔踢英超,仲有西甲巴塞e支班霸佢踢
巴塞 VS 雷丁,你係細哨你揀邊隊?;)

Aristo~ 發表於 2006-9-4 01:45 AM

有冇諗過球員意願呢樣野呢???
人望高處~
人人都想自己高人工既啦...
咁有球會俾得起, 你唔可以話對其他小球會唔公平喎!
仲有波士文條約保障球員利益...
即係約滿就可以自由轉會...
呢點對球會, 亦對球員有利丫..

chrislovegill 發表於 2006-9-4 01:48 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]MaxFigo[/i] at 2006-9-4 01:36 AM:



問題係....NBA對加素ge吸引力,... [/quote]

我愈來愈愛你了 MaxFigo兄
o係呢個體育版,你講o既野幾時都咁有道理
服到你五體投地呀!~!~!~:clap::clap::clap:

harvey22 發表於 2006-9-4 01:50 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]bigfish[/i] at 2006-9-4 01:22 AM:

點解細哨唔可以去雷丁?... [/quote]

eg? hey even reading have the chance the get 細哨, they can't afford his salary. do u realise that the way football clubs works are totally different to nba teams? even if they manage to pull of the 細哨 wage, they properly left with no money for any other players. so at the end is still a unbalence issue.

mate, football is not juz a sport, is so commercial i am sure ur ideas won't work out~

bigfish 發表於 2006-9-4 03:36 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]harvey22[/i] at 2006-9-4 01:50 AM:


eg? hey even reading have the c... [/quote]
我只係諗住一齊 brainstorm 一種制度抗衡車仔壟斷英超 jeh
眾所周知車仔d 青訓唔掂, o係新制之下曼聯呢d 青訓好o既球會同查爾頓呢d 下游球會就可以抗衡車仔用錢買冠軍o既策略

bigfish 發表於 2006-9-4 03:39 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]Kian76[/i] at 2006-9-4 12:29 AM:

咁老實講句,薪酬呢樣野睇你點呃既... [/quote]
如果可以咁呃人工, knicks 同 blazers 就唔駛年年俾豪華稅啦, barkley 就唔駛領取底薪打 rockets 啦
班費應該包埋茶水, 經理, 教練, 啦啦隊開支

harvey22 發表於 2006-9-4 04:20 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]bigfish[/i] at 2006-9-4 03:36 AM:

我只係諗住一齊 brainstorm 一種制... [/quote]

you have too much fantasy lol~

runrun 發表於 2006-9-4 04:57 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]bigfish[/i] at 2006-9-3 10:07 PM:
依家又話韋斯咸有富商入主, 加埋車仔,... [/quote]
不嬲你都係一日一笑話, 而家仲一日一廢話添... :D

不如索性乜人都唔買, 場場擲骰定勝負啦笨! :P:P

頁: 1 [2] 3 4

Powered by Discuz! Archiver 7.0.0  © 2001-2009 Comsenz Inc.