Chenjinnan 發表於 2006-11-22 11:44 PM
[quote]Originally posted by [i]Rated-R[/i] at 2006-11-22 23:39:
;) [/quote]
但係家下仲係小弟最少 TO 喎... :eek:
艾力克 發表於 2006-11-22 11:44 PM
[quote]Originally posted by [i]Rated-R[/i] at 2006-11-22 11:42 PM:
你點ar [/quote]
冇諗喇, 去左做功課 :haha:
Rated-R 發表於 2006-11-22 11:44 PM
[quote]Originally posted by [i]Chenjinnan[/i] at 2006-11-22 23:38:
哈哈... 唔好咁啦... [/quote]
你條友表現好,貴做冇興趣,唔合格我就會用合理價錢買,這是我的玩法
Chenjinnan 發表於 2006-11-22 11:47 PM
[quote]Originally posted by [i]Rated-R[/i] at 2006-11-22 23:44:
你條友表現好,貴做冇興趣,唔合格我就會用合理價錢買,這是我的玩法 [/quote]
佢係我 first pick,我隊波自不然係建立喺佢啲 stat 度啦...
Rated-R 發表於 2006-11-22 11:47 PM
[quote]Originally posted by [i]Chenjinnan[/i] at 2006-11-22 23:44:
但係家下仲係小弟最少 TO 喎... :eek: [/quote]
後備偏多
Rated-R 發表於 2006-11-22 11:48 PM
[quote]Originally posted by [i]Chenjinnan[/i] at 2006-11-22 23:47:
佢係我 first pick,我隊波自不然係建立喺佢啲 stat 度啦... [/quote]
咁就大鑊
Chenjinnan 發表於 2006-11-22 11:49 PM
[quote]Originally posted by [i]Rated-R[/i] at 2006-11-22 23:47:
後備偏多 [/quote]
呢個真...
艾力克 發表於 2006-11-22 11:50 PM
[quote]Originally posted by [i]Rated-R[/i] at 2006-11-22 11:48 PM:
咁就大鑊 [/quote]
我都好大鑊, arenas 同 howard 兩個唔同風格o既人走埋一齊 :P
Chenjinnan 發表於 2006-11-22 11:50 PM
[quote]Originally posted by [i]Rated-R[/i] at 2006-11-22 23:48:
咁就大鑊 [/quote]
點大鑊法?
Rated-R 發表於 2006-11-22 11:50 PM
[quote]Originally posted by [i]艾力克[/i] at 2006-11-22 23:44:
冇諗喇, 去左做功課 :haha: [/quote]
:gun:
研究過
最好
Redd+Jack
VS
JJ+???
Rated-R 發表於 2006-11-22 11:54 PM
[quote]Originally posted by [i]Chenjinnan[/i] at 2006-11-22 23:50:
點大鑊法? [/quote]
你應以Kidd為中心
所有野圍住佢實冇死
Brand---你只會諗怎去加強REB去助其威力更強,你中左喇:sleep:
艾力克 發表於 2006-11-22 11:55 PM
[quote]Originally posted by [i]Rated-R[/i] at 2006-11-22 11:50 PM:
:gun:
研究過
最好
Redd+Jack
VS
JJ+??? [/quote]
wht will be the effect on jack once roy returned to the lineup? :confused:
Rated-R 發表於 2006-11-22 11:58 PM
[quote]Originally posted by [i]艾力克[/i] at 2006-11-22 23:55:
wht will be the effect on jack once roy returned to the lineup? :confused: [/quote]
Roy Is SG
Jack is PG
這是肯定的組合
而且Portland並沒有比Jack更好更懂分波的PG
艾力克 發表於 2006-11-23 12:00 AM
[quote]Originally posted by [i]Rated-R[/i] at 2006-11-22 11:58 PM:
Roy Is SG
Jack is PG
這是肯定的組合
而且Portland並沒有比Jack更好更懂分波的PG [/quote]
but dixon is the backup of roy and jack
and i found that claxton is quite similar to jack's function, so i need to watch the game tmr
艾力克 發表於 2006-11-23 12:01 AM
[quote]Originally posted by [i]Rated-R[/i] at 2006-11-22 11:50 PM:
:gun:
研究過
最好
Redd+Jack
VS
JJ+[color=Red]???[/color] [/quote]
=邊幾個先? ;)
whatever?
Rated-R 發表於 2006-11-23 12:05 AM
[quote]Originally posted by [i]艾力克[/i] at 2006-11-23 00:00:
but dixon is the backup of roy and jack
and i found that claxton is quite similar to jack's function, so i need to watch the game tmr [/quote]
dixon只是Shooter,難左右大局,睇佢幾場都只系得分為先,分波欠奉,Teamwork意識低,Bobby.Jackson咁
claxton反而差,Lue防守比他好,而且已多次表現了自己,咁會分薄好多
你鐘意點就點
[[i] Last edited by Rated-R on 2006-11-23 at 12:06 AM [/i]]
Rated-R 發表於 2006-11-23 12:06 AM
[quote]Originally posted by [i]艾力克[/i] at 2006-11-23 00:01:
=邊幾個先? ;)
whatever? [/quote]
上次果幾個
Chenjinnan 發表於 2006-11-23 12:10 AM
[quote]Originally posted by [i]Rated-R[/i] at 2006-11-22 23:54:
你應以Kidd為中心
所有野圍住佢實冇死
Brand---你只會諗怎去加強REB去助其威力更強,你中左喇:sleep: [/quote]
以Kidd為中心,只會做到樣樣有啲,但係風險好高,隨時輸 9-0!始終有 12 teams,冇咁多球員分 (同埋要預啲粉腸失準,好似 Brand 咁),所以只能集中幾樣。我 first pick Brand 當然想佢 keep 住 2x/1x + 2.x BLK,加埋 Camby,諗住強攻 REB/BLK,PG 用 Kidd 都係想幫 REB (當然佢 3PTM/AST/STL 都好值錢),我是但再攻多範都至少保證唔會大敗!
呢個純粹係我嘅玩法~
Rated-R 發表於 2006-11-23 12:13 AM
[quote]Originally posted by [i]Chenjinnan[/i] at 2006-11-23 00:10:
以Kidd為中心,只會做到樣樣有啲... [/quote]
睇耐D先low
艾力克 發表於 2006-11-23 12:18 AM
[quote]Originally posted by [i]Rated-R[/i] at 2006-11-23 12:13 AM:
睇耐D先low [/quote]
訓喇, bye~