[quote]Originally posted by [i]艾力克[/i] at 2006-10-29 17:57:
兩個都好吸引, 有晒就最好喇 :drool::drool:
如果我有bullips or ak, 我都覺得有得諗o既 [/quote]
我覺得AK系B+
但Arenas & bullips系最top既S級-A級
[quote]Originally posted by [i]feuosma[/i] at 2006-10-29 05:59 PM:
你咁快做完功課???:eek::eek::eek: [/quote]
唔係呀, 兩樣一齊做 :P
JJ + ? vs allan + ?
is it possible? :kiss:
[quote]Originally posted by [i]Rated-R[/i] at 2006-10-29 06:00 PM:
我覺得AK系B+
但Arenas & bullips系最top既S級-A級 [/quote]
如果計球員o係o個個位置o既grade, pg billups 係好過 sf AK o既
但overall黎睇, 兩個其實差唔多, pts, ft%, ast, to, 3ptm vs reb, stl, blk
[quote]Originally posted by [i]艾力克[/i] at 2006-10-29 18:04:
唔係呀, 兩樣一齊做 :P
JJ + ? vs allan + ?
is it possible? :kiss: [/quote]
唔得.....;););)
[quote]Originally posted by [i]艾力克[/i] at 2006-10-29 18:06:
如果計球員o係o個個位置o既grade, pg billups 係好過 sf AK o既
但overall黎睇, 兩個其實差唔多, pts, ft%, ast, to, 3ptm vs reb, stl, blk [/quote]
系我心目中,AK耐傷性及穩定性系1個大問題,我唔容許我team有個大將今日三雙,聽日後日得幾分,及打下停下,停下又打下,當然以上系個人想法~
而且你team現在不像上年般強,系咪仲需要將500000000萬美金豪落個俄羅斯輪盤到?
[[i] Last edited by Rated-R on 2006-10-29 at 06:20 PM [/i]]
[quote]Originally posted by [i]Rated-R[/i] at 2006-10-29 18:14:
系我心目中,AK耐傷性及穩定性系1個大問題,我唔容許我team有個大將今日三雙,聽日後日得幾分,及打下停下,停下又打下,當然以上系個人想法~ [/quote]
100%同意:agree::agree:...所以唔換得阿倫......:D:D:D
[quote]Originally posted by [i]Rated-R[/i] at 2006-10-29 06:14 PM:
系我心目中,AK耐傷性及穩定性系1個... [/quote]
點同上年比喎 :haha:
上年keep住7項stats就得, 今年keep得5項
唯有靠trade同fa喇 :hitwall:
[quote]Originally posted by [i]艾力克[/i] at 2006-10-29 18:25:
點同上年比喎 :haha:
上年keep住7項stats就得, 今年keep得5項
唯有靠trade同fa喇 :hitwall: [/quote]
但arenas trade AK就一定系有問題,你唔扲返D甜頭系幫不到你
依家先知原來pick AK咁大獲
總知唔pick好過pick:kicking:
[quote]Originally posted by [i]Rated-R[/i] at 2006-10-29 06:28 PM:
但arenas trade AK就一定系有問題,你唔扲返D甜頭系幫不到你 [/quote]
i won't trade arenas, howard, or even richardson
certainly i think arenas is more aggressive than billups, so i just think it may be possible if AK vs billups
i know ur point too, i like consistency even more :D
[quote]Originally posted by [i]艾力克[/i] at 2006-10-29 18:34:
i won't trade arenas, howard, or ... [/quote]
以為你short左咋,原來誤會
哈哈, 咁快又有人玩交易呢 !
[quote]Originally posted by [i]terryjog06[/i] at 2006-10-29 18:33:
依家先知原來pick AK咁大獲
總知唔pick好過pick:kicking: [/quote]
um~用佢要冒一定既險
[quote]Originally posted by [i]fantesticming05[/i] at 2006-10-29 18:49:
哈哈, 咁快又有人玩交易呢 ! [/quote]
諗住點?
[quote]Originally posted by [i]Rated-R[/i] at 2006-10-29 06:54 PM:
諗住點? [/quote]
未有打算, 你覺得我邊方面有需要 ??
[quote]Originally posted by [i]fantesticming05[/i] at 2006-10-29 18:54:
未有打算, 你覺得我邊方面有需要 ?? [/quote]
各方面都有需要
但你個Caste不是最差果個
[[i] Last edited by Rated-R on 2006-10-29 at 07:48 PM [/i]]
[quote]Originally posted by [i]terryjog06[/i] at 2006-10-29 06:33 PM:
依家先知原來pick AK咁大獲
總知唔pick好過pick:kicking: [/quote]
AK 其實留比自己用先係上策。同人換好易比人壓價﹐因為受傷問題
如果講級數既話:
C
top - Yao Ming, C.Bosh, Okur
2nd - B.Miller B.Wallace
3rd - Shaq, Camby, Z, Kaman
PF
top -KG , Brand, Dirk
2nd - TD, D.H, Bosh
SF
top - LBJ, SM
2nd- Paul Pierce, AK, Odom, Anthony
SG
top - Kobe, Wade
2nd -VC, Allen, Redd, JJ
PG
top- G.A, AI, Nash, C.Paul
2nd- Billup, Kidd, Bibby, Marbury, A.Miller, Hinrich.
:dev:
[quote]Originally posted by [i]Xtravagant[/i] at 2006-10-29 20:10:
AK 其實留比自己用先係上策。同人... [/quote]
何必要撻晒我D主力出黎:haha:
我只想掩埋掩埋唔想比人煩:dev:
[quote]Originally posted by [i]Xtravagant[/i] at 2006-10-29 08:10 PM:
AK 其實留比自己用先係上策。同人... [/quote]
我想問Z.I o係C係咩級??
仲有就係parker同外星人係pg咩級??
R. Davis trade Z. Ilgauskas點睇??
[[i] Last edited by terryjog06 on 2006-10-29 at 09:23 PM [/i]]
[quote]Originally posted by [i]terryjog06[/i] at 2006-10-29 21:16:
我想問ZI o係C係咩級??
仲有就係parker同外星人係pg咩級??
R. Davis trade Z. Ilgauskas點睇??
[[i] Last edited by terryjog06 on 2006-10-29 at 09:19 PM [/i]] [/quote]
(1)3rd - Shaq, Camby, Z, Kaman
...Z代表Z.I.....
(2)我會覺得佢地都屬於第三級pg....
(3)我ok..但好因人而異....