**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****
[quote]Originally posted by [i]bigfish[/i] at 2006-12-17 11:57 PM:
dogbra 呢球波射得好中間, 侯活企得太前先會失
我覺得 2-2 賽果比較合理 [/quote]
你覺得合理的事情,其實很多都是不合理的.還有自命英國佬的你,我已經在以之前教過你杜奧巴是drogba.你連咁簡單的英文都不會,確實掉盡英國人的架.
豬油包轉身窩利抽射 @@
林伯腳指尾拉西入死角 .........
十分精彩既比賽~
[quote]Originally posted by [i]王晶[/i] at 2006-12-18 12:04 AM:
dogbra係咩黎架
係咪你老母心口纜住果件
[[i] Last edited by 王晶 on 2006-12-18 at 12:09 AM [/i]] [/quote]
咩事講到要人身攻擊呀?
[quote]Originally posted by [i]bigfish[/i] at 2006-12-18 12:56 AM:
咩事講到要人身攻擊呀? [/quote]
有咩? 你話dogbra呀ma
唔係女人用架咩
[quote]Originally posted by [i]locklock[/i] at 2006-12-18 12:10 AM:
其實今場摩帥是好想贏，先肯收起舒... [/quote]
當然舒夫真高在場係有佢ge作用
但作為一個值3000萬鎊ge世界級前鋒
佢要做ge野唔止咁少
真係希望黎緊聯賽杯可以有助佢盡快操起狀態
睇見佢尋晚邊走邊射...最後撻Q仲要仆左係度個樣....
佢應該幾難受 =.="""
[quote]Originally posted by [i]MaxFigo[/i] at 2006-12-18 10:06 PM:
當然舒夫真高在場係有佢ge作用
... [/quote]
有仆咩? :o
對韋根場波已經證明左 dogba 之前d 入球只係曇花一現, 佢所謂最佳射手之名並唔係貨真價實
[[i] Last edited by bigfish on 2006-12-25 at 04:39 PM [/i]]
[quote]Originally posted by [i]bigfish[/i] at 2006-12-25 03:36 PM:
對韋根場波已經證明左 dogba 之前d 入球只係曇花一現, 佢所謂最佳射手之名並唔係貨真價實
[[i] Last edited by bigfish on 2006-12-25 at 04:39 PM [/i]] [/quote]
究竟邊個係dogba:confused:
**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****
**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****
豬油包同林伯
1touch pass
再1 touch shoot
好靚
:good:完美既組織:good:
[quote]Originally posted by [i]bigfish[/i] at 2006-12-25 03:36 PM:
對韋根場波已經證明左 dogba 之前d 入球只係曇花一現, 佢所謂最佳射手之名並唔係貨真價實
[[i] Last edited by bigfish on 2006-12-25 at 04:39 PM [/i]] [/quote]
WOOHOO LAWLZ:agree:
[quote]Originally posted by [i]bigfish[/i] at 25-12-2006 15:36:
對韋根場波已經證明左 [u][b][size=60][color=Blue]Drogba[/color][/size][/b][/u] 之前d 入球只係曇花一現, 佢所謂最佳射手之名並唔係貨真價實
[/quote]
如果聯賽入廿球，總數入卅二球都叫曇花一現......
咁唔怪得之我要叫Ｃ７、朗尼呢ｄ去「再培訓」啦。。。:lol::lol::lol::lol:
我諗你都會認同我個可？:naughty::naughty::naughty: