亞運獎牌應否採用新計法?
中國人口咁多, 拎咁多面金牌係理所當然但係香港, 卡塔爾呢d 人口較少地區, 奪金數目同人口比例遠遠高於中國
如果亞運再用呢種計法, 只會令人錯覺以為中國體壇平均水準遠超其他亞洲國家:nogood: 人口多拎金牌點解係理所當然
君不見印度10億人口 只得10面金牌嗎
拎金牌數目多寡唔係以人口量定
係睇你國家投放既資源、有無人才、有無良好既訓練系統 [quote]Originally posted by [i]王晶[/i] at 2006-12-16 11:50 PM:
人口多拎金牌點解係理所當然
君不見... [/quote]
點解要同印度比唔同香港比?
香港人口只有中國二百分之一, 按比例香港平均體壇水準係高過中國喎 奧運都係用呢種計法,你咁有見地,意見咁精闢,事不宜遲,快d去信信奧委會,睇下有沒有人接受你e種"高見". [quote]Originally posted by [i]bigfish[/i] at 2006-12-16 11:54 PM:
點解要同印度比唔同香港比?
香港人口只有中國二百分之一, 按比例香港平均體壇水準係高過中國喎 [/quote]
香港有部份金牌都係國援拎既 咁點計 [quote]Originally posted by [i]bigfish[/i] at 2006-12-16 11:54 PM:
點解要同印度比唔同香港比?
[/quote]
因為你條天才話人多金牌就多囉 [quote]Originally posted by [i]bigfish[/i] at 2006-12-16 23:54:
點解要同印度比唔同香港比?
香港人口只有中國二百分之一, 按比例香港平均體壇水準係高過中國喎 [/quote]
不過唔好忘記香港好多精英運動員都係國援...
今屆亞運攞牌已經有帖雅娜, 張瑞, 王晨, 于偉麗.... I thinks we should use points but not number of gold
eg 1 gold = 3 points
1 silver= 2 points
.
.
.
.
this will be more fair [quote]Originally posted by [i]r0211272[/i] at 2006-12-17 00:12:
I thinks we should use points but not number of gold
eg 1 gold = 3 points
1 silver= 2 points
.
.
.
.
this will be more fair [/quote]
其實用金銀銅牌已經有呢個意思
(係獎牌榜上) 算啦 佢接受唔到中國好多體育健將
奧運入面美國人口唔係最多都囉第一啦
你都囉黎講
事實上你又o係度唔用腦講廢話:nogood:
唔抵得 叫d英國人o係奧運入面囉多幾面囉 bigfish 膠膠膠!
No bad words and personal attack in here!!!
:angry::angry::angry:
:nogood::nogood::nogood:
:mad::mad::mad:
Penalty
-5
[[i] Last edited by brightlee on 2006-12-17 at 04:01 AM [/i]] [quote]Originally posted by [i]bigfish[/i] at 2006-12-16 11:44 PM:
中國人口咁多, 拎咁多面金牌係理所當... [/quote]
:nogood::nogood::nogood::nogood:
#10:good::good::good: 由你呢個post 可得知你0既思想和思維都 :nogood::nogood::nogood: [quote]Originally posted by [i]王晶[/i] at 2006-12-16 11:50 PM:
人口多拎金牌點解係理所當然
君不見... [/quote]
王晶兄 , 算把啦 , 大家都唔同level , 笑下算啦:clap::clap: 都唔明你咁開post講有咩意思
中國拎金牌既人咪又係訓練出黎
你估真係國家人多就得既咩...
如果好似體操隊楊威拎幾塊金牌...咁都係靠佢個人努力ja
同國家人多真係有關係?
小弟不才...請指教 1)首先想講...在亞洲...
中國的而且確係體育強國...
呢個唔係錯覺...
即使在全世界...
中國都係一個體育強國...
睇下近年既奧運會...
中國既金牌數子都係數一數二...
2)其實奧運\亞運呢D 世界大型既運動會...
佢地已經做得非常公平...
例如每個國家...
在單人項目上只可以派出最多兩名既選手參賽...
呢條條例...已經保護左好多人口少既國家...
好似田徑項目咁...
如果無左呢條例...
可能有D 項目...
八個決賽選手入面...
有六個都係美國人...
3)其實如果係一個識諗既人...
佢地絶對唔會用中國既金牌數子同香港比...
要比....可能係用今年中國既金牌數子同上屆比...
如果要國家同國家比...
都會用差唔多情況\實力既國家比...
例如香港同新加坡比...美國同中國比...
就例如足球...
你可能會將車仔比較下曼聯...
但絶對唔會用車仔比港會... [quote]Originally posted by [i]sonyguy[/i] at 2006-12-17 08:52 AM:
1)首先想講...在亞洲...
中國的而且... [/quote]
好同意你第3點:good:
要比較既唔應該同其他國家比較
係應該同被比較既國家既過往成績作比較
咁先顯出佢地係過往日子既努力 [quote]Originally posted by [i]bigfish[/i] at 11:54 PM:
點解要同印度比唔同香港比?
香港人口只有中國二百分之一, 按比例香港平均體壇水準係高過中國喎 [/quote]
點解要同印度比唔同香港比?
你話人口多就金牌多,咁點解印度人口多你就唔用印度比? i think population size has no linkage with the achievements in sports. for example, china has lots of people, but she can't even send out 11 good players to play soccer. [quote]Originally posted by [i]anttiniemi2000[/i] at 2006-12-17 05:41 PM:
i think population size has no linkage with the achievements in sports. for example, china has lots of people, but she can't even send out 11 good players to play soccer. [/quote]
咁多個係得你一個講d 有見地o既公道說話:good:
頁:
[1]
2