佢一個月人工等如我搵一世都未必搵到~ Because 美國無球星,儲左好多錢~ [quote]Originally posted by [i]kgkgkg212121[/i] at 2007-1-15 03:32 PM:
睇黎都冇乜可能:P [/quote]
碧咸都係睇中美國聯賽有發展潛質先加盟美職聯 jeh
香港足球係衰落中, 佢點會加盟丫
同樣道理, 意甲球壇衰落令米蘭無法簽入碧咸, 同時佢又唔想加盟 man u 以外o既英超球隊, 咁咪唯有揀一個有進步o既聯賽囉 [quote]Originally posted by [i]bigfish[/i] at 2007-1-15 07:20 PM:
碧咸都係睇中美國聯賽有發展潛質先... [/quote]
發緊夢呀你:sleep::drool::sleep::drool: [quote]Originally posted by [i]kuru[/i] at 2007-1-15 04:53 PM:
呢個世界真係好唔公平,又靚仔,又有錢,
佢一個月人工等如我搵一世都未必搵到~ [/quote]
你唔記得之前有個銀行廣告叫人投資
話生得你有錢又靚仔機會只四千分之一
........
不過我話應該係四萬分之一呱 主要都係因為佢靚仔 [quote]Originally posted by [i]kuru[/i] at 2007-1-15 04:53 PM:
呢個世界真係好唔公平,又靚仔,又有錢,
佢一個月人工等如我搵一世都未必搵到~ [/quote]
係無錯齋睇外表同佢既身家佢係好完美
但係佢錯在有把雞仔聲
所以佢好難會有戲拍
上天係唔會咁唔公平架:good::good: fully agreed with locklock. Beckham is a kind of goods in football market that he can be trade to everywhere with acceptable price. Sometimes it cannot be determined by Beckham himself. even he don't want to, but when the football association made the deal, he has to go. Like the usual trading of exchange member in NBA (recently Iverson). Beckham can increase the profit of the football association in terms of increase in tickets, sponsor, advertisment, side product including cloth, sports accessories ....... etc. the question is can Beckham help the association to earn back the inverstment on him ! 佢商業價值高,幫到球會賺錢,球會又點會待薄佢... 我睇過d news, 間美國球會其實比番差唔多beckham而家既人工之嘛, 其他全部都係黎自贊助呀肖像權呀果d野~~ 睇報紙話佢會做 playmaker, 方便佢憑技術多d 控制中場節奏, 打呢個 position 打多五年都冇問題, 又唔駛走上走落, 佢依家體能都仲好 fit
好簡單,因為佢賣樣
一睇就知買佢個隊球隊係想拎佢黎搵銀啦..... 佢 D 波衫同 D 人入去睇佢踢波都 EARN 錢 EARN 到喊 [quote]Originally posted by [i]bigfish[/i] at 2007-1-16 04:08 PM:睇報紙話佢會做 playmaker, 方便佢憑技術多d 控制中場節奏, 打呢個 position 打多五年都冇問題, 又唔駛走上走落, 佢依家體能都仲好 fit [/quote]
我想講碧咸係完全無做playmaker既技術, 佢過到去都係做斬波機器罷了 [quote]Originally posted by [i]flash_2006[/i] at 2007-1-16 11:57 PM:
我想講碧咸係完全無做playmaker既技術, 佢過到去都係做斬波機器罷了 [/quote]
點為之 playmaker 技術?
唔通你就有 playmaker 技術, 反而碧咸冇?:mad: [quote]Originally posted by [i]bigfish[/i] at 2007-1-17 12:07 AM:
點為之 playmaker 技術?
唔通你就有 playmaker 技術, 反而碧咸冇?:mad: [/quote]
如果你話碧咸有playmaker技術我都無野好講, 徙氣:sleep:
仲有, 如果個個都要有職業球員至可以講波我相信呢度無人有資格係度再講任何野..單細胞你知道嗎? 佢跟本唔識足球
只知道英國
中場中唔係要最多體能咩 如果打得好ga話
你睇下老左冇體能ga 雷拿(曼城)打得幾差
同埋佢真係單細胞得好緊要
我都有睇過果篇新聞
人地係話佢會打中場中 唔係playmarker
仲有 人地話佢打係因為比佢多d機會掂波
咁樣先多人見到 增加巿場價值ja [quote]Originally posted by [i]20001160[/i] at 2007-1-17 12:39 AM:
佢跟本唔識足球
只知道英國
[color=Red]中場中唔係要最多體能咩 如果打得好ga話[/color]
你睇下老左冇體能ga 雷拿(曼城)打得幾差
同埋佢真係單細胞得好緊要
我都有睇過果篇新聞
人地係話佢會打中場中 唔係playmarker
仲有 人地話佢打係因為比佢多d機會掂波
咁樣先多人見到 增加巿場價值ja[/quote]
純粹路過想講一講
本人立場並冇偏向其中一方
碧咸體能真係無需懷疑
佢只不過跑得唔夠快但係體能一定唔差
落得場一定前前後後都見到佢
佢每場走動既距離多過好多一級球員
純粹為世間人對碧咸既體能誤解作出平反
平反完畢
另外見你咁有見解比個例子你玩下
以你既見解列基美體能屬於乜野程度呢
佢係唔係一級既中場中(定係前一格)呢
[[i] Last edited by donald15 on 2007-1-17 at 01:33 AM [/i]] [quote]Originally posted by [i]donald15[/i] at 2007-1-17 01:31 AM:
純粹路過想講一講
本人立場並冇偏... [/quote]
講得o岩, 碧咸o既體能屬世界級:good:
我所講o既位置係好似列基美咁唔駛做防守工作, 唔係馬基里尼o個隻中場中
我相信碧咸一定唔會差得過列基美囉, 罰球, 創造力, 傳送, 射門, 護球能力全部都具頂級超卓水平, 不過我擔心佢d 隊友未必能夠搶到波俾佢, 又未必接應到佢o既助攻...希望到時佢地生生性性啦 [quote]Originally posted by [i]flash_2006[/i] at 2007-1-17 12:14 AM:
如果你話碧咸有playmaker技術我都無... [/quote]
有好多技術你同我都唔識做, 唔通我地有資格教佢點射罰球點斬波?
但有陣時態度同貪念我地就可以批評, 好似安歷卡, 肥馬o既人格, 同埋費高o既貪念, 我地都可以批評 [quote]Originally posted by [i]bigfish[/i] at 2007-1-17 02:02 AM:
有好多技術你同我都唔識做, 唔通我... [/quote]
咁beckham我地都可以批評了:kicking: