[quote]Originally posted by [i]bigfish[/i] at 2007-1-16 04:08 PM:
睇報紙話佢會做 playmaker, 方便佢憑技術多d 控制中場節奏, 打呢個 position 打多五年都冇問題, 又唔駛走上走落, 佢依家體能都仲好 fit [/quote]
係美國聯賽梗係無問題喇~
[quote]
我相信碧咸一定唔會差得過列基美囉, 罰球, 創造力, 傳送, 射門, 護球能力全部都具頂級超卓水平
[/quote]
奇文共賞．單細胞的偉論:lol:
坦白講, 除左斬波同罰波外, 碧咸係護波,創造力只屬英甲水平. 你羅列基美既攻擊力同碧咸相提並論係侮辱左列基美
仲有, 佢打中場中間, 腳法又唔好, 過唔到人只係做博腳點做攻擊中場..防守, 一係就矛人, 一係就鍚身..完全唔係打防守中場既水準..
如果佢咁勁皇馬晨早搵佢打中場中路啦
[[i] Last edited by flash_2006 on 2007-1-17 at 08:20 AM [/i]]
[quote]Originally posted by [i]flash_2006[/i] at 2007-1-17 08:15 AM:
奇文共賞．單細胞的偉論:lol:
坦... [/quote]
呵呵
初加盟時搵佢打過中間
結果............有目共睹:haha:
[quote]Originally posted by [i]donald15[/i] at 2007-1-17 10:12 PM:
呵呵
初加盟時搵佢打過中間
結果............有目共睹:haha: [/quote]
中場 playmaker, 係兩個前鋒後面, 三個中場前面o個種喎
[quote]Originally posted by [i]flash_2006[/i] at 2007-1-17 08:15 AM:
奇文共賞．單細胞的偉論:lol:
坦... [/quote]
同距講晒氣啦,距嚮呢度留低嘅偉論仲會少咩. 講技術, 碧咸連幫列基美挽鞋嘅資格都未有啦.系距D咁嘅球盲先講得出口嘅姐.
[quote]Originally posted by [i]mchu14[/i] at 2007-1-17 10:32 PM:
同距講晒氣啦,距嚮呢度留低嘅偉論仲會少咩. 講技術, 碧咸連幫列基美挽鞋嘅資格都未有啦.系距D咁嘅球盲先講得出口嘅姐. [/quote]
咁又唔可以話挽鞋都未夠班ge...
其實列基美都有弱點
列基美頭搥、速度、心理質素相信都未達一級水平
講傳中球...列基美也根本及不上碧咸
當然列基美都有比碧咸好的地方
例如hold波、控制節奏、創造力、腳法
而e d優勢，正正係列基美比碧咸勝任playmarker一職的原因