娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 電腦區 » Is Windows Vista Faster Than XP?

vcrcan 發表於 2007-3-29 07:54 PM

if you install it to your current old machine,there's no way Vista faster than XP

abcdeok 發表於 2007-4-2 12:54 AM

其實佢最差都係相容性問題, 冇xp咁好

yukason 發表於 2007-4-5 11:01 AM

besides it requires too much on hardware now

Jonny B 發表於 2007-4-9 07:07 AM

If you have the newest hardware, Vista might be alright, but I don't think it's worth upgrading if you have an older comp, I tried and it didn't work well.

tonyw 發表於 2007-4-10 08:52 PM

無可能

兩樣我都試過
xp 大大遠遠好過 vista 好多

sinatemp 發表於 2007-4-12 01:08 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]因果[/i] at 2007-3-18 10:08 PM:
基本上 vista 發展未成熟...佢依家係唔夠XP勁..
但再多過d時間...Vista 是取代XP...
但唔係依家...
仲要...Vista 需要好高既電腦性能... [/quote]

同意:agree:

lungchimo 發表於 2007-4-12 08:32 PM

I heard from my colleague that XP is stable than Vista, don't use Vista now

belon 發表於 2007-4-14 06:49 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]因果[/i] at 2007-3-18 22:08:
基本上 vista 發展未成熟...佢依家係唔夠XP勁..
但再多過d時間...Vista 是取代XP...
但唔係依家...
仲要...Vista 需要好高既電腦性能... [/quote]

i don't understand why it is necessary for OS to need "好高既電腦性能".
Most people use computer just to surf interent, type word doc or excel spreadsheet.

It is just a way of commercial or business for microsoft / intel / computer vendors to make people keep on buying hardware and software.

I mean, come on, how many people really need core 2 duo or quad ?
It is just a way (and the only way) to keep the computer hardware price stay up.

KC-Alen 發表於 2007-4-20 02:42 AM

ur a little wrong about the processors of  dual cores & quad cores, those processors are NOT made for letting the price rise for the hardware components & those processors NOT specially made for gamers and normal users (making word documents, chatting surfing internet etc, those processors are more made for video editing dudes etc, and some companys who will need to run about 2~6 hard softwares which will use many cpu's calculation because of those more cores, the processor doesn't need to calculate so many things if ur running like 2~6 hard softwares. Many many video editting softwares use many memory and cpu's memory.

If ur thinking to buy a quad core for playing games, then u r doing something silly.
cuz a quad core is a piece a sjit for a gamer. A dual core is alright for a gamer, but not necessery.


Also a windows vista "could" be faster then xp, because of its required enquipment, and vista is a powerful os, but if you want to have ur vista running faster then ur xp, you will have to stack alot of money on your computer just for running vista faster then xp (silly work to do this).

wukingtung 發表於 2007-4-22 05:39 PM

睇你部機架咋啵

nicktse1980 發表於 2007-4-28 05:53 PM

出Vista 目的，只係話你知你張Display 卡同 CPU 同底板都舊喇，要去換。
我等緊 AMD X 4出。先換其他野。

好係 Rainbow 3 PC 版咁，都係話你你張Display 好唔掂，去買 XBOX 360啦

nicktse1980 發表於 2007-4-28 05:57 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]tonyw[/i] at 2007-4-10 08:52 PM:
無可能

兩樣我都試過
xp 大大遠遠好過 vista 好多 [/quote]

當你有粒 D-Core 2 Duo 1.6
加 2G Ram，你唔會咁說諗

查看完整版本: Is Windows Vista Faster Than XP?