[quote]Originally posted by [i]勇勇[/i] at 2007-6-3 09:26 PM: n9z0L&k z|+Vs%I
T
明白晒:):):)
咁下次我打多d字啦:(:(:( [/quote]/O|@D*\,t$Kt4n
Ev8t
吾關打字多少既問題 , S310 兄都打左好多字 , 但都係攞10分......
我個答案都吾係好多字 , 但你有冇留意我既內容...有d咩與別不同的合理觀点
[quote]Originally posted by [i]playbr2[/i] at 2007-6-3 21:40:
/~~.b-l;~J#Zpdy[
N@ARJ
吾關打字多少既問題 , S310 兄都打左好多字 , 但都係攞10分......
我個答案都吾係好多字 , 但你有冇留意我既內容...有d咩與別不同的合理觀点 [/quote]
即係88講出佢另類觀點(雖然唔岩),所以多D分加:):):):)
完全明白晒LA:agree::agree:
咁我PART4要發表多D意見LA:):):)(雖然我知道自己經已答對了):P:P:P
[quote]Originally posted by [i]勇勇[/i] at 2007-6-3 09:46 PM:
M!_5M+t?'CX+hJ k
即係88講出佢另類觀點(雖然唔岩... [/quote]Snl@3R
88d觀點都合理架 , 佢講左受傷吾走遠d e個point , 不過都係缺乏針對疑犯''證人''既論述
[quote]Originally posted by [i]勇勇[/i] at 2007-6-3 09:46 PM:d o'to(^+d2j;y
%ic%h8zvO
即係88講出佢另類觀點(雖然唔岩... [/quote]
其實只要合理,即使與標準答案有出入,應可接受}0~|HDS}t
我地(你,我,s310)拿唔足分的確如playbr2所言,都係缺乏針對疑犯''證人''既論述,應該係指下面嗰段 B2~\ I"eA
[quote]Originally posted by [i]playbr2[/i] at 2007-6-2 09:32 PM: