意甲波 古惑多
安玻里 對 羅馬 2:2熱拿亞 對 巴勒莫 3:3
利禾奴 對 烏甸尼斯 0:0
拿玻里 對 里賈納 1:1
帕爾馬 對 錫耶納 2:2
今晚踢左7場(未計祖雲達斯對國際米蘭),和左5場,其中4場有記錄,1場0:0
拿玻里對里賈納89分鐘入波
另外3場都係補時階段先入波,有無咁啱呀? 都係o個句：
英超和波多=巧合
意甲和波多=假波
英超4：4=激戰
意甲4：4=假波 What's about Portsmouth vs Reading this year?!
2 goals in injury time?! [quote]Originally posted by [i]brightlee[/i] at 2007-11-5 10:03 AM:
What's about Portsmouth vs Reading this year?!
2 goals in injury time?! [/quote]
又諗起 7:4 ...... 真係人都癲 ....... :D:D:D:D:D I got no idea..
why people always think games are corrupted in their mind?
Man........... human can't control all things!!!!
=.=''''''
like do u think Gunners vs Red Devils was corrupted on Sat as William Gallas scored an own goal and scored a goal in 91 mins to draw that game?! 因為意甲個底花晒
以前成日比人爆出係打假波
所以d人好容易就會將假波同意甲連埋 [quote]Originally posted by [i]皇馬_王子[/i] at 2007-11-5 18:46:
因為意甲個底花晒
以前成日比人爆出係打假波
所以d人好容易就會將假波同意甲連埋 [/quote]
Be honest, we never know the game will be corrupted or not...
sometimes, they can be, YES, or NO....
But 1 thing I really dislike people... which is... a draw/strange game, in any league... means there would be corrupted!!!
I watch English soccer since 1985... there are a lot of results unpredictable. Even last year, as Man Utd won Roma 7-1... no one expected that after first leg...
But no one was talking about corruption...
:noway:
I am not saying that game was corrupted.. but nowadays in HK, people are not watching soccer now. When the result for that game maybe not coming out in their minds, they are thinking the game should be corrupted straightly
That's really upset! People always forget the meaning of sports, is gambling in their head!:( 呵呵~~
雲達斯對國際米蘭 都係１：１和波 italy d波和就假波,,真好野:clap: 尋日場羅馬先離普, 上半場羅馬輕輕鬆鬆就入兩粒, 中場就換走古利, 補時仲俾人追和, 我睇到眼火爆 [quote]Originally posted by [i]brightlee[/i] at 2007-11-5 05:08 PM:
Be honest, we never know the ... [/quote]
我覺得話假波o既話, 場波o既賽果就要解釋唔倒
如果場波追和/反勝/反敗係因為領隊領先時調走主將, 球隊更重視下一場比賽, 或因為某d原因而冇心機踢(e.g.同管理層或領隊不和), 就算賽果唔同預期都唔可以話假波 ;) [color=Red][size=5]其實係度講過好多次, 講極d朋友仔都唔會明....[/size][/color]
[b]假? 咁我好想問, 和左波係咪d莊家就通殺, 唔洗派彩?
假? 我想問你地知唔知點解會有 "亞洲盤" 呢樣野?
假? 我想問你地知唔知要在場22球員, 加上雙方領隊, 後備12個球員, 再加4個球証,
要呢40個人齊心做一場波, 個難度係會有幾高?
假? 你地知唔知祖記同ac比人捉既唔係賭錢, 係收買對手輸比自己?[/b]
小弟深信世界上一定有假波, 但亦深信呢d咁高水準既球賽"造波"難度極高
[b][color=Red][size=5]成人講d球員球隊球証做波, 不如先代入下, 就當你自己要"造"一場波,
要萬無一失, 應該要點做, 深入諗完之後, 相信你心目中既"假波"會大大減少...[/size][/color][/b]:):):)
如果大家對以上幾點想討教, 歡迎之至... [quote]Originally posted by [i]filter-052fans[/i] at 2007-11-5 23:20:
[color=Red][size=5]其實係度講過好多... [/quote]
[color=Purple]【假波】得益者根本就唔關莊家事，係２支球隊嘅事！！如果２支球隊講好數，然後大大舊錢買落去自己已經知道嘅賽果，真係想要幾多錢就有幾多錢！！[/color]
【[color=Green]假波】只要兩個領隊＋兩個守門員已經可以造一場【假波】（再唔係加多２個前鋒，一共都係６個人），根本就唔洗成村人去造一場【假波】！[/color]
[color=Blue]【假波】小第就岩岩o係１０月２０號睇左一場，就係[color=Red]羅馬對拿玻里[/color]，[color=Red]拿玻里[/color]入o個４球波，[color=Red]羅馬[/color]個守門員都係睇住個波入，一Ｄ反應都冇！[/color]
[color=Red][size=5][color=Maroon]p.s::[/color]足球唔一定係假，但係要踢一場假波造一場假波，根本就易如反掌，只要約出街一齊打場麻雀已經可以！[/size][/color] [quote]Originally posted by [i]勇勇[/i] at 2007-11-5 11:56 PM:
[color=Purple]【假波】得益者根本... [/quote]
其實再簡單d, 一個守門員都已經得
最多賽後話佢夢游或者失準 :D [quote]Originally posted by [i]勇勇[/i] at 2007-11-5 11:56 PM:
[color=Purple]【假波】得益者根本... [/quote]
即係
羅賓遜牛油手+柯蛋====佢廢
羅馬個古斯夢遊冇反應==假波
身為羅馬既球迷，聽倒你咁講真係唔知好嬲定好笑好。 [quote]Originally posted by [i]皇馬_王子[/i] at 2007-11-5 04:46 PM:
因為[color=Red]意甲個底花晒[/color]
以前成日比人爆出係打假波
所以d人好容易就會將假波同意甲連埋 [/quote]
梗係花晒啦，你幾可有聽過大陸反貪架？？香港就反貪反到冇停手，大陸就年中一兩單反貪show咁囉。
即係香港個底花晒喇。 [quote]Originally posted by [i]Kian76[/i] at 2007-11-6 12:50 AM:
即係
羅賓遜牛油手+柯蛋====佢廢
羅馬個古斯夢遊冇反應==假波
身為羅馬既球迷，聽倒你咁講真係唔知好嬲定[color=Red]好笑[/color]好。 [/quote]
其實每次聽倒有人話假波都覺得好好笑 :D:D [quote]Originally posted by [i]勇勇[/i] at 2007-11-5 11:56 PM:
[color=Purple]【假波】得益者根本... [/quote]
我絕對唔想咁串用"白痴"去形容呢種思維, 我早就講, 先要代入想"造波"既人,
[color=Red][size=4]閣下講到要"造"就只要講掂數就得咁簡單, 呢種思維就真係簡單過小學生...[/size][/color]
[b]首先, 你已經假設呢個世界係完美既, 唔存在人世間你虞我詐既黑吃黑...[/b]:haha::haha::haha:
[color=Blue]假設我同你同一班人打場波, 大家講好數要"造"場客勝四比一,
大家如你所講早知賽果係咩, 所有知情既人都一面倒買晒讓球盤, 波膽, 客勝等等彩池,
由於你呢班傻仔買晒果客勝四比一, 填左一大筆錢落去個pool 度,
偏偏身為主隊keeper既我, 同一班後防兄弟講好, 唔輸比你地, 食埋你果舊錢,
我仲可以係出班搵埋一班有錢朋友幫我買爆主勝, 我只抽10分1作報酬.....[/color]:D
[b]呢個只係我小小既舉例, 有我以上既思維既人可能多到你發夢都估唔到,
就算你地兩隊friend過打band, 莊家又可以收買球証, 因為此仍天生, 人類既劣根性.....[/b]:secret::secret::secret:
足球雖然彩池多, 但其實只有"贏""和""輸"三辦, 形同賭場既"大細"同"百家樂"
賭場也可以出老千, 但何官只有一人, 例諗下如果係同足球一樣, 三四十人打一口莊,
係咪仲'造"得咁順利?
仲有一點好緊要既, 你當d球員係你呢一種升斗小民, 人家個個開架法拉利去球員練波,
我唔明正正當當都搵到大錢, 做咩要去做d穿左出黎一世玩完既野...
當然蠢人一定有, 唔係唔都會有意甲"電話門"事件, 但呢種白痴一定唔係球員既主流...
[color=Red][b][size=5]再講你第一點之愚昧, 我從來只有聽過, "造"波"造"馬收左黑金放水益d大莊,
從未聽過有人蠢到自己真金白銀出錢去落注, 會咁做既相信只有白痴....[/size][/b][/color]:D:D:D
泰利番一個月人工大約700萬港紙左右, 碧咸就大約3500萬港紙一個月...
唔講呢d最高人工既, 普普通通一個四大聯賽球員平均都有港紙20萬左右一個月...
我真係唔知如果佢地要賭, 個pool要有幾大, 先夠佢地玩....
唔通靠你果注雞仔注?? :D:D:D 講多少少。
電話門事件中，祖雲達斯係衰單方面控制球證，甚至禁固出錯球證。
而AC米蘭主要係衰在指定某球證執法。
但好似末聽過雙方夾埋造賽果wor~~~~唔好意思~~~~~
瑞典vs丹麥呢d反而係雙方意識及利益上共通的戰術性偽造賽果2：2。
但唔計得失球既意甲，偽造賽果有咩意義？？ [quote]Originally posted by [i]Kian76[/i] at 2007-11-6 12:59:
講多少少。
電話門事件中，祖雲達... [/quote]
i watched Sweden vs Denmark and Italy vs Bulgaria in the same time
I don't think that's any flake results in there.
I still remember when Italy scored 2-1... and within 10 seconds, Sweden scored their 2 goals to draw the game
Be honest, if you were Swedish or Danish
and you know your team can qualify in injury time, will you attack?
頁:
[1]
2