娛樂滿紛 26FUN's Archiver

Xtravagant 發表於 2008-1-12 08:01 AM

熱火上訴獲悉﹐下次和膺隊碰頭將重賽51.9秒

NBA 史無前例地讓熱火於十二月9號隊HAWKS既賽事進行重賽。
但吾係打晒成場﹐只係最後果51.9妙。呢個重賽將於下次和HAWKS碰頭時比賽之前舉行。

[我覺得NBA呢個決定有D兒戲:lol:]

[[i] Last edited by Xtravagant on 2008-1-12 at 08:04 AM [/i]]

brightlee 發表於 2008-1-12 08:02 AM

Oh~~~ how come?
is that something wrong in that match?

Xtravagant 發表於 2008-1-12 08:15 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]brightlee[/i] at 2008-1-12 08:02 AM:
Oh~~~ how come?
is that something wrong in that match? [/quote]

Shaq was charged with a wrong foul and got fouled out in the last game when the score was very close / tie. The foul was acutally charged against another player (forgot who hewas).

chicken 發表於 2008-1-12 09:06 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]Xtravagant[/i] at 2008-1-12 08:15:


Shaq was charged with a wrong foul and got fouled out in the last game when the score was very close / tie. The foul was acutally charged against another player (forgot who hewas). [/quote]

That's unbelievable error so rematching later period is a good decision I think.

nac971 發表於 2008-1-12 09:45 AM

熱火下次對鷹隊係8/3(香港時間9/3)

chong2002 發表於 2008-1-12 09:50 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]Xtravagant[/i] at 2008-1-12 08:01 AM:
NBA 史無前例地讓熱火於十二月9號隊HA... [/quote]
嘩...我以前我以前玩3on3 先有依d..
估唔到nba 都有 :lol:

Overpowering 發表於 2008-1-12 02:17 PM

so funny....

brightlee 發表於 2008-1-12 02:23 PM

Additional information:

The protest is the first granted by the NBA since December 1982, when then-NBA commissioner Larry O'Brien upheld a request for a replay by the San Antonio Spurs after their 137-132 double-overtime loss to the Los Angeles Lakers the previous month.

The Spurs and Lakers finally finished the game in April 1983, with San Antonio winning 117-114.

kgkgkg212121 發表於 2008-1-12 02:48 PM

51.9秒... 熱晒身準備晒就係為左果51.9秒~~
114-111
有1個幾月時間俾佢地諗下點追果3分~~:lol:

Mun 發表於 2008-1-12 03:58 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]Xtravagant[/i] at 2008-1-12 08:01 AM:
NBA [color=Red]史無前例[/color]地讓熱火於十二月9號隊HA... [/quote]
It's not......

123456yyyYYY 發表於 2008-1-12 04:55 PM

咁都得@@
查實點解要 "重賽"呢 51.9秒呢?

kgkgkg212121 發表於 2008-1-12 06:20 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]Mun[/i] at 2008-1-12 03:58 PM:

It's not...... [/quote]
只係25年黎第1次;)

阿感 發表於 2008-1-12 07:45 PM

熱火打成咁,都入唔荒入到playoff啦,呢場就咁輸埋佢,博選秀佢好過啦:dev:

[[i] Last edited by 阿感 on 2008-1-12 at 10:17 PM [/i]]

brightlee 發表於 2008-1-12 10:06 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]阿感[/i] at 2008-1-12 21:45:
熱火打成咁,都入唔荒入到playoff啦,呢場就咁輸埋佢,博過選秀佢好過啦:dev: [/quote]
the problem is: when they got the trading for Ricky Davis this year, they sent 1st round pick to T'wolves...
so they won't get 1st round pick at the end of this season
:hitwall:

Xtravagant 發表於 2008-1-12 10:11 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]brightlee[/i] at 2008-1-12 10:06 PM:

the problem is: when they got the trading for Ricky Davis this year, they sent 1st round pick to T'wolves...
so they won't get 1st round pick at the end of this season
:hitwall: [/quote]

Really ??? so if they get 1st round, it will be sent to t'wolves?

asurada001 發表於 2008-1-12 10:16 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]Xtravagant[/i] at 2008-1-12 09:11 AM:


Really ??? so if they get 1st round, it will be sent to t'wolves? [/quote]

the draft pick is lottery protected in 2008, top 10 in 2009, top 6 in 2010, beyond: unprotected.....

therefore miami will keep this pick this year as long as they don't make the playoffs..

[url=http://http://www.nbadraft.net/draftnotes.asp#min102407]http://www.nbadraft.net/draftnotes.asp#min102407[/url]

[[i] Last edited by asurada001 on 2008-1-12 at 09:17 AM [/i]]

brightlee 發表於 2008-1-12 10:29 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]asurada001[/i] at 2008-1-13 00:16:


the draft pick is lottery prote... [/quote]
Thanks for your information~~~!!:)
Cos when I read that trading first time.. I couldn't see that selection criteria :)

asurada001 發表於 2008-1-12 11:42 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]brightlee[/i] at 2008-1-12 09:29 AM:

Thanks for your information~~~!!:)
Cos when I read that trading first time.. I couldn't see that selection criteria :) [/quote]

the news doesn't reveal these draft protection often...

$$88 發表於 2008-1-15 03:25 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]阿感[/i] at 2008-1-12 07:45 PM:
熱火打成咁,都入唔荒入到playoff啦,呢場就咁輸埋佢,博選秀佢好過啦:dev:

[[i] Last edited by 阿感 on 2008-1-12 at 10:17 PM [/i]] [/quote]
:good::good:
冇錯,熱火太令人失望

艾力克 發表於 2008-1-18 10:39 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]Xtravagant[/i] at 2008-1-12 08:01 AM:
NBA 史無前例地讓熱火於十二月9號隊HAWKS...
呢個重賽將於[color=Red]下次和HAWKS碰頭時比賽之前舉行[/color]。[/quote]
咁如果追番和打加時, 咁跟住場比賽咪有排都打唔倒, 打到攰晒喎 :giveup:
會唔會依51.9秒好快會有人foul out呢? :dev::D:D

頁: [1] 2

Powered by Discuz! Archiver 7.0.0  © 2001-2009 Comsenz Inc.