法興500幾億單野似搵人食死貓
法興500幾億單野似搵人食死貓:confused:有冇人有同感:P [quote]Originally posted by [i]admin[/i] at 2008-1-28 19:50:
法興500幾億單野似搵人食死貓:confused:
有冇人有同感:P [/quote]
小弟個人覺得絕對係咯~:D
有咁好機會點解唔借個漏洞去益自己荷包先？:P
有咁利害可以動用龐大資金點解會職位都係咁低微？:haha:
有咁嘅頭腦同心思點解會有個咁嘅投資錯誤？:eek:
陰謀論d 去睇，無理由無幕後黑手喎~:dev: i don't think so
by putting the blame on a rogue trader the bank is opening itself up for public scrutiny and a thorough investigation by the authorities
if the bank is trying to hide something it is much simpler to lump it into a subprime related writedown and face less questions
[url]http://online.wsj.com/article/SB120148103803521017.html?mod=hps_us_whats_news[/url]
[url]http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=aZ03C88esp1Q&refer=home[/url] 法興自己公司根本投資有問題, 兼將責任卸落職員到,
有乜理由一個初級職員可以動用到咁大資金呢? 今日同同事傾開都有呢個感覺.
一個小職員點可能控制咁大筆資金.
就算係控制到, 不停補倉, t+2 結算個陣冇左咁大筆資金,佢上司冇可能唔知.
而且宜家講到好似唔駛埋數咁, 突然發現...真係好有問題! We still don't know much about the details of what he was supposed to have done. But apparently a lot of this related to exchange traded futures. These trades are recorded in the stock / futures exchange's computers and monitored by exchange officials - latest news is that exchange officials have warned SG something is wrong many weeks ago (so SG did not just suddenly find out about a big loss 10 days ago).
As tk83 says, other staff (SG's treasury dept) must have sent him lots of money to finance his trades over a long period of time. It's just unbelievable to say the guy acted alone.
頁:
[1]