娛樂滿紛 26FUN's Archiver

迪達拉姑 發表於 2008-2-13 02:14 AM

中意貝碧托夫/羅比堅尼多d?

:clap:我一定揀羅比堅尼..佢配合度同進取度都比貝仔高好多我覺得..周不時有波入,之前睇熱刺有場波 覺得完全表現哂英超係節奏快既精彩之處!但貝仔唔多識跑快d..

john01daly 發表於 2008-2-13 07:36 AM

Both are age 27, but I think Dimitar Berbatov is little bit better.

ontong 發表於 2008-2-13 11:09 AM

技術計好似貝碧托夫全面 二傳又得 埋門把握都好

kubrick 發表於 2008-2-13 12:37 PM

但貝碧托夫無羅比堅尼果種passion..
羅比緊尼睇得到佢好有heart同埋搏到盡

bunce2806 發表於 2008-2-13 01:27 PM

Maybe Berbatov because of his great natural talent (which he seems to be able to turn on liike a light switch) and strength.  But both of them are vital to the team as a whole as they link up very well and complement each other, a bit like Klinsmann and Sheringham in the old days.

Foxcom 發表於 2008-2-13 02:38 PM

我覺得兩個都好, 而兩者互相配合就更好, 比以前要配迪科爾好得多, 貝碧托夫技術較好,  能"軒"制到對手防線, 提供空位給羅比堅尼並能作出有效二傳; 後者則是射手型, 鬥心強敢起腳又把握力不俗, 若球隊當時打得順, 進攻模式做得好, 經常能入兩三球

wizard000 發表於 2008-2-13 07:37 PM

係熱刺fans都會choose 羅比rather than 貝碧

freeze0912 發表於 2008-2-16 08:13 PM

羅比堅尼好似無貝碧咁全面

阿M 發表於 2008-2-17 10:59 PM

Berbatov !
主場對曼魚果場打出身價 !!

Ljungberg 發表於 2008-2-20 05:45 PM

貝碧托夫踢法好瀟灑:good:

ThomasKoon 發表於 2008-2-29 11:27 PM

好難講﹐各有千秋﹐robbie keane就好有鬥心﹐夠拚搏﹐berbatov好似唔多願走﹐不過只要有波到佢腳﹐就一定有野俾你睇。

我個人比較鍾意berbatov多啲﹗

迪達拉姑 發表於 2008-3-1 12:55 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]ThomasKoon[/i] at 2008-2-29 11:27 PM:
好難講﹐各有千秋﹐robbie keane就好有鬥心﹐夠拚搏﹐berbatov好似唔多願走﹐不過只要有波到佢腳﹐就一定有野俾你睇。

我個人比較鍾意berbatov多啲﹗ [/quote]
indeed,我都發現踢波經常有兩種人..一種好勇鬥狠..一種扮豬食老虎..羅比堅尼好欣賞佢夠勤力...而貝碧嫌佢未夠勁d爆發力..可能身型好似 高路斯,東尼,阿祖安奴個d咁.就平均好睇d

edmond25 發表於 2008-3-1 04:37 AM

我都係熱刺fans ~ 兩個其實類型好唔同 , 貝碧的技術較好 , 而羅比堅尼就好肯去跑去搏 ~  所以佢地就真係好配合..... 既然兩個都唔同type, 中意邊個多d 就好睇你中意睇d 咩 ~
我會choose 貝碧 ~ 因為好中意睇佢既二傳同埋交直線 ~ 佢有時任何情況下都可以交到波俾人 ~

頁: [1]

Powered by Discuz! Archiver 7.0.0  © 2001-2009 Comsenz Inc.