[quote]Originally posted by [i]filter-052fans[/i] at 2008-4-12 03:25 PM:
我唔明點解我句野會被曲解成, &qu... [/quote]
哈!!:D:D:D
我明白!
以閣下既為人,我都知你係乜都冇講過!
我對空氣講嘢!!
"不知道!!甚麼不知道!!"
哈!
明o架喇!
曲解??!!!
係啩!
"商業因素".....哩句先好笑!!事實黎o架喎!!乜都要錢啦!
球隊有商業因素,球員有商業因素,所以球証又有商業因素.......
咪又玩法一個!!!
:D:D:D
"簡單講, 我既意思係話, 如果第一回合贏到, 次回作輸緊3比2都唔洗谷上去輸埋第4球!!"
講講吓又話自己講乜嘢輸第四球.......輸3:2同4:2...都係有分別既如果第一回合贏到....所以你話佢哋第一回合贏唔到就要問吓佢哋做乜第一回合要贏唔到喇!!
"阿仙奴除左怪欠運之外, 點解唔問下自己, 主場果場點解係1比1?
如果上星期主場贏既話, 相信而家出局既係利物浦!!"
嘩......點解要1比1喎......有得解o架喎.....哩啲嘢有得解o架喎......
話時話.....點解阿仙奴輸完第三球唔即刻入返一球呢??甘佢哋咪可以出線囉!
班球員真on居!!
係喎.....應該係冇講過喎.....鬼遮眼添......唔係唔係.....會錯意...又會錯意!
根本都冇講過.....句嘢自己飛出黎之嘛!
哈!
"嘩,c朗呀!勁呀!!贏梗喇!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!"
[[i] Last edited by HansChan on 2008-4-12 at 05:09 PM [/i]]
liv 超前 3:2 個球 12碼 百分百 係枉判
呢個波係全場的轉捩點
假如無判 12 碼的話
當時仲有幾分鐘就完場
結果會點
god know
周圍都有人討論 big 4 邊個領隊揾藉口揾得多
其實亞先老多呢種情況就係人都知
唔係話其他 big 4 無
情況肯定無好似亞記咁
咁 fans 們唔開心 睇唔過眼
好正常
咁都要左拉右拉話無不公無唔抵就真係無野好講
算
你講晒
[quote]Originally posted by [i]hkusu[/i] at 2008-4-13 09:46 PM:
周圍都有人討論 big 4 邊個領隊揾藉口... [/quote]
老兄!
你冇學到嘢咩?
主場俾人追番要有得解......
但球証錯判要問自己之前做乜唔贏.......
仲有!
要本末倒置去睇比賽......
中文程度要夠高,如果唔就唔可以將自己打過既嘢既意思搬弄.......
"嘩.....又係C朗..勁呀!!贏梗喇!"
算啦. 各位. 唔好再鬧交啦...一切已成定局...
今日ars輸俾manu又係penalty...
我都唔想再講...
但我想問一個中堅會唔會係冇威脅下特登手球? = =
[quote]Originally posted by [i]michelle_tom[/i] at 2008-4-14 01:29 AM:
算啦. 各位. 唔好再鬧交啦...一切已成定局...
今日ars輸俾manu又係penalty...
我都唔想再講...
但我想問一個中堅會唔會係冇威脅下特登手球? = = [/quote]
言下之意, 唔應該吹12碼 ?
[quote]Originally posted by [i]filter-052fans[/i] at 2008-4-14 02:18 AM:
言下之意, 唔應該吹12碼 ? [/quote]
果球吹左我無說話好講...
但唔吹更合理... :kicking:呢球Gallas係係禁區入面.......明知出手會有penalty...
點會特登去擋個波...
的確不論係有意用手打落個波
或者係波飛埋泥掂到手...球証都有權吹手球犯規(即犯手球)
但係我成日覺得手球有時真係吹得好唔抵....
[[i] Last edited by michelle_tom on 2008-4-14 at 02:43 AM [/i]]
[quote]Originally posted by [i]michelle_tom[/i] at 2008-4-14 02:32 AM:
果球吹左我無說話好講...
但唔吹... [/quote]
輸球發瘟波, 無人會覺得抵,
但是實上果球係12碼, 咁都唔吹仲大獲...
老實講我分唔清加拿斯係想 "縮" 定 "擋"...
我覺得失分到呢個連雲加都已經投左降既位置,
要去分析阿仙奴既下滑, 用運氣同球證錯判已經不足以解釋...
有時我覺得十二碼呢家野真係好麻煩...
客觀d講可以話球證誤判偏袒/有雙重標準亦係球賽一部分, 但都係怨不得人...
但實際影響有幾大 可想而知...
唔係only話阿記...
十二碼真係玩死唔少球隊....
那個penalty沒話說，阿仙奴好像開始喜歡上送點球了。 。 。
可是Adebayor進的球好像也是用手
My comments:
Not hand ball for Adebayor.
There should be penalty for Man Utd.
100% sure.
不看重播也很難判斷
[url]http://101greatgoals.magnify.net/item/XTC0BFGBF0D72DNV[/url]
[quote]Originally posted by [i]woooot[/i] at 2008-4-14 10:49 AM:
不看重播也很難判斷
[url]http://101greatgoals.magnify.net/item/XTC0BFGBF0D72DNV[/url] [/quote]
但我覺得只係攝影機既角度問題...
其實果兩球波都無吹錯, 理由好簡單, 你睇在場球友都無人投訴....
傳聞阿仙奴入第一球, 係有人嗌keeper, 攪到曼聯後防誤會...
至於曼聯第一球12碼, 更加明顯係發波瘟之作....
[url]http://www.mediafire.com/?fjw9mhco9ty[/url]
here's the video about interview and post match analysis after Man Utd VS Arsenal...
by Lee Dixon, and Alan Hansen..
they did make some pin-point comments about current Arsenal crisis...it's worth of watching it~~
[quote]Originally posted by [i]arthur8088[/i] at 2008-4-14 17:10:
[url]http://www.mediafire.com/?fjw9... [/quote]
I will watch it later on tonight
really big file!!!
[quote]Originally posted by [i]filter-052fans[/i] at 2008-4-14 14:06:
但我覺得只係攝影機既角度問題...... [/quote]
be honest, I think there'd be excuse for rumours.......
I watched that game too... cos if there'd be similar situation as that Man Utd's player describing about it. The reaction for Man Utd players won't be liking this when they lost that goal -- they should blame each others.. indeed they just knock down their heads and walked away ....
其實算把啦...12碼比自己鐘意個隊...無人會話唔好...(無話正唔正確...總之有就好啦)
相反當被射12碼果個係自己鐘意既隊,就會好正常咁分析個球係唔係正確...
人之常情...
一場比賽唔單只係所以技術既比賽,重有運氣既比賽...
如果唔認同...我就真係覺得無得再講...
只係認為純技術就可以論雙方比賽既賽果...咁就真係太過天真...
我只係想係lee 個post 講多一句...球證既誤判係可以直接影響個賽果...
唔係賴而係事實係誤判...
阿仙奴...近幾場都係因為12碼既運氣..咁阿仙奴既球迷出來講幾句公平說話
有咩問題...我都唔知點解更有d 人出來扮公正...
叫人唔好賴lee 樣果個樣...輸就輸...
大佬唔通我地講幾句會有得上訴,.,,之後可以判得返咩...
我覺得大家真係有睇個果幾場...大家都會覺得阿記係唔低羅...
阿記既實力...雖然因為傷患....大打折扣...
但係昨日既一場...捉以令以為曼聯食更既曼聯迷...大下一跳...
主場但係控球率係阿仙奴佔優....
阿記係輸...曼聯我覺得勝也係正常...
夏格既罰球真係好靚....c7既12碼也無得講...第二次射都可以咁靚既死位...
但係我只係覺得歐聯咁大既賽事可以有兩次誤判...我覺得真係好失望..
恩，c7的12碼无话说，超靚
話說回來，連英國的外交官（阿仙奴球迷）都在他的blog扯上了。
“THE foreign secretary, David Miliband, has put a highly undiplomatic boot into overseas football players after seeing his favourite team crash out of the Champions League last week.
After Liverpool beat Arsenal 4-2, Miliband let rip on his blog on the Foreign Office’s official website.
He lambasted the “dodgy” Swedish referee; accused a Dutch player of falling over “rather too easily”; and complained that Philippe Senderos, a Swiss defender for Arsenal, “left half of north London cursing that he was ever let into the country”. ”
[url]http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/politics/article3736236.ece[/url]
[quote]Originally posted by [i]kaing[/i] at 2008-4-14 21:14:
其實算把啦...12碼比自己鐘意個隊...... [/quote]
kaing
Actually I don't want to reply this topic, cos I would like to let others to share their feelings, but not me...
But up to now, I believe I should step up to say something.
Some board members in here that they may know 1 of my career is: soccer referee, who got FIFA referee license and I am refereeing local league in Sydney, Australia.
I look at both incidents for Champions League and the penalty that Man Utd was given.
This is my comment, from a referee point of view
Arsenal vs Liverpool -- that referee failed to give the penalty -- I mean, even as referee, I think there'd be unforgivable mistakes. He saw that action completely and he'd be failed to make the penalty
Liverpool vs Arsenal -- the referee was not in the best position -- as referee should be normally running left side of the ball within 10-15 yards -- he didn't so he couldn't see the whole incident clearly. I would say there'd be marginal penalty -- of cos when we watched from TV angle, there would be no penalty and you can say you should caution Ryan Babel -- as he was diving in that incident. But if referee was standing in that position and needed to make that decision with 1 second. I am surprising for his decision.
Man Utd vs Arsenal -- there should be penalty, 100%, because when you looked back that incident -- Gallas was raising up his hand to touch the ball -- no matter he was moving to the front or to the back. Referee thought he got intention to move his arm to touch the ball, there should be penalty.
William Gallas didn't caution for that incident is because referee knew he broke the Law of the Game, but not "seriously" using his arm to touch the ball. He got his yellow is due to he'd be challenging the decision from referee.
I hope what I say, can make you clear for these incident
[quote]Originally posted by [i]brightlee[/i] at 2008-4-15 10:39 AM:
kaing
Actually I don't want to r... [/quote]
旁証好緊要..............
球証睇唔清楚要依賴旁証..........