tovic 發表於 2008-5-23 11:01 PM
[quote]Originally posted by [i]lizard[/i] at 2008-5-23 10:41 PM:
覆#15-#19 。
一個好球員,如果係... [/quote]
我係曼迷. 不過都好SUPPORT TERRY.
2隊射12碼加埋叭有佢同COLE 係後衛(曼聯: TEVEZ, CARRICK, C7, HARGO, NANI, ANDERSON, GIGGS 車路士: BALLACK, BELLETI, LAMPARD, COLE, TERRY, KALOU, ANELKA ) . 佢以隊長身份 (後衛腳) 做最後一人踢, 我好敬重佢. 失重心下射失, 非戰之罪.
我唔清楚你基於什麼原因會聯想到收錢, 照你甘講, 86' 既薜高, 94' 既巴治奧都收左唔少水了~
lizard 發表於 2008-5-23 11:14 PM
[quote]Originally posted by [i]tovic[/i] at 2008-5-23 11:01 PM:
我係曼迷. 不過都好SUPPORT TERRY... [/quote]
以前無咁那多人賭波,也不會有現在這種投注金額。現在投注金額之大,就足有能力改變賽果陰謀論產生,所以根本就吾應該將足球跟賭博掛勾。
arthur8088 發表於 2008-5-23 11:18 PM
o dear...i cant believe someone would say John Terry or C.Ronaldo were both bribed...
would someone be that stupid to bribe players who will be playing in a match watching by Billions of people in this world??
guys...Stop watching Shaolin Soccer~~they are not "Golden Right Foot"~~
Sometimes your expected result or mostly predicted scores did not come out, it doesnt mean that's a fixed match~~
cheerss~~
lizard 發表於 2008-5-23 11:31 PM
[quote]Originally posted by [i]arthur8088[/i] at 2008-5-23 11:18 PM:
o dear...i cant believe someone wou... [/quote]
C.Ronaldo were both bribed
C.Ronaldo 有無corruption,我無講,也不多講!
不過 Terry 會係無人干擾下,有咁既絕頂低級失誤,我就認為絕大問題!
arthur8088 發表於 2008-5-24 12:32 AM
[quote]Originally posted by [i]lizard[/i] at 2008-5-23 23:31:
C.Ronaldo were both bribed
C.Ronaldo 有無corruption,我無講,也不多講!
不過 Terry 會係無人干擾下,有咁既絕頂低級失誤,我就認為絕大問題! [/quote]
you cant compare basketball with soccer in this situation~~it's totally unfair...
after 120 mins hard fight, players are exhausted both phycailly and mentally, Penalty shoot-out is already a big affection to them~~ i dont see how low-class it is for missing a penalty kick...even for a big-named players~~
if you argue with Terry is not mentally world-classed, I would agree~~
絕頂低級失誤??yeh..there's one in the match, it's not Terry, It's Dider Drogba~~
Slapping Vidic during a match is really 絕頂低級失誤
looks like you have not participated into any competitive team-work sports game....agree with #15 said, you would not understand their feeling at that moment~~
in #13, you said 只有用陰謀論,有人收錢,故意自己滑倒啦...
:giveup::giveup:
Terry is being paid for around $130,000 GBP per week.(according to rumours and newspaper), how much do you think that you need to pay to him to convince him losing in such an important match, a match that would bring his England captaincy back?? a match that would bring him the championship that he dreams for since being a professional soccer player???
just one more thing, what about you try to slip on the grassy wetty pitch on purpose, but still able to kick the ball...:noway::noway::crybye::crybye:
[[i] Last edited by arthur8088 on 2008-5-24 at 12:39 AM [/i]]
tovic 發表於 2008-5-24 12:37 AM
如果收錢, 點解右要救GIGGS EXTRA TIME 球空門呢?? .........
:confused::confused:
可能莊家預到有12碼同埋叫佢12碼先好射失.
eqhigh 發表於 2008-5-24 01:11 AM
[quote]Originally posted by [i]lizard[/i] at 2008-5-23 11:14 PM:
以前無咁那多人賭波,也不會有現在這種投注金額。現在投注金額之大,就足有能力改變賽果陰謀論產生,所以根本就吾應該將足球跟賭博掛勾。 [/quote]
要收幾多錢先可以彌補到果一刻既失落?
一個職業既足球員,有一個機會,可以為自己效力多年既球隊奪得第一個歐聯,可以以隊長身份捧起歐冠杯,可以成為各人心中既英雄
幾多錢可以令佢放棄依個機會?而變成一個令人唾罵既過街老鼠?
況且,佢射唔入只係令佢地要進入突然死亡階段,假如傑斯射失,而安歷卡射入,咁贏既咪又係車仔?
再者,佢捧起依個歐聯之後,阿布分比佢既獎金亦係天文數字
佢入左果球十二碼可以盡覽榮譽,又可以逗獎金
反之,唔入既話雖然有錢收,但係個名要遺臭萬年
比你揀,你揀邊樣?
amigofans 發表於 2008-5-24 01:12 AM
香港一般朋友, 係完全以自己既世界觀套落好多足球員身上,
佢地普遍認為足球員都收水, 因為佢地自己如果踢波, 都係會收既...
咩彩池大, 注碼多, 人就容易受金錢誘惑...
我係26fun不知同多少朋友研究討論幾多次....
其實大部份人根本唔了解足球博彩如何賺大家既錢,
更聽過有朋友覺得球員自己會造波下注, 真係天真得好笑...
不是恃老賣老, 當睇波球齡有番咁上下長, 咩奇怪比賽都睇過以後,
當然要運用自己既腦袋, 相信大家會發現, 真係有可疑既比賽,
真係10年都無果一場.....
amigofans 發表於 2008-5-24 01:22 AM
[quote]Originally posted by [i]eqhigh[/i] at 2008-5-24 01:11 AM:
要收幾多錢先可以彌補到果一刻既... [/quote]
you're right !! :good:
之前講過好多足球員, 奉獻自己半世甚至成世係足球上,
佢地成世人既理想可能係奉聯賽冠軍, 歐聯冠軍甚至世界杯...
情形等於奧巴馬希拉莉鬥生鬥死想做美國總統,
李小龍想中國武術發揮光大一樣,
佢地唔會因為有人比錢佢地, 就會放棄自己既夢想...
[color=Red][size=4][b]我唔明d友仔咁鐘意話佢地收錢, 10幾萬英鎊一星期,
收水黎食黎你地買果港幣一萬幾千蚊咩, 係咪好唔 logic 先...[/b][/size][/color]:giveup:
amigofans 發表於 2008-5-24 01:40 AM
[quote]Originally posted by [i]lizard[/i] at 2008-5-23 10:41 PM:
覆#15-#19 。
一個好球員,如果係... [/quote]
我真係估唔到, 有人嚴苛到, 大雨跣腳都係因為個人唔小心有問題...
唔係唔比你咁講, 不過真係有點雞蛋裡挑骨頭....:haha:
[color=Blue][size=4][b]一個200幾磅既高大球員, 走足120分鐘再加上大雨滂沱,
我真係想請教, 做左你講果d所謂 "防範跣腳" 步驟, 就sure唔會跌?
最奇係我都唔見其餘射入波果11個球員有做你講果d野wor...[/b][/size][/color]
如果用你呢種思維方式, 世界上基本上無球員會合格 !!:giveup:
[size=4][b]至於贊助商波boot既問題, 唔能夠保護對腳or設計浮誇,
係生產商既問題, 唔係球員問題!![/b][/size]
只要你係好波出名受歡迎, 贊助商就會搵你, 避不了,
要清高如你講既球員, 往足球小將裡找,
不過好似次偉小志強, 都有sponsor...:D
[[i] Last edited by amigofans on 2008-5-24 at 01:41 AM [/i]]
donald15 發表於 2008-5-24 01:47 AM
講開泰利球十二碼又令我諗起碧咸
兩個都係國家隊隊長
一個就國家隊時互射十二關鍵時刻"線"腳射上ifc
另一個就自己球隊互射十二關鍵時刻"線"腳射中條柱
又會咁岩都有既
lizard 發表於 2008-5-24 02:00 AM
[quote]Originally posted by [i]eqhigh[/i] at 2008-5-24 01:11 AM:
要收幾多錢先可以彌補到果一刻既... [/quote]
佢係一個乜野球員,
會有幾失落?
還記得英格蘭歐賽出吾到線嘛?
那些球員在出線前夕、通宵達旦叫雞!其中一個就係TERRY!
佢真係一個咁有決心,為榮辱而戰既球員咩?
[url]http://www.26fun.com/bbs/viewthread.php?tid=168166&fpage=1&highlight=%E8%8B%B1%E6%A0%BC%E8%98%AD&page=6[/url]
#173。
我當時在#59已經指出問題啦!
filter-052FANS #90也駁過我,結果怎樣,我有無說錯!
我有無合理懷疑這個球員,不用多講了吧!
donald15 發表於 2008-5-24 02:15 AM
[quote]Originally posted by [i]lizard[/i] at 2008-5-24 02:00 AM:
佢係一個乜野球員,
會有幾失落... [/quote]
個遠近差咁多都拉得埋黎講
如果無射十二碼輸左佢一定唔會喊成咁
如果射十二碼佢無射到而輸左佢都唔會喊成咁
但係佢依家只要個波一過條白線個杯就係佢地既
佢就可以光榮地成為英雄
距離近到一線之隔
但係轉眼間又英雄變為罪人個落差大難以形容
等同你對六合既中晒七個字中晒點之睇一睇原來張飛係上期既:haha:
如果話佢收錢射唔入你估佢會唔會射到咁近條柱丫拿
如果真係收左錢佢一個唔覺意入左你又估佢會唔會橫屍街頭呢
真係收錢射出黎球波肯定射上ifc:eek:
almourinho 發表於 2008-5-24 08:07 AM
**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****
amigofans 發表於 2008-5-24 09:18 AM
[quote]Originally posted by [i]lizard[/i] at 2008-5-24 02:00 AM:
佢係一個乜野球員,
會有幾失落... [/quote]
首先你講既果單係英式炒作式新聞, 泰利歐聯激動落淚,
則係幾10億球迷親眼所見! 所以並不可以相提並論!!
[color=Black][size=4][b]我係樓上講過, 好多認為球員收錢放水既朋友,
根本完全唔了解博彩業如果運作, 如何賺大家既錢,
只要賽果唔合自己心水,就認為係"假波"[/b][/size][/color]
相信你絕對係呢類朋友既一份子, 其實我一句就可以駁斥你既謬誤,:nogood::nogood::nogood:
[color=Red][b][size=5]主流足球博彩, 只計90分鐘, 加時12碼既勝負, 根本同該場注碼無直接關係!![/size][/b][/color]:secret::secret::secret:
[b][size=4]剩下落黎, 有關既只有投注 "歐聯冠軍" 既注額, 一來注碼不及正常彩池大,
二來要放水比曼聯贏, 90分鐘內已經可以完成, 可需要去到12碼既最後一球??[/size][/b]
最後一點, 就係泰利收左曼聯錢,
但以此logic, 曼聯人也可收艾巴莫域治既錢...
你可以用呢點駁斥既, 不過此論點假設性太多, 全無討論既價值...
[[i] Last edited by amigofans on 2008-5-24 at 09:27 AM [/i]]
amigofans 發表於 2008-5-24 09:25 AM
[quote]Originally posted by [i]almourinho[/i] at 2008-5-24 08:07 AM:
碧咸果次肯定是假波,泰利赌波成性,收钱绝不出奇,但射到中柱又未免太高,所以我觉得这球假的机会只有20% [/quote]
該晚歐聯場上, 不計後備球員, 在場22位球員, 保守估計月薪合共約為9000萬港元,
香港9000元月薪, 輸7000元一個月既賭客比比皆是, 若如你所講泰利係 "賭波成性"
個彩池要有幾大先夠賠比因為造波而 "可以必勝" 既球員?
靠你同我果一百幾十蚊雞仔注?? :D:D:D
Tokyo2040 發表於 2008-5-24 10:10 AM
如果Terry收咗錢, 就唔洗護空門啦. 成場波咁多機會"失誤", 洗唔洗等到射12碼, 重要係自己射最後果球, 然後射出一球跣腳中柱唔入球? 果球波如果係特登嘅, 叫你射多一百次都未必射得番.
brightlee 發表於 2008-5-24 05:22 PM
There'd be a question I want to ask......
Have you ever played a soccer match, 120 mins, with heavy raining in whole match?
If you haven't done this, you never know how much energy John Terry lost and what'd be the pitch condition at that moment
I still remember 2 years ago when I was refereeing in a game during local league, there'd be similar raining as the game in Champions League Final. I can tell you, the pitch condition was absolutely bad, you can't believe what it could be even tough all the grasses looks fine. Even there'd be sunny a day before, all players just couldn't play as good as they should be. I never surprise John Terry slipped when he took his kick.
Another problem is, have you run 120 mins for soccer game?
I run 90 mins for 1 soccer game, and sometimes 180 mins for 2 soccer games on Saturday as refereeing in local league. You know, you lost a lot of energy you may never think about it in your head up to now. I can tell you if I need to be refereeing 180 mins on Saturday, there'd be a bad day for me even though I could finish them well.
I don't want to talk about the pressure to take penalty, I believe everyone knows there'd be absolutely high pressure to take penalty in real game.
[[i] Last edited by brightlee on 2008-5-24 at 07:24 PM [/i]]
tovic 發表於 2008-5-24 05:24 PM
唔好意思, 從呢D相我只見到一個平時打不死既鐵漢流下英雄淚, 我真的看不到任何打假波演技.
[[i] Last edited by tovic on 2008-5-24 at 05:25 PM [/i]]
ronja 發表於 2008-5-24 05:44 PM
泰利打飛機射向天咪得囉!洗乜射中柱咁難度高呀??:D:D