**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****
[quote]Originally posted by [i]almourinho[/i] at 2008-5-24 23:10:
As said, I tend to think Terry's pe... [/quote]
You are partly right... that's why I will give you a lot of additional points
:)
But you are partly wrong.. I can tell you some reasons that why FIFA won't allow to use replay system.. (cos I am official referee and under FIFA) so I know the reason behind the back....
They won't use video replay is: there'd be horrible time delaying problems.......
Think about if you watch the replay, you may need to spend 30 seconds to 1 mins to do it.
IN a soccer game, 30 seconds can cause a goal. IF there'd be video replay for 3 times (I can tell you, there'd be more than 3 times per games if there'd be starting to use video replay)
There'd be at least 5 mins extra time in each game....
Players, Referees will be fatigue more easier and there'd be truth as FIFA said, Video replay will block the rathym of the game.
[[i] Last edited by brightlee on 2008-5-24 at 11:38 PM [/i]]
[quote]Originally posted by [i]lizard[/i] at 2008-5-23 10:41 PM:
覆#15-#19 。
一個好球員，如果係... [/quote]
基本上..唔止射12碼果時跣腳lor...
其實今場波一半時間都係落雨...
個場已經有好多水...
喺佢地踢緊法定時間同加時果陣, 都係有球員跣腳
再加上射12碼時, 雨勢甚大...
佢會唔知射之前攪下果個範圍, 重心腳要用力踏?
果d防跣行為, 你估佢唔識?
但係, 喺塊濕晒ge草地度, 又要一直咁落緊雨
難道做左就一定唔跣?
唔好成日提出呢d咁ge假波陰謀論...咁係好無聊...
點解個個人講佢射吾入，因為壓力大？為何其他射得入波既人就會無壓力咩？呢個叫解釋理由咩
場上大部份人無打足120分鐘嘛？點解其他人又撐到十二碼都射入？
場上十幾個人都吾會滑到，偏偏只有一個人會滑到？
係NBA ，如MJ 佢平均命中約四成。但關頭時刻，佢就能將4成機會率變十成。這才叫英雄。
係12碼上，機會率射入佔八成，將八成機會率都不能達標既。只會係狗雄。
眾人：你們所持理由，不外乎〔壓力、體力。下雨.....〕
當日有份參賽既球員，先跟Terry 去比較。
其他大部份球員都有這種壓力，都用盡體力，但都能把握八成射入十二碼既機會率。正好說明你們強詞奪理。點解大部份球員都可以，唯一人吾得。
[size=4][b]合邏輯嗎？[/b][/size]
用蓋率邏輯分析，其他人就無問題！偏離蓋率既，就係問題？
[quote]Originally posted by [i]lizard[/i] at 2008-5-24 23:50:
點解個個人講佢射吾入，因為壓力大？為何其他射得入波既人就會無壓力咩？呢個叫解釋理由咩
場上大部份人無打足120分鐘嘛？點解其他人又撐到十二碼都射入？
場上十幾個人都吾會滑到，偏偏只有一個人會滑到？
係NBA ，如MJ 佢平均命中約四成。但關頭時刻，佢就能將4成機會率變十成。這才叫英雄。
係12碼上，機會率射入佔八成，將八成機會率都不能達標既。只會係狗雄。
眾人：你們所持理由，不外乎〔壓力、體力。下雨.....〕
當日有份參賽既球員，先跟Terry 去比較。
其他大部份球員都有這種壓力，都用盡體力，但都能把握八成射入十二碼既機會率。正好說明你們強詞奪理。點解大部份球員都可以，唯一人吾得。
合邏輯嗎？
用蓋率邏輯分析，其他人就無問題！偏離蓋率既，就係問題？ [/quote]
just wonder where do you come up with "係12碼上，機會率射入佔八成"!!??
is it just a bullcrap from you!!??~~
btw, if you judge Terry as 狗雄 by missing this stupid penalty kick~~then MJ was a 狗雄 as wellll...i cant remember how many buzzer-beating shots he has missed in his life~~
wonder 之前，吾該自己上網先睇下。
維基百科寫90% 有的網8成以上，我已經用較低標準啦？
[quote]Originally posted by [i]lizard[/i] at 2008-5-25 01:20 AM:
wonder 之前，吾該自己上網先睇下。
維基百科寫90% 有的網8成以上，我已經用較低標準啦？ [/quote]
數係死既人係生既死牛一面頸
過澳門買大細係人都之門大或者開細既機率大約係50%
咁我買100鋪大係一定開番50鋪大比我先
再講番季初慈善盾車仔一個都唔入咁個機率數據又點解釋
係咪又收左錢
世界杯瑞士又係一個十二碼都唔入咁個機率數據又點解釋
係咪又係收左錢
你要講實有大把位比你入
如果你堅持令到你心靈上搵到藉口安慰自己既損失既咁你繼續啦
不過希望你可以從火星番到黎地球
[quote]Originally posted by [i]lizard[/i] at 2008-5-25 01:20:
wonder 之前，吾該自己上網先睇下。
維基百科寫90% 有的網8成以上，我已經用較低[color=Red]標準[/color]啦？ [/quote]
OMG...OMG...OMG>....
:help::help::help:
you quote the statistics from 維基百科~~speechless~~:haha::haha::giveup::giveup:
are you freaking kidding me..!!???
You are not university student, do you...??I will be freaked out if you are SERIOUSLY~~~@@___@@
is this the article you are talking about from wiki...??
[url=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Penalty_kick]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Penalty_kick[/url]
"A German professor who has been studying penalty statistics in the German Bundesliga for 16 years found that 76% of all the penalties during those 16 years went in, and 99% of the shots in the higher half of the goal went in[color=Red][citation needed[/color]],"
OMG....this part is not even citied~~:hitwall::hitwall:..OMG...
and i couldnt find any reserach papers to support this arguement~~~
go to Google and get some scholar's papers to support this fancy bull before saying it~~~
[[i] Last edited by arthur8088 on 2008-5-25 at 03:13 AM [/i]]
其實外國有評論說過,丁偉傑也曾提及過,
打假假波這玩意,9成以上只能發生在一些次級聯賽.
例如北歐斯堪地那維亞地區或南美州低組別聯賽.
的確有證據顯示有被賭波集團操縱的現象.
但在一級聯賽,以至國際大舞台其實很罕見(當然不是沒有,例如當年利物浦門神的哥寶拿)
原因有三個:
1)那些球星錢大把(你唔好用那些賭仔如哥利摩亞以偏蓋全).有左錢,仲為乜?
星爺電影都講過,就是要名.相信對於星級球員來說,名比錢更重要.
那集團如何能打假波?
2)頂級球會老闆好多根本就是世界或最少當地有影響力人士.
你敢搞佢隊波?相反,小型聯賽而當地博彩機構有開盤的就易操縱了.
3)一級聯賽,以至國際大舞台世上幾億人看著,風險那麼大,點解要玩?
我的結論是:別開口埋口打假波.
[quote]點解個個人講佢射吾入，因為壓力大？為何其他射得入波既人就會無壓力咩？呢個叫解釋理由咩
場上大部份人無打足120分鐘嘛？點解其他人又撐到十二碼都射入？
場上十幾個人都吾會滑到，偏偏只有一個人會滑到？
[/quote]
你呢種理論叫做"倒果為因", 而且你唔同意大家睇法我係完全理解,
[color=Blue][size=4][b]因為你一開始已經認為, 射12碼就算有重大壓力, 射入都係份內事,
仲有踢完120分鐘滂沱大雨下踢12碼, 跣腳唔係 "[color=Black]意外[/color]",
係可以小心用步法同撥走d水就可以避免既...[/b][/size][/color]:haha:
但普羅球迷係接受12碼唔一定會入, 同泰利當晚既係一場 "意外"....
[b][color=Red]以你此嚴苛無情既羅輯, 四川地震係咪可以避免死人?
日本地震只係死左幾千人, why中國死8萬?[/color][/b]:confused:
[quote]係NBA ，如MJ 佢平均命中約四成。但關頭時刻，佢就能將4成機會率變十成。這才叫英雄。
係12碼上，機會率射入佔八成，將八成機會率都不能達標既。只會係狗雄。[/quote]
藍球除左個波都係圓形之外, 無咩係同足球一樣, 你用黎比喻以乎全不洽當...
足球世界唔同藍球, 我見過馬勒當拿miss easy shot, 見過zico射唔入12碼,
見過舒米高甩手, 也見過施丹交錯波輸波...
可能 nba 你比較熟悉, 但請你睇多d足球, 有更多了解或又另一d睇法...
[quote]Originally posted by [i]hllee[/i] at 2008-5-25 08:51 AM:
其實外國有評論說過,丁偉傑也曾提及過... [/quote]
you're right, 我有少少補充...
當年立會議員鄭家富, 曾用高巴拿事件黎講球員收錢係平常事...
好多人都鐘意用呢點黎討論...
但佢地根本一知半解, 今時今日球員既薪水, 不知係80年代既多少倍...
當年一萬磅週薪可能已經好高, 但今日一個青年人既人工都多過呢個數...
泰利好似係12萬磅週薪, 月薪太約700萬港紙左右...
**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****
[quote]Originally posted by [i]almourinho[/i] at 2008-5-25 11:38:
Thks!
But you know, people won... [/quote]
yes, i got what you mean...
we can't know everyone ... haha.. they may bribe.. they may not...
but in this incident, I believe there'd be NO..
and yeah.. sometimes.... we never know anyone thinking in their heads too.
:)
[quote]Originally posted by [i]arthur8088[/i] at 2008-5-25 02:36:
just wonder where do you come... [/quote]
I still remember MJ miss his last shoot in Bulls 93 vs Charlotte Hornets as Alanzo Mourning, Larry Johnny, Dell Curry, Mussy Bouges, Kendall Gill were in there........
[quote]Originally posted by [i]filter-052fans[/i] at 2008-5-25 09:14 AM:
你呢種理論叫做"倒果為因&qu... [/quote]
**** Hidden Message *****
[[i] Last edited by Edgar_Davids on 2008-5-25 at 06:14 PM [/i]]
[quote]Originally posted by [i]lizard[/i] at 25-5-2008 17:05:
[size=5][b]filter-052fans：你... [/quote]
[b][color=Blue]To begin with, I hope you can read English,
if not I am going to ask someone else to help me translate it once. :agree:
The first thing I would like to tell you is,
[size=6]"What a ridiculous logic ! :nogood:"[/size]
In fact, [color=Red]I could not find any cold-blooded expressions from gogo's replies.[/color]
The example "Eathquake" he used was to prove that "What is accident",
but not neglecting lives, just like what you have misgotten. :nogood:
As long as you do not respect others, respect the area and respect yourselves,
I cannot let this atmosphere continue spreading. :nogood::nogood:
[color=Red]From now on,
your account will be banned for [size=5]one month, until [/size][size=6]25 June, 2008.[/size]
Hope you would reflect your faults and get your manner changed during this period. ;);)[/color]
Moreover, [color=Red]you are not allowed to register new account(s) to reply here[/color],
if not all your accounts will be banned [size=4][color=Red]forever[/color][/size].
[color=Green]Regards,
[size=5]Edgar Davids[/size]
KMOD,
26FUN Sports Section[/color][/color][/b]
[[i] Last edited by Edgar_Davids on 2008-5-25 at 06:14 PM [/i]]
**** Hidden Message *****
[quote]Originally posted by [i]Edgar_Davids[/i] at 2008-5-25 05:58 PM:
[b][color=Blue]To begin with,... [/quote]
[b][color=Blue]係開始之前，我希望您識得睇我既英文
否則，我會搵其他人幫我翻譯一次。 :agree:
首先我想同您講既係：
[size=6]「不知所謂既邏輯！:nogood:」[/size]
實際上，[color=Red]我係gogo(ami_gofans)的回復上面，發現唔到任何冷血既表現[/color]
「四川地震」，只係佢用作證明「意外」既一個例子
但佢冇忽略到人命，依一點似乎您並不了解。:nogood:
您不尊重其他人，不尊重依個地方，又或者不尊重您自己，
因此我並唔可以比依種態度繼續傳播下去。:nogood::nogood: [/color]
[color=Red]從而家起，
您既帳戶將被[size=5]禁訪一個月[/size]，[size=6]直到2008年6月25日。[/size]
在依段期間，我希望您會反省到您既缺點，並且改變您既態度。;);)[/color]
[color=Blue]而且，[color=Red]您係唔可以登記新既帳戶，再係依度回復[/color]
否則，所有您既帳戶將會[size=4][color=Red]永遠被ban[/color][/size]。[/color]
[color=Green]謹致,
[size=4]Edgar_Davids[/size]
副版主,
26FUN Sports 討論版[/color]
[size=4][color=Teal]譯:巡察eqhigh[/color][/b][/size]
[quote]Originally posted by [i]eqhigh[/i] at 25-5-2008 19:05:
[b][color=Blue]係開始之前，我希... [/quote]
Thank you so much pal~~ :kiss::kiss:
[[i] Last edited by Edgar_Davids on 2008-5-25 at 07:28 PM [/i]]
**** Hidden Message *****
[[i] Last edited by brightlee on 2008-5-25 at 11:20 PM [/i]]