娛樂滿紛 26FUN's Archiver

infjlam 發表於 2008-5-25 10:47 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]BOYDWAN[/i] at 2008-5-25 10:13 PM:
vtJF i'f
p `N"{d,e9M
7l$sJ;l^e^ YGQE2jo/{\
講得合理亦有道理~:agree:
M:qx8{+N6Z3C 只要多一個人識咁諗, 就會少一個暴力事件發生嘅機會:good: [/quote]xTT7m3n2~nv4S
~C5`+Z*\_9\+h_"f
BOYDWAN版主,Jen01,我只係路過吹下水o者:kiss:+H z/b;}X/n#H.[
I'm nobody.
)c*j&s6z1WxU|
'rd&m|8b t2z Q~ 8cg"Ev#P2qs8`7{
不過段片又真係好誇張,
4\P6`G U']1ob5v 尤其最尾一腳,
FX\(l6?Mu*J 踢到個女o既坐低(內傷都似:noway:),
|*|2H_w J 若我唔回應幾句,
;j3Y7r Y7XE0v(Q 個心真係有D唔安樂...
A{,}4Gz[ pnu T Z]G]Uz
[[i] Last edited by infjlam on 2008-5-26 at 01:20 AM [/i]]

jen01 發表於 2008-5-25 10:49 PM

**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****

infjlam 發表於 2008-5-25 10:59 PM

jen01,呢個唔止係道理,仲係香港法例:'fFS'| tD^.py
R;`3|Z$R'V,ZI?~
香港法例第212章  侵害人身罪條例
DD.t!j kE"KdY4^"n ^ z/]]bc N7h:T
第17條:意圖造成身體嚴重傷害而射擊、企圖射擊、傷人或打人(可處終身監禁)
ecK5O(Z%|y!RX*w2y 第19條:傷人或對他人身體加以嚴重傷害(可處判監禁3年)1i$D+k d1y@2`)@
第39條:襲擊致造成身體傷害(可處判監禁3年)*C;n6oJ/?4S(E
第40條:普通襲擊(可處判監禁1年)f-U c\r|Jv
:[0HC9NGr8n

+k:V+m Mit!rX 身為文明人,是非對錯,自己諗o拉...

belibala 發表於 2008-5-25 11:04 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]jen01[/i] at 2008-5-25 10:49 PM:
0Om8w)F e`9{
.zl$xW/un q p.s.  infjlam我唔知你有心定無意,
]d Og']4O        但[color=Red]我個人係鐘意對號入座[/color].......[/quote]
"[;^+}{$Ol cI
&G#xS M(ch&T] 唔怪得你成日覺得其他人針對你啦:haha::haha:(N}&nlE9uZWM x~
咁樣你做人都唔開心啦, 放鬆d, 唔好成日諗埋一邊

slwong3 發表於 2008-5-25 11:04 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]jen01[/i] at 2008-5-25 10:49 PM:
)jP9CB.d!n(z:X
|0pQ fl;m!j#{"]
f u*\O2N}|3fZ Yd 既然唔知頭唔知露,
C1BG-B5lTBl a 一開口就話個... [/quote]"SN'^ t0e$k Qpr?#R i
e8LT+{zb^
V`,EW4tG
Mr Jen01...after reading all your replies in this thread....+XHkwjI8qi

,L-ey;El9M you still don't understand the whole point of what other people say....b1v_-rf

B3T5wj%_-R[wO (yes, we don't know the reason why that man would beat up the girl)
f$xRM L'X {*\ Je ` HfK
however, the whole point of what other people are trying to tell you is that violence can not solve anything.....+{ f8\0mU ogn2e\"f-y
mG `n|"KuK
"個男仔出咁重手可能係錯,
B(^*hQ(]q3Eb}^S;M 但你知點解佢會咁咩 ??
-kA&N9H4| 當中發生左咩事你知條毛呀 ??T6AMXma
至於你問有咩正當理由,
*K7y2x}F\dO8{ 你一係就搵個男仔問佢,一係就搵個女仔 !!!!"
Ba:[!k:R
6]0y6Ub:OU*E what you're basically saying at here is, the man could be right by beating up the girl if the girl had done something bad to the man....lL!`;~([[!WBb
c(]Z~0Ky/{
______________________________
|3Sp f|6Sln!N b RP0@T G t,Zs
well, as a man, I wouldn't beat up a girl.  If the girl had done something terribly wrong and against the law, the man should just call the police and bring her to the court.....

jen01 發表於 2008-5-25 11:19 PM

**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****

jen01 發表於 2008-5-25 11:22 PM

**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****

qqwqqwqqw1 發表於 2008-5-25 11:23 PM

都唔知邊個定,男打女係賤格,女打男都唔o岩9U` KM M,xE(@2?
因為男人生下來比較強壯?
t+F9v!_3p+S:~ 如果個女係空手道黑帶又點計先:haha:
_B |Pd Z(}IV}1^ 打比自己強既生物就無咁錯?
|"zO J)ES*HdM7F 打唔贏仲同你打咩:P走都走唔切啦:dev:}u?7W6EM ]
唔話打人一定唔o岩,要睇情況,
y*v-a:r)@:\W 有人走過來要打死你,邊趕得切求救,前面又無路,不能不打,7rH[X b^5M4?
當只有暴力能解決問題的時候,暴力就是神聖M$d7f]e.v
我們為什麼不能犯法,因為有法律,我們屈服於暴力,%g O'U3} N]Ef'd`1b
在背後支撐法律的就是最大的暴力---政府,社會:agree:
Kr0E*[R;j5|U%p 就算如何掩飾,暴力也是社會的基本:gun:

jen01 發表於 2008-5-25 11:27 PM

**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****

slwong3 發表於 2008-5-26 12:50 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]jen01[/i] at 2008-5-25 11:22 PM:@y o G(W7Qr$e
8E9kJ F h"`-T B+L
4t&leG*{4ea o3Ft
我想講嘅,
a1bcx#G 只係我地根本唔知咩事,
kUe zoG ]f!s 就唔好咩都入晒個男仔數,
esxN{Ex@U1uH 咁對個男仔公平咩 ??,HL.psW6I5Y~Z

.qcv[.?d3KP x p.s.唔代表我支持個男仔咁做....唔好斷章取義呀 ~!! [/quote]9TF S/p/r)Mev

8U1['@m,u%\r7d that means you still don't understand what other people are saying)M5Vo;]mS{V1n

W$r+zK!?8m&lL no one cares what happened between the man and the girl....
cB2x ES 8X)I0D4oq I?{
the point is [color=Red]violence can't solve any problems[/color]

slwong3 發表於 2008-5-26 12:53 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]qqwqqwqqw1[/i] at 2008-5-25 11:23 PM:
+N/bYm g2G 都唔知邊個定,男打女係賤格,女打男都... [/quote]QUH1W6PGB(P

aW}z3y \(z/R
Bz\.r0P7{ then in the video, do you think it was the girl who hit the man first?{r ~Wa$\

aQ/d/Ox6bc4nZ0k2g do you think the man hit the girl because of protecting himself????
P(bn&qQ!jo
3VI1Uf;a}].O if the girl is that strong, do you think she would let the man hit her like that????D}3l CRV
]k%jb&G?
_2Cg [2J.l3B9E
oh god!!!  what are people thinking with their brain

hamsubboy 發表於 2008-5-26 03:03 AM

嘩! 訓醒一覺, 見自己開個POST有 A LOT OF REPLY, FEEL GREAT!
om l)AG r,svMuc-o Q
s3{3o^BJ 但有點ARGUE, 我試下做"中間人"去說話,IZ z o0r"}g'v(Q
可能比較直接, 請多多包涵.w tc(}eNK js1m

t3k5@T:[!?1z@ 首先: BELIBALA e{"m]mM
#9, 係針對人唔係對事, NO GOOD.
M%N*`[!RW3` q f+}%t #17, 有點死CHICKEN撐飯蓋. C;{/~ g"h&w\q/KQ
#18, OK:)`)l&{]c-N
#64, 有進步, 說出重點.:good:7Pn3U9]e:c
ps. 有進步 good!:good:V4Y@%J%D:`_Hm
(h Ri!ImB1Q
infjlam lg8BOv8i'l
#30 good point, :good:
]Q;z+g~2Ah,|D #34 GOOD POINT:good:D2[W C{?$D
#63, 講得好!F'P#d,Sq!S"l
*UMQP2W
Jen01,[p"GT$?

0[h&}gr{] Er #33, 你太敏感, 又話別人針對你........... 我就唔係好覺.,eS1K|d7CN2Q
如果你覺得, infjlam的技巧就高籮! jen, 你咁樣都起火發圍.... 你咪低籮!
0[*aRT)y S5G;u 你果句"[color=Red]我地根本唔知咩事,無資格去評論呢件事[/color] !!!"Y"p;g/\ ukG
我開個post出來討論, 唔評論, d 網友進來干嘛?(ogr"R{b
*Vo0g!kb0vc
SLWONG3,
@ e,`-kf[email protected] #71, [color=Red]oh god!!!  what are people thinking with their brain[/color]r4t;t6c/C&M1bC5w
有點港式, I like it very much:clap::clap::clap:
p:w ^KVb3R%T
D5KXBB4g.fD9x n6n jen01, 你太敏感喇! infjlam在政版, 他的立場的確和你有異,......,RA rRV0F
在this topic, 你見infjlam回話, 你就話別人針對你. ?Q@7f$sEQ&G
而且你說話的方式, 有點市井小民 . 果句"當中發生左咩事[color=Red]你知條毛呀[/color] ??"#`kLKS

+gn)I7T8^"z [color=Red]我淨係段片見到,
G3g,nATh3@ 個女仔班 FD 見到個女仔比人打都唔幫佢,
+l v7D%^5Oe 仲要行埋一邊冷眼旁觀,{8O-GMGo
咁即係暗示左d咩呀 ??[/color]
Uk"E?z2xJW+^A#I 我覺得其他人係驚! not冷眼旁觀$}RfwQ|r2lS

C7QPw6F,Vs [color=Red]infjlam我唔知你有心定無意,.m7^m:}i
       但我個人係鐘意對號入座.......[/color]2sO ~6[0T In$U(I B
呢d 紛爭, 是jen你個人製造出來的:nogood::nogood:[ o-}!FOAr
O|S9d-k(JR:e.m,C M
jen, 可否告訴我, 你的星座:)

jen01 發表於 2008-5-26 03:18 AM

**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****

jen01 發表於 2008-5-26 04:11 AM

**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****

Edgar_Davids 發表於 2008-5-26 08:09 AM

**** Hidden Message *****V8D)mb6CYV
M#n3xfuaHi
[[i] Last edited by Edgar_Davids on 2008-5-26 at 08:30 AM [/i]]

QuiGonJinn 發表於 2008-5-26 09:08 AM

**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****

小小種子 發表於 2008-5-26 10:17 PM

好好笑^^5| X'a Y ]va
)pV;Q'eitp
我問番你,  沒有男女平等的時候,  即以前封建時
H3VC6SB9?#o
0j$V C(X8Qs.n%T 常出現女打男的男女不平等既情況咩??
FT~.j4R5@ 7F c:Qrbk-W.eN&o1I
你意思話我知, H~#fTz7]-g Q'N

)i-w r}+[G;G 而家有男女平等, 所以條仔打條女係冇錯 P-f5n-hL`/B!c)MU

Aa3O\Zz 第2, 單單係香港,  就有保護女性或婦孺既法例x.Y.h*o%Q:S[6X
4C Ke.lw*Y2s b
包括強姦, 非禮, 虐打等罪,   
:K Eh+C$h3z+{ I+Jp,m dJ9\
係法律下,  女性同婦孺係率先得到保護
5P8Tv` ]fNU!n$G(t "R4m#OiO|!zg
照呢個意思去諗, 加埋條片做證   相信好難說服到係條變態佬岩

小小種子 發表於 2008-5-26 10:23 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]jen01[/i] at 2008-5-25 10:49 PM:
c7]0ws*U5^,ccog3M0Rz/j r3kh}6nr"nX%C/p

1oHd&]bhUV 既然唔知頭唔知露,
5qbB/e a#r:U 一開口就話個... [/quote]UHO+h#U)td.?
見你挑釁某會員同你係政版筆戰 s4h?rZ6^

2Sc1OXQ 我覺得好好笑,  你咁既思維...,,,PToQl q
+H!^ J0vk ] U$_ x'|/r
你重點係我地唔知頭唔知路  所以冇權話個男人是對是錯;Uw3?GY i

n e:F\n5H6g 但如果真係個女仔錯,  係咪個男人就可以用呢種武力去對待佢??'U p:SjY2Me-k)pU

/s O4e~L:` 如果個女仔錯,  個男人可以打死佢??5K9d e%b jY O4a3[

Lq)y`*?&_ MzdP+[? 以片所示,  佢使用武力既程度非常高,  絕對有危及性命可能
p lL+^7Y3q 7JPdf8t3I!w%GuQ?
個男人根本冇控制自己既能力Q$d t-x;](a
@1^H0S QDgE
我問你,  
!dJ8C3z5W b k^8bV7Xd{"Nv1d
世界上有人可以剝奪別人生存既權利嗎??
h1F:T8z n{ @ B_
.Q,U[;H;O&Gap{ 除左殺人犯既生存權可以被剝奪外, 我諗唔到仲有咩人可以
VJsju0Z6W
0z b6C'M W g 法律係要保護婦孺     相信情況交由警方處理的話
2OXHV X Y:z z
r5S _iT ~o.q 不管女仔有什麼錯,   男人一定會被起訢
(^j3O Cp7\p{
r0`N6]I,V 係一定,   而唔係你果d (可能)
.?gl6Z/Qsz\ y/XkYRb3]o7g2Y3p
ps. 你既論點不堪一擊     如果你想同人筆戰qGzJ!w
Zpb+F4tO
我介紹你去aio搵會員chumy    佢同你思維不相伯仲
:Nk8|%G x-p 1Ht8Mb\5}U.l2s w
[[i] Last edited by 小小種子 on 2008-5-26 at 10:25 PM [/i]]

小小種子 發表於 2008-5-26 10:28 PM

jen01  呀可
y)?k2u _-@+E!s
9h[-y f$^-l 我比多個例子你啦
.vO4c$wO
)S%~?"c*hmJ a 係香港  
L}~3Yymc\
RS3w'K$tHP 曾經有不足16歲女性  色誘 男性,  而果位男性大專以上
:VH#~1|4dVWX R5D\ x2cmt(a
結果係   男性被判   犯  與不成年少女發生性行為
X2V {WC7D
%Da4tw&_;j*dU"\ 雖然事源係女仔錯, 但女仔就冇罪
9W$L KB&rRv,P!t#\o
f'Oh \Q1i 你點理解??H0j*mE7]P Tg
+a8ziM_6IM1y
呢d就係法律   就係保護婦孺既最佳例子

ktwu2007 發表於 2008-5-28 01:04 AM

終於知道咩事....[ K%}c$p*t
+cl-w.p.Ccn5fY
   四川官員就毆打義工道歉
sv;B4F9| s [28/05 星期三 00:30] #_}/G:v)e+}

&kW7Q?rgw
iT?'~ }8T$dpE 四川衛生廳工作人員張建新,就襲擊一名地震後擔任義工的男子向對方道歉,並停職接受調查。
A;V^/`io@n6p
6O L%tRi` 事發在上星期三,張建新坐車到江油市一間醫院工作時,被為汽車消毒的義工用消毒水澆到頭部和面部,於是出手毆打對方。事件在網上傳出後,引起網民強烈批評。
,{BW6YVU _#L1_&l.R V+r
[url]http://pshweb02.881903.com/framework/pccs.gateway?url=jsp/news/main.jsp&menuID=5&category=NEWS&newsid=2008052800300198500[/url]

頁: 1 2 3 [4] 5

Powered by Discuz! Archiver 7.0.0  © 2001-2009 Comsenz Inc.