娛樂滿紛 26FUN's Archiver

infjlam 發表於 2008-5-25 10:47 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]BOYDWAN[/i] at 2008-5-25 10:13 PM:mlc f*re9|
k6\fP!M9k

1]!ir![4b8M N[n &L;z7g;P9Iq^ @ F7D
講得合理亦有道理~:agree: Y3@/ba LI
只要多一個人識咁諗, 就會少一個暴力事件發生嘅機會:good: [/quote]
(aL)j x*E)KbHq 2N5kUS anG%bOf
BOYDWAN版主,Jen01,我只係路過吹下水o者:kiss:v+ciR!~&IL!vo9b:x
I'm nobody.y u)Hq1[;TI-{7}9A(P

s S"ElB$V6E\+tN 8Bi Ji:M;o4p@U
不過段片又真係好誇張, ?p@~jw
尤其最尾一腳,
9_ND7`k+w f6DJ 踢到個女o既坐低(內傷都似:noway:),Lq U [r+PcR
若我唔回應幾句,
z6g'{4eHxg 個心真係有D唔安樂... p4n/hCzH8g}pi

/e._8E+e^*LUQ [[i] Last edited by infjlam on 2008-5-26 at 01:20 AM [/i]]

jen01 發表於 2008-5-25 10:49 PM

**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****

infjlam 發表於 2008-5-25 10:59 PM

jen01,呢個唔止係道理,仲係香港法例:+]mi\7W%{

m-S"PWv0O3o 香港法例第212章  侵害人身罪條例yUQ7}[
S V6I$@"pP}
第17條:意圖造成身體嚴重傷害而射擊、企圖射擊、傷人或打人(可處終身監禁) e3w.qVl+IKJ;S w
第19條:傷人或對他人身體加以嚴重傷害(可處判監禁3年)4rjW9b%xC
第39條:襲擊致造成身體傷害(可處判監禁3年)S9[F(O1l.n {5mJ
第40條:普通襲擊(可處判監禁1年);}n-cx;C.uIf/O

.p7|o-C KeK a*i R 6Z szfpC4l \K'C
身為文明人,是非對錯,自己諗o拉...

belibala 發表於 2008-5-25 11:04 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]jen01[/i] at 2008-5-25 10:49 PM: ZO*_9d:t+i]*w
!^axp'r&z0GUb S;B
p.s.  infjlam我唔知你有心定無意,
(U*tU5M:V&D's?        但[color=Red]我個人係鐘意對號入座[/color].......[/quote]
6o,R'm0p&K Ld*d"~\
唔怪得你成日覺得其他人針對你啦:haha::haha:1d c A(N7wN2M
咁樣你做人都唔開心啦, 放鬆d, 唔好成日諗埋一邊

slwong3 發表於 2008-5-25 11:04 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]jen01[/i] at 2008-5-25 10:49 PM:ApT+eS&ul8HCq [

3J{&S%v1p
5d i+U^TCz4Q 既然唔知頭唔知露,
j$r*~Z4j@6` 一開口就話個... [/quote]
+G1e.FO.A$t ([#]6y D4j7@ @/v*I2M0K
2k4B)B/D0WW/t(K~8p(c
Mr Jen01...after reading all your replies in this thread....2D%l/S5^7r2Cb?A
)\N.E Mde|%{
you still don't understand the whole point of what other people say....@5jc%os}oT@8@\
.Sbh aC)K
(yes, we don't know the reason why that man would beat up the girl)
lR'c0J2T9{Iv
#F AME+t;@x } however, the whole point of what other people are trying to tell you is that violence can not solve anything.....0n&M6Sy%g

8a.H @0i.Rq h "個男仔出咁重手可能係錯,
w(@sik,h&I 但你知點解佢會咁咩 ?? I B)E;t0UG
當中發生左咩事你知條毛呀 ?? V A8}1y[K3\z
至於你問有咩正當理由,
o3Y9M6Sg#? l 你一係就搵個男仔問佢,一係就搵個女仔 !!!!"
? f(b9]f-R+s%BeN k\x@ aj*r8R
what you're basically saying at here is, the man could be right by beating up the girl if the girl had done something bad to the man....)i5y9M,l W/~O9ei2l
?Z/j;J)p0@0Z1q*~1\ S3C
______________________________
N9Yf}#AG H7K
2G-mBF3D3bqi%e well, as a man, I wouldn't beat up a girl.  If the girl had done something terribly wrong and against the law, the man should just call the police and bring her to the court.....

jen01 發表於 2008-5-25 11:19 PM

**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****

jen01 發表於 2008-5-25 11:22 PM

**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****

qqwqqwqqw1 發表於 2008-5-25 11:23 PM

都唔知邊個定,男打女係賤格,女打男都唔o岩m:V7R1K%k:Hx
因為男人生下來比較強壯?w m"yH6IG4m&e3@
如果個女係空手道黑帶又點計先:haha:
X7A4p?.E!Ni5[ 打比自己強既生物就無咁錯?h a LocXE4I&F h
打唔贏仲同你打咩:P走都走唔切啦:dev:ns7q-{7M;o#d%OI
唔話打人一定唔o岩,要睇情況,
%z9k{6w"N{9^ 有人走過來要打死你,邊趕得切求救,前面又無路,不能不打,A!c&t-UZ
當只有暴力能解決問題的時候,暴力就是神聖}E%A2ha(M#~
我們為什麼不能犯法,因為有法律,我們屈服於暴力,
FN'M8J9hof8x 在背後支撐法律的就是最大的暴力---政府,社會:agree:w\ L(sd
就算如何掩飾,暴力也是社會的基本:gun:

jen01 發表於 2008-5-25 11:27 PM

**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****

slwong3 發表於 2008-5-26 12:50 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]jen01[/i] at 2008-5-25 11:22 PM:)x0A7a@VQj

ZZ-T y%u.d$w S6O*^
%BlHP6I&la 我想講嘅,
.n,[7K'Oy C~ _a(j 只係我地根本唔知咩事,;t!iB3F? [ Qd ?
就唔好咩都入晒個男仔數,
*WU F/w J 咁對個男仔公平咩 ??
3n'w.t:C Zf:uU
ZS"^;l;B p.s.唔代表我支持個男仔咁做....唔好斷章取義呀 ~!! [/quote]
/CYb2q1xz
:~?#k[0ab@H#_:K that means you still don't understand what other people are saying
]\_X_0x3Z
%gN0gzO4o-L0M@.B}C-z no one cares what happened between the man and the girl....,`*@"L h~-PSu

s'@+C3{C2S/F-r? the point is [color=Red]violence can't solve any problems[/color]

slwong3 發表於 2008-5-26 12:53 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]qqwqqwqqw1[/i] at 2008-5-25 11:23 PM:s'c c+n7|T
都唔知邊個定,男打女係賤格,女打男都... [/quote]
l ]/]Q4jID-L5GO Pm%?\ch?+|'K&c R

di$_7n x#T,Fs)P2G-J then in the video, do you think it was the girl who hit the man first?
V(C6QUlk"r
x(t${Y2]G[1| do you think the man hit the girl because of protecting himself????
nE Q;QsN HL%c2| Cks_
if the girl is that strong, do you think she would let the man hit her like that????
"Y.iG/UN4jueFSj .Cb1py ?bf

e9tj/Q5? V,|g oh god!!!  what are people thinking with their brain

hamsubboy 發表於 2008-5-26 03:03 AM

嘩! 訓醒一覺, 見自己開個POST有 A LOT OF REPLY, FEEL GREAT!yc&}2W2E

|DzKLL;t 但有點ARGUE, 我試下做"中間人"去說話,
(H7i gCo 可能比較直接, 請多多包涵.
+T0z*~l$d D1`ks_9c)P.IF
首先: BELIBALAB,D5r7r }
#9, 係針對人唔係對事, NO GOOD.
3\8Ae.iEF ImEq #17, 有點死CHICKEN撐飯蓋.
+b,C$jXyX"x #18, OK:)
3@/ROg~i'[ #64, 有進步, 說出重點.:good:p hD.|@
ps. 有進步 good!:good:
'pq$H.X*r8q+j-m+H)N y "M$C,x#_I*G6]:b
infjlam
wy o4s R #30 good point, :good:.Ry y:VO&T"A
#34 GOOD POINT:good:
(]\3x/GMp6zt #63, 講得好!
K#u6} }'UaF
TE[7m$J @B^ Jen01,%S{ l)q C_Z8[
7L.Ex!J(Lo
#33, 你太敏感, 又話別人針對你........... 我就唔係好覺.
/s&N;S+k U8H\u 如果你覺得, infjlam的技巧就高籮! jen, 你咁樣都起火發圍.... 你咪低籮!M2AD&r5dlLo
你果句"[color=Red]我地根本唔知咩事,無資格去評論呢件事[/color] !!!"8qNN:D!UV
我開個post出來討論, 唔評論, d 網友進來干嘛?n{3k#P{KN
GAS7AH;Z x"rA2Y]V0\
SLWONG3,2O7\c z\Q:C m9]C
#71, [color=Red]oh god!!!  what are people thinking with their brain[/color]
u\i5K}[ 有點港式, I like it very much:clap::clap::clap:,Y:m4Q(gQs

1k um6XZM z$N jen01, 你太敏感喇! infjlam在政版, 他的立場的確和你有異,.......N'gr/{,_!zF8M
在this topic, 你見infjlam回話, 你就話別人針對你.'H(`iW Jx2K
而且你說話的方式, 有點市井小民 . 果句"當中發生左咩事[color=Red]你知條毛呀[/color] ??"6E d.m&aLW

5[@Q2gPt4Y [color=Red]我淨係段片見到,C|(h S9Y$Y
個女仔班 FD 見到個女仔比人打都唔幫佢,
r+Y8{6W0@ 仲要行埋一邊冷眼旁觀,;bdEZM;X
咁即係暗示左d咩呀 ??[/color]{(w)vn]a5v@1O
我覺得其他人係驚! not冷眼旁觀{4~A(T Qz#d
;VC%L-ilWd)R!f!N
[color=Red]infjlam我唔知你有心定無意,1vtH-c*a)L6w6~!s
       但我個人係鐘意對號入座.......[/color]
n-z*r+SF!CBS5S9_ 呢d 紛爭, 是jen你個人製造出來的:nogood::nogood:M*x/bH,w)F

i*W$Bzu-Wu jen, 可否告訴我, 你的星座:)

jen01 發表於 2008-5-26 03:18 AM

**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****

jen01 發表於 2008-5-26 04:11 AM

**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****

Edgar_Davids 發表於 2008-5-26 08:09 AM

**** Hidden Message *****
%k]%yE#Y X t&r6?y^
[[i] Last edited by Edgar_Davids on 2008-5-26 at 08:30 AM [/i]]

QuiGonJinn 發表於 2008-5-26 09:08 AM

**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****

小小種子 發表於 2008-5-26 10:17 PM

好好笑^^
4}tpz"?M!z ,y0Qi$F2m9D
我問番你,  沒有男女平等的時候,  即以前封建時+?0l0LF0A+`X

wfp8T;nj.yr'S.d 常出現女打男的男女不平等既情況咩??7yk#Q W A7X-m
0E7|/I#S#] T;].@;o9]
你意思話我知, IJ:[!PNkm

/vtY~*S+qLQ 而家有男女平等, 所以條仔打條女係冇錯
Nyy%G%YF[ zj^p B-Vp`C
第2, 單單係香港,  就有保護女性或婦孺既法例GU"lO7_H+aYD

-{1q*l#M^ I 包括強姦, 非禮, 虐打等罪,   
+X`fzBz8H
+j9q6l(Yi/a;X/LN 係法律下,  女性同婦孺係率先得到保護4a,Hg"U2zr,A]

6I-{a;t_E"i.\ 照呢個意思去諗, 加埋條片做證   相信好難說服到係條變態佬岩

小小種子 發表於 2008-5-26 10:23 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]jen01[/i] at 2008-5-25 10:49 PM: Px]/t2S%}BC
.h'm;s"hB
i ^Hqh_E-E'r
既然唔知頭唔知露,
+d1SWQ8C%k6n 一開口就話個... [/quote]2FS"t7F@y['@v/QL
見你挑釁某會員同你係政版筆戰
1d~Ll }8?~%h[
i N7bS4V 我覺得好好笑,  你咁既思維...,,,
?} Z+@ [tX \ QbvdU
你重點係我地唔知頭唔知路  所以冇權話個男人是對是錯 nLr%am;c&R
D3P!B"x1B
但如果真係個女仔錯,  係咪個男人就可以用呢種武力去對待佢??%[l8p s+M]

+s"z_c)r M CR 如果個女仔錯,  個男人可以打死佢??}oVD,q

|5V4I @x5]#j 以片所示,  佢使用武力既程度非常高,  絕對有危及性命可能
!BO nq"W9v3q)P vr:@,^ lQ
個男人根本冇控制自己既能力i9L.L M7y\%i*B
g-`:[9WNk.]?
我問你,  y9x5i2iOP a aR K

#z XP2P+~ P*EA!B R^ 世界上有人可以剝奪別人生存既權利嗎??o&d~ yf%fO|

1Rlh7_"|k%TQ 除左殺人犯既生存權可以被剝奪外, 我諗唔到仲有咩人可以
h*b L*HhQ lj&j9L0w$?n)m
法律係要保護婦孺     相信情況交由警方處理的話
A @9|u g(}3P
$o,YQCx!G-U+x+[ 不管女仔有什麼錯,   男人一定會被起訢 [ FZ/L*z-}(Q3s

3K3j t/Vl1b.n 係一定,   而唔係你果d (可能)l V-V^ dag] P7G
b u+jIR1?
ps. 你既論點不堪一擊     如果你想同人筆戰
"L'Qi rgS1y
5F8[#] e3A+n*G/` 我介紹你去aio搵會員chumy    佢同你思維不相伯仲:s#Q-^]*b)q$n f._

Yc#S1q'e`R;T2c [[i] Last edited by 小小種子 on 2008-5-26 at 10:25 PM [/i]]

小小種子 發表於 2008-5-26 10:28 PM

jen01  呀可)a yT8o3bg{
U?.bQ|_ z:y|
我比多個例子你啦
5b]@9uI#U
P q9b:E^+^B)ms 係香港  -FI#F{ \3Z Mo7g/m

W!{7T [!vN%XI)G 曾經有不足16歲女性  色誘 男性,  而果位男性大專以上
8i-g$lEH,m(e .F)s7Ah?[b
結果係   男性被判   犯  與不成年少女發生性行為1~@&XY.c mJ
L)zJVO;\8L
雖然事源係女仔錯, 但女仔就冇罪
^I2f[8rP2Z&|
a-KK7X CP 你點理解??!T:Z0LSY7Z

7Y A!}q8]Br9@r 呢d就係法律   就係保護婦孺既最佳例子

ktwu2007 發表於 2008-5-28 01:04 AM

終於知道咩事....
g RI3cG`C3\ Wa;H5}z7KS
   四川官員就毆打義工道歉
K z'??wnV [28/05 星期三 00:30] 4]&M h]gbM0M8o#Z
/x.zhZ%HB*`?

@#m]-KARY 四川衛生廳工作人員張建新,就襲擊一名地震後擔任義工的男子向對方道歉,並停職接受調查。'vKFpKcm

ur}txUJP\ 事發在上星期三,張建新坐車到江油市一間醫院工作時,被為汽車消毒的義工用消毒水澆到頭部和面部,於是出手毆打對方。事件在網上傳出後,引起網民強烈批評。9sS4l;VZU

q2rN jW1hk [url]http://pshweb02.881903.com/framework/pccs.gateway?url=jsp/news/main.jsp&menuID=5&category=NEWS&newsid=2008052800300198500[/url]

頁: 1 2 3 [4] 5

Powered by Discuz! Archiver 7.0.0  © 2001-2009 Comsenz Inc.