娛樂滿紛 26FUN's Archiver

infjlam 發表於 2008-5-25 10:47 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]BOYDWAN[/i] at 2008-5-25 10:13 PM:_#k;~1k;cuzu%zK}
R@1M]n:g5KH
{qE _;D e(D
J%y,UT;xZ6\
講得合理亦有道理~:agree:*lL^&}H)O
只要多一個人識咁諗, 就會少一個暴力事件發生嘅機會:good: [/quote]
,U^N&a,iv `
8S2A9o%B{ ?+e"j1a6R j1` BOYDWAN版主,Jen01,我只係路過吹下水o者:kiss:VO"^zj(g
I'm nobody.t7nB#~j+[+BN `

|"uO:Z)z&`$J
2MqB3bhIAnv 不過段片又真係好誇張,^2k@hX DHwl
尤其最尾一腳,6H2T#Q'sh cNg
踢到個女o既坐低(內傷都似:noway:),}sJe;Lz*h
若我唔回應幾句,C eiPJ lj~9[\/@&X
個心真係有D唔安樂...
DBPQLN;\
Vr+S&i1s1h1gX [[i] Last edited by infjlam on 2008-5-26 at 01:20 AM [/i]]

jen01 發表於 2008-5-25 10:49 PM

**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****

infjlam 發表於 2008-5-25 10:59 PM

jen01,呢個唔止係道理,仲係香港法例:H-\ aL P$L&if4H*~]!EY
/^ s]j/K
香港法例第212章  侵害人身罪條例ro#E2UP&KPi+U
czq/wJVs
第17條:意圖造成身體嚴重傷害而射擊、企圖射擊、傷人或打人(可處終身監禁)ACf E.K%naz
第19條:傷人或對他人身體加以嚴重傷害(可處判監禁3年)
vq:~~+Fm(r b 第39條:襲擊致造成身體傷害(可處判監禁3年)(Qwx Y0|"h {-b:C*x
第40條:普通襲擊(可處判監禁1年)#H\|X.W2~:fN

!I~ VT+Av0q
e8] Z]%p'H"WL T 身為文明人,是非對錯,自己諗o拉...

belibala 發表於 2008-5-25 11:04 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]jen01[/i] at 2008-5-25 10:49 PM:
uy%Qi'WG,?1t7_-~
t u%Pi,^D7n p.s.  infjlam我唔知你有心定無意,
n1lcs wV5];@+o        但[color=Red]我個人係鐘意對號入座[/color].......[/quote]o.M@z-K5N

gUfE)[hu~ 唔怪得你成日覺得其他人針對你啦:haha::haha:
^(EyuAN5l1h 咁樣你做人都唔開心啦, 放鬆d, 唔好成日諗埋一邊

slwong3 發表於 2008-5-25 11:04 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]jen01[/i] at 2008-5-25 10:49 PM:
]f[#Cs*fm,t
J`;W8Vl&TI+[(a
1|$K)co no 既然唔知頭唔知露,/B*EO8^&@
一開口就話個... [/quote]
y4f M,HM/k(O4Dz "F[0gY S!roH

%x fZ(]-zY)JE Mr Jen01...after reading all your replies in this thread....d%{)qlv
%^!w.RK1S b^k
you still don't understand the whole point of what other people say....Y#TH Hg(}

8M"NTS zlf (yes, we don't know the reason why that man would beat up the girl)g7QqO+xj;P

#DpL.GO!`7X&V however, the whole point of what other people are trying to tell you is that violence can not solve anything.....Qe.|XFVN.n9Y}

`0l5R u7Z;e "個男仔出咁重手可能係錯,q.Qm;Z-J:\
但你知點解佢會咁咩 ??5Yc$B` `k-s#q|6V\
當中發生左咩事你知條毛呀 ??
-kAdwFdd 至於你問有咩正當理由,
,Fup3p ~ G\(tz 你一係就搵個男仔問佢,一係就搵個女仔 !!!!"d@4X.J,RX?
H/NS~2}-Dp
what you're basically saying at here is, the man could be right by beating up the girl if the girl had done something bad to the man....&~(W%J5h/g1n
0l-P&x1ld\p.EV
______________________________
f:^$KT!]8L+Mi0Y!v
?Fo~d8Cys well, as a man, I wouldn't beat up a girl.  If the girl had done something terribly wrong and against the law, the man should just call the police and bring her to the court.....

jen01 發表於 2008-5-25 11:19 PM

**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****

jen01 發表於 2008-5-25 11:22 PM

**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****

qqwqqwqqw1 發表於 2008-5-25 11:23 PM

都唔知邊個定,男打女係賤格,女打男都唔o岩
Y#o8m@.K B2B:bi8o 因為男人生下來比較強壯?
#}V9z7nu\R 如果個女係空手道黑帶又點計先:haha:v2`"IRO8ih4v4B.H!d9G
打比自己強既生物就無咁錯?
A-{A ?@p.G5m y 打唔贏仲同你打咩:P走都走唔切啦:dev:
{&B7N&Ci 唔話打人一定唔o岩,要睇情況,1g!e]?hc)}
有人走過來要打死你,邊趕得切求救,前面又無路,不能不打,
NSRvZ:Ch8x L1B 當只有暴力能解決問題的時候,暴力就是神聖~ _:D-tS(H
我們為什麼不能犯法,因為有法律,我們屈服於暴力,
]qdf|G\[3v 在背後支撐法律的就是最大的暴力---政府,社會:agree:lO$_?f^$[3{1U(py:T
就算如何掩飾,暴力也是社會的基本:gun:

jen01 發表於 2008-5-25 11:27 PM

**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****

slwong3 發表於 2008-5-26 12:50 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]jen01[/i] at 2008-5-25 11:22 PM:gF ~2VAa
I*rh-M`DRTL
7Sp3j6R [|X
我想講嘅,
xoB3HM 只係我地根本唔知咩事,`VrHNw.er
就唔好咩都入晒個男仔數,O1R+P n:bJ @ M Ui
咁對個男仔公平咩 ??uAJg"k+k"x#V_
JW*[-s.X6J6~1g@
p.s.唔代表我支持個男仔咁做....唔好斷章取義呀 ~!! [/quote]8]cA_b{`(bt4Y
]Is2_i0M0t:iqJ
that means you still don't understand what other people are saying
`#g#Q5Ld3}
+g,[mlQ%v b no one cares what happened between the man and the girl.... nCd2H2fSU

1B;?y#N I*D the point is [color=Red]violence can't solve any problems[/color]

slwong3 發表於 2008-5-26 12:53 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]qqwqqwqqw1[/i] at 2008-5-25 11:23 PM:
3^it!w1tYfIC,A 都唔知邊個定,男打女係賤格,女打男都... [/quote]-}Qa}$V`!HL(x5WI

0Tq1g/O3s"Nu1d n9e9y,Dp3@K
then in the video, do you think it was the girl who hit the man first?
{j sT)M3\xq
!Eagk#u6Zz+_&g do you think the man hit the girl because of protecting himself????SI iL%j~6ID2\

v-I/AZ^~^r if the girl is that strong, do you think she would let the man hit her like that????
;ms(Dz6W{yg'Ez!r .u/od*D C7L2nR
qu'KE;gOM
oh god!!!  what are people thinking with their brain

hamsubboy 發表於 2008-5-26 03:03 AM

嘩! 訓醒一覺, 見自己開個POST有 A LOT OF REPLY, FEEL GREAT!
.KA$s2NK|0DT$G K)Zc;yV#}
但有點ARGUE, 我試下做"中間人"去說話,|uy,{pc
可能比較直接, 請多多包涵.
Y3q h,UP~d
~`Sl;VTQH 首先: BELIBALAW f-B/k Wz.B V
#9, 係針對人唔係對事, NO GOOD.
R&o+~4[3D5v U!bX+zX4^ #17, 有點死CHICKEN撐飯蓋.
z2_Ljf\9F/P #18, OK:)/L A^)KCY
#64, 有進步, 說出重點.:good:
'By'V yv5v ps. 有進步 good!:good:
_V+T Z+kQN.V)Z Q#hx aA-S/ZR6J
infjlam
#j%W W#[TV8boi+s eBT #30 good point, :good:
+W(\IO~px8ER O #34 GOOD POINT:good:#q bd(g6bSo m
#63, 講得好!
&jYF:_d %D,kF7y@+~
Jen01,{jw j*o| O^HD)?#C
}aR2{Mx
#33, 你太敏感, 又話別人針對你........... 我就唔係好覺.
h/H5QV1V z4H 如果你覺得, infjlam的技巧就高籮! jen, 你咁樣都起火發圍.... 你咪低籮!
X!}K h'j_#P 你果句"[color=Red]我地根本唔知咩事,無資格去評論呢件事[/color] !!!"i:Zl'Z9~H8{h7^NB
我開個post出來討論, 唔評論, d 網友進來干嘛?
v3bW#E0Sm
6Igk:R F SLWONG3,
j:{uC/q:Mv #71, [color=Red]oh god!!!  what are people thinking with their brain[/color]
e6Z#~2jZZ 有點港式, I like it very much:clap::clap::clap:
)q.^.A ? _|D2^4LxU H0M,N9upmE#A
jen01, 你太敏感喇! infjlam在政版, 他的立場的確和你有異,......
;g?6\|0|u 在this topic, 你見infjlam回話, 你就話別人針對你.Z8yR l6qxcl
而且你說話的方式, 有點市井小民 . 果句"當中發生左咩事[color=Red]你知條毛呀[/color] ??"
iQ$W$d{$\s g"om8\(d
:s/JvmJw [color=Red]我淨係段片見到,
*?(W6ql/y[a_ S} 個女仔班 FD 見到個女仔比人打都唔幫佢, k8Q},x8[OE;Dd
仲要行埋一邊冷眼旁觀,:R,OqMD? ~#ED-H9d
咁即係暗示左d咩呀 ??[/color] f"P WG0E6L7v0D!_*u
我覺得其他人係驚! not冷眼旁觀3^ Z:{~A.Y
:E/h5T @:lTZ(m
[color=Red]infjlam我唔知你有心定無意,&Vz3PGc D v
       但我個人係鐘意對號入座.......[/color]:KQ8b`%x B$ogk
呢d 紛爭, 是jen你個人製造出來的:nogood::nogood: AM,X/PB"Io;L
U%J%A5`A$w5M |ly!_
jen, 可否告訴我, 你的星座:)

jen01 發表於 2008-5-26 03:18 AM

**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****

jen01 發表於 2008-5-26 04:11 AM

**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****

Edgar_Davids 發表於 2008-5-26 08:09 AM

**** Hidden Message *****N4rt;R;DR]T([[
6Lv#T5`!E6[ M7|
[[i] Last edited by Edgar_Davids on 2008-5-26 at 08:30 AM [/i]]

QuiGonJinn 發表於 2008-5-26 09:08 AM

**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****

小小種子 發表於 2008-5-26 10:17 PM

好好笑^^
U-LK.Ev j2Z7a
0B%Y w.P/L ^ 我問番你,  沒有男女平等的時候,  即以前封建時h!V2y pco/Y#b(W

s+Le;F,V*P 常出現女打男的男女不平等既情況咩??&te2w0?)F-@9V T
1V1^&gf8`+CVy
你意思話我知, k(s TQ)Vk
;U:O nG vF ca-~'X
而家有男女平等, 所以條仔打條女係冇錯"Hy9e#_0\7S [6{/i;^.Q

n9S Fdc-Uh@ X 第2, 單單係香港,  就有保護女性或婦孺既法例g3OrSGq`U.o
J Z.c0v1Q7Ky5`
包括強姦, 非禮, 虐打等罪,   #u ^8Y\;V!YfC(j

w xQ@/WI.zk_ u"i2_G 係法律下,  女性同婦孺係率先得到保護m;U0c;r'?"xp RRe

2f.Ode h9I0i)^:O 照呢個意思去諗, 加埋條片做證   相信好難說服到係條變態佬岩

小小種子 發表於 2008-5-26 10:23 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]jen01[/i] at 2008-5-25 10:49 PM:3K+F MK5V$uZ"e;O*@`/g

2h} r R`Q
/W%G&Z5pyAaI 既然唔知頭唔知露,
M h k&Nkl 一開口就話個... [/quote]
:p^9{j;^ 見你挑釁某會員同你係政版筆戰
#d3v-jGMqfy &R[5J%tY2no@
我覺得好好笑,  你咁既思維...,,,Hg;S$R0P.i9i3UP
5T ](s~7Qfn
你重點係我地唔知頭唔知路  所以冇權話個男人是對是錯rz"kG%Xht,x^K
sM+F|1{
但如果真係個女仔錯,  係咪個男人就可以用呢種武力去對待佢??P Q0E_pI
3^V"l3m'{.lg\B
如果個女仔錯,  個男人可以打死佢??
c(jN {`.|qbS "`-^ W }G#P#I9e+n;~
以片所示,  佢使用武力既程度非常高,  絕對有危及性命可能UoN[K9E6g
.b2A&BPT:X*fR;O3G
個男人根本冇控制自己既能力bU9N:z9M%rB9d3x!?
Pq)l2|&LRv#O
我問你,  I8}0PC pM-onM-e
zJN]%U~
世界上有人可以剝奪別人生存既權利嗎??
2M7\tN4M:O
X(nmyh,C;{ 除左殺人犯既生存權可以被剝奪外, 我諗唔到仲有咩人可以
$Z)osd-j)hG d9E'D.AD1J3O
法律係要保護婦孺     相信情況交由警方處理的話
3L,PC7p'b @ { P{1q*{+K+L
不管女仔有什麼錯,   男人一定會被起訢;g&bH {+~]
} cL_#`
係一定,   而唔係你果d (可能)
4gB(pnyj9j"J
No8En*\z7s'S ps. 你既論點不堪一擊     如果你想同人筆戰
!sey'X9o}~:q
V(\Dx&W3B 我介紹你去aio搵會員chumy    佢同你思維不相伯仲#f&Jl `"g;jg F

m8f(}N a'D [[i] Last edited by 小小種子 on 2008-5-26 at 10:25 PM [/i]]

小小種子 發表於 2008-5-26 10:28 PM

jen01  呀可
8]QH|#Y} r,uD9d.\T GqF
我比多個例子你啦
m4v WK5G*oV U4f/o*G zP A\
係香港  '?.oKsCF^ R
8F@*A!Z'N5y{T%{
曾經有不足16歲女性  色誘 男性,  而果位男性大專以上
;lx-]-i*kpr{1q "y6^o+U-mT:P2A
結果係   男性被判   犯  與不成年少女發生性行為Oj t%Y%HG
:_ B,_5c-N:H
雖然事源係女仔錯, 但女仔就冇罪F K g s:@k:D[1f

;u9Sl3p/{Q$^ 你點理解??
-VO}bs LBS3@t O2?$vF dk
呢d就係法律   就係保護婦孺既最佳例子

ktwu2007 發表於 2008-5-28 01:04 AM

終於知道咩事....
"S%E-w9lq3v ;|!X#mt s C0r8r
   四川官員就毆打義工道歉?,kb-EsSO.L!Rh,w I
[28/05 星期三 00:30]
bZ5A}"}(n6p)ykEu.b
G r1S/}h RF
&f"B'|)` ?*G0r 四川衛生廳工作人員張建新,就襲擊一名地震後擔任義工的男子向對方道歉,並停職接受調查。
2zidlX4b"Os jKoQ$h7S
事發在上星期三,張建新坐車到江油市一間醫院工作時,被為汽車消毒的義工用消毒水澆到頭部和面部,於是出手毆打對方。事件在網上傳出後,引起網民強烈批評。
9t`;~ H(] `T&Y'`({
'S!NCXi.v [url]http://pshweb02.881903.com/framework/pccs.gateway?url=jsp/news/main.jsp&menuID=5&category=NEWS&newsid=2008052800300198500[/url]

頁: 1 2 3 [4] 5

Powered by Discuz! Archiver 7.0.0  © 2001-2009 Comsenz Inc.