娛樂滿紛 26FUN's Archiver

infjlam 發表於 2008-5-25 10:47 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]BOYDWAN[/i] at 2008-5-25 10:13 PM:
!jx |'ki0o7c;t4l "w1c|M;Qm(AB
R_B&g"m7_0t
+bO/w N w3bu&_+A
講得合理亦有道理~:agree:\V$W ` gn+}T\2`
只要多一個人識咁諗, 就會少一個暴力事件發生嘅機會:good: [/quote]m{7x2d-F%ab k

}Y q_Gt7k+QA a IB BOYDWAN版主,Jen01,我只係路過吹下水o者:kiss:
NWC/n] I'm nobody.&h JJN*c

yi^ yO|2l
;Bn@WDIe 不過段片又真係好誇張,cr6j#R YI t:]i
尤其最尾一腳,
%K py5~5]9qY 踢到個女o既坐低(內傷都似:noway:),
{;gD;[-e.E3F7S 若我唔回應幾句,oh2] ^ CZ Q
個心真係有D唔安樂...
|5B1oU-{h.j&b #e8v7P1H@"c7Y+I
[[i] Last edited by infjlam on 2008-5-26 at 01:20 AM [/i]]

jen01 發表於 2008-5-25 10:49 PM

**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****

infjlam 發表於 2008-5-25 10:59 PM

jen01,呢個唔止係道理,仲係香港法例:S9m F&V!]?4_mc)N&z;X7}
%l y6rm*gF7e
香港法例第212章  侵害人身罪條例#m'Jg`C ] |%{0s

L5j"L!['i7sB i 第17條:意圖造成身體嚴重傷害而射擊、企圖射擊、傷人或打人(可處終身監禁)
\;m|F] V~.L 第19條:傷人或對他人身體加以嚴重傷害(可處判監禁3年)
:@b#mV T#IW 第39條:襲擊致造成身體傷害(可處判監禁3年)
Tt;X#pbwa*CQs 第40條:普通襲擊(可處判監禁1年)Q8Y#x)eB{c
.N6eX~j
I Kq9| }u
身為文明人,是非對錯,自己諗o拉...

belibala 發表於 2008-5-25 11:04 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]jen01[/i] at 2008-5-25 10:49 PM:L^qh)mFt]
G\:H7k!e$C"{/l
p.s.  infjlam我唔知你有心定無意,(P@7S-H/i;d3}
       但[color=Red]我個人係鐘意對號入座[/color].......[/quote]'V&t#bO|Tc
,^@#i:Uu1h
唔怪得你成日覺得其他人針對你啦:haha::haha:K? aG0r%fp|%?[6F
咁樣你做人都唔開心啦, 放鬆d, 唔好成日諗埋一邊

slwong3 發表於 2008-5-25 11:04 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]jen01[/i] at 2008-5-25 10:49 PM:o n L @&\S FW

\yB n:jm!w$O Jd_ft+e#p
既然唔知頭唔知露,Xt1w"r4[ B
一開口就話個... [/quote]'Wws|*]
}z5f$k| g1w9O
.ll%T~k]/G U*z6r
Mr Jen01...after reading all your replies in this thread....S;IJ4D%Z(BOz
pV;r_&K\3f,WO
you still don't understand the whole point of what other people say....+?s1h#qq0h7ub
b"E6t/n5F
(yes, we don't know the reason why that man would beat up the girl)lu/F;H'Mf'\Tr!Mf

%A6fX)DB s however, the whole point of what other people are trying to tell you is that violence can not solve anything.....
*E{pD jX C
p!x;@y(J(W "個男仔出咁重手可能係錯,K~$MJ~ wD+L8|
但你知點解佢會咁咩 ??BtD.sfn0b5j:Q
當中發生左咩事你知條毛呀 ??z;k"TlBo
至於你問有咩正當理由,
O2K9@Df+g@ A 你一係就搵個男仔問佢,一係就搵個女仔 !!!!"\G+i l E1PI vL&_
Vu4Pn t!x7HK0A
what you're basically saying at here is, the man could be right by beating up the girl if the girl had done something bad to the man....g3P3wE5n}0KO'y
9t7yjBp(Kho
______________________________-Gn(XeRT-C)V PL`
h)d9C;d [ Lpb
well, as a man, I wouldn't beat up a girl.  If the girl had done something terribly wrong and against the law, the man should just call the police and bring her to the court.....

jen01 發表於 2008-5-25 11:19 PM

**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****

jen01 發表於 2008-5-25 11:22 PM

**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****

qqwqqwqqw1 發表於 2008-5-25 11:23 PM

都唔知邊個定,男打女係賤格,女打男都唔o岩8~W-GBy*My
因為男人生下來比較強壯?
)ifb&i4V"J 如果個女係空手道黑帶又點計先:haha:
/V.rxC!Yu 打比自己強既生物就無咁錯?
$^+L EP?)bg1Go [ 打唔贏仲同你打咩:P走都走唔切啦:dev:1j$ZH*? H O3?cF
唔話打人一定唔o岩,要睇情況,
]"G q1lb;B F!@s 有人走過來要打死你,邊趕得切求救,前面又無路,不能不打,
SP(a+x/D3Q 當只有暴力能解決問題的時候,暴力就是神聖a D@g+Kb1o,?8q
我們為什麼不能犯法,因為有法律,我們屈服於暴力,
7b+Y.N0E$Sqo:WR!b 在背後支撐法律的就是最大的暴力---政府,社會:agree:
[ Sp W*?+C9W 就算如何掩飾,暴力也是社會的基本:gun:

jen01 發表於 2008-5-25 11:27 PM

**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****

slwong3 發表於 2008-5-26 12:50 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]jen01[/i] at 2008-5-25 11:22 PM:9Q1x.uV&B xP-Vl`

+U]\CWf9J
N {0c9L%}Syq'z 我想講嘅,-K/P JB U @&n
只係我地根本唔知咩事,
2y!O(^?'ss2BcxM 就唔好咩都入晒個男仔數, ?+x+U-]l xv
咁對個男仔公平咩 ??
c&f(b^(x"P
i3C(@]O$Ve*\4fC p.s.唔代表我支持個男仔咁做....唔好斷章取義呀 ~!! [/quote]
l(tO)rH.^Mwb
qc"kAC3Lg2g ~a that means you still don't understand what other people are sayingx]+d2KjZA
/}Q D+Q%u5N(gs
no one cares what happened between the man and the girl..../Q-L7d~T H!]"c/uy

Lq+GM0~v|!` the point is [color=Red]violence can't solve any problems[/color]

slwong3 發表於 2008-5-26 12:53 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]qqwqqwqqw1[/i] at 2008-5-25 11:23 PM:.l;Cl8zK3J%]rH
都唔知邊個定,男打女係賤格,女打男都... [/quote]b3@*K/l-s

'W f,k!nTBF
l:F'o8Fq6l;k:D then in the video, do you think it was the girl who hit the man first?
j jU(l/Pl3T ?+@3c u C x'y tf+k
do you think the man hit the girl because of protecting himself????)h+n`4qMY]s

@)D,dje4Kp if the girl is that strong, do you think she would let the man hit her like that????Vr,s8r&c"to
|t4p7{Y-k
$T:k+?;_+vW'ak
oh god!!!  what are people thinking with their brain

hamsubboy 發表於 2008-5-26 03:03 AM

嘩! 訓醒一覺, 見自己開個POST有 A LOT OF REPLY, FEEL GREAT!z%^BGZxk

f/]$O3V/P mj'R 但有點ARGUE, 我試下做"中間人"去說話,2C DQS ~y%}
可能比較直接, 請多多包涵.)s!HB Jy |;@,b
0DEx'`,X L'tL
首先: BELIBALA J9E:^R5d4E
#9, 係針對人唔係對事, NO GOOD.
Yp6pJkzr #17, 有點死CHICKEN撐飯蓋.%R I%m2N*mH
#18, OK:)
m_!@gg i{ #64, 有進步, 說出重點.:good:
#W?3cye ps. 有進步 good!:good:k0ux_%Lj] `?D
#[x0bAs|
infjlamkJ]qo
#30 good point, :good:(os3{4L%b6u$u
#34 GOOD POINT:good:
&u_ wa}9Y!O #63, 講得好!?H&\{KM5s!@
G7U-nM5IE3](X
Jen01,
0S2F7B0@y
%l6tGw_zN |5]2wk #33, 你太敏感, 又話別人針對你........... 我就唔係好覺.
xK'm'W\g 如果你覺得, infjlam的技巧就高籮! jen, 你咁樣都起火發圍.... 你咪低籮!
nQ#I P$Y#^({2` 你果句"[color=Red]我地根本唔知咩事,無資格去評論呢件事[/color] !!!"-lUVI+\%q;gi,Xx
我開個post出來討論, 唔評論, d 網友進來干嘛? ^ n/[(xji

Bqr-e0~HC SLWONG3,7GgI"j,~
#71, [color=Red]oh god!!!  what are people thinking with their brain[/color]#r`9Dm6U9v8J;@k
有點港式, I like it very much:clap::clap::clap:*x2lvl%x3wd
_aJJCC,?K
jen01, 你太敏感喇! infjlam在政版, 他的立場的確和你有異,......"P(q;xSzE!w
在this topic, 你見infjlam回話, 你就話別人針對你.
lQ,m^8}i 而且你說話的方式, 有點市井小民 . 果句"當中發生左咩事[color=Red]你知條毛呀[/color] ??"
:O`x0T)M'RPk 6n9QR8]$pD i0h"t
[color=Red]我淨係段片見到,
X.CG1UYV r$^ 個女仔班 FD 見到個女仔比人打都唔幫佢,
Xl6l h*nG+[ 仲要行埋一邊冷眼旁觀,
\ t C6N8R'F 咁即係暗示左d咩呀 ??[/color]
i&_I p [7r cV8A+U 我覺得其他人係驚! not冷眼旁觀
1i:jFH6@~/} q/N+q
6}o{\z0},F#H [color=Red]infjlam我唔知你有心定無意,
#j)G~?Y E2A0x)BQ9T        但我個人係鐘意對號入座.......[/color]
{X^-ZI&oC2k l Q1W 呢d 紛爭, 是jen你個人製造出來的:nogood::nogood:g0ws1Ft$jrOb
n5PH@0V
jen, 可否告訴我, 你的星座:)

jen01 發表於 2008-5-26 03:18 AM

**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****

jen01 發表於 2008-5-26 04:11 AM

**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****

Edgar_Davids 發表於 2008-5-26 08:09 AM

**** Hidden Message *****N4K g.a0\(S B9U.[,?e
5m,ZK,viJ8px$U9T
[[i] Last edited by Edgar_Davids on 2008-5-26 at 08:30 AM [/i]]

QuiGonJinn 發表於 2008-5-26 09:08 AM

**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****

小小種子 發表於 2008-5-26 10:17 PM

好好笑^^6_N;A+M/{H6K(^
5B+O8~Pi+{&V
我問番你,  沒有男女平等的時候,  即以前封建時
1emp| b T7\%~N
I0t#B;e!j+Rg3B 常出現女打男的男女不平等既情況咩??IW&o xa

$^xTL WU)f~ 你意思話我知, 0_q0tp _B#|N
~ z s.a;Ty+N]
而家有男女平等, 所以條仔打條女係冇錯
3ls J]bC*h 5Qs-{_ YmK)E
第2, 單單係香港,  就有保護女性或婦孺既法例
#o ~x%|`/Y9W
W)\!o5~ V:q 包括強姦, 非禮, 虐打等罪,   
6Or9K$N k.Fi&GRW?
3d } e7yy!F-^/|Qbe 係法律下,  女性同婦孺係率先得到保護T^5TY1D4t$S Z
cK/T4?(?h!|
照呢個意思去諗, 加埋條片做證   相信好難說服到係條變態佬岩

小小種子 發表於 2008-5-26 10:23 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]jen01[/i] at 2008-5-25 10:49 PM:
r1BZBY
j*TU~]'Kx
T'sJZfN$k!w? 既然唔知頭唔知露,7ob%pcd;Y#p"i
一開口就話個... [/quote]#Ciy%Du6_*w{ K8F
見你挑釁某會員同你係政版筆戰
Fu ]%os3pcE U1Z3sno9\
我覺得好好笑,  你咁既思維...,,,
.}%M4M,y$@1s \D_
%L;fk9u6b8MS 你重點係我地唔知頭唔知路  所以冇權話個男人是對是錯`Zj(oA O S4I&?.q%L
8L4m#} ]8q'l p
但如果真係個女仔錯,  係咪個男人就可以用呢種武力去對待佢??
^)sYx^~I!Lb
*q#\rF7P!T R*J 如果個女仔錯,  個男人可以打死佢??
AnK\9]y0ZG
8};t-y?DDH*V K 以片所示,  佢使用武力既程度非常高,  絕對有危及性命可能
9JAj WO Z:w'J\j`!{ ^v/aNKG6j
個男人根本冇控制自己既能力
-uk^D3n3L
2eq9gN J 我問你,  *cBkTLp5Z

n[2\^6Vx4HP 世界上有人可以剝奪別人生存既權利嗎??:c#S[D;?| D4A3K
%[8D,J"s^v,Y
除左殺人犯既生存權可以被剝奪外, 我諗唔到仲有咩人可以
g.^\/M/p ] Qp5mn @-F'P
法律係要保護婦孺     相信情況交由警方處理的話|'H"at*N]P,X

#L j8dUY `I 不管女仔有什麼錯,   男人一定會被起訢Q'Fx9W6f,^'q"V0aI
loN)]Q b0W#T
係一定,   而唔係你果d (可能)
;HVn7mN6hg] L2r!G)eS xyj3hy R
ps. 你既論點不堪一擊     如果你想同人筆戰 iX4tVOi
C0Zf$\dj9Cw
我介紹你去aio搵會員chumy    佢同你思維不相伯仲
$DAf3iVoiZ hg\2zP;M)I J!}
[[i] Last edited by 小小種子 on 2008-5-26 at 10:25 PM [/i]]

小小種子 發表於 2008-5-26 10:28 PM

jen01  呀可
2QW7[4Ks|#x-mKy M0PV,c/r3Z
我比多個例子你啦
S&zo^i&G GC6?Y)m.T+A4U
係香港  
;SK(^u*U1^Q3`s3[ *M?/O:p \%A@~$MXk
曾經有不足16歲女性  色誘 男性,  而果位男性大專以上5s*q'@c$O[k-Ufdt"y`
H L*C8`7wY)x
結果係   男性被判   犯  與不成年少女發生性行為
dt7{C WNq %z;~5U}T;W
雖然事源係女仔錯, 但女仔就冇罪7LL$QY(h m8pd

CnNg%GW$hY0jXf 你點理解??cw W{-_&R
&|X1d1F&QC+a{zH
呢d就係法律   就係保護婦孺既最佳例子

ktwu2007 發表於 2008-5-28 01:04 AM

終於知道咩事.... _ N&A+H9Y2rw)n2X
.k V5h$y2_S
   四川官員就毆打義工道歉
cZ)m'_z ir [28/05 星期三 00:30]
x!ua7UD6crhd
-~M}8O5Go'@ g2H *Z6kpY&Ktt7G
四川衛生廳工作人員張建新,就襲擊一名地震後擔任義工的男子向對方道歉,並停職接受調查。
+t'Oc [&B-o y!s(@x4\eJG
事發在上星期三,張建新坐車到江油市一間醫院工作時,被為汽車消毒的義工用消毒水澆到頭部和面部,於是出手毆打對方。事件在網上傳出後,引起網民強烈批評。 G0{['EZt.J
-cF2d&s%f XYr o(O$~j
[url]http://pshweb02.881903.com/framework/pccs.gateway?url=jsp/news/main.jsp&menuID=5&category=NEWS&newsid=2008052800300198500[/url]

頁: 1 2 3 [4] 5

Powered by Discuz! Archiver 7.0.0  © 2001-2009 Comsenz Inc.