[傑出港女系列](轉貼)又有新野啦
香港法例有等如無.:t[ E }Yp/bhp+po9VA7x8D
毆打係刑事,警方竟然不採取檢控行動.
.g z;m!u W N
對打人者只作出警告了事. W)V+g0W x C-\[
K-~y*KN hDu)[
差人涉嫌包庇打人者.
[url]http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=XnjZIvpq3dQ[/url]
而阿伯打人係事實,毆打係刑事,警方唔可以唔檢控阿伯.
請問d「死差佬」,幾時修改左法例,毆打可以警告了事. W:jN ["v a bp
H&g-_&K^ZIPt
!D q m5n[$Z rY
5Y!}-L n9V
[color=red]個人認為.....X.|'[4T'~WT V Y7\*L
岩岩唔記得左加評語...(依家補番)
好簡單,個阿伯唔岩在先,但個女仔都唔方係咩好野.....[/color])n v[0ybh5~'Y x
uR I'd B;O3`4v
[[i] Last edited by jen01二世 on 2008-6-30 at 12:17 AM [/i]] have u studied law or anything related to legal studies?
do you know what is called an "assault" or "battery"?%?OI#e8C:H
are you the witness of the incident?6SS!G O X k
if not i prefer you stop commenting on this issue..6|)bIhp
and better not using words like "阿伯打人係事實" and "毆打".c/_]%Y W6~&ZVxj(|r
otherwise, you could be charged as "defamation" [quote]Originally posted by [i]Kev[/i] at 2008-6-30 12:12 AM:
have u studied law or anything rela... [/quote]
~ j(y"z6UD:p#G
黑字 : 係轉貼
};F"qJ)L m"{9e
紅字 : 個人感想 m#Q L#t"K*J"|^-x gF
ok ?? dont have to ask for my approval :)I [uY5Ocn
it's your choice to get yourself into trouble or not.0V:N3N$urN.y
btw, im not sure if "publishing" or "spreading" "false statement" is against law or not.. ['Z!u/C5q
just becareful even if the words arent your own words..
good luck and hope you could last long in this world. 我係甘認為 U]2E)gC F!Ns
該警員明顯地想息事寧人...
唔係既話唔通拉個啊伯返去告佢傷人......但係都要驗到有傷先得
如果驗唔到有傷,甘去到警米都係警告...浪費曬3方面既時間
以上係由阿伯係錯曬...既方向所說
我反而認為此事係一件雙方道一句歉就可以解決既事+q5h?;oc#{ {(V6D
該警員的處理手法絕對洽當
請恕我直言...該女子有點......那個...........無x取x {"oRv6]$?/Sh b-~C
由佢將依段好明顯係佢自拍既片段放上youtube,仲要改個甘既標題就知道
頁:
[1]