[傑出港女系列](轉貼)又有新野啦
香港法例有等如無.0w4c,dgOZd+^fk Y{ A wc+a
毆打係刑事,警方竟然不採取檢控行動."\#w.\:H c1I8U$J
對打人者只作出警告了事. o8T vA1u z:|_
rM~ wOk3{7C
差人涉嫌包庇打人者.sw)bw;w
[url]http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=XnjZIvpq3dQ[/url]Nb&x%cT w L s }
)iHBM g#K
而阿伯打人係事實,毆打係刑事,警方唔可以唔檢控阿伯.
請問d「死差佬」,幾時修改左法例,毆打可以警告了事.
(HB2u@v1v s'z5^ f.@
\#]5U(P#BB mka
[color=red]個人認為.....6o"n-T$rr1y {
岩岩唔記得左加評語...(依家補番)ZnB] V{ c;s-zf
4~B I)?0I h
好簡單,個阿伯唔岩在先,但個女仔都唔方係咩好野.....[/color]u C K Akh8n
[[i] Last edited by jen01二世 on 2008-6-30 at 12:17 AM [/i]] have u studied law or anything related to legal studies?9?P3S1[o t/X
do you know what is called an "assault" or "battery"?
are you the witness of the incident? K-e;_$o o
if not i prefer you stop commenting on this issue..+l;z ?#@7k
and better not using words like "阿伯打人係事實" and "毆打".
otherwise, you could be charged as "defamation" [quote]Originally posted by [i]Kev[/i] at 2008-6-30 12:12 AM:
have u studied law or anything rela... [/quote]/c4?7TH*ub
黑字 : 係轉貼+A'g_#I'H
紅字 : 個人感想
ok ?? dont have to ask for my approval :)Q3SS g'~6Vj1o
it's your choice to get yourself into trouble or not.b L#[Z0}}d
btw, im not sure if "publishing" or "spreading" "false statement" is against law or not..
just becareful even if the words arent your own words..5B tQab`?{
good luck and hope you could last long in this world. 我係甘認為hJ.?+M rX-x Me
該警員明顯地想息事寧人...
唔係既話唔通拉個啊伯返去告佢傷人......但係都要驗到有傷先得6x1l CE%z3?&K gg
如果驗唔到有傷,甘去到警米都係警告...浪費曬3方面既時間
以上係由阿伯係錯曬...既方向所說
我反而認為此事係一件雙方道一句歉就可以解決既事
該警員的處理手法絕對洽當,z/m `"b Gt
請恕我直言...該女子有點......那個...........無x取x
由佢將依段好明顯係佢自拍既片段放上youtube,仲要改個甘既標題就知道
頁:
[1]