[傑出港女系列](轉貼)又有新野啦
香港法例有等如無.!YR _3x0N x^\毆打係刑事,警方竟然不採取檢控行動.
對打人者只作出警告了事. G"Y8f a'[c%G)o5Wb
Q O6~M"Gk^3iU
差人涉嫌包庇打人者.%n'AE r%B1i\N
[url]http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=XnjZIvpq3dQ[/url]
J^5O6ng#T(w
而阿伯打人係事實,毆打係刑事,警方唔可以唔檢控阿伯.
請問d「死差佬」,幾時修改左法例,毆打可以警告了事.x6zw2h k~
[color=red]個人認為.....|1EeS$Di&?
岩岩唔記得左加評語...(依家補番)
好簡單,個阿伯唔岩在先,但個女仔都唔方係咩好野.....[/color]tD V,s3J
[[i] Last edited by jen01二世 on 2008-6-30 at 12:17 AM [/i]] have u studied law or anything related to legal studies? T~1NeK,D_0[ ~
do you know what is called an "assault" or "battery"? HLf\ y.uUm
are you the witness of the incident?
if not i prefer you stop commenting on this issue..
and better not using words like "阿伯打人係事實" and "毆打".
otherwise, you could be charged as "defamation" [quote]Originally posted by [i]Kev[/i] at 2008-6-30 12:12 AM:
have u studied law or anything rela... [/quote]
x;ng4@:z H n8U
黑字 : 係轉貼
*l-HN U6P"}
紅字 : 個人感想
ok ?? dont have to ask for my approval :)
it's your choice to get yourself into trouble or not.
btw, im not sure if "publishing" or "spreading" "false statement" is against law or not.. M;K,|Cx3X\N5f+_
just becareful even if the words arent your own words..
good luck and hope you could last long in this world. 我係甘認為
該警員明顯地想息事寧人...
唔係既話唔通拉個啊伯返去告佢傷人......但係都要驗到有傷先得 A1A2?dO3tQN
如果驗唔到有傷,甘去到警米都係警告...浪費曬3方面既時間 EEdN?OCA\
以上係由阿伯係錯曬...既方向所說
我反而認為此事係一件雙方道一句歉就可以解決既事Py y4U;KDiT'd;M*_
該警員的處理手法絕對洽當4un v:jw;Y Ao c"w
請恕我直言...該女子有點......那個...........無x取x
由佢將依段好明顯係佢自拍既片段放上youtube,仲要改個甘既標題就知道
頁:
[1]