[傑出港女系列](轉貼)又有新野啦
香港法例有等如無.毆打係刑事,警方竟然不採取檢控行動.Gk2v0@!P6hPw
L4YF3y;q"s d7H
對打人者只作出警告了事.
Y;_ E8I5|/?9I
差人涉嫌包庇打人者.(Vr$[b|'khD
[url]http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=XnjZIvpq3dQ[/url]
.HmwW:{;c
而阿伯打人係事實,毆打係刑事,警方唔可以唔檢控阿伯.
請問d「死差佬」,幾時修改左法例,毆打可以警告了事.
e}Y3f"H1v.]
LP"q%t7q5|7l
[color=red]個人認為.....@0B];xP3@q
岩岩唔記得左加評語...(依家補番)
T+\ OTku%?
好簡單,個阿伯唔岩在先,但個女仔都唔方係咩好野.....[/color]
[[i] Last edited by jen01二世 on 2008-6-30 at 12:17 AM [/i]] have u studied law or anything related to legal studies? d y/j8b+s%[Wk,^
do you know what is called an "assault" or "battery"?3qUz3Rf)j6w
are you the witness of the incident?o&pTX[E8F I*Q,U
if not i prefer you stop commenting on this issue.. Z6k4H Y3_h(?qR
and better not using words like "阿伯打人係事實" and "毆打".W#p2w$b7M
otherwise, you could be charged as "defamation" [quote]Originally posted by [i]Kev[/i] at 2008-6-30 12:12 AM:
have u studied law or anything rela... [/quote]W)M9D$e!n*T3B
9E9x}Qt Gg9d
黑字 : 係轉貼~k"r0[w
Pbg&F1Q9Zz
紅字 : 個人感想
ok ?? dont have to ask for my approval :)
it's your choice to get yourself into trouble or not.
btw, im not sure if "publishing" or "spreading" "false statement" is against law or not.. 8ufTZ:v e5};oL
just becareful even if the words arent your own words..
good luck and hope you could last long in this world. 我係甘認為s"GgB j&sQ.o
該警員明顯地想息事寧人...
唔係既話唔通拉個啊伯返去告佢傷人......但係都要驗到有傷先得
如果驗唔到有傷,甘去到警米都係警告...浪費曬3方面既時間Y'Z1\'zKd b5ndc s
以上係由阿伯係錯曬...既方向所說 D^|I7J x
我反而認為此事係一件雙方道一句歉就可以解決既事DA X l C9ldu
該警員的處理手法絕對洽當t1g"Jh~*b
請恕我直言...該女子有點......那個...........無x取x
由佢將依段好明顯係佢自拍既片段放上youtube,仲要改個甘既標題就知道
頁:
[1]