[傑出港女系列](轉貼)又有新野啦(頁 1) - 吹水版 - 娛樂滿紛 26FUN

jen01二世 發表於 2008-6-29 11:59 PM

[傑出港女系列](轉貼)又有新野啦

香港法例有等如無.&zz#c}k4I I
qj!~v`3M&K1k;E8z
毆打係刑事,警方竟然不採取檢控行動.:O%O2Z[B2BL[
/`^-SxLbhn
對打人者只作出警告了事.7M$X.U/A7X

差人涉嫌包庇打人者.

[url]http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=XnjZIvpq3dQ[/url]

而阿伯打人係事實,毆打係刑事,警方唔可以唔檢控阿伯.LrXmx(|(~
&wK De9| dPE0T({
請問d「死差佬」,幾時修改左法例,毆打可以警告了事.T+Jer5uTk4p&t
G!\nk {;@"L
nz_Ao4{;w

[color=red]個人認為..... Yl!d8?"O$s*y
4l"A Y/VdR
岩岩唔記得左加評語...(依家補番)@+kw5Zu*kB}Q wlx)L
y^3?|D:r
好簡單,個阿伯唔岩在先,但個女仔都唔方係咩好野.....[/color]W2X(Vs s/d&dC R
5Wn4O/UHlG2u
[[i] Last edited by jen01二世 on 2008-6-30 at 12:17 AM [/i]]

Kev 發表於 2008-6-30 12:12 AM

have u studied law or anything related to legal studies?`9\-@H9{N|~
do you know what is called an "assault" or "battery"?ov?? E|)t1_oR'[
are you the witness of the incident?
if not i prefer you stop commenting on this issue..
and better not using words like "阿伯打人係事實" and "毆打".wAw^it d
otherwise, you could be charged as "defamation"

jen01二世 發表於 2008-6-30 12:17 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]Kev[/i] at 2008-6-30 12:12 AM:4Q$@L*l.qy(c
have u studied law or anything rela... [/quote]
4U_A&l NF2d u.P6m!c
黑字 : 係轉貼 {D N"QA|~

紅字 : 個人感想R { n,\6hV
a;K'drJ"t&GX2T
ok ??

Kev 發表於 2008-6-30 12:25 AM

dont have to ask for my approval :)
it's your choice to get yourself into trouble or not.8R.W:h(O6@G{y/F'[
btw, im not sure if "publishing" or "spreading" "false statement" is against law or not.. ]-@?k5a
just becareful even if the words arent your own words..
good luck and hope you could last long in this world.

lastwing 發表於 2008-6-30 01:08 AM

我係甘認為
該警員明顯地想息事寧人...
唔係既話唔通拉個啊伯返去告佢傷人......但係都要驗到有傷先得6Sl*t4C0f6PA.u
如果驗唔到有傷,甘去到警米都係警告...浪費曬3方面既時間;sLZ3p6d-Ph
以上係由阿伯係錯曬...既方向所說*]7K"gkZf)e%j
我反而認為此事係一件雙方道一句歉就可以解決既事
該警員的處理手法絕對洽當#iT/E^?w4X]
請恕我直言...該女子有點......那個...........無x取x5q7`;J6J_#I!ty
由佢將依段好明顯係佢自拍既片段放上youtube,仲要改個甘既標題就知道

頁: [1]

娛樂滿紛 26FUN's Archiver

[傑出港女系列](轉貼)又有新野啦