車仔vs巴塞
真係越諗越火....有無黑哨大家有眼睇:mad:[url=http://sports.sina.com.cn/uclvideo/bn/2009-05-07/03452943.html]http://sports.sina.com.cn/uclvideo/bn/2009-05-07/03452943.html[/url]
球證好多球企係咁近...都可以扮睇唔到...:angry:
賽後片段:
[size=3][color=black][url]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SASM_NzheK0[/url][/color][/size]
[[i] 本帖最後由 lawmk168 於 2009-5-7 05:46 PM 編輯 [/i]] 球證係球賽既一部份
吹得唔好唔代表黑哨 [quote]原帖由 [i]池佐島夜香[/i] 於 2009-5-7 06:08 PM 發表 [url=http://www.26fun.com/bbs/redirect.php?goto=findpost&pid=3136284&ptid=202623][img]http://www.26fun.com/bbs/images/common/back.gif[/img][/url]
球證係球賽既一部份
吹得唔好唔代表黑哨 [/quote]
但呢場球證係比賽既全部份
艾比度無啦啦紅牌...車仔有十二碼又無畀...etc.
你話一兩球判錯我都忍...但睇到呢場波...我真係忍唔到... 呢場車仔起碼有4球獲得12碼, 好相信呢個係黑哨和巴塞fans球証 Please don't say CORRUPTION everytime ok?
As referee, I feel this referee is failing to do his job, I don't know why as his full time job as psychologist, he couldn't make sure he made some right calls
I believe Chelsea should get at least 2 penalty, first and second one were absolutely penalty..
and I couldn't believe he sent off a Barcelona defender too. I don't think that's real body contact to get a foul at all.
He (the referee) should know how to handle pressure and he's failed to do his job properly [quote]原帖由 [i]brightlee[/i] 於 2009-5-7 08:26 PM 發表 [url=http://www.26fun.com/bbs/redirect.php?goto=findpost&pid=3136357&ptid=202623][img]http://www.26fun.com/bbs/images/common/back.gif[/img][/url]
Please don't say CORRUPTION everytime ok?
As referee, I feel this referee is failing to do his job, I don't know why as his full time job as psychologist, he couldn't make sure he made some right cal ... [/quote]
一場比賽,少有地有甘多錯判....已經係好唔正常......
係唔係黑哨....我唔敢講....但可以講個球証都一定係有偏幫.....
我覺得今時今日既球賽....有幾多係純交量吖!!
其實都唔第一次講....曼聯對熱刺甘....我就打死都唔信可以45分鐘話入5球就入5球喇!
話晒都頂級聯賽頂級球會...有幾大可能可以下半場變對南華出黎同人踼?嗰場曼聯入既第一球咪又夾硬黎既十二碼!
嘥氣啦!
球證,領隊,球員....邊個正當,邊個唔正當,邊鬼個可以知得晒吖!! 黑哨就唔會趕abidal出場~應該話球證水準低...呢個uefa應該擺d高水平d既球證係重要既賽事~ if he's a 黑哨, he wouldnt send abidol off.. 各位車仔迷,容許我咁講:
一個好難接受既賽果,但係都應該佩服巴塞到最後都仍然好有耐性咁樣組織....呢個入球或多或少佢地deserve.
除左etoo最後果個有d懷疑,其他都應該係penalty.但係唔好話係黑哨. abidal既紅牌其實都好冤枉.同埋第一回合messi係禁區俾人剷低亦都冇事....好同意球證係球賽既一部份.你點講我都唔信有黑哨.
同埋車仔入左一球之後,實質威脅巴塞攻門亦都唔多,無疑係留左一個位俾人去反勝,呢樣野值得檢討.
最後,輸左波仲輸埋風度.唔知drogba有幾受車仔迷歡迎.但係完場後既行為同打球證都冇mud分別. 好似lampard同hiddink,即使幾失望幾嬲都唔會做出過火既行為.我諗terry,drogba同ballack要好好學習 係黑哨 但係係曼記的 你諗下 車仔又出局 巴塞又停幾件 我不是車仔同巴塞fans, 我係反曼狗既
我覺得巴塞係唯一可以同曼狗鬥過既球隊~
今季恩尼斯達真係好實而不華
決賽力撐巴塞:agree: :agree: [quote]原帖由 [i]Shaqleung[/i] 於 2009-5-7 09:59 PM 發表 [url=http://www.26fun.com/bbs/redirect.php?goto=findpost&pid=3136426&ptid=202623][img]http://www.26fun.com/bbs/images/common/back.gif[/img][/url]
各位車仔迷,容許我咁講:
一個好難接受既賽果,但係都應該佩服巴塞到最後都仍然好有耐性咁樣組織....呢個入球或多或少佢地deserve.
除左etoo最後果個有d懷疑,其他都應該係penalty.但係唔好話係黑哨. abidal既紅牌其 ... [/quote]
[color=red]同埋車仔入左一球之後,實質威脅巴塞攻門亦都唔多,無疑係留左一個位俾人去反勝,呢樣野值得檢討.[/color]
[color=#ff0000][/color]
[color=black]我想講,車仔大把chance但係入唔到,咎由自取[/color]
[color=black]巴塞得1腳中龍就入了,係漂亮足球?我唔覺[/color]
[color=black]係,巴塞係打悅目足球,短傳入揳[/color]
[color=black]但係唔係個個對手都要好似皇馬咁打對攻比你入6球先係叻仔?[/color]
昨晚攻入的一球都只係禁區頂射波, 巴塞响呢180分鐘邊有組織入到禁區?
車仔作客打defense,情有可願, 返主場屢失良機,又遇著衰球証,只可以講再一次天意弄人 [size=4][color=purple][b]車仔有本事的話，藉著對手打少個，攻入多一球已無後顧之憂[/b][/color][/size]
[size=4][color=purple][b]成果諗住煲魚生粥[/b][/color][/size]
[size=4][color=purple][b]真係冇得怪任何人:kicking: [/b][/color][/size] 希望曼聯幫英國球隊出番口氣, 捧走冠軍 我個人認為兩隊打法都冇問題, 各施所長
車仔明知唔夠巴塞攻, 穩守突擊
巴塞繼續打地面滲入等機會
有人話車仔打多個點解唔攻多粒, 我又唔覺佢唔攻
車仔吸收上場皇馬同巴塞鬥攻既惡果, 唔想亂左陣腳 keep 住打法
總結成場波既勝負取決於球證多番錯誤判斷
今次車仔出局, 焦點會o係多次冇判十二碼
如果巴塞出局, 焦點會轉去艾比度無辜紅牌
[[i] 本帖最後由 raylau2004 於 2009-5-8 02:06 AM 編輯 [/i]] **** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 **** 球証誤判得益一方既艾比度, 係落後一球下被逐, 呢點已經完全否定"黑哨"一說
唔怕得罪講, 大多球迷認為有"假波"同"黑哨"成日會出現,
係因為本身對"足球運動"同"博彩事業"知識貧乏所致...:giveup:
[b][color=red]踢足球唔係安坐家中, 按下手制球員就會加速既電視遊戲, [/color][/b]
[b][color=red]體能, 戰術, 士氣同教練既調動都可以影響最後戰果,[/color][/b]
[b][color=red]想有更多了解既朋友, 最好係多d參與下實際既足球比賽....[/color][/b]
[b][color=blue]有規模既博彩事業, 係眾多博彩專家同精算師協助下, 已經變成坐係度等收錢既生意, [/color][/b]
[b][color=blue]大費周章去"製造戰果", 目的竟然係你與我如此普羅的一個幾毫, [/color][/b]
[b][color=blue]更要身家多我地何只千倍既球員同流合污, 投資數十億既老細們隻眼開隻眼閉,[/color][/b]
[b][color=blue]根本就荒謬絕倫....[/color][/b]
上面有位朋友講得好, 而家車仔輸左, 大家當然集中講果四球所謂12碼上,
但如果換正輸家係巴塞, 艾比度之紅又會成為焦點..
小弟認為車仔係不幸, 遇上一個不知所謂既球証, 但果所謂5球問題球,
都唔係球球波個個球証都會比, 尤其當晚位球証明顯對杜奧巴有偏見...
[b]最後一句送比認為係"黑哨"既朋友們:[/b]
[b][size=4][color=red]無收到人錢, 都可以吹錯既o者!:dev: [/color][/size][/b] [quote]原帖由 [i]dawand3rer[/i] 於 2009-5-8 04:08 AM 發表 [url=http://www.26fun.com/bbs/redirect.php?goto=findpost&pid=3136728&ptid=202623][img]http://www.26fun.com/bbs/images/common/back.gif[/img][/url]
r u mistaken?
is his full time job seeing psychiatrist instead?
honestly, this guy is totally biased
it's hard to expect everyone is free of bias, but at least u try to be neutral man, these referee ... [/quote]
hi.... I "copy" this from soccernet....
'"Ovrebo, 42, works as a psychologist outside football. In Euro 2008 the ItalianFootball Federation demanded an apology from UEFA after he incorrectly ruled outa goal by [url=http://soccernet.espn.go.com/players/profile?id=14104]Luca Toni[/url] in Italy's match against Romania Afterwards, Ovrebo admittedhe had made a mistake and was not assigned any more tournament matches."
Maybe both Soccernet and I make the same mistakes :haha:
[[i] 本帖最後由 brightlee 於 2009-5-8 12:29 PM 編輯 [/i]] [quote]原帖由 [i]Shaqleung[/i] 於 2009-5-7 09:59 PM 發表 [url=http://www.26fun.com/bbs/redirect.php?goto=findpost&pid=3136426&ptid=202623][img]http://www.26fun.com/bbs/images/common/back.gif[/img][/url]
各位車仔迷,容許我咁講:
一個好難接受既賽果,但係都應該佩服巴塞到最後都仍然好有耐性咁樣組織....呢個入球或多或少佢地deserve.
除左etoo最後果個有d懷疑,其他都應該係penalty.但係唔好話係黑哨. abidal既紅牌其 ... [/quote]
我就認為既塞"偶然性"多過"耐性", 正所謂好運好過好波, 車仔兩年歐聯都欠大運也....
小弟比較偏激, 認為杜奧巴兜口兜面鬧佢做得好,
[b]國際足協成日強調要尊重球證, 但佢地成日錯, 仲叫人點尊重?[/b]
[b]須知教練輸波會被炒, 球員輸波會比雪比賣走, 老細輸波會蝕錢, 球迷輸波有人會自殺.....[/b]
[b]球証大人吹錯, 最多SAY句SORRY, 停果一場半場息事寧人, 成本甚低呀!! :secret: [/b] 係咪黑哨就唔知,
不過球證成日擾亂賽果,
係家陣數以億計上落嘅足球比賽中真係好大影響:nogood:
頁:
[1]
2