大家估下湖人會贏咩比數?
我雖然吾係lakers fans, 但係我吾覺得magic 會偷到雞, 五個位lakers 都勁好多 乜樓主覺得拜林勁過侯活好多...:eek: ??我覺得有得打囉~
湖人嬴 4-2 啦~ [quote]原帖由 [i]jefferson24[/i] 於 2009-5-31 10:57 PM 發表 [url=http://www.26fun.com/bbs/redirect.php?goto=findpost&pid=3162377&ptid=203794][img]http://www.26fun.com/bbs/images/common/back.gif[/img][/url]
乜樓主覺得拜林勁過侯活好多...:eek: ??
我覺得有得打囉~
湖人嬴 4-2 啦~ [/quote]
你arm, 侯活係勁d [quote]原帖由 [i]EdwardLee[/i] 於 2009-5-31 10:53 PM 發表 [url=http://www.26fun.com/bbs/redirect.php?goto=findpost&pid=3162372&ptid=203794][img]http://www.26fun.com/bbs/images/common/back.gif[/img][/url]
我雖然吾係lakers fans, 但係我吾覺得magic 會偷到雞, 五個位lakers 都勁好多 [/quote]
唔係掛:yy28: .....我估魔術贏:yy10: 下...未打就話lakers win??
笑 重點係Game 1同2邊場超人會食T foul...
If Game 2/3食的話....九成九Lakers win 4:1
If第一場就食T
可能會打成3:3 [quote]原帖由 [i]自由神[/i] 於 2009-5-31 11:27 PM 發表 [url=http://www.26fun.com/bbs/redirect.php?goto=findpost&pid=3162409&ptid=203794][img]http://www.26fun.com/bbs/images/common/back.gif[/img][/url]
重點係Game 1同2邊場超人會食T foul...
If Game 2/3食的話....九成九Lakers win 4:1
If第一場就食T
可能會打成3:3 [/quote]唔爭在tip埋game7 la賢子:yy04: Lakers一定贏梗架?！
唔好少看magic囉:yy34: 我覺得高比太強, magic 無人守到佢, 如困係celtics or cavaliers 都話會有人mark 到, magic 真係會比佢噤住泥打 邊隊贏第一場就會贏得冠軍
事實上大家實力不相百仲, 好難估到
但我希望那隊是湖人 :yy33: LBJ都守得住
Kobe都應唔會太輸洩
重點在於內線
如果howard稱霸的話,隨時又係magic win 4-2 Bynum is not so par with Howard anyway, Howard has been improving greatly this season, and Bynum don't have the fire in his head... And 3-point shower of Magic is a great weapon of theirs, may effectively challenge Lakers. If Lakers' 2nd-tier doesn't play well enough, they will be having great trouble as Magic indeed has a very average and all-round squad.
Yet for expereince I will no doubt go for Lakers, Jackson and Kobe dual would lead Kobe for his first title after Shaq's era.
4-2 maybe, it could be tight, and no easy road for Lakers, mind the gap! [quote]原帖由 [i]cfccfcc[/i] 於 2009-6-1 12:00 AM 發表 [url=http://www.26fun.com/bbs/redirect.php?goto=findpost&pid=3162440&ptid=203794][img]http://www.26fun.com/bbs/images/common/back.gif[/img][/url]
LBJ都守得住
Kobe都應唔會太輸洩
重點在於內線
如果howard稱霸的話,隨時又係magic win 4-2 [/quote]我反而會咁睇~
Odom Gasol Bynum呢3個，點都一定勁過Big-Z Big-Ben同華利祖
從奧運可見，Howard其實對Gasol並無著數（仲可以話4：6波）
Magic之所以可以KO 騎士
最主要不是中鋒位（等6場除外）
最主要係土國皇帝同Lewis呢對6'10既鋒線令騎士防唔到（騎士無同等身高同位置既人）
但Lakers卻有Walton Ariza odom同gasol可以夠身高對Magic呢2點打鋒線位
但Magic既3分，反而會係Final既X-factors
補充一點：Magic其實防唔到James的，佢只係等佢開頭搏到累，尾2節反擊
所以...邊個mark到kobe呢？我唔知
而且kobe技術上同整體意識其實高過james好多下:)
[[i] 本帖最後由 自由神 於 2009-6-1 12:15 AM 編輯 [/i]] [quote]原帖由 [i]EdwardLee[/i] 於 2009-5-31 11:35 PM 發表 [url=http://www.26fun.com/bbs/redirect.php?goto=findpost&pid=3162416&ptid=203794][img]http://www.26fun.com/bbs/images/common/back.gif[/img][/url]
我覺得高比太強, magic 無人守到佢, 如困係celtics or cavaliers 都話會有人mark 到, magic 真係會比佢噤住泥打 [/quote]
Courtney Lee is a good defensive player, but of couse might no be "good" as Dahnthy Jones, and they may use Pietrus to match Kobe, he is not bad defensively too, and for some time they can use Lewis to check Kobe, especially when Walton is in.
And even if Kobe can pass the 1st man, Howard will always be there waiting in the paint, Kobe still couldnt get lay-up as easy as you may think. Magic is good in defence, Stan Van Gundy leads good defence motion to Magic, they have the ability to win, yet will still be the underdog~ 雖然我信奉中鋒主宰論 ...
但我唔覺一個中鋒基本功咁差既明星中鋒 ,
可以win冠軍~~ LAKERS 4-0 贏硬 MAGIC,
如果唔係大家即管笑 LAKERS 啦:D magic win 4-2
magic will get lakers collapsed by long distance shots 自從magic贏左騎士我就想佢贏埋湖人...估magic贏4:2 聽聞Nelson會出番黎..
咁又唔同講法..
魔術係常規賽...2:0嬴湖人..
Nelson分別拎27,28分..
所以魔術絕對有得打!!
頁:
[1]