[quote]
我同意最好無果球問題球, 咁無得賴!!
[color=DarkOrange]但事實上係86遇上上帝之手, 90, 98, 06三次12碼出局, 10今年係世紀問題球...[/color]
[color=DarkOrange]先不論實力同奪標機會, 請找一隊如此黑運的球隊給我看看吧!![/color]
P.s hans你又再一次表演"倒果為因", 話英軍fans盲目追捧大肆評擊你既所謂"理性討論", 若果唔係有人開個post攻擊英格蘭,
你再入黎加把口先, 人家fans又如果攻擊你? 自己開個post出黎亂鬧一通?
我咁口臭, 你有見我開個post出黎抽抽法國同意大利水? 就算會, 仲比人駁駁駁, 小弟亦唔會認為自己好"委屈":dev:
[size=2][url=http://www.26fun.com/bbs/redirect.php?goto=findpost&pid=3454654&ptid=230975][color=#999999]filter-052fans 發表於 2010-7-2 12:23 AM[/color][/url][/size][/quote]
橙色嗰句.....甘不如你話英軍不如贏晒三場唔對德國!!事實擺咗出黎..唔係甘嘛!三次踼輸十二碼唔係黑仔o架!至少90,96德國响十二碼處上係高過英軍...96修夫基射失..唔佢想,但佢係真係唔夠人射得的!!十二碼決贏負係多少有講運...但射贏既一樣可以係實力來的!!
p.s嗰度!傻仔!不如大家都唔識打字,唔識用電腦甘咪大家都唔駛講嘢囉!!我發表既嘢就英軍哩十多年都啺得唔好,.所謂既最強亦只係不外如是之類既言論!我係反駁,我係用我既由黎反駁...你做乜做甘多火藥味出黎???其實你想點呢??我發表完你就甘多咩全世界都錯係你一個岩之類既言論....係你講的喎!!係你好似唔想我再講嘢甘咋喎!!!你自己搞清錯先出聲啦,師兄!
我係覺得英軍廢...甘又點呢??難道要覺得英軍強先可以得你批准响樹講嘢!??甘惡既啲人..............
[quote]
唔再拗啦, 我只覺得, 3個都係好波之人, 朗尼仲踢緊, 24歲已經做左大部份佢地既成就, thats all...
我好同意佢出左曼聯會無咁好, 皆因所有曼聯放出去, 會踢得好過係曼聯既, 20年黎大概只有杜比利同科蘭二人only... ...
[size=2][url=http://www.26fun.com/bbs/redirect.php?goto=findpost&pid=3454662&ptid=230975][color=#999999]filter-052fans 發表於 2010-7-2 12:36 AM[/color][/url][/size][/quote]
我由頭到尾都係話朗尼"未"到前輩既級數之嘛!!!我話佢廢都好啦....我都話佢一直响英軍既表現之嘛!!!點解你會睇到廢就係永遠都廢呢??
不過我的確係覺得未來英軍都出唔到啲乜可以扭轉而家不濟表現既人.....因我覺得可能英國青訓根本出黎出去都甘既類形既球員...甘打後出既同而家出既都甘既類形,表現只會差唔多,唔會特別好咗!!
[quote]
今時今日仲有咩人會話英格蘭天下無敵呀大佬, 有果個都痴架啦, 你同佢地癲?
[color=Purple]當然你有權表達英軍不足之處, 但唔同意你既就會駁架啦, so simple...[/color]
p.s. [color=DarkOrange]瑞士係弱隊, 南非甚至紐西蘭都係, 但佢地都打得好過英格蘭, ok?[/color]
講英格蘭既不足同衰野, 我大概可以寫一篇10萬字既論文, 絕對會比你講果d深入n倍,
英格蘭需要有好大既改進, 因為佢地真係幾垃圾下...
你而家個心會唔會舒服dd, 無咁委屈?
[size=2][url=http://www.26fun.com/bbs/redirect.php?goto=findpost&pid=3454677&ptid=230975][color=#999999]filter-052fans 發表於 2010-7-2 12:45 AM[/color][/url][/size][/quote]
紫色嗰句...冇人唔俾反駁呀...係你加好多火藥味落去咋喎!!我講黎講去都講波,你就話我惡意攻擊,抽水咋喎!!又係你喎!!!
橙色.....唔知點解你甘講....嗰位師兄話好多弱隊入到16,8強.....都冇你講哩幾隊......烏,巴,加哩三隊的確係發揮得好過英軍!!
黑色嗰啲......隋你啦!!又賴皮了?!
[quote]
橙色嗰句.....甘不如你話英軍不如贏晒三場唔對德國!!事實擺咗出黎..唔係甘嘛!三次踼輸十二碼唔係黑仔o架!至少90,96德國响十二碼處上係高過英軍...96修夫基射失..唔佢想,但佢係真係唔夠人射得的!!十二碼決贏負係多少 ...
[size=2][url=http://www.26fun.com/bbs/redirect.php?goto=findpost&pid=3454678&ptid=230975][color=#999999]HansChan 發表於 2010-7-2 12:46 AM[/color][/url][/size][/quote]
[size=5]你係邊一忽聞到"火藥味"? 我好冷靜咁同你討論亦無咩攻擊性, I'm 心如止水, I'm 佛陀... :) [/size]
再講一次, 你話d英軍fans盲目反駁你, 問題係你攻擊人地愛好既球隊先, 人家先會駁,
當然第d朋友唔會mind有人駁佢地, 因為呢度大概只有你會mind, 認為"有人唔比你發表偉論"...
一人手一對, 以字數水份計你絕對ko所有人, airtime同聲都比別人大, 何會自己"有人講無你講呢"? :secret:
[i=s] 本帖最後由 HansChan 於 2010-7-2 01:09 AM 編輯 [/i]
[quote]
你係邊一忽聞到"火藥味"? 我好冷靜咁同你討論亦無咩攻擊性, I'm 心如止水, I'm 佛陀... :)
再講一次, 你話d英軍fans盲目反駁你, 問題係你攻擊人地愛好既球隊先, 人家先會駁,
當然第d朋友唔會mind有人駁佢地, 因 ...
[size=2][url=http://www.26fun.com/bbs/redirect.php?goto=findpost&pid=3454693&ptid=230975][color=#999999]filter-052fans 發表於 2010-7-2 12:57 AM[/color][/url][/size][/quote]
反駁更要啦,唔係邊有得討論....但若個個如你甘...就死得人多啦!!
我係覺得好多英軍fans好盲目,因支持可以係同踼得好同唔好冇關...只不過我話英軍踼到pat屎甘都俾人講咗十年係廿年黎最強...甘我話哩啲係盲目既英軍fans講...你都唔可以話我唔可以甘講嘢格....當然可以英軍行緊十年大衰運都得....只係我會用哩十年既大賽表現去發表一下佢哋點唔夠班啫....甘又錯?就會俾你講埋嗰啲,咩領隊廣告商都錯就只係得我岩之類既言論??!你真係理性喎!!你都係小心啲,你INSULT緊佛陀呀!!
我就冇mind過任何人駁我既...都係討講吓嘢啫...即使如你哩啲甘既人,我都冇介意過!!所以你係唔好諗住生事喇...冇人會當你係一回事的!
[quote]
我由頭到尾都係話朗尼"未"到前輩既級數之嘛!!!我話佢廢都好啦....我都話佢一直响英軍既表現之嘛!!!點解你會睇到廢就係永遠都廢呢??
不過我的確係覺得未來英軍都出唔到啲乜可以扭轉而家不濟表現既人.....因我覺得可 ...
[size=2][url=http://www.26fun.com/bbs/redirect.php?goto=findpost&pid=3454685&ptid=230975][color=#999999]HansChan 發表於 2010-7-2 12:50 AM[/color][/url][/size][/quote]
喂, 除左入球數字, 朗尼有邊樣野唔及shearer同owen? 佢兩個24歲果時, 係國家隊得幾多頂cap帽同入球?
shearer, owen攞左幾多次fa cup, 聯賽同歐聯?
你講果d級數定係cup數? 邊樣唔及請指出....
吹大上一代英格蘭既實力, 去矮化今時今日呢班, 係呢度你都未算最叻...
我只係覺得自己慘, 果時班尼斯, 笠臣到舒利亞比人笑不夠水準,
到今時今日有朗尼呢代做到以前恥笑者要求之時, 又開始有人話佢地衰過上一兩代...
所以話捧英格蘭真係笑話, 仲錯得好緊要... :dev:
[b] [url=http://www.26fun.com/bbs/redirect.php?goto=findpost&pid=3454654&ptid=230975]53#[/url] [i]
filter-052fans[/i] [/b]
荷蘭咪一樣咁黑,
74輸比主辦國西德,
78告魯夫唔敢去阿根廷,
90抽下簽對西德,
92射輸12碼比丹麥,
94古列治唔肯打世界盃
96射輸12碼比法國,
98射輸12碼比巴西,
00射輸12碼比意大利,
仲有好多內部不和因素.
唯一好運係04年12碼射羸瑞典
但我唔會用黑仔做藉口...:hitwall: 輸就係輸
[quote]
反駁更要啦,唔係邊有得討論....但若個個如你甘...就死得人多啦!!
我係覺得好多英軍fans好盲目,因支持可以係同踼得好同唔好冇關...只不過我話英軍踼到pat屎甘都俾人講咗十年係廿年黎最強...甘我話哩啲係盲目既英軍fa ...
[size=2][url=http://www.26fun.com/bbs/redirect.php?goto=findpost&pid=3454698&ptid=230975][color=#999999]HansChan 發表於 2010-7-2 01:08 AM[/color][/url][/size][/quote]
生事唔夠你強, 至少我好少比人投訴...:dev:
無菩薩心腸就一早收左你檔啦, 仲同你傾咁耐咩...
訓啦, 祝聽日大家睇好波啦下 :cheers:
[quote] 53#
filter-052fans
荷蘭咪一樣咁黑,
[b][color=red]74輸比主辦國西德,[/color][/b]
[b][color=red]78告魯夫唔敢去阿根廷,[/color]
[color=red]90抽下簽對西德,[/color][/b]
92射輸12碼比丹麥,
[color=red][b]94古列治唔肯打世界盃[/b][/color]
96射輸12碼比法國,
98射輸12碼比巴西,
00射輸12碼比意大利,
仲 ...
[size=2][url=http://www.26fun.com/bbs/redirect.php?goto=findpost&pid=3454704&ptid=230975][color=#999999]屠膠含三世 發表於 2010-7-2 01:16 AM[/color][/url][/size][/quote]
sorry, 紅字果d根本唔可以算,
唔賴黑仔, me2, 我都無...
訓啦咁多位, 大家聽晚睇場好波啦 :cheers:
[b] [url=http://www.26fun.com/bbs/redirect.php?goto=findpost&pid=3454698&ptid=230975]65#[/url] [i]HansChan[/i] [/b]
相信好多英格蘭球迷都係好理性, 唔會覺得自己愛隊強得過巴西德國
剛才我都話, 英格蘭對德國係45%對55%, 至於對巴西, 就係等佢同荷蘭打到兩敗俱傷先可以打成平手(巴西冇德國咁針對英格蘭踢法)
反而閣下認為烏, 巴, 加表現好過英格蘭, 我就唔可以認同
烏拉圭十六強對弱旅南韓, 巴拉圭, 加納兩隊都係踢得差情況下壓到日本美國晉級, 如果佢地士旦一隊對住德國, 都唔止輸1-4啦
[i=s] 本帖最後由 HansChan 於 2010-7-2 01:24 AM 編輯 [/i]
[quote]
[color=red]喂, 除左入球數字, 朗尼有邊樣野唔及shearer同owen? 佢兩個24歲果時, 係國家隊得幾多頂cap帽同入球?
[/color]
shearer, owen攞左幾多次fa cup, 聯賽同歐聯?
你講果d級數定係cup數? 邊樣唔及請指出....
[color=yellow]吹大上一代英格蘭既實力, 去矮化今時今日呢班, 係呢度你都未算最叻...
我只係覺得自己慘, 果時班尼斯, 笠臣到舒利亞比人笑不夠水準,
到今時今日有朗尼呢代做到以前恥笑者要求之時, 又開始有人話佢地衰過上一兩代...
[/color]
所以話捧英格蘭真係笑話, 仲錯得好緊要...
[size=2][url=http://www.26fun.com/bbs/redirect.php?goto=findpost&pid=3454700&ptid=230975][color=#999999]filter-052fans 發表於 2010-7-2 01:11 AM[/color][/url][/size][/quote]
紅色嗰句,一句講晒,表現同俾到人既信心!!舒利亞甘,佢把握力大,射門技術一絕,基本上嗰時佢起親腳對方個龍都撲死...奧雲甘佢一起步入禁區個個後衛都驚甘咋...所以係睇得出英軍係依賴佢哋黎踼的..朗尼暫時睇唔到有兩位前輩甘既能力,佢起腳中龍都要鼓掌,佢又做唔到殺入禁區..所以我覺得佢响英軍係好一般!
黃色嗰啲.....記憶所講係佢哋唔及第二啲強國既球員...但點都好.....就講哩廿年....我都唔知講過幾多次...有一次又一次既結果活生生擺咗出黎.....班前輩既表演係好過你嗰班黃金一代....所以我之前已講,我係用眼去睇足球,唔係跟紅頂白,人云亦云!!
[quote]
生事唔夠你強, 至少我好少比人投訴...:dev:
無菩薩心腸就一早收左你檔啦, 仲同你傾咁耐咩...
訓啦, 祝聽日大家睇好波啦下 :cheers:
[size=2][url=http://www.26fun.com/bbs/redirect.php?goto=findpost&pid=3454706&ptid=230975][color=#999999]filter-052fans 發表於 2010-7-2 01:16 AM[/color][/url][/size][/quote]
收人檔都要有能力的.....你何來甘既能力??
你算罷啦...我知你係搞事高人...但又何必呢?
[i=s] 本帖最後由 HansChan 於 2010-7-2 01:54 AM 編輯 [/i]
[quote] 相信好多英格蘭球迷都係好理性, 唔會覺得自己愛隊強得過巴西德國
剛才我都話, 英格蘭對德國係45%對55%, 至於對巴西, 就係等佢同荷蘭打到兩敗俱傷先可以打成平手(巴西冇德國咁針對英格蘭踢法)
反而閣下認為烏, 巴, 加表現好過英格蘭, 我就唔可以認同
烏拉圭十六強對弱旅南韓, 巴拉圭, 加納兩隊都係踢得差情況下壓到日本美國晉級, 如果佢地士旦一隊對住德國, 都唔止輸1-4啦
[size=2][url=http://www.26fun.com/bbs/redirect.php?goto=findpost&pid=3454711&ptid=230975][color=#999999]darkensun 發表於 2010-7-2 01:20 AM[/color][/url][/size][/quote]
師兄,你太多假設喇!
正如賽前好多人都會諗英軍首名出線....結果呢??唔係下下都話唔好運的!
三場分組賽,得最後嗰場係"免強合格"....佢哋想攞多球都做唔到啦,頭兩場直頭連卡比路都認衰.....
冇甘多如果的....
嗰四隊...論分組賽,你可以話係加納欠啲說服力....但其餘都係實至名歸的!巴頭兩場踼得好好,烏除咗頭一場...場場都好!加納就死守同攻不強...但16強係壓倒性甘贏美的!巴對日本...係大家不相百仲....我睇唔到佢哋有幾弱....師兄係立論根本就標籤咗佢哋係弱隊,佢哋差過英軍,所以佢哋晉級而英軍唔得呢,就係佢哋好彩,英軍唔好彩.....
唔係甘既...英軍有邊場稱得上說服到人??
事但一班對德國都輸唔止1-4,又係你以上面既立論而推出黎既啫.....起碼加納咪活生生俾咗你睇輪0:1囉!
佢哋會贏定輸,我唔敢講,因又係假設既嘢.....但師兄你每讓以甘既方式去講.....係有點以情意結去講既....係可以講到會飛都得的!
To be fair, if Lampard's goal were counted which it really should have, I don't think the Germans could get the 3rd & the 4th in that easy manners. And nobody could tell the eventual outcome :)
[quote]To be fair, if Lampard's goal were counted which it really should have, I don't think the Germans could get the 3rd & the 4th in that easy manners. And nobody could tell the eventual outcome :)
[size=2][url=http://www.26fun.com/bbs/redirect.php?goto=findpost&pid=3454772&ptid=230975][color=#999999]im0.07 發表於 2010-7-2 04:43 AM[/color][/url][/size][/quote]
你甘講係中肯啲!
若當時2:2,可能德國會冇甘易打到反擊既...會係中肯啲假設...
如98年碧咸世紀一踼出咗場.....當時好多人都話如果唔係佢,英軍會贏.....其實甘講都多餘!!
可能性既嘢可以有好多的嘛....其實只可以話若果碧咸冇出到場,英軍就唔駛踼得甘辛苦..甘駛得返甘少機會去攻....賽果係點咪又係要出咗黎先知...
In my opinion, even Lampard's goal was counted....England probably could only hold the defence until penalty.
From the way that they played in those 4 games, I really didn't see there was any great play that would create chances to score.
Players have no team work, the coach doesn't really have any strategy.
The coach doesn't know how to make a change and would just let the players play the same way even they are playing bad (same way in all 4 games).
England just deserved to lose.
[quote][table][tr][td]In my opinion, even Lampard's goal was counted....England probably could only hold the defence until penalty.
[color=red]From the way that they played in those 4 games, I really didn't see there was any great play that would create chances to score.
Players have no team work, the coach doesn't really have any strategy.
The coach doesn't know how to make a change and would just let the players play the same way even they are playing bad (same way in all 4 games).
England just deserved to lose.[/color][/td][/tr][/table]
[size=2][url=http://www.26fun.com/bbs/redirect.php?goto=findpost&pid=3455029&ptid=230975][color=#999999]slwong3 發表於 2010-7-2 10:33 PM[/color][/url][/size][/quote]
其實咪就係甘囉!!
[quote]
其實咪就係甘囉!!
[size=2][url=http://www.26fun.com/bbs/redirect.php?goto=findpost&pid=3455036&ptid=230975][color=#999999]HansChan 發表於 2010-7-2 10:55 PM[/color][/url][/size][/quote]
The ultimate winner not necessary the best team. Italy has never showed the world why they were the world champion in the last 4 years, isn't it ? :P
[i=s] 本帖最後由 HansChan 於 2010-7-3 01:55 AM 編輯 [/i]
[quote]
The ultimate winner not necessary the best team. Italy has never showed the world why they were the world champion in the last 4 years, isn't it ? :P
[size=2][url=http://www.26fun.com/bbs/redirect.php?goto=findpost&pid=3455153&ptid=230975][color=#999999]im0.07 發表於 2010-7-3 01:47 AM[/color][/url][/size][/quote]
又唔係喎!(我意思係話四年前既意大利,但第一句係絕對同意的!!)
佢哋不過不失喎.....意大利足球甘多年都係守多於攻...叠瓦反擊為主....上屆佢算係相對地攻返多啲既....可以話冇人哋正正打攻擊既球隊如巴西哩啲甘悅目啫......我又覺得上屆佢哋係實力唔差的喎....(上屆賽前買咗佢冠軍,7倍....贏咗$3500!!:P )
佢地今次係踢得差,與人無猶