娛樂滿紛 26FUN's Archiver

新經濟學巨人 發表於 2005-4-3 06:42 PM

反對日本成為聯合國常任理事國

[url]http://hongkong-property.netfirms.com/UN/anti_japanese_to_be_un.htm[/url]4yj'k"d3E!g
[size=6]請大家簽名支持,亦要告知你的朋友[/size]

cyhk 發表於 2005-4-3 06:53 PM

全力支持新經濟學巨人
x[){/X Okp~ i:x Qia W A.e@7V
反對日本成為聯合國常任理事國 Zb-i cr

t%egT3c j(x1K)t\-k 大家要珍惜今日可以咁自由happy享用26FUN.COM的日子
rj |ld]
0M?4wt$H;H4L 千萬記著, 倭寇狼子野心, 必須提防慘痛歷史的重複

史艷文2 發表於 2005-4-3 10:19 PM

小日本狗一定信唔過,心胸險惡,又扮好人.
r` j Zs7UR5Hj%] 鬼唔望一夜之間海嘯加地震,等日本 齊齊玩 冚家產

clchoicl 發表於 2005-4-3 10:30 PM

[img]http://hk.geocities.com/ronald_be_free/pkjapan.JPG[/img]

新經濟學巨人 發表於 2005-4-3 11:45 PM

[size=6]請大家將訊息傳播開去![/size]

sklai 發表於 2005-4-4 01:10 AM

[font=宋體][color=Red][size=6]反日本軍國主義復興[/size][/color][/font]

chinese 發表於 2005-4-4 01:22 AM

totally support u

新經濟學巨人 發表於 2005-4-4 01:25 AM

[size=5]同是犯錯,雖然改變唔到歷史,德國卻願意道歉及賠償!
9f.|Ho&V4QBfZSI 9H RQ/h}`b F
主動建碑立館,讓後人警惕, 4g8a/v3O9Y4k(}([/]:q

g6D be\g Dm 德國政府對處理第二次世界大戰的態度及立場,值得一讚!
:f O1f z#?+D
_"E"{+XQT7R!J 早排有一個登陸諾曼第的紀錄片,片中詳述當年的慘況,並由各一名 hlq_:ez

%S }(CU9s4X 美國及德國老兵,各自站在自己當年(60年前)的地方, 0d!~S5\H3d

gU;D#`0knY(ke t 美國老兵講自己如果搶灘,並且親身示範,德國老兵講自己如果死守; HM[HFd

6l#~*x@G&w5nP 最後在片尾,兩名老兵相遇, 並互相握手,
k1EP Am [7gdN :m]+~H,o D'Nv
美國老兵問:當年你見到我們登陸搶灘嘛? .|_(je~[5X9F
RDXX'X)D-\ n B
德國老兵回應:有....我見到......[/size]
g1[ CX+["^B/R {.EG:[|^R^i
[[i] Last edited by 新經濟學巨人 on 2005-4-4 at 01:26 AM [/i]]

小豪豪 發表於 2005-4-4 01:41 AM

反日本,死不悔改

robertchai 發表於 2005-4-4 04:29 AM

好心d日本仔啦,有時間拍多幾套av咪仲好...我罷買日貨都一定支持你D AV碟啦
(Es;j&awj7g V U0_)A"Bd'l+C
男個d精盡人亡,女果d俾人姦死哂,咁就正

新經濟學巨人 發表於 2005-4-4 06:59 PM

請支持!

pk boy 發表於 2005-4-4 09:20 PM

我會用行動支持,溝哂d"o架"妹,直至佢地放棄呢個念頭為止!!!
?:r)Ir3Q8l'U :):):)

stupid X 發表於 2005-4-4 11:46 PM

shall we be more reasonable?nf | R:q5S2w8l
japan has been very influential nowadays.
Z+vnMV;q.e although i hate japaneses, but in UN,
Y@fuB%q w1A japan should occupy a place.

新經濟學巨人 發表於 2005-4-5 12:00 AM

[size=6]簽名反對,好合理囉![/size]~\M$|SUA

C%n X*cG `"` 是否代表有錢人可以做乜都得?{4P M2`y!][yz
HM)llL"UY0^$B1a
不分有沒有錢,都要有作為人的NORM.

MaxFigo 發表於 2005-4-5 12:02 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]stupid X[/i] at 2005-4-4 11:46 PM:
L(?-Yf F pX6Yu shall we be more reasonable?
$l5U3dF:]w japan has been very influential nowadays.
9haEE4v e7@5pFl#y&c although i hate japaneses, but in UN,W\ ZS\'O
japan should occupy a place. [/quote]
(s1F9c{s[3K}b
:wf G]&n B Y,O.mt;@A
兄弟...國際事務唔係咁簡單...%k.^3?k9k7^5`#h5nW
日本係好強我絕對認同Dy TR W.k+b
但同時佢亦都係個好有野心ge國家...
6y.u*~ x#~'d)v 助長軍國主義講到底都唔係一件好事 @@

新經濟學巨人 發表於 2005-4-5 12:07 AM

[size=6]講到強,
*O3V"?QlH E`3e
t}r3K!WR 第一次世界大戰後,日本強佔山東(德國影響範圍),"R _6w5B S-U-Y*K2o
,Y5k{%g bp3W\6\
及後日本更退出國際聯盟(即聯合國前身),c4{;j Y.z_T
o?\;U L_;@*A
肆無忌憚入侵中國![/size]

stupid X 發表於 2005-4-5 12:09 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]MaxFigo[/i] at 2005-4-5 12:02 AM:
n3B0{^ON
de3rY i&YtR+?7G.J\
1gi#?@1|k^)og4M4m
E*xK~!g ?e 兄弟...國際事務唔係咁簡單...,X%IoR1NUL I} }
日本係好強我絕對認同
TR-^ \2KEL 但同時佢亦都係個好有野心ge國家...
+\n9d9~#Huq 助長軍國主義講到底都唔係一件好事 @@ [/quote] ^l B5`Z]0F
4GZ2P&l$V a!DZ
~2e9@1_a$X
m8fd__
p*o!cj k4j-S
i agree with u.So i say japan can be a member of UN only.
+Mbf4I9Y~ in the next 50 years, japan will decline. tK;MH:|5@
a new "Brick" will form and become the strongest countries
^b9Me|*em4Vg t'M Does anyone know?

MaxFigo 發表於 2005-4-5 12:12 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]stupid X[/i] at 2005-4-5 12:09 AM:9r SO Iy5oh7d
,N+vT|q/fqH

e#]*A u J4Eh.Q 0br2O5v%U+p
+oh5l]] }
&W9G T6`w9@
&\`$_k(V1{Fh d
in the next 50 years, japan will decline.9o"l2o*GvLE1Z/o
[/quote]$mH(ej&qL;u
5rK{S2`-B^HG
係ar...日本本身其實都隱藏左唔少經濟問題 @@
;K~%S.wW)W#_
(}ktX`qC 下面果句唔太明:P

stupid X 發表於 2005-4-5 12:16 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]新經濟學巨人[/i] at 2005-4-5 12:07 AM:5HG2l5MY1N,L-M{
[size=6]講到強,
Y*V9w,{9SI:xG s
Bc'T8k5s@G(?e 第一次世界大戰後,日本強佔山東(德國影響範圍),['J a0UKKc

^XD)r1|Zk 及後日本更退出國際聯盟(即聯合國前身),
EOv0S/L V7Jr$KKJ"P}*y+Zb
肆無忌憚入侵中國![/size] [/quote]
tkpO0V4]y+XW
}tEx-Y[o
(O@,L#RQlGhK the bro knows quite much of history.hB ~/s{.]
|s-BQy
UN is now becoming國際聯盟. Its importance is now decreasing since America attacked Iraq without permission from UN. UN will eventually 架空 by strong countries.
M.EwyQ,x l,[#TaeTd
Apart from that, I think Japan is only playing tricks with America because he can never enter UN if China object to it.#j\j5EHV/vo"lC4C
V3? Z#G6~,tJO'sJ
China has a right of veto否決權.3{a b@q
If anyone among the five 常任理事國 uses veto to object,
-x$U'?)]P\,qw"Y the issue will au---atically be banned
^e/iY}%tqf/T N Veto is a special right offered to victorious countries in WW2

stupid X 發表於 2005-4-5 12:21 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]MaxFigo[/i] at 2005-4-5 12:12 AM:4WaR)\d ^;q
^.}Ps }(p oS'W
o)Z'KdIN1N
係ar...日本本身其實都隱藏左唔少經濟問題 @@ UBSUg"sKK,p
)[+C HF7U1l1`G$C_
下面果句唔太明:P [/quote]
h}SH.`3Pah
g6kye8B7E_ ;w3o_-Y+A E+H
金鏄四國 is a new idea which shocked the whole world in 2003.
{Y!T%_hJ %p(q&w)Lq`Z
One of the 高盛 investigator proposed a report which make the whole world ecmomic scholars and also 元首s3uQ!c ~};Z [5`
E zS*J1wj
why it is called "Brick"
y4S _ofW P)e'W:H]
it is because the four new countries which will lead the world economy in 21 centries is Brazil,Russia.India and Chinaf0t]!sW^2Xe
9FI2v*M/}"j
%B4onmRg;d
*b@zH6s5A
PS: if u want anymore info., search it in yahoo, it's a very new idea but very well known among all 投資行

頁: [1] 2

Powered by Discuz! Archiver 7.0.0  © 2001-2009 Comsenz Inc.