娛樂滿紛 26FUN's Archiver

新經濟學巨人 發表於 2005-4-3 06:42 PM

反對日本成為聯合國常任理事國

[url]http://hongkong-property.netfirms.com/UN/anti_japanese_to_be_un.htm[/url]%UO q.lL8L%Q
[size=6]請大家簽名支持,亦要告知你的朋友[/size]

cyhk 發表於 2005-4-3 06:53 PM

全力支持新經濟學巨人
$?-zM:T#i"@4r!V O/mZM#lB
反對日本成為聯合國常任理事國
OH-X_8H*z
R9IP/Gcd 大家要珍惜今日可以咁自由happy享用26FUN.COM的日子
{?:n6k:P8dv|
/E4b;]'fc 千萬記著, 倭寇狼子野心, 必須提防慘痛歷史的重複

史艷文2 發表於 2005-4-3 10:19 PM

小日本狗一定信唔過,心胸險惡,又扮好人.v;x3G6J%iliRX&~{
鬼唔望一夜之間海嘯加地震,等日本 齊齊玩 冚家產

clchoicl 發表於 2005-4-3 10:30 PM

[img]http://hk.geocities.com/ronald_be_free/pkjapan.JPG[/img]

新經濟學巨人 發表於 2005-4-3 11:45 PM

[size=6]請大家將訊息傳播開去![/size]

sklai 發表於 2005-4-4 01:10 AM

[font=宋體][color=Red][size=6]反日本軍國主義復興[/size][/color][/font]

chinese 發表於 2005-4-4 01:22 AM

totally support u

新經濟學巨人 發表於 2005-4-4 01:25 AM

[size=5]同是犯錯,雖然改變唔到歷史,德國卻願意道歉及賠償! .DeaY?7O
$dxw,R4A(o&b
主動建碑立館,讓後人警惕,
~'`0g]8C:eI+\ COl c }
w*W7I)o^7d 德國政府對處理第二次世界大戰的態度及立場,值得一讚!
'| GM#UA?#^U"E ,x5~fH7c
早排有一個登陸諾曼第的紀錄片,片中詳述當年的慘況,並由各一名
U%t/H_1q8i+LRVF
?3j$Or1Tk2H_ 美國及德國老兵,各自站在自己當年(60年前)的地方,
TL5j,S#d(Jl9d8DR
@x'H7WP8z!~4tnkPt"` 美國老兵講自己如果搶灘,並且親身示範,德國老兵講自己如果死守; ;HP&t%D3m f1`UA@
?:}$xW,eEC
最後在片尾,兩名老兵相遇, 並互相握手,
ao#C'g2~4\
2uT:u%H$B`M 美國老兵問:當年你見到我們登陸搶灘嘛?
ZStS@#D'Z +B;zQk%MFv%]8fC
德國老兵回應:有....我見到......[/size]
I d-Wqg_{ 4l!B%p?3y8Hs
[[i] Last edited by 新經濟學巨人 on 2005-4-4 at 01:26 AM [/i]]

小豪豪 發表於 2005-4-4 01:41 AM

反日本,死不悔改

robertchai 發表於 2005-4-4 04:29 AM

好心d日本仔啦,有時間拍多幾套av咪仲好...我罷買日貨都一定支持你D AV碟啦
:}4H7cT X6E 4r+gS~IOy-o6Z8n
男個d精盡人亡,女果d俾人姦死哂,咁就正

新經濟學巨人 發表於 2005-4-4 06:59 PM

請支持!

pk boy 發表於 2005-4-4 09:20 PM

我會用行動支持,溝哂d"o架"妹,直至佢地放棄呢個念頭為止!!!
G0[@m ? B!\t-_ :):):)

stupid X 發表於 2005-4-4 11:46 PM

shall we be more reasonable?s Iq8@6A^#le
japan has been very influential nowadays.
o%?Rk{:E$A although i hate japaneses, but in UN,!t(LfAM d
japan should occupy a place.

新經濟學巨人 發表於 2005-4-5 12:00 AM

[size=6]簽名反對,好合理囉![/size] z se[]&x}
l0{M8]-B0_BC
是否代表有錢人可以做乜都得?G%Md K!a
q)q0|h?u8_5f
不分有沒有錢,都要有作為人的NORM.

MaxFigo 發表於 2005-4-5 12:02 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]stupid X[/i] at 2005-4-4 11:46 PM:(M n _;Xj
shall we be more reasonable?6ckn;CdTN1R
japan has been very influential nowadays.M-uK;p.l
although i hate japaneses, but in UN,
$wSKL%j$i+_ japan should occupy a place. [/quote]8f;I;k e ? h5^
W];nkI0i

[ Vh(U2?4i 兄弟...國際事務唔係咁簡單...? \Y+Ec\
日本係好強我絕對認同
\1b!]g8i"Q8rpQVQx/S 但同時佢亦都係個好有野心ge國家...
L5z4pVp\ x5Yt| 助長軍國主義講到底都唔係一件好事 @@

新經濟學巨人 發表於 2005-4-5 12:07 AM

[size=6]講到強,6o@-vxQp[-yx
.C)[qO+`*I+x0mD
第一次世界大戰後,日本強佔山東(德國影響範圍),!c Fs%@~/Iq&cm

t^B'M}:C^D#Eth 及後日本更退出國際聯盟(即聯合國前身), i W.rUNd!^

2c+b+t#Q7Ct 肆無忌憚入侵中國![/size]

stupid X 發表於 2005-4-5 12:09 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]MaxFigo[/i] at 2005-4-5 12:02 AM:+aPRd5Fd/}v

6y@.yDa*j[`~Q
Yn^-]w~ 9e,u"V J^X;ap
兄弟...國際事務唔係咁簡單...f"X#UX3sE;w#Kd9Y
日本係好強我絕對認同
"aC%BFK)mCU+z 但同時佢亦都係個好有野心ge國家...
c1S!^p*J*W4P6K 助長軍國主義講到底都唔係一件好事 @@ [/quote]8q/c Y3xvV]ru

2Lw j"[[x8Ko 3]^v%C#B@

_5uz$qo|:hO
z!m|4u4b e H i agree with u.So i say japan can be a member of UN only.
8}8{._Q(Ro4]\GN in the next 50 years, japan will decline.$W't$]:p9Kn
a new "Brick" will form and become the strongest countries
sAN7{)[ dg*X Does anyone know?

MaxFigo 發表於 2005-4-5 12:12 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]stupid X[/i] at 2005-4-5 12:09 AM:,^'`|3W cF

cujd{T'@
(a)r1F0W&zB2\g,S
\rr A i;x
mj8k#B8N^,S/o&{6f9Q*r
hu;p _5H ^\;x
+LI YPd in the next 50 years, japan will decline.~6C5D3p6`8TV~c
[/quote]C [:Jt9E/`
.W/B7Q*vnT
係ar...日本本身其實都隱藏左唔少經濟問題 @@
?n-r_+D6o|
eZ'VBm:[+O 下面果句唔太明:P

stupid X 發表於 2005-4-5 12:16 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]新經濟學巨人[/i] at 2005-4-5 12:07 AM:2I t(P iQ ] A
[size=6]講到強,
|&M`(Rv7{ v'k3y#f zR
第一次世界大戰後,日本強佔山東(德國影響範圍),*Ils6aLN1g!pL`

:m(BE+\J 及後日本更退出國際聯盟(即聯合國前身),gc _)f[S4S
G'r&`6^4X+xOw
肆無忌憚入侵中國![/size] [/quote]c.R;z~ G"gA.qu5Do

`2GS:lR"v1} A5L!y.N7d7w(vb
the bro knows quite much of history.y/E6b}8]

"ehbO#D?{ }:R UN is now becoming國際聯盟. Its importance is now decreasing since America attacked Iraq without permission from UN. UN will eventually 架空 by strong countries.
r3C9\(R j/\,h6S C `M+e/E:\Z]
Apart from that, I think Japan is only playing tricks with America because he can never enter UN if China object to it.
[0R)eE4tU r
-P8{\$M D China has a right of veto否決權..{ Y K5RAw L7?T
If anyone among the five 常任理事國 uses veto to object,E~4@_P
the issue will au---atically be banned
"Yur/t,YPo7p Veto is a special right offered to victorious countries in WW2

stupid X 發表於 2005-4-5 12:21 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]MaxFigo[/i] at 2005-4-5 12:12 AM:%`(uDv,|;zg!~;p J L
S MRmY @C

'n6QmpP5PsqH 係ar...日本本身其實都隱藏左唔少經濟問題 @@-ZSz W4X:K6G
4eS\IZud#]
下面果句唔太明:P [/quote]
7V)XA For"i PN/q*HxApy

x S-XT}XT n 金鏄四國 is a new idea which shocked the whole world in 2003. @yh!d W FK-f

*W%}U?+r One of the 高盛 investigator proposed a report which make the whole world ecmomic scholars and also 元首s n~ y^X8\U6c\
lcQ ~3j+D
why it is called "Brick"Z9j)TGQT y
(Cogs p jW
it is because the four new countries which will lead the world economy in 21 centries is Brazil,Russia.India and China
rx9cG P3u(w O
%H(NZZ(m7Pv
-Ofn7AR |6_2C T\#wZu w AI)Zx
PS: if u want anymore info., search it in yahoo, it's a very new idea but very well known among all 投資行

頁: [1] 2

Powered by Discuz! Archiver 7.0.0  © 2001-2009 Comsenz Inc.