娛樂滿紛 26FUN's Archiver

新經濟學巨人 發表於 2005-4-3 06:42 PM

反對日本成為聯合國常任理事國

[url]http://hongkong-property.netfirms.com/UN/anti_japanese_to_be_un.htm[/url]
aB,N$Y*~$c9c gZGo [size=6]請大家簽名支持,亦要告知你的朋友[/size]

cyhk 發表於 2005-4-3 06:53 PM

全力支持新經濟學巨人
D fQg0Ld(U H Ahe3Z v F2r4oxs v`
反對日本成為聯合國常任理事國
K n(^zT
&c'S.akWaW[&M}#q 大家要珍惜今日可以咁自由happy享用26FUN.COM的日子
Nd%E:K0C S|e N$BFCG4ZyK.o
千萬記著, 倭寇狼子野心, 必須提防慘痛歷史的重複

史艷文2 發表於 2005-4-3 10:19 PM

小日本狗一定信唔過,心胸險惡,又扮好人. fmU;Os+~
鬼唔望一夜之間海嘯加地震,等日本 齊齊玩 冚家產

clchoicl 發表於 2005-4-3 10:30 PM

[img]http://hk.geocities.com/ronald_be_free/pkjapan.JPG[/img]

新經濟學巨人 發表於 2005-4-3 11:45 PM

[size=6]請大家將訊息傳播開去![/size]

sklai 發表於 2005-4-4 01:10 AM

[font=宋體][color=Red][size=6]反日本軍國主義復興[/size][/color][/font]

chinese 發表於 2005-4-4 01:22 AM

totally support u

新經濟學巨人 發表於 2005-4-4 01:25 AM

[size=5]同是犯錯,雖然改變唔到歷史,德國卻願意道歉及賠償!
dt1H&e'[5K&] i
V.y/dzQ 主動建碑立館,讓後人警惕,
f|xxC"xY._V)T
RZ.E:^'~XR(H|?LW&h 德國政府對處理第二次世界大戰的態度及立場,值得一讚!
J9r)rU1u e;M~)Z
Nyj5W X:Y@'zD4A 早排有一個登陸諾曼第的紀錄片,片中詳述當年的慘況,並由各一名 :l0s VR/i6M?w

C7@/^;g4]7| 美國及德國老兵,各自站在自己當年(60年前)的地方,
!I"ler~S:e!gS J TD9O(w6eF
美國老兵講自己如果搶灘,並且親身示範,德國老兵講自己如果死守;
b A-o&`t`+xP
w%Q0Pw4H9~z9c/f 最後在片尾,兩名老兵相遇, 並互相握手,nq_q2] `7wc

@~`Y8@I Q 美國老兵問:當年你見到我們登陸搶灘嘛? Zz*f"\SQ6r7l9Ud,t3]

)y F f!o%MT 德國老兵回應:有....我見到......[/size]cft4P BC-|

O&M1U I$rX-fm gY [[i] Last edited by 新經濟學巨人 on 2005-4-4 at 01:26 AM [/i]]

小豪豪 發表於 2005-4-4 01:41 AM

反日本,死不悔改

robertchai 發表於 2005-4-4 04:29 AM

好心d日本仔啦,有時間拍多幾套av咪仲好...我罷買日貨都一定支持你D AV碟啦LWV,J e*Oy

,?)]CWUI 男個d精盡人亡,女果d俾人姦死哂,咁就正

新經濟學巨人 發表於 2005-4-4 06:59 PM

請支持!

pk boy 發表於 2005-4-4 09:20 PM

我會用行動支持,溝哂d"o架"妹,直至佢地放棄呢個念頭為止!!!
.u*ME:F}^b Z :):):)

stupid X 發表於 2005-4-4 11:46 PM

shall we be more reasonable?iNpv p J
japan has been very influential nowadays.
I3t;rY5iVE%[1GW although i hate japaneses, but in UN,-H!]:ge1U9J'X
japan should occupy a place.

新經濟學巨人 發表於 2005-4-5 12:00 AM

[size=6]簽名反對,好合理囉![/size]
@kpS5]*g1Y
UL r*Vv.n_t 是否代表有錢人可以做乜都得?
0d"` v+{ \6J )uVM'@E
不分有沒有錢,都要有作為人的NORM.

MaxFigo 發表於 2005-4-5 12:02 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]stupid X[/i] at 2005-4-4 11:46 PM:
I{ s&JzL shall we be more reasonable?
8?)Sd(Y m japan has been very influential nowadays.
fjv(^{ although i hate japaneses, but in UN,"o(P{"o9y i6c j#?
japan should occupy a place. [/quote]%~e.K h7AZ
9y$uVv)n
I%y9n7L3b
兄弟...國際事務唔係咁簡單...GE2P,A _u NWT| \
日本係好強我絕對認同-EGZp:i@wi,N,_
但同時佢亦都係個好有野心ge國家...nM|[Ff
助長軍國主義講到底都唔係一件好事 @@

新經濟學巨人 發表於 2005-4-5 12:07 AM

[size=6]講到強,&\snV8J

#O@ q] YW|8g 第一次世界大戰後,日本強佔山東(德國影響範圍),
"qv,~&f Dif A x9NXB jbHd
及後日本更退出國際聯盟(即聯合國前身),
KCZF(sL#m
u0u$rU`M%y.AM7O'k 肆無忌憚入侵中國![/size]

stupid X 發表於 2005-4-5 12:09 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]MaxFigo[/i] at 2005-4-5 12:02 AM:
Y`x7[-hC^"A
WD"ya7fbv\
"F5A\qh9d*v0ku
&_/Fviobh 兄弟...國際事務唔係咁簡單...
$` xN+J2z(} 日本係好強我絕對認同E.s"J'P g]3r2rG{&W
但同時佢亦都係個好有野心ge國家...-p)u},l$TN)vo
助長軍國主義講到底都唔係一件好事 @@ [/quote]
KF{sz0M,|
];@2E~aXC ?6VO9E2}
Y5AVn:S(G a
RR uDs-\kI
EpM1b;d i agree with u.So i say japan can be a member of UN only.+X5k$a2].y&F1E
in the next 50 years, japan will decline.
g&ER1z0ih a new "Brick" will form and become the strongest countries
/J p)W Y8d"Q x&j Does anyone know?

MaxFigo 發表於 2005-4-5 12:12 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]stupid X[/i] at 2005-4-5 12:09 AM:
2r"}Y*Z(K
)XZ)i P6mS
7~h$D!B%dD)n.^G)Gj-hZS
jPn},C;s6Q ]!Y%m)`@9d

O!I+j0u{C@L my0ka?6g
in the next 50 years, japan will decline.;p9@5|xn1}hn,`4Z3X
[/quote]6[1gJ?1dw'B

MNh+O"Ec*@ 係ar...日本本身其實都隱藏左唔少經濟問題 @@[/yG[q6C

T:[;@;z Oyr8kN 下面果句唔太明:P

stupid X 發表於 2005-4-5 12:16 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]新經濟學巨人[/i] at 2005-4-5 12:07 AM:
7@)pSx$Py [size=6]講到強,
qU6LuZ2f \
`~cr K 第一次世界大戰後,日本強佔山東(德國影響範圍),_?;A0vAj.]
fNU([*XRo
及後日本更退出國際聯盟(即聯合國前身),
!d5gSku6J
3P4E _f"?xY'l 肆無忌憚入侵中國![/size] [/quote]v*|4P9~GV
\Nu&G9E-@

PI+h3j.AsX the bro knows quite much of history.aH|5u-Yj
/G/uQ2r6wt
UN is now becoming國際聯盟. Its importance is now decreasing since America attacked Iraq without permission from UN. UN will eventually 架空 by strong countries.
6Ah(@&e1zu,l
z5iDpw_!r` Apart from that, I think Japan is only playing tricks with America because he can never enter UN if China object to it.;W["]-\"|fbtXd

n[Dv)O#If4Ybl China has a right of veto否決權.
sc1s4c0uC,LH-\ If anyone among the five 常任理事國 uses veto to object,
1};|BBm5g6g8{`U the issue will au---atically be banned/w1xtiE
Veto is a special right offered to victorious countries in WW2

stupid X 發表於 2005-4-5 12:21 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]MaxFigo[/i] at 2005-4-5 12:12 AM:ISG8e0L0]+^
Z@ _9L%{1ay

H*b k$b%O 係ar...日本本身其實都隱藏左唔少經濟問題 @@Tn\ Nrgv

o4C7o#q-X2Mc9lDQL Q 下面果句唔太明:P [/quote] Ur/X%g"eI1`

/nJ_%joI B:AhY8Z(Ge$d;S
金鏄四國 is a new idea which shocked the whole world in 2003.W:MRr{vkT

/lYL6[ w#g)U One of the 高盛 investigator proposed a report which make the whole world ecmomic scholars and also 元首s!fm'M%Q$G9c

:]!~y\5}N why it is called "Brick"ue*~Z4[;V;[c
fgv%P d BU(F(t
it is because the four new countries which will lead the world economy in 21 centries is Brazil,Russia.India and China
(~4J)MGP PNjQ vVy

q2]-B mO
m5~:OJ%q8_o3NR PS: if u want anymore info., search it in yahoo, it's a very new idea but very well known among all 投資行

頁: [1] 2

Powered by Discuz! Archiver 7.0.0  © 2001-2009 Comsenz Inc.