娛樂滿紛 26FUN's Archiver

新經濟學巨人 發表於 2005-4-3 06:42 PM

反對日本成為聯合國常任理事國

[url]http://hongkong-property.netfirms.com/UN/anti_japanese_to_be_un.htm[/url];U%jlA7U6L
[size=6]請大家簽名支持,亦要告知你的朋友[/size]

cyhk 發表於 2005-4-3 06:53 PM

全力支持新經濟學巨人
Xc'wZ3k0CR c [ [Q/Z'SS
反對日本成為聯合國常任理事國rGbGj*L:lf6U
$Xv;wb.j)i
大家要珍惜今日可以咁自由happy享用26FUN.COM的日子
xI xwEx4fE7{
~Y7si0|!\:g4H 千萬記著, 倭寇狼子野心, 必須提防慘痛歷史的重複

史艷文2 發表於 2005-4-3 10:19 PM

小日本狗一定信唔過,心胸險惡,又扮好人.Syu*LI*e-N\1Fw
鬼唔望一夜之間海嘯加地震,等日本 齊齊玩 冚家產

clchoicl 發表於 2005-4-3 10:30 PM

[img]http://hk.geocities.com/ronald_be_free/pkjapan.JPG[/img]

新經濟學巨人 發表於 2005-4-3 11:45 PM

[size=6]請大家將訊息傳播開去![/size]

sklai 發表於 2005-4-4 01:10 AM

[font=宋體][color=Red][size=6]反日本軍國主義復興[/size][/color][/font]

chinese 發表於 2005-4-4 01:22 AM

totally support u

新經濟學巨人 發表於 2005-4-4 01:25 AM

[size=5]同是犯錯,雖然改變唔到歷史,德國卻願意道歉及賠償! )t-OUo x*x#B

)]&p5mM_#U4Z#\&p 主動建碑立館,讓後人警惕, -gc6_b9W;v}

LhM t4v4W 德國政府對處理第二次世界大戰的態度及立場,值得一讚! yoS/g${*u+la'g/Qr

f5sS9^'P8N!Xv4M7B 早排有一個登陸諾曼第的紀錄片,片中詳述當年的慘況,並由各一名 rw TRz8@L3X

3W+LU!B+RR#DO 美國及德國老兵,各自站在自己當年(60年前)的地方, *Z&R)t ]%k_ v:v

$X7F%F-l1U1c"m 美國老兵講自己如果搶灘,並且親身示範,德國老兵講自己如果死守; {P[8YAM_:I,y_ d

p+DsIj 最後在片尾,兩名老兵相遇, 並互相握手,
5T S#{ `:A$ZO ^{
*i bPD9wu 美國老兵問:當年你見到我們登陸搶灘嘛? |UJKh]1re
,S%w?5}0\"G1SwL6n+w.^
德國老兵回應:有....我見到......[/size]
f mER^"^ "A'm2[U,IXii
[[i] Last edited by 新經濟學巨人 on 2005-4-4 at 01:26 AM [/i]]

小豪豪 發表於 2005-4-4 01:41 AM

反日本,死不悔改

robertchai 發表於 2005-4-4 04:29 AM

好心d日本仔啦,有時間拍多幾套av咪仲好...我罷買日貨都一定支持你D AV碟啦
$|&FtA%|3{Z]
Rpd/U'y } 男個d精盡人亡,女果d俾人姦死哂,咁就正

新經濟學巨人 發表於 2005-4-4 06:59 PM

請支持!

pk boy 發表於 2005-4-4 09:20 PM

我會用行動支持,溝哂d"o架"妹,直至佢地放棄呢個念頭為止!!!
8zjJ^v,DN$N/e :):):)

stupid X 發表於 2005-4-4 11:46 PM

shall we be more reasonable?
;Ta1aGG Q japan has been very influential nowadays.Lgt|6u{JK
although i hate japaneses, but in UN,M:}tN5_f,?/}
japan should occupy a place.

新經濟學巨人 發表於 2005-4-5 12:00 AM

[size=6]簽名反對,好合理囉![/size] M6|*BIa:W*Yj!]`
Kx H ueB3`4RI a'G.M
是否代表有錢人可以做乜都得? HE2@ c'M1|!B"O
!NM1P4};X.Jf
不分有沒有錢,都要有作為人的NORM.

MaxFigo 發表於 2005-4-5 12:02 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]stupid X[/i] at 2005-4-4 11:46 PM: }.MC%LM
shall we be more reasonable?'zD$r~'Ci
japan has been very influential nowadays.+M:k c^D+Tg
although i hate japaneses, but in UN,JG%t6ow(v2V$F
japan should occupy a place. [/quote]
B1j_4Ge?
k {1C%Vh3J d T]l|)]K!P
兄弟...國際事務唔係咁簡單...
7N Nz Z[I1X7l*r 日本係好強我絕對認同x5x nAG?0O1[
但同時佢亦都係個好有野心ge國家... h}T[7Xxr0b(B
助長軍國主義講到底都唔係一件好事 @@

新經濟學巨人 發表於 2005-4-5 12:07 AM

[size=6]講到強,9_a L+H,kx.v eI

;w'b.]"w%f 第一次世界大戰後,日本強佔山東(德國影響範圍),J3x)H"A;_
K:UJ?V)v `5Z8l{.}
及後日本更退出國際聯盟(即聯合國前身),?1H pc:W

?y7j?)RF 肆無忌憚入侵中國![/size]

stupid X 發表於 2005-4-5 12:09 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]MaxFigo[/i] at 2005-4-5 12:02 AM:
*p$gIX-H*xZ a
"DU c+py!LFH^*yr z"l)Zh8Kz)D@
R,XGhn*r2D6@
兄弟...國際事務唔係咁簡單...
)z7Ga e$i[!_ 日本係好強我絕對認同
"Q!i.p-kn K6g 但同時佢亦都係個好有野心ge國家...
-Rs"?D G(S;y5}(xNp 助長軍國主義講到底都唔係一件好事 @@ [/quote]T Mco7U.r1~.l

D^4z-~z {fM%v
2m3lg w,q8NN"D
@#v f0cx2y k0}XoN1F5f7Z
i agree with u.So i say japan can be a member of UN only.h AVu1C9SN e
in the next 50 years, japan will decline.
~!H(Xu%g a new "Brick" will form and become the strongest countries
A*vQ+c1gz/C Does anyone know?

MaxFigo 發表於 2005-4-5 12:12 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]stupid X[/i] at 2005-4-5 12:09 AM:y$R9X|%d&{9T8m

0GT-R MAd&n&?
F2Sx6m%n
"zc'xV1qw{$U;] VW7hQ*R+x3[s
g @k}^`g

"oq'cc~n2i"?F in the next 50 years, japan will decline.
2`:n3?5z'm)l0m'x3{ [/quote]]&r#o|7]
p%S4f:~.H{G'i
係ar...日本本身其實都隱藏左唔少經濟問題 @@;m,`2xx-B&^y/^
+X$rAWO(Us _
下面果句唔太明:P

stupid X 發表於 2005-4-5 12:16 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]新經濟學巨人[/i] at 2005-4-5 12:07 AM:{"Vk*M r@&s-y
[size=6]講到強,
v!~0|q X _1~
T"vv1@yr 第一次世界大戰後,日本強佔山東(德國影響範圍),
oh"RM]m+CM -K D co6A"~z aU
及後日本更退出國際聯盟(即聯合國前身),B4mt Y9k4a%B!X/o!k
PvI0ea~MTG
肆無忌憚入侵中國![/size] [/quote]
c:u#NP}o
mXI'N8Qk ?tk#l rK7{
the bro knows quite much of history.2Cli2lIb:P$v"]
*Gwi A f
UN is now becoming國際聯盟. Its importance is now decreasing since America attacked Iraq without permission from UN. UN will eventually 架空 by strong countries.'C-]If!f+i
Bt(R+E}
Apart from that, I think Japan is only playing tricks with America because he can never enter UN if China object to it.
Z&KM TQb^(ta4AS9My K;N,Y!p#Ci!|
China has a right of veto否決權."pu+A7`\ihEIt g S3N
If anyone among the five 常任理事國 uses veto to object,-H}JT _;]ew2_y
the issue will au---atically be banned
$A1SLV+f~ BA Veto is a special right offered to victorious countries in WW2

stupid X 發表於 2005-4-5 12:21 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]MaxFigo[/i] at 2005-4-5 12:12 AM: l9Y1Or3f n-fl2H
_,fsj]Z
w0T'x*vk
係ar...日本本身其實都隱藏左唔少經濟問題 @@3hq nol"Z

8R_.ea}4] 下面果句唔太明:P [/quote]
mGEX0E.z
c2F3P5I&gZSXX~
[ \*S.PdD^4a)e7o 金鏄四國 is a new idea which shocked the whole world in 2003.Lc:p~3ZzGQ
rdGgC9LnNj
One of the 高盛 investigator proposed a report which make the whole world ecmomic scholars and also 元首s
Po#mn,Q4s){a 's@ z*Mq
why it is called "Brick"Q`$\ L3b9NF(x

AWKC| it is because the four new countries which will lead the world economy in 21 centries is Brazil,Russia.India and ChinaZ1sBs$l'i~

W @*bP"k'c &\o hOT!hOT
Qz*Sx x"E
PS: if u want anymore info., search it in yahoo, it's a very new idea but very well known among all 投資行

頁: [1] 2

Powered by Discuz! Archiver 7.0.0  © 2001-2009 Comsenz Inc.