娛樂滿紛 26FUN's Archiver

新經濟學巨人 發表於 2005-4-3 06:42 PM

反對日本成為聯合國常任理事國

[url]http://hongkong-property.netfirms.com/UN/anti_japanese_to_be_un.htm[/url]D2z6u/oB Jbu6S
[size=6]請大家簽名支持,亦要告知你的朋友[/size]

cyhk 發表於 2005-4-3 06:53 PM

全力支持新經濟學巨人
9t a4G V(m %ZP{w3dSFp
反對日本成為聯合國常任理事國
WI'V)v-?1]] iD{M^#_x L5Y6?9O a
大家要珍惜今日可以咁自由happy享用26FUN.COM的日子
*`4S5i4a6z] @
?U#UL@3lZ 千萬記著, 倭寇狼子野心, 必須提防慘痛歷史的重複

史艷文2 發表於 2005-4-3 10:19 PM

小日本狗一定信唔過,心胸險惡,又扮好人.:\/ntH!t {aR9|2I U(L
鬼唔望一夜之間海嘯加地震,等日本 齊齊玩 冚家產

clchoicl 發表於 2005-4-3 10:30 PM

[img]http://hk.geocities.com/ronald_be_free/pkjapan.JPG[/img]

新經濟學巨人 發表於 2005-4-3 11:45 PM

[size=6]請大家將訊息傳播開去![/size]

sklai 發表於 2005-4-4 01:10 AM

[font=宋體][color=Red][size=6]反日本軍國主義復興[/size][/color][/font]

chinese 發表於 2005-4-4 01:22 AM

totally support u

新經濟學巨人 發表於 2005-4-4 01:25 AM

[size=5]同是犯錯,雖然改變唔到歷史,德國卻願意道歉及賠償! NL @}r,|D F

I!`r] `5m$p 主動建碑立館,讓後人警惕,
&VD4^!aW$F DR
$IyL5?0Y8u@ 德國政府對處理第二次世界大戰的態度及立場,值得一讚!
"NE CNe9@P 7@;}$j%G(}N6j)z
早排有一個登陸諾曼第的紀錄片,片中詳述當年的慘況,並由各一名
.p"UzLR "mA8DB rP2xu
美國及德國老兵,各自站在自己當年(60年前)的地方,
Fz2O3M8@#v!o p+P&c)P{9J
美國老兵講自己如果搶灘,並且親身示範,德國老兵講自己如果死守; 4Q4`\C8`-Y*U_

Hdlvw|l+ZH 最後在片尾,兩名老兵相遇, 並互相握手,
*K#M0ons'h2Z;o$d
4m!?'}`iC|#H 美國老兵問:當年你見到我們登陸搶灘嘛?
+U+} nE-L:R
w8| l Oy4\v zG4[0w 德國老兵回應:有....我見到......[/size] { FH:F]s

V;i3a2?%\3sSa%z2Qk?+O [[i] Last edited by 新經濟學巨人 on 2005-4-4 at 01:26 AM [/i]]

小豪豪 發表於 2005-4-4 01:41 AM

反日本,死不悔改

robertchai 發表於 2005-4-4 04:29 AM

好心d日本仔啦,有時間拍多幾套av咪仲好...我罷買日貨都一定支持你D AV碟啦
D9Z%X4D(n"Z#d
M y"xt%WM 男個d精盡人亡,女果d俾人姦死哂,咁就正

新經濟學巨人 發表於 2005-4-4 06:59 PM

請支持!

pk boy 發表於 2005-4-4 09:20 PM

我會用行動支持,溝哂d"o架"妹,直至佢地放棄呢個念頭為止!!!Aov{0h
:):):)

stupid X 發表於 2005-4-4 11:46 PM

shall we be more reasonable?$[}7{~V(F
japan has been very influential nowadays.T-z_$G1X;BC V F4\
although i hate japaneses, but in UN,vQN5n@
japan should occupy a place.

新經濟學巨人 發表於 2005-4-5 12:00 AM

[size=6]簽名反對,好合理囉![/size]
-Gg0hm+g |5DL'?3aUz
是否代表有錢人可以做乜都得?
vp{-[e-gN1Qs ;v'k9qd0Y$v9d
不分有沒有錢,都要有作為人的NORM.

MaxFigo 發表於 2005-4-5 12:02 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]stupid X[/i] at 2005-4-4 11:46 PM:
"c&p8tE2y+i1]E shall we be more reasonable?o0{ JJ"NL
japan has been very influential nowadays.
p$aFD$f P5} although i hate japaneses, but in UN,
|-R6ca!\ japan should occupy a place. [/quote]8i9Y;FbH p
aPc EeO
]5I2YxGk
兄弟...國際事務唔係咁簡單...f.e&buy(Z
日本係好強我絕對認同
2[Q!LV9r1y 但同時佢亦都係個好有野心ge國家...
6}5{ l%{ ]K"Ali 助長軍國主義講到底都唔係一件好事 @@

新經濟學巨人 發表於 2005-4-5 12:07 AM

[size=6]講到強,
g0D m t? E9f3co7}~0oY7d
OS fCE(n 第一次世界大戰後,日本強佔山東(德國影響範圍),9?S.]h3Yc
'X.Df/imgt o
及後日本更退出國際聯盟(即聯合國前身),
@(nn1z!qcb;y
9S6e6@y7n*b 肆無忌憚入侵中國![/size]

stupid X 發表於 2005-4-5 12:09 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]MaxFigo[/i] at 2005-4-5 12:02 AM:'n:d,m'W,W/c8Z8`
?}b$w'Ht-w*Q(A3I
J4miU'At_\
'qsR!{? Zk"F.i G
兄弟...國際事務唔係咁簡單... [!r/G+f.VP:@*j(@P
日本係好強我絕對認同7Q/r_'ZM.\J
但同時佢亦都係個好有野心ge國家...8@ n"yu%F ?
助長軍國主義講到底都唔係一件好事 @@ [/quote]7dXFP _5q!M
\+oU"U%or
vM}p-x3@L v0p

)A!`7h/ja@#H
N] }s;j k%IO i agree with u.So i say japan can be a member of UN only.
&fz,dWn V0G in the next 50 years, japan will decline.
l tL5|-x(V a new "Brick" will form and become the strongest countries +ZZ2Lo&_X I
Does anyone know?

MaxFigo 發表於 2005-4-5 12:12 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]stupid X[/i] at 2005-4-5 12:09 AM:Z~@e }bM?
!d@ X&T!F%[(AMV
-DN7R c O+p
*w)Oo3~p"l#_
N;q |1c'Ks.vK

A|(}!{*|:e0Ok&\@ }fcs ^)sm P
in the next 50 years, japan will decline.
o8~y2n#s2M/?"t [/quote]^0F1|~6j y

W9V:AAf\r KR/b4p 係ar...日本本身其實都隱藏左唔少經濟問題 @@x\o:Y0x"`"ink
3z&] R gE;~4A
下面果句唔太明:P

stupid X 發表於 2005-4-5 12:16 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]新經濟學巨人[/i] at 2005-4-5 12:07 AM:|-F'~Q)GB2~$W
[size=6]講到強,;da:yx z"D zVK'x

"yfnR+ep5Jy] 第一次世界大戰後,日本強佔山東(德國影響範圍),Q0`BO ?vEB
5Cg'OqeDo
及後日本更退出國際聯盟(即聯合國前身),0_$o"E)s1T"XpQ
1aLxY0J-?;t$m-A
肆無忌憚入侵中國![/size] [/quote]
d3Z$d6p$F`%ScP @r:A!Me

0E,vAO;v4m1? A| the bro knows quite much of history.7AT$I%vN ~7LGyY1C

7MB:{O9V`'q!l UN is now becoming國際聯盟. Its importance is now decreasing since America attacked Iraq without permission from UN. UN will eventually 架空 by strong countries.TniY(B4O

? EK\B!E Apart from that, I think Japan is only playing tricks with America because he can never enter UN if China object to it.
Kv]NI4em%R
#]M*p:p|{%| ~0H China has a right of veto否決權.
]iD2_M If anyone among the five 常任理事國 uses veto to object,
Zk r9Z ^zG L9ww!U the issue will au---atically be banned
2Ndb&wf U2H Veto is a special right offered to victorious countries in WW2

stupid X 發表於 2005-4-5 12:21 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]MaxFigo[/i] at 2005-4-5 12:12 AM:U^&[%p c I/z
Sd*e0J5Y.@)T'pg%D
r%QSpY4_)y
係ar...日本本身其實都隱藏左唔少經濟問題 @@
O ?L|A Ln+~;k8q P9d*]vY
下面果句唔太明:P [/quote]
Q6dPoU -Iv0e9~6X[[X

}e\L"uj_5^ 金鏄四國 is a new idea which shocked the whole world in 2003.R+n1j%YB _6\$px%z

A }X:@&e_ One of the 高盛 investigator proposed a report which make the whole world ecmomic scholars and also 元首s"~ c%pt/tC;X

ST"a5c]8Yz@^-e why it is called "Brick"Ek5iDR V
+XT2h4Dl1A ca7g"A
it is because the four new countries which will lead the world economy in 21 centries is Brazil,Russia.India and ChinaRCV%q4r%V*n!M2b {

+F"j.|T(H2j RQ4h7^P O-Y:?Mb

0`o x4O/G,P8H PS: if u want anymore info., search it in yahoo, it's a very new idea but very well known among all 投資行

頁: [1] 2

Powered by Discuz! Archiver 7.0.0  © 2001-2009 Comsenz Inc.