娛樂滿紛 26FUN's Archiver

新經濟學巨人 發表於 2005-4-3 06:42 PM

反對日本成為聯合國常任理事國

[url]http://hongkong-property.netfirms.com/UN/anti_japanese_to_be_un.htm[/url]
*ylcN[5jZ&ZC [size=6]請大家簽名支持,亦要告知你的朋友[/size]

cyhk 發表於 2005-4-3 06:53 PM

全力支持新經濟學巨人
|X i9y mm2TX +A!H8u ga/@
反對日本成為聯合國常任理事國'?v \U?E6L K3M
u ? g+q5MN z
大家要珍惜今日可以咁自由happy享用26FUN.COM的日子
'UqdvW
}-@4M D0W 千萬記著, 倭寇狼子野心, 必須提防慘痛歷史的重複

史艷文2 發表於 2005-4-3 10:19 PM

小日本狗一定信唔過,心胸險惡,又扮好人.
3M|)[y ` T 鬼唔望一夜之間海嘯加地震,等日本 齊齊玩 冚家產

clchoicl 發表於 2005-4-3 10:30 PM

[img]http://hk.geocities.com/ronald_be_free/pkjapan.JPG[/img]

新經濟學巨人 發表於 2005-4-3 11:45 PM

[size=6]請大家將訊息傳播開去![/size]

sklai 發表於 2005-4-4 01:10 AM

[font=宋體][color=Red][size=6]反日本軍國主義復興[/size][/color][/font]

chinese 發表於 2005-4-4 01:22 AM

totally support u

新經濟學巨人 發表於 2005-4-4 01:25 AM

[size=5]同是犯錯,雖然改變唔到歷史,德國卻願意道歉及賠償!
e,Y x1H l*XX[e !s(p,l[4l2Xjy
主動建碑立館,讓後人警惕,
q2~.El P,L hb
6{hM9_1Q/oD~/@2K 德國政府對處理第二次世界大戰的態度及立場,值得一讚!
\uC5n S !]&W/`X#h/D
早排有一個登陸諾曼第的紀錄片,片中詳述當年的慘況,並由各一名
:k ~F+l:R/M:C s
G M4X}?K 美國及德國老兵,各自站在自己當年(60年前)的地方,
iJgU)].u&fw t 4yT ^V#P9UC/Rz-I
美國老兵講自己如果搶灘,並且親身示範,德國老兵講自己如果死守;
$z;C:\w.}1I /RM3@^ ga[3B,X
最後在片尾,兩名老兵相遇, 並互相握手,] d ?.`|*rH'v

MCMFhc 美國老兵問:當年你見到我們登陸搶灘嘛?
Ib? nZ"w
!F0J5m7Xp5| 德國老兵回應:有....我見到......[/size]2x6e"y`5cC

&T+D'r7d3X [[i] Last edited by 新經濟學巨人 on 2005-4-4 at 01:26 AM [/i]]

小豪豪 發表於 2005-4-4 01:41 AM

反日本,死不悔改

robertchai 發表於 2005-4-4 04:29 AM

好心d日本仔啦,有時間拍多幾套av咪仲好...我罷買日貨都一定支持你D AV碟啦
i3i N!m X~
0umh5Y6S!_zp:Ib 男個d精盡人亡,女果d俾人姦死哂,咁就正

新經濟學巨人 發表於 2005-4-4 06:59 PM

請支持!

pk boy 發表於 2005-4-4 09:20 PM

我會用行動支持,溝哂d"o架"妹,直至佢地放棄呢個念頭為止!!!@m{E;j#Tr
:):):)

stupid X 發表於 2005-4-4 11:46 PM

shall we be more reasonable?(^ ]O^fmNBs0F#r
japan has been very influential nowadays.
3\q$P xx although i hate japaneses, but in UN,-Z O+J2D2y {Q
japan should occupy a place.

新經濟學巨人 發表於 2005-4-5 12:00 AM

[size=6]簽名反對,好合理囉![/size]D9GuJs rl1K
'Y#x6LXXib#Xg4C!_a m
是否代表有錢人可以做乜都得?
MD{v[*J5]
:S5s q2y0`xp!Y#iMq&S R 不分有沒有錢,都要有作為人的NORM.

MaxFigo 發表於 2005-4-5 12:02 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]stupid X[/i] at 2005-4-4 11:46 PM::_nA8pMh%he
shall we be more reasonable?XA&c$]1u*n9O [$rE"[ Zu
japan has been very influential nowadays.q)o"{6Y%k7I _^QX
although i hate japaneses, but in UN,%usl)S {
japan should occupy a place. [/quote]&G{+f _3Y3i(b5z
)s8X)jTU,x

r9r]3a kL*? a 兄弟...國際事務唔係咁簡單...0D#e,~p[$P
日本係好強我絕對認同
lV&{3m[ H 但同時佢亦都係個好有野心ge國家...
r3Y0FY AI0Q` 助長軍國主義講到底都唔係一件好事 @@

新經濟學巨人 發表於 2005-4-5 12:07 AM

[size=6]講到強,/E|+Z!VAW(Pp ]q
B-F}sW P
第一次世界大戰後,日本強佔山東(德國影響範圍),
.T(S"aH!l I!`N
8N5W ga]7d R;E] 及後日本更退出國際聯盟(即聯合國前身),-F a4@n4}0~

IuNd$[0ib } 肆無忌憚入侵中國![/size]

stupid X 發表於 2005-4-5 12:09 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]MaxFigo[/i] at 2005-4-5 12:02 AM::p1G$o6ZgEf"R X`i2f5L

}8rF6t)J n{2EJ D(M5?%Fp7v9[
)p5T&Hb7~;n1h
兄弟...國際事務唔係咁簡單...
:B6T c6v$dm 日本係好強我絕對認同
w5pO-bwh 但同時佢亦都係個好有野心ge國家...?!Wd[Wr
助長軍國主義講到底都唔係一件好事 @@ [/quote]tYvD Xl

q:Kg T*H^ ,Y;M:\!YURE[

}'Ee?vr ~ :h4u#D8lM,Yf
i agree with u.So i say japan can be a member of UN only.
pXv5h!a e in the next 50 years, japan will decline.
m;t#|:]-t#P4{-NcD!r a new "Brick" will form and become the strongest countries
P%C(T/ewS Does anyone know?

MaxFigo 發表於 2005-4-5 12:12 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]stupid X[/i] at 2005-4-5 12:09 AM:
}5n/n6d-C b3ev6L sH
N _3Mkus] 0IB3_"b$D

a*{/Z_;bWc@
Q%|s:s)bA K -J6Cr Gb)hj-c

u j)S mAP%wa7q in the next 50 years, japan will decline.
g0F3GU&B5c'j4UXLy [/quote]dZ1~g,}&VZcB
u.EX/e ie
係ar...日本本身其實都隱藏左唔少經濟問題 @@
he$}Nt?
V8a1k Y/k)^ 下面果句唔太明:P

stupid X 發表於 2005-4-5 12:16 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]新經濟學巨人[/i] at 2005-4-5 12:07 AM:
Sc'F:Yf [size=6]講到強, nr6M6zh!G ^P
/qG-UeA%X r0bd
第一次世界大戰後,日本強佔山東(德國影響範圍),dr2P8b X;V

Z4x0U:M4O 及後日本更退出國際聯盟(即聯合國前身),Us Xb/`
W+k2s;yi y.Y
肆無忌憚入侵中國![/size] [/quote]-Tl:a6hO8R!J3e
jG uj?;I1o

HY.F(|3Z CE4]RU the bro knows quite much of history./`%Dw{5nj4]$u

W@7evC)ki2`h(i5D UN is now becoming國際聯盟. Its importance is now decreasing since America attacked Iraq without permission from UN. UN will eventually 架空 by strong countries.SR'V-I9E6t#@YA;j
#@$p'QA4Xj Tc2X#s
Apart from that, I think Japan is only playing tricks with America because he can never enter UN if China object to it. J E3k+cN7yj@
;NBy IF$u+g8m
China has a right of veto否決權.!~z\r+d&@U z
If anyone among the five 常任理事國 uses veto to object,%B&SZLo vO%Jj#{
the issue will au---atically be bannediTT/y[Df
Veto is a special right offered to victorious countries in WW2

stupid X 發表於 2005-4-5 12:21 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]MaxFigo[/i] at 2005-4-5 12:12 AM:
;i5@"A[M8g"{ U
W'L`f]i
a%R8S hpT8D 係ar...日本本身其實都隱藏左唔少經濟問題 @@ Z+|:O4{8w&j;[

/p4o o#L8YKsj 下面果句唔太明:P [/quote]
h\9Cy`2rb2T
*C&_6~_~ \u
0Y7](a*s&vz y 金鏄四國 is a new idea which shocked the whole world in 2003.?,q5Um`4c
5a/`#O's~%a
One of the 高盛 investigator proposed a report which make the whole world ecmomic scholars and also 元首s
IO!e`2eqRZ @+f /k_4y#Et@V
why it is called "Brick"FC"z3LE
l*H'O/wtV,c
it is because the four new countries which will lead the world economy in 21 centries is Brazil,Russia.India and China
ZssF;gT(]w7s0^ 'j5zn Q#o
C1C.ZBnnj$R

!D3r1?*H L2]X ? PS: if u want anymore info., search it in yahoo, it's a very new idea but very well known among all 投資行

頁: [1] 2

Powered by Discuz! Archiver 7.0.0  © 2001-2009 Comsenz Inc.