娛樂滿紛 26FUN's Archiver

新經濟學巨人 發表於 2005-4-3 06:42 PM

反對日本成為聯合國常任理事國

[url]http://hongkong-property.netfirms.com/UN/anti_japanese_to_be_un.htm[/url]Ugu)p%us-Q WZ
[size=6]請大家簽名支持,亦要告知你的朋友[/size]

cyhk 發表於 2005-4-3 06:53 PM

全力支持新經濟學巨人
UX5O'o7{*g8vk
mYQ(W.pw*{ 反對日本成為聯合國常任理事國
3{ xiuY7Es!{d I+\"qB,S&C6F;om+^
大家要珍惜今日可以咁自由happy享用26FUN.COM的日子4DTD tt0}N3tE
3Gw1el$QMu7z
千萬記著, 倭寇狼子野心, 必須提防慘痛歷史的重複

史艷文2 發表於 2005-4-3 10:19 PM

小日本狗一定信唔過,心胸險惡,又扮好人.A,b mZ#ys
鬼唔望一夜之間海嘯加地震,等日本 齊齊玩 冚家產

clchoicl 發表於 2005-4-3 10:30 PM

[img]http://hk.geocities.com/ronald_be_free/pkjapan.JPG[/img]

新經濟學巨人 發表於 2005-4-3 11:45 PM

[size=6]請大家將訊息傳播開去![/size]

sklai 發表於 2005-4-4 01:10 AM

[font=宋體][color=Red][size=6]反日本軍國主義復興[/size][/color][/font]

chinese 發表於 2005-4-4 01:22 AM

totally support u

新經濟學巨人 發表於 2005-4-4 01:25 AM

[size=5]同是犯錯,雖然改變唔到歷史,德國卻願意道歉及賠償!
8b0H1x KEq5_0R M1b/sO
cn0xGdL"S*o8td 主動建碑立館,讓後人警惕, X*B/u I7[V.C X

_M[^Gp 德國政府對處理第二次世界大戰的態度及立場,值得一讚! )` s2PcKTSagx
JnJ x t*Zt
早排有一個登陸諾曼第的紀錄片,片中詳述當年的慘況,並由各一名 T}F0T@e[
.v5} z5D?\Ga
美國及德國老兵,各自站在自己當年(60年前)的地方,
%Y5hRO G6V4~!]
g mD%J&Q 美國老兵講自己如果搶灘,並且親身示範,德國老兵講自己如果死守;
t a0?q+GP I-i b
+`(Z.G.mK(R.`({1z ?`0A 最後在片尾,兩名老兵相遇, 並互相握手, @^:`h#uE

~ch!FXS2l*? 美國老兵問:當年你見到我們登陸搶灘嘛?
0Iqr_zI*i
'Go'O1f,|X y6RX-k 德國老兵回應:有....我見到......[/size]
y+g HrT c 6aKU$I*d F;Wk:zw h
[[i] Last edited by 新經濟學巨人 on 2005-4-4 at 01:26 AM [/i]]

小豪豪 發表於 2005-4-4 01:41 AM

反日本,死不悔改

robertchai 發表於 2005-4-4 04:29 AM

好心d日本仔啦,有時間拍多幾套av咪仲好...我罷買日貨都一定支持你D AV碟啦c~5u [&j\

z-d{ G5Zb 男個d精盡人亡,女果d俾人姦死哂,咁就正

新經濟學巨人 發表於 2005-4-4 06:59 PM

請支持!

pk boy 發表於 2005-4-4 09:20 PM

我會用行動支持,溝哂d"o架"妹,直至佢地放棄呢個念頭為止!!!
(KU*O'{x#o4~8i :):):)

stupid X 發表於 2005-4-4 11:46 PM

shall we be more reasonable?
@L v8E6I R(B japan has been very influential nowadays.
DO2v6Y[A w8i9Q^ although i hate japaneses, but in UN,
mo2Dd!oy*|]aJ japan should occupy a place.

新經濟學巨人 發表於 2005-4-5 12:00 AM

[size=6]簽名反對,好合理囉![/size]
il3T/R0G0_U7e &_ {N y|yTuK
是否代表有錢人可以做乜都得?4lVV"z$bo|
u,Li!ZoY pN.o
不分有沒有錢,都要有作為人的NORM.

MaxFigo 發表於 2005-4-5 12:02 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]stupid X[/i] at 2005-4-4 11:46 PM:_|/{'w*T&Ik1~
shall we be more reasonable?
k$l q?%QCe P;O p P japan has been very influential nowadays.a1a(n/w"@!PL1U xt
although i hate japaneses, but in UN,)Ej4n-p~,Z(ub
japan should occupy a place. [/quote],J3]?-\3t} N"@S F
:H;I{"VF7I?S{4X7|

pK{ Xdx 兄弟...國際事務唔係咁簡單...U6j}[vK(bP1p
日本係好強我絕對認同U G ZY1[#sX3V
但同時佢亦都係個好有野心ge國家..._ aSv?SU0W
助長軍國主義講到底都唔係一件好事 @@

新經濟學巨人 發表於 2005-4-5 12:07 AM

[size=6]講到強,
6R|.U$u*z+?j_ \.x$BZ1p_-u
第一次世界大戰後,日本強佔山東(德國影響範圍),$_qHz|r(s;^d4d

q\&Fa[2u 及後日本更退出國際聯盟(即聯合國前身),
(k#y!]9k"R~m V$}Z}:]S
肆無忌憚入侵中國![/size]

stupid X 發表於 2005-4-5 12:09 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]MaxFigo[/i] at 2005-4-5 12:02 AM:h!Z }e+y

m#Fc-s,`
H|8r'[Oz&g 4s j;Il/FGN
兄弟...國際事務唔係咁簡單.../n X X2pQ
日本係好強我絕對認同(X SF'vw2i ^
但同時佢亦都係個好有野心ge國家...
%{\c3\LX*h6sq'V 助長軍國主義講到底都唔係一件好事 @@ [/quote]"m1T1};mzj9h

p6nvb7SWW l!cara

b.yRKa?A
8Gws4K~HW i agree with u.So i say japan can be a member of UN only.
!a t*yq)H+eI in the next 50 years, japan will decline.7by/f[R
a new "Brick" will form and become the strongest countries
Ve8L-ec0x7d'@ Does anyone know?

MaxFigo 發表於 2005-4-5 12:12 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]stupid X[/i] at 2005-4-5 12:09 AM:!v/EEp'R

F-\#w TAIbhj
dzp,~ei5z%e ] *ep9n.aW
%l#PM:oqt

f&R&G5Ta5z l @(U-`"O? ]]%o,yo
in the next 50 years, japan will decline.
^+Lcs"{G.q [/quote]
"j9hn!d["Z%s(Q
;G2hC krD#@ 係ar...日本本身其實都隱藏左唔少經濟問題 @@
X[De zys LR'XsQ8zcr1Y
下面果句唔太明:P

stupid X 發表於 2005-4-5 12:16 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]新經濟學巨人[/i] at 2005-4-5 12:07 AM:!]4u9l!U3F\;{ my
[size=6]講到強,
*v%b;? Mbs
q+s'~;dSH 第一次世界大戰後,日本強佔山東(德國影響範圍),y_o3fV$t'D4t+@x
K5?[ N6y
及後日本更退出國際聯盟(即聯合國前身),W0k3fu7|rQ
F^"`g6i)]|
肆無忌憚入侵中國![/size] [/quote]
!HM} l7w)^Cy 9W2y$FMQ6E Iq$M!p`
#~$Z)jJ1R(r'p
the bro knows quite much of history.
jI[email protected]}| ~}` R
ZP,[CfJz UN is now becoming國際聯盟. Its importance is now decreasing since America attacked Iraq without permission from UN. UN will eventually 架空 by strong countries.`+fdH3~B
lP'W~Rt^%O1G H/C
Apart from that, I think Japan is only playing tricks with America because he can never enter UN if China object to it.
K%e3U)]l4Y4zX ] [8L?ml \
China has a right of veto否決權. Q9g+UyUR#X$?:W
If anyone among the five 常任理事國 uses veto to object,im(Y \Qe-W*`;N/q
the issue will au---atically be banned8CbZ)py
Veto is a special right offered to victorious countries in WW2

stupid X 發表於 2005-4-5 12:21 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]MaxFigo[/i] at 2005-4-5 12:12 AM:
Qq+f{ j#B P-\kS n,[Y&h

-M6k{fvOTFG 係ar...日本本身其實都隱藏左唔少經濟問題 @@"KD9Z F9@bb
R e!m8B"f{-[
下面果句唔太明:P [/quote]qFE*ET2bG c
OA^3{j"YIv
&p5X1r9u,@ x$t
金鏄四國 is a new idea which shocked the whole world in 2003.
k}I%_)nF7`
G6Dw NA-c+ZC&o7l One of the 高盛 investigator proposed a report which make the whole world ecmomic scholars and also 元首s#e3ha}(h&p/~?
6zn8v.vu)f*R
why it is called "Brick"0MG~K s v Q hJ)G

A5P]XS1I o it is because the four new countries which will lead the world economy in 21 centries is Brazil,Russia.India and China%g!s4V/I4k2{C4\!I(_X

SR3^(G+~Hm
V~L`,xa OXU
b2]J3^"s PS: if u want anymore info., search it in yahoo, it's a very new idea but very well known among all 投資行

頁: [1] 2

Powered by Discuz! Archiver 7.0.0  © 2001-2009 Comsenz Inc.