娛樂滿紛 26FUN's Archiver

新經濟學巨人 發表於 2005-4-3 06:42 PM

反對日本成為聯合國常任理事國

[url]http://hongkong-property.netfirms.com/UN/anti_japanese_to_be_un.htm[/url]O6?? h*S6G7KJ4?.n2y F
[size=6]請大家簽名支持,亦要告知你的朋友[/size]

cyhk 發表於 2005-4-3 06:53 PM

全力支持新經濟學巨人
@-{t:v c
3])i:qtHwt 反對日本成為聯合國常任理事國
h AbU8_"A6^&E}y2e
)Be^m w.]%u#M#T 大家要珍惜今日可以咁自由happy享用26FUN.COM的日子MP7J Z }1tw _TS
"O1w zg+{#Z
千萬記著, 倭寇狼子野心, 必須提防慘痛歷史的重複

史艷文2 發表於 2005-4-3 10:19 PM

小日本狗一定信唔過,心胸險惡,又扮好人.
W8] N;s5| 鬼唔望一夜之間海嘯加地震,等日本 齊齊玩 冚家產

clchoicl 發表於 2005-4-3 10:30 PM

[img]http://hk.geocities.com/ronald_be_free/pkjapan.JPG[/img]

新經濟學巨人 發表於 2005-4-3 11:45 PM

[size=6]請大家將訊息傳播開去![/size]

sklai 發表於 2005-4-4 01:10 AM

[font=宋體][color=Red][size=6]反日本軍國主義復興[/size][/color][/font]

chinese 發表於 2005-4-4 01:22 AM

totally support u

新經濟學巨人 發表於 2005-4-4 01:25 AM

[size=5]同是犯錯,雖然改變唔到歷史,德國卻願意道歉及賠償!
e'x n*` sv
4sP%X1L k*i{+[ 主動建碑立館,讓後人警惕,
R&gKu5?oK#H
)ai/M `jOPWJy ])Xr 德國政府對處理第二次世界大戰的態度及立場,值得一讚!
;hB]]z
VDIy F 早排有一個登陸諾曼第的紀錄片,片中詳述當年的慘況,並由各一名 7B"|7EG7V#kOq

3_*} T*Ki@~.m:@oB 美國及德國老兵,各自站在自己當年(60年前)的地方, 8On~P3k,en Co
0d? X,C!Q
美國老兵講自己如果搶灘,並且親身示範,德國老兵講自己如果死守; .gmRS*Tk+Kn)qy e9}

u0l#lM!D.cmn-bkX2[ 最後在片尾,兩名老兵相遇, 並互相握手,
B(k;YUvq;| -KsG-BF
美國老兵問:當年你見到我們登陸搶灘嘛?
sN}SuWu"{ ?P}oM-B(Y]
德國老兵回應:有....我見到......[/size]
u([|jJ4M
DH6EHdR#N9A7A [[i] Last edited by 新經濟學巨人 on 2005-4-4 at 01:26 AM [/i]]

小豪豪 發表於 2005-4-4 01:41 AM

反日本,死不悔改

robertchai 發表於 2005-4-4 04:29 AM

好心d日本仔啦,有時間拍多幾套av咪仲好...我罷買日貨都一定支持你D AV碟啦k.n+MG7r.ko2|
,V&d~X6^5M
男個d精盡人亡,女果d俾人姦死哂,咁就正

新經濟學巨人 發表於 2005-4-4 06:59 PM

請支持!

pk boy 發表於 2005-4-4 09:20 PM

我會用行動支持,溝哂d"o架"妹,直至佢地放棄呢個念頭為止!!!+Zz*g-`h
:):):)

stupid X 發表於 2005-4-4 11:46 PM

shall we be more reasonable? t^MNR Gq9wA
japan has been very influential nowadays.
4U r-\\YXv P p!X although i hate japaneses, but in UN,
hZ~ g6HgPM ~ japan should occupy a place.

新經濟學巨人 發表於 2005-4-5 12:00 AM

[size=6]簽名反對,好合理囉![/size]-@XF${z
)P#ev3a |zS
是否代表有錢人可以做乜都得?0Q&[%T:]#xM t jg
W5R0V['vHL
不分有沒有錢,都要有作為人的NORM.

MaxFigo 發表於 2005-4-5 12:02 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]stupid X[/i] at 2005-4-4 11:46 PM:
T _Ra};]+| shall we be more reasonable?;T*dg*qt^
japan has been very influential nowadays.ys9VP+qk5t*{
although i hate japaneses, but in UN,
8S1q%C,y4_2Hu\| ] japan should occupy a place. [/quote]
I5l7XT+Y6H -D)L(?7L yE
ha w$G|C(Kz
兄弟...國際事務唔係咁簡單...
] j ` |#W h M9` z 日本係好強我絕對認同 vOD1P h^Z Q
但同時佢亦都係個好有野心ge國家...@@'_+i` q#O
助長軍國主義講到底都唔係一件好事 @@

新經濟學巨人 發表於 2005-4-5 12:07 AM

[size=6]講到強,
l*l3y0A3L ~*?w M$aPt9c9S)`2z
第一次世界大戰後,日本強佔山東(德國影響範圍),
,S!F1IZw X-m)S N*a"b us zE.YWY]3Ui
及後日本更退出國際聯盟(即聯合國前身),C n#R:k/~@j4a

-H,C m'Ss 肆無忌憚入侵中國![/size]

stupid X 發表於 2005-4-5 12:09 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]MaxFigo[/i] at 2005-4-5 12:02 AM:
.Q.G%lp3f(Ty8[g
Ta8_Wn X5|H{Y$C x0j3`

.x1b)kL0T'D1C 兄弟...國際事務唔係咁簡單...
&D5] a:p#]Bq 日本係好強我絕對認同*U*~)a2B#J:k4W
但同時佢亦都係個好有野心ge國家...$KrE{wG
助長軍國主義講到底都唔係一件好事 @@ [/quote]
3o(d&k~o+Z/`;C
'I3I4V8N;qkG4C|
w7hOdnG$g
gt5A XT ^-R&AO^(n y{
i agree with u.So i say japan can be a member of UN only.
}6FLv:U`MK in the next 50 years, japan will decline.6ya w(N#\P
a new "Brick" will form and become the strongest countries
J(z^n;_%h!YWi Does anyone know?

MaxFigo 發表於 2005-4-5 12:12 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]stupid X[/i] at 2005-4-5 12:09 AM:
MRDYIqs5Z 5{;n)is)Fv j? D
^q/h v2Z

\]pc0M-] p%b+{wk I,VVV1`'l&k:@

IE(x*k9vD ?uRko {
in the next 50 years, japan will decline.8_5BYZUw G ~
[/quote]-p2e+gP"L8I5l
#Fm iT8v K't"u(Pt
係ar...日本本身其實都隱藏左唔少經濟問題 @@ ?KavvV,_

L_#W5[,\2a2V 下面果句唔太明:P

stupid X 發表於 2005-4-5 12:16 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]新經濟學巨人[/i] at 2005-4-5 12:07 AM:r%S;f/` a&gV
[size=6]講到強,d NBx"`N0g1[

J-e-ZbD7GY-r 第一次世界大戰後,日本強佔山東(德國影響範圍), o:o!\7{:@E

e!cx:n)q 及後日本更退出國際聯盟(即聯合國前身),
-Jf*Sf\:m q7l?7} W@DC9i,TDQ"s e
肆無忌憚入侵中國![/size] [/quote]
3}#Yjb5|gq
uA%hf.a boM 7_*[:dp!}
the bro knows quite much of history. gE#k9j6k\

*XUms Tg.?%y@O UN is now becoming國際聯盟. Its importance is now decreasing since America attacked Iraq without permission from UN. UN will eventually 架空 by strong countries.
R(` }'LJS$u5B c
x$b"d-ED%@-_ Apart from that, I think Japan is only playing tricks with America because he can never enter UN if China object to it.
Sgp.?#xpt9QO y!m/jV,V;cq F[5E
China has a right of veto否決權.2I YoH6O/r7IT(NsV$`N
If anyone among the five 常任理事國 uses veto to object,%FJk7^!O;j%lj8w+P1B6j
the issue will au---atically be banned
?9s#m/@xMx Veto is a special right offered to victorious countries in WW2

stupid X 發表於 2005-4-5 12:21 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]MaxFigo[/i] at 2005-4-5 12:12 AM:-C.a,gQv {7x
DR,s|Z
|xx YGWY$x
係ar...日本本身其實都隱藏左唔少經濟問題 @@
-hv c8P"M/@#}wI
!Y"X/n'\ V SI7i 下面果句唔太明:P [/quote]
l7lR2w6Sv*^7T{
9Zfc#l dW
9|8scf*Q(I 金鏄四國 is a new idea which shocked the whole world in 2003.7B Py_U2r2Rt

+g;?*}7gZ6L}]gmsp One of the 高盛 investigator proposed a report which make the whole world ecmomic scholars and also 元首s
9e*E ?a-l+W#J
ssQ'f_h,h'J} why it is called "Brick"
WW%z5^)d]
b2k:zX5O;d it is because the four new countries which will lead the world economy in 21 centries is Brazil,Russia.India and China
"]&J Y}!iW
R L3g?!Ijg#s
$wh yE;Q\ F%o 4k1s?0MJ/D*~
PS: if u want anymore info., search it in yahoo, it's a very new idea but very well known among all 投資行

頁: [1] 2

Powered by Discuz! Archiver 7.0.0  © 2001-2009 Comsenz Inc.