娛樂滿紛 26FUN's Archiver

新經濟學巨人 發表於 2005-4-3 06:42 PM

反對日本成為聯合國常任理事國

[url]http://hongkong-property.netfirms.com/UN/anti_japanese_to_be_un.htm[/url]8?H6W TE&qGa
[size=6]請大家簽名支持,亦要告知你的朋友[/size]

cyhk 發表於 2005-4-3 06:53 PM

全力支持新經濟學巨人 [Q5G5` A(W.G.c E;fj

,\`*g;_j&G b0`]&h] 反對日本成為聯合國常任理事國
B` cp^ U!dT 'f"eY/lIFXK9a
大家要珍惜今日可以咁自由happy享用26FUN.COM的日子,EI'l'B6Y%k

x*s:CSl7IKCO 千萬記著, 倭寇狼子野心, 必須提防慘痛歷史的重複

史艷文2 發表於 2005-4-3 10:19 PM

小日本狗一定信唔過,心胸險惡,又扮好人.
$G5gL W8O,aA 鬼唔望一夜之間海嘯加地震,等日本 齊齊玩 冚家產

clchoicl 發表於 2005-4-3 10:30 PM

[img]http://hk.geocities.com/ronald_be_free/pkjapan.JPG[/img]

新經濟學巨人 發表於 2005-4-3 11:45 PM

[size=6]請大家將訊息傳播開去![/size]

sklai 發表於 2005-4-4 01:10 AM

[font=宋體][color=Red][size=6]反日本軍國主義復興[/size][/color][/font]

chinese 發表於 2005-4-4 01:22 AM

totally support u

新經濟學巨人 發表於 2005-4-4 01:25 AM

[size=5]同是犯錯,雖然改變唔到歷史,德國卻願意道歉及賠償! +U%e\#JF&E2C

C] wVd rL5S&d 主動建碑立館,讓後人警惕,
SX G"nc?7PK _'e6Y g K PR
德國政府對處理第二次世界大戰的態度及立場,值得一讚!
5z!t0y'@$?M3P!C1t EK(Kqld#_
早排有一個登陸諾曼第的紀錄片,片中詳述當年的慘況,並由各一名
'u^r JC7e$F&~
"J(p"a5Z y#^ 美國及德國老兵,各自站在自己當年(60年前)的地方, 8X|Zp6_4H(KK
?9[t)M:SV-H
美國老兵講自己如果搶灘,並且親身示範,德國老兵講自己如果死守; 7DF%Y!Z3GnX.^|

;`Rjnt9v 最後在片尾,兩名老兵相遇, 並互相握手,
NR0nVc;I]"k G/i[%w9Z"M h
美國老兵問:當年你見到我們登陸搶灘嘛? D7|1Q8nP+vaO8A

x I2\N7f_FQa 德國老兵回應:有....我見到......[/size]
:yLS^y}-[xI#V O6[C,r,v`*k
[[i] Last edited by 新經濟學巨人 on 2005-4-4 at 01:26 AM [/i]]

小豪豪 發表於 2005-4-4 01:41 AM

反日本,死不悔改

robertchai 發表於 2005-4-4 04:29 AM

好心d日本仔啦,有時間拍多幾套av咪仲好...我罷買日貨都一定支持你D AV碟啦
.HYa&g5\a z "^+}H%AUyg\yiR
男個d精盡人亡,女果d俾人姦死哂,咁就正

新經濟學巨人 發表於 2005-4-4 06:59 PM

請支持!

pk boy 發表於 2005-4-4 09:20 PM

我會用行動支持,溝哂d"o架"妹,直至佢地放棄呢個念頭為止!!!
o5[4OZ2^p J:n :):):)

stupid X 發表於 2005-4-4 11:46 PM

shall we be more reasonable?
D{i ^+i"Y~ japan has been very influential nowadays.
PO0{7Jn5@[{_1X although i hate japaneses, but in UN,
Kq}x7p8U japan should occupy a place.

新經濟學巨人 發表於 2005-4-5 12:00 AM

[size=6]簽名反對,好合理囉![/size]
w6jIs2WLu
!H;R;Q w;}r 是否代表有錢人可以做乜都得?
4cwF_d
u [rN'r P 不分有沒有錢,都要有作為人的NORM.

MaxFigo 發表於 2005-4-5 12:02 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]stupid X[/i] at 2005-4-4 11:46 PM: qR } [SFx.t
shall we be more reasonable?B1p(a#x5c B\r ]
japan has been very influential nowadays.
{4RR{ g}L,q` although i hate japaneses, but in UN,,sfa:z K;UkkE;x
japan should occupy a place. [/quote]
*IPxpRkvwh1J
+^(B/i;V!V} Ut/Qp;a!@8wS
兄弟...國際事務唔係咁簡單...c.?C}^ k%wmJ ]X
日本係好強我絕對認同/Pq+c!xAP!O
但同時佢亦都係個好有野心ge國家...
Q[w6AuI R 助長軍國主義講到底都唔係一件好事 @@

新經濟學巨人 發表於 2005-4-5 12:07 AM

[size=6]講到強,!T[;h?@$V4N8F(Y
Q*h,rcG0d
第一次世界大戰後,日本強佔山東(德國影響範圍),
d+@y p9TPj O*JX)t;j,zgTy
及後日本更退出國際聯盟(即聯合國前身),2Z;m_U(buMQ
s'|'Qr?;{ X$kk
肆無忌憚入侵中國![/size]

stupid X 發表於 2005-4-5 12:09 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]MaxFigo[/i] at 2005-4-5 12:02 AM:&U7\1^1r]9|kA.c
+v;{-U eF
#C5@9ME LZ@Y:D

zBk&z _Q]5} 兄弟...國際事務唔係咁簡單...Tz%K5zu?s-b!T
日本係好強我絕對認同
4v8__#K#@)V"{ 但同時佢亦都係個好有野心ge國家...7DdD#? RCf,J9d
助長軍國主義講到底都唔係一件好事 @@ [/quote]
#gM)N7Gk8k6lfL'X E*j
4{KY}#dMo #}*vokV+k[%Z|
Q? eIBZ bb

U&OHzj Z7u+O i agree with u.So i say japan can be a member of UN only.EM4Op2Rj7L
in the next 50 years, japan will decline.
*o a ]sv4NA6M a new "Brick" will form and become the strongest countries h4N8a9o(W2}H1oV
Does anyone know?

MaxFigo 發表於 2005-4-5 12:12 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]stupid X[/i] at 2005-4-5 12:09 AM:
^ m#lV9E ?
&u(i`S_T_Q@ :V pG8fyZ

,iVm_m CE
$M;A)]G U\ X%]~BP
'Yq6n9N@Vf ?x8~Y6j
in the next 50 years, japan will decline.
2h|%hm'q3Z [/quote]/x1af~:K$uJr
cJ+w$k;Y:yO$`
係ar...日本本身其實都隱藏左唔少經濟問題 @@k6f(f~'W@J

Z"w UV%v?5V,s;x 下面果句唔太明:P

stupid X 發表於 2005-4-5 12:16 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]新經濟學巨人[/i] at 2005-4-5 12:07 AM:
A Ss of!rEK6hyG [size=6]講到強,}m X&fY

"VLL ^$WK 第一次世界大戰後,日本強佔山東(德國影響範圍),'CUY:R3G y

+k-K7g8T+t5J5k 及後日本更退出國際聯盟(即聯合國前身),
;X~PNh8bP
7Eo3fC/~$u-z.J 肆無忌憚入侵中國![/size] [/quote]
%JC6ah*s .y6w.SBh/rO?
:y.I \it&C
the bro knows quite much of history.R P e!~1n)y

j0tq.n"g{p UN is now becoming國際聯盟. Its importance is now decreasing since America attacked Iraq without permission from UN. UN will eventually 架空 by strong countries.
{s1^s+A
9k*~;q AB-C+M4} Apart from that, I think Japan is only playing tricks with America because he can never enter UN if China object to it.W Nt HYq
/bY0K&dc
China has a right of veto否決權.
V g1S.L\{9b+j:}nX If anyone among the five 常任理事國 uses veto to object,3E OO:t(yl
the issue will au---atically be banned2U/j-Li0Dw
Veto is a special right offered to victorious countries in WW2

stupid X 發表於 2005-4-5 12:21 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]MaxFigo[/i] at 2005-4-5 12:12 AM:
a n `(g6l^6G
)Vu\t~%c@ x~6z;yb DMd,o:w
係ar...日本本身其實都隱藏左唔少經濟問題 @@ eR$u@n)l7W"]
k$RSPV ?!xGy
下面果句唔太明:P [/quote]
2e%j u'E+jM5e
.?7YP t;@z5L?R2o3V 'mN+F"Tbw
金鏄四國 is a new idea which shocked the whole world in 2003. o9E:i e5~7|O

#c8j Nq&c'i.UT#AU0\ One of the 高盛 investigator proposed a report which make the whole world ecmomic scholars and also 元首s&JD{#~?AV[C
5jM;pBg.wo!w
why it is called "Brick"!F&g~)GO"h
#x(D9J5d`I5W
it is because the four new countries which will lead the world economy in 21 centries is Brazil,Russia.India and China
u!d'{-\ Fi?
'a6k;UU.}Z-A
O4M]6x+su;r
n}2m m b_ PS: if u want anymore info., search it in yahoo, it's a very new idea but very well known among all 投資行

頁: [1] 2

Powered by Discuz! Archiver 7.0.0  © 2001-2009 Comsenz Inc.