娛樂滿紛 26FUN's Archiver

新經濟學巨人 發表於 2005-4-3 06:42 PM

反對日本成為聯合國常任理事國

[url]http://hongkong-property.netfirms.com/UN/anti_japanese_to_be_un.htm[/url]3R#K0i2f tZwm
[size=6]請大家簽名支持,亦要告知你的朋友[/size]

cyhk 發表於 2005-4-3 06:53 PM

全力支持新經濟學巨人!K#QK0VF)|J(U
!f^l2|^g~W
反對日本成為聯合國常任理事國M"]DpN5Gbb
+d6E D7Fw(h4y-f4^aK
大家要珍惜今日可以咁自由happy享用26FUN.COM的日子
C{C*? _@D M6H4s
5E/Yj8p q0w 千萬記著, 倭寇狼子野心, 必須提防慘痛歷史的重複

史艷文2 發表於 2005-4-3 10:19 PM

小日本狗一定信唔過,心胸險惡,又扮好人.b%v/C9u c {^en
鬼唔望一夜之間海嘯加地震,等日本 齊齊玩 冚家產

clchoicl 發表於 2005-4-3 10:30 PM

[img]http://hk.geocities.com/ronald_be_free/pkjapan.JPG[/img]

新經濟學巨人 發表於 2005-4-3 11:45 PM

[size=6]請大家將訊息傳播開去![/size]

sklai 發表於 2005-4-4 01:10 AM

[font=宋體][color=Red][size=6]反日本軍國主義復興[/size][/color][/font]

chinese 發表於 2005-4-4 01:22 AM

totally support u

新經濟學巨人 發表於 2005-4-4 01:25 AM

[size=5]同是犯錯,雖然改變唔到歷史,德國卻願意道歉及賠償!
,Qh%Y0SKPF
+E[U;Sk*URP 主動建碑立館,讓後人警惕,
Z3@7| V/ob
q:x4TVCAg 德國政府對處理第二次世界大戰的態度及立場,值得一讚! _ ]~.dwb
(^2P;w"pw'a6SQ
早排有一個登陸諾曼第的紀錄片,片中詳述當年的慘況,並由各一名 }zJjb*]-eUf

Pq!]mt)O 美國及德國老兵,各自站在自己當年(60年前)的地方,
h)B\)`Emw[ 'P^D/|]7W/^`-j8m
美國老兵講自己如果搶灘,並且親身示範,德國老兵講自己如果死守; ,XyW`x.[

ND\ TW4j6nq_ MZ 最後在片尾,兩名老兵相遇, 並互相握手,
:|/~?{GC Ta0E&? o]R
美國老兵問:當年你見到我們登陸搶灘嘛?
Pd#I/TFM-[y'H1N /ipt6J;O
德國老兵回應:有....我見到......[/size]
1a7n6R3fX v Sf/P sl
[[i] Last edited by 新經濟學巨人 on 2005-4-4 at 01:26 AM [/i]]

小豪豪 發表於 2005-4-4 01:41 AM

反日本,死不悔改

robertchai 發表於 2005-4-4 04:29 AM

好心d日本仔啦,有時間拍多幾套av咪仲好...我罷買日貨都一定支持你D AV碟啦\"eE:d!v.Olk
,U9yl/@;a
男個d精盡人亡,女果d俾人姦死哂,咁就正

新經濟學巨人 發表於 2005-4-4 06:59 PM

請支持!

pk boy 發表於 2005-4-4 09:20 PM

我會用行動支持,溝哂d"o架"妹,直至佢地放棄呢個念頭為止!!!
%Z~ j2n z,{ Q :):):)

stupid X 發表於 2005-4-4 11:46 PM

shall we be more reasonable?
*BGg!G7Mc#v?\ japan has been very influential nowadays.1j&\'aqF ~(MwLe0x
although i hate japaneses, but in UN,c4k3eJFWIX
japan should occupy a place.

新經濟學巨人 發表於 2005-4-5 12:00 AM

[size=6]簽名反對,好合理囉![/size]X,b5h9as LX6C8S!C

4x&Nvt mX a 是否代表有錢人可以做乜都得?
z8z2_~{oXo1l
0?1~8R:MT9^ 不分有沒有錢,都要有作為人的NORM.

MaxFigo 發表於 2005-4-5 12:02 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]stupid X[/i] at 2005-4-4 11:46 PM:
V n[+G!a$lw shall we be more reasonable?
YJ+}(u,nm'_ r'E5~/](e japan has been very influential nowadays.
(gk Ia;E"O0b although i hate japaneses, but in UN,
5Ni/N(@'S!U8bYj japan should occupy a place. [/quote]
vk&n.yJ*E v
5l q;T{'V {.`8u Y%_!VK#e{
兄弟...國際事務唔係咁簡單...8lP n3i%p
日本係好強我絕對認同
r@\'aEQG7\PL:r 但同時佢亦都係個好有野心ge國家...
o)h;J6K3c|:I 助長軍國主義講到底都唔係一件好事 @@

新經濟學巨人 發表於 2005-4-5 12:07 AM

[size=6]講到強,8erx3[J-l{ u3a
Cl;o }3xd}:w
第一次世界大戰後,日本強佔山東(德國影響範圍), x)oLC4p
-Z3s:b-UP a2MDI
及後日本更退出國際聯盟(即聯合國前身),IT"w*E)A1q;K

+|:YF'iE#l3W%o 肆無忌憚入侵中國![/size]

stupid X 發表於 2005-4-5 12:09 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]MaxFigo[/i] at 2005-4-5 12:02 AM:
ul'|#I _J t2{#t )d-y+f/HJk
3s8Vl+Lf7SO4u2q{
8[D ?4w}.t
兄弟...國際事務唔係咁簡單...
s2N|c*V){'WW 日本係好強我絕對認同,?[+A_{
但同時佢亦都係個好有野心ge國家...;p(F-E4j(n e
助長軍國主義講到底都唔係一件好事 @@ [/quote]
M7~ K.E,R[:QW
9jj;|;q @-[;W
RBQ7V"@'Y]|^} w
B8u b(y `#J %sU,I'p%?Z
i agree with u.So i say japan can be a member of UN only..nw#I'vY'Z@
in the next 50 years, japan will decline.
,L? A?,Hd/G a new "Brick" will form and become the strongest countries 4Sm}/R*V
Does anyone know?

MaxFigo 發表於 2005-4-5 12:12 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]stupid X[/i] at 2005-4-5 12:09 AM:
l&P5D r$\
$q0s$b.W,nJ8pV.` v'VvqqB
9p l0N+Y,L0o&^ v

!yC Gp1{ c\r
"p AE\!Kv\
s`G"` u5}u in the next 50 years, japan will decline.*^iVYusF
[/quote]L6pe$B }-|

`'Vq`^*Y)l n 係ar...日本本身其實都隱藏左唔少經濟問題 @@e}e+S d/_| d L
)n w*|&Sa&a GE`+_E
下面果句唔太明:P

stupid X 發表於 2005-4-5 12:16 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]新經濟學巨人[/i] at 2005-4-5 12:07 AM:
*O3x2M'MH)O3Fw [size=6]講到強,
BAUC)Z|/X9F 5p M/a bj;Qg"cf
第一次世界大戰後,日本強佔山東(德國影響範圍),
&`{b*v_ z "Pu(D SRp0C
及後日本更退出國際聯盟(即聯合國前身),:NS0H.PrzX

C|k;Ra,yr!n 肆無忌憚入侵中國![/size] [/quote]
\^;s.ZMM\ S
;G[*{\;B`2r /v,loyQ;m6i
the bro knows quite much of history.
*]C"rh3{^;A;b3L :w(X:R`v d!\ H
UN is now becoming國際聯盟. Its importance is now decreasing since America attacked Iraq without permission from UN. UN will eventually 架空 by strong countries.
wApF+n*O ,xv-V0do
Apart from that, I think Japan is only playing tricks with America because he can never enter UN if China object to it.C\0R@} u
n,z(~.I;o^QFo
China has a right of veto否決權.m?MJ6K X
If anyone among the five 常任理事國 uses veto to object,
Yl'[ y:Z the issue will au---atically be bannedy~C P-@\ n-~
Veto is a special right offered to victorious countries in WW2

stupid X 發表於 2005-4-5 12:21 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]MaxFigo[/i] at 2005-4-5 12:12 AM:Z^*@6o*jPx0@Fx

"G`)A,P3B@ j3o9jj5Q'S
,G&Ca1XP.H _ 係ar...日本本身其實都隱藏左唔少經濟問題 @@
#s)RM/vg cb`Q6e _*QR!AP"e2ad
下面果句唔太明:P [/quote]h7tULK,wX
(q"D9l9aPXD

~(W `U)_&PJP 金鏄四國 is a new idea which shocked the whole world in 2003.
X lLe_"?F `zrBus8`?
One of the 高盛 investigator proposed a report which make the whole world ecmomic scholars and also 元首s7m"h6W ]g-A/A
;I SQ;ne!J{Y
why it is called "Brick"T.AP^q Ov$e R h.O

{*?Ll5? Y it is because the four new countries which will lead the world economy in 21 centries is Brazil,Russia.India and China
p]]~5[V:vd YC)B$k8W&Z&h4Oak$|
q3e4~1Q|p

j }5o$M0o;t;kpG:c PS: if u want anymore info., search it in yahoo, it's a very new idea but very well known among all 投資行

頁: [1] 2

Powered by Discuz! Archiver 7.0.0  © 2001-2009 Comsenz Inc.