[quote]Originally posted by [i]迷途小羔羊[/i] at 2005-11-23 05:47 PM:
維拉利爾防守有表現，無辦法 [/quote]
曼聯套打法對住密集
攻力=0......./_\
好彩個邊又0:0-.-""
有心冇力
[quote]Originally posted by [i]kakeidevil[/i] at 05 11 09 07:23 PM:
有心冇力 [/quote]
最好ge係朗尼~~寄望對賓菲加~~~:(:(:(
[quote]Originally posted by [i]路路[/i] at 2005-11-23 07:35 PM:
最好ge係朗尼~~寄望對賓菲加~~~:(:(:( [/quote]
史高斯就真係無咩表現可言, 踢落真係無神無氣.....
睇吓其餘歐洲強隊嘅戰績同曼聯比較，就算最後紅魔能夠殺入十六強，想更上一層樓真係非常困難。
琴日場波好似有d攻唔起咁, 星仔做左幾場後備之後好明顯唔係幾fit, 上半場頭果10分8分鐘一出黎d攻勢係唔錯, 好有mu惜日架霸氣, 不過就係得10分鐘咁上下.
其實入波機會都幾多下, 不果全都狀態唔係幾好, 把握唔到. 默契方面真係要努力甲多d
[quote]Originally posted by [i]kakeidevil[/i] at 2005-11-23 07:42 PM:
史高斯就真係無咩表現可言, 踢落真係無神無氣..... [/quote]
睇佢呢幾場係咁俾人擇名就知啦~ 可能因為要謗住s14, 攪到有d唔上唔落咁:(
[quote]Originally posted by [i]kakeidevil[/i] at 2005-11-23 07:43 PM:
睇吓其餘歐洲強隊嘅戰績同曼聯比較，就算最後紅魔能夠殺入十六強，想更上一層樓真係非常困難。 [/quote]
無錯~ 琴日一路睇右入唔到波, 但就一路睇住其他強隊不停入波, 好明顯係呢一期高下立見:(
鏡報今日再傳不利消息,
鏡報記者指出, 美國佬經已向"費爵爺"下達最後指令!!
如果曼聯未能係歐冠盃出線16強, 曼聯會即時同"費爵爺"終止合約.
另外記者指出"軒斯菲特"經已同美國佬傾好晒,
除時可以飛過奧脫福接手曼聯
點解踢成咁???c7真係一時時先有料....朗尼fit都冇用啦...
而家想傑c快d番出黎啦...
唉唉唉!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
真係估佢唔到,竟然和波..曼聯真係冇乜邊年既分組賽要去到依個地步.......=.="""
朗尼仔算係全隊表現最穩定.....唔理咩比賽都咁博殺........
[quote]Originally posted by [i]kakeidevil[/i] at 2005-11-23 08:09 PM:
鏡報今日再傳不利消息,
鏡報記者指出... [/quote]
會唔會暴動架:o
[quote]Originally posted by [i]kakeidevil[/i] at 05 11 09 08:11 PM:
點解踢成咁???c7真係一時時先有料....... [/quote]
1月到底有冇fit ge進攻中場黎呀????~~尋晚邊睇邊想呢ge問題,好心急~~~~:(
c7尋晚又晒左唔少入波機會,佢埋門好似真係差dd~~~:(
[quote]Originally posted by [i]kakeidevil[/i] at 2005-11-23 08:11 PM:
點解踢成咁???c7真係一時時先有料....... [/quote]
前面v10控唔到波, 分唔波俾兩易, 再自己沖上去入波, 已前呢招超殺食..... 所以要v10禁區外自己一手攪掂其實對mu黎講唔係好事, 因為咁係證明左佢地沒計可c, 情形就好似要d後衛上黎入波, 根本唔係值得高興架事.....:o
係另一個topic見到本週最佳陣容,竟然冇雲佬,真係莫名其妙~~~~
對查爾頓雲佬真係踢得好好~~個轉身入波靚到暈,唉~~~~
[quote]Originally posted by [i]supportMU[/i] at 2005-11-23 08:50 PM:
前面v10控唔到波, 分唔波俾兩易, 再... [/quote]
又唔係既.......果陣時已經大局已定la.....
再加上雲佬自己搞掂哂,係我生命中只睇過兩次
一次係呢次
另一次係02-03對熱刺果場
唔駛咁灰既各位曼迷！
上年的利記也可以奪得歐冠盃
證明左一樣野
就係未到最後一刻，大局都未定
去到十六強之後的情況係點
到時先算
最緊要贏到下一場
其實曼聯對住維拉利爾也算不錯了
只是對手打密集先贏唔到
我相信下場贏賓菲加既機會好大
因為雖然作客，但賓菲加為左出線都係焗攻
對住死守既球隊，曼聯可能無計
但對住肯攻既球隊，曼聯鬥攻既情況下就多數有計
所以我都幾有信心
今季真係令人特別失望 又買唔到好既中場中 仲要走埋堅尼(雖然佢又老又成日傷 but 始終有d用) 成隊既表現又差 睇返車仔.........真係好失望
[b][color=Red]VODAFONE END UNITED DEAL [/color]
Manchester United are searching for a new shirt sponsor after Vodafone ended their current £36million deal two years early.
Negotiations between Old Trafford executives and the telecommunications giant have resulted in a mutual decision to end the current £9million-a-year contract at the end of the season.
While the announcement is bound to be seen as a setback in the business plan of new owner Malcolm Glazer, having taken early soundings from potential replacements, Red Devils commercial director Andy Anson is convinced it will actually allow the club to negotiate a better deal.
"The Manchester United shirt is the most iconic in sport," he said.
"The club feels that, in the current market, there is a genuine chance to attract significant additional investment.
"Initial soundings and filter-004ions with a number of world-class potential partners have been very encouraging and we are confident of securing a new deal in the coming months."
Although Vodafone did let an opt-out clause in the current deal pass without giving an indication they wished to end it, it is believed the company wish to restructure their sponsorship, with the focus likely to be on the Champions League.
However, it is also anticipated they will remain as platinum sponsors with United, who announced their intention to concentrate on attracting a core group of investors prior to the £790million Glazer buyout.
Anson has already been responsible for attracting a major sponsorship deal with German car manufacturer Audi and will now step up his search for what will be only the third shirt sponsor in United's history.
Japanese electrical firm Sharp were the first company to have their name emblazoned on the famous red strip, with their association lasting 18 years from 1982.
Although Anson is correct in his assertion United remain one of the most famous footballing names on the planet, their image has been tarnished by a relative lack of success in recent seasons and the possibility of an early exit from this year's Champions League will not help in his negotiations.
Anson will be hopeful of eclipsing the biggest current shirt sponsorship deal in English soccer, the £50million, five-year contract Chelsea have with Samsung.
However, even that contract is eclipsed by the massive £16million-a-year Real Madrid will rake in from Taiwanese mobile company BenQ Mobile in a deal which takes effect in the summer, a figure Anson will be under pressure to match.[/b]
[color=Blue][b]===================
vodafone唔同曼聯續約,
唔知有咩新贊助商出現係球衣身上呢???[/b][/color]
[quote]Originally posted by [i]kakeidevil[/i] at 2005-11-23 20:09:
鏡報今日再傳不利消息,
鏡報記者指出... [/quote]
我認為其實費蛇佢自己都有責任
用人方面, 條中場線佢好似好滿意咁.....其實費柴, alan, scholes既沉態等等.....吾係話佢地吾好 / 無潛質, 不過佢地既卡士(class)係咪果啲世界級球星就真係大家心中有數.....
佢幾個咁樣踢, 踢米杜士堡, 保頓果啲可能會有前途
但如果想保持曼聯以往既皇者風範, 我唸alan, fletcher, 真係吾夠班
費蛇真係要醒下
睇下以往giggs, keane, scholes(有態), beckham.....1999,2000,2001 既時候既黃金中場既威力就知, 佢地既防守 (keane, scholes), 助攻, 雙翼齊飛, 直線/斜線轉送全部都好殺
宜家既中場就真係助守無以前咁好, 控制吾到場波, 無雙翼齊飛, 完全無直線/斜線, 最多格梗落下底傳個無乜威脅既波出嚟.......
其實直家有時有好表現, 大部份功勞都係rooney, van, park, 間吾中c7......咁係造成球隊表表現吾穩定既原因, 就算有神童rooney, 世界級van佬, 都有時會一、兩、三場波入吾到波 (仲要係中場無乜傳送), 咁點啊? 咪都只係見fletcher, alan, scholes, etc.... 走下走下, 踢下踢下, 成身汗, 但仍然係無乜助攻, 有威脅的傳送, 幫吾到隊波, 幫吾到兩個超級前鋒.......換句話講, 即係宜家既中場線係吾夠[size=4][color=Red]class[/color][/size], 唯一做法就係引入一些世界級中場, 如果吾係我地呢啲曼聯迷都係一次又一次咁失望, 睇往自己隊波俾人淘汰.......
吾該換反alan, fletcher, scholes 做後備啦
買入 ballack, virea, etc.....既球星啦
錢係要花架啦......呢個世界係要啲咁既人先可以帶到成績俾我地睇
[size=5][color=Red][b]曼迷必睇!![/b][/color][/size]
[b]雲佬於PSV之008片段[/b]
[color=green][b]雲佬於PSV(啅號008,因為着8號波衫)既入波片段,
[color=Green]第一球係大約係中圈位置起腳笠射入左[/color][/b][/color]
[color=blue][b][url]http://s9.yousendit.com/d.aspx?id=22KSKCENKVG9A1F1H6866I24FE[/url][/b][/color]