[4/21加分題] 討論: 大家點樣睇天份同努力?
好多人會恃住有天份而唔太努力7|!a&t`]-dypz又有好多人因為無天份而將勤補拙hIi6Jv&H0s
大家覺得:2UjFh+IZ4x.W
只要有天份就唔需要努力? 還是
只要肯努力就唔需要天份?
希望大家討論下, 分享下:
你覺得邊樣重要?
自己屬於靠天份/靠努力既人, sU.VGZ!r
覺得響邊d事上面要天份, 邊d事上面要努力?&w$N SS$zvyf
有無成功/失敗既例子?LdtpfF {&Tc
有無試過有天份做一樣野而又努力? 成果如何?
:H9N!t vy;z.Pc
希望大家俾心機答:D6GM!VO"F)Z`8O7p,A
我諗會幾有分加;)D)E%]TgYV ]9Q
同埋有時唔洗下下都為分嫁, 一齊傾下會學到野:D
ys1I(oL
$q"iae l1q%x9F2~
*大家記住唔好吵架呀:D
[[i] Last edited by 樂壇渣Fit人 on 2005-4-23 at 01:33 PM [/i]] 我覺得只要肯努力就唔需要天份好過有天份但唔努力囉~~
因為有d有天份o既人會恃才傲物~~~3s(QJg&qnM hx*~
浪費左上天俾佢o地o既恩典~~!U+K!KZ*H9d;H
但係d努力o既人就要好俾心機先可以追貼d有天份o既人o既 level~~~QJ_ })P-L ~
對d好努力o既人係好唔公平囉~~
g q3P4|&CG
而我就覺得我係一個有少許天份同少許努力o既人~~
因為有d事我唔雖用好努力就可以做得比d好努力o既人好 =.=
以上只係我o既分享:P 當然係天份重要啦,我覺得天份同努力的重要性差不多7:3 啦
或者我鍾意睇SPORT GAMES啦,你睇O下入面D球星
個個都一定係天才橫溢,但是就基本上冇一個係無天份而可以將勤補拙;v+|Z5GI4H l8M
就好像讀書咁,叻的人半個鐘就溫晒書,唔叻的人就半日都溫唔晒書
冇天份而靠將勤補拙的,最多只係唔差,但肯定冇機會再上一層S fU-Q*R{"e
有天份而唔太努力,就肯定已經係唔差先,仲有機會再上一層 [quote]Originally posted by [i]srfqt1[/i] at 2005-4-21 02:00 PM:LOoFc ?
當然係天份重要啦,我覺得天份同努力的重 ... [/quote]@l M f{Dfn)k
但係你唔覺得咁會對d努力o既人好唔公平咩???
雖然我都知道肯努力o既人多數都比唔上有天份o既人...... [quote]Originally posted by [i]sfxc0000[/i] at 2005-4-21 02:04 PM:
但係你唔覺得咁會對d努力o既人好唔公平咩???
雖然我都知道肯努力o既人多數都比唔上有天份o既人...... [/quote]
}{ W G%m_+e$c;X Y
呢個世界可以話公平又得,唔公平又得C{6C%[.f2T4C
我覺得做人有時好像玩d rpg game咁
上天係分配咗你的能力大約都係差唔多,唔會一個太高, 一個太低
只不過a君可能讀書叻,b君就運動叻,c君就eq高
可能b君會羨慕a君讀書叻,但是a君又可能羨慕c君eq高U5r-Tg F1q
其實做人就係咁,可能上天俾咗一野樣你,你係全世界全叻的
不過俾果一野樣,係你成世人都用唔著既,咁你可唔可以怨個天唔公平
[[i] Last edited by srfqt1 on 2005-4-21 at 02:42 PM [/i]] [quote]Originally posted by [i]srfqt1[/i] at 2005-4-21 02:16 PM:
2K4O}2R&Zi Z)j;@O^
呢個世界可以話公平又得,唔公平又得 ... [/quote]
咁又係~~4n,QzO:Y(Hz#i
好似我思考會好d, 但背誦又差到貼地 =.= [quote]Originally posted by [i]srfqt1[/i] at 2005-4-21 04:00 PM:
當然係天份重要啦,我覺得天份同努力的重要性差不多7:3 啦)FY| Q8~V/s
或者我鍾意睇SPORT GAMES啦,你睇O下入面D球星Pk Uk,l
個個都一定係天才橫溢,但是就基本上冇一個係無天份而可以將勤補拙4D3kN1tnpmx1K
就好像讀書咁,叻的人半個鐘就溫晒書,唔叻的人就半日都溫唔晒書
冇天份而靠將勤補拙的,最多只係唔差,但肯定冇機會再上一層
有天份而唔太努力,就肯定已經係唔差先,仲有機會再上一層 [/quote]
8a}yT,`:}'P'X4J
用運動是很好的例子:D
因運動的確好著重天份, 但大家其實亦很喜歡工兵型球員, Keane, Gattuso, Makelele, etc.C?$u.q"h.@1T
他們沒有太細膩的腳法, 身價腳可與其他星級球員看齊,
同時亦有很多天份型球員從不努力, 肥朗是好例子, 大家因他的天份而愛上他, 亦因他懶而開始討厭他..$i-K0QODS3sl
/a n&zkR4]
而讀書, 叻的定義太廣, 我相信無人可以科科都叻, 有d科都要努力fC-o7f5Ns
而且你看那些10A狀元語錄, 多是每天溫上7/8小時書...
qWM$b:D9x'B
這題目矛盾的地方是:
太多有天份的人自恃天份高而從不努力, 或選擇性地努力
他們大多被努力的人趕過了, 是龜兔賽跑的道理 [quote]Originally posted by [i]crap[/i] at 2005-4-21 02:29 PM:{^W"KXa(U
這題目矛盾的地方是:
太多有天份的人自恃天份高而從不努力, 或選擇性地努力Zo1X@Q3lN
他們大多被努力的人趕過了, 是龜兔賽跑的道理[/quote]
可能係是龜兔賽跑的道理,但是我好堅持一樣野]_M/T-f~+W
冇天份而靠將勤補拙的,肯定冇機會再上一層eF7Yrk*A*n
有天份而唔太努力,重有機會再上一層/RA8P$]Jm;P W
有d無奈,但是已經接受咗呢個事實/y,eZ _ xI
[[i] Last edited by srfqt1 on 2005-4-21 at 02:39 PM [/i]] [quote]Originally posted by [i]srfqt1[/i] at 2005-4-21 04:38 PM:'|!?"JAj/S0v1p
:I3l${9`Mc
可能係是龜兔賽跑的道理,但是我好堅持一樣野
[color=Purple]冇天份而靠將勤補拙的,肯定冇機會再上一層[/color]P"t]mP
[color=Blue]有天份而唔太努力,重有機會再上一層[/color] [/quote]Iy!@8R3v
%?;XU@%m-X ^-c
[color=Blue]呢點我非常認同[/color],
[color=Purple]但呢點又未必, 於工事上, 聰明人有天份, 自然有野心, 不少上級會選擇一個肯搏命的人, 但當然不少會選有效率的, 所以唔一定係肯定無機會再上一層, 所以唔需要無奈:)[/color]8QD`-]&RnI5o
[[i] Last edited by crap on 2005-4-21 at 04:47 PM [/i]] talent, yes, it's really important.
but I believe Hard working is the most important thing, even you are working in our society, you are studying in school or in university.
If you are not hard working, even you get the talents for Ronaldano.. do u think you will practise well if u are lazy?! what will be your results?! You can guess it.
em.. this is my comment, both of them are really really really important 聰明重要&HiiVi{
世界各地個 d 天才兒童
睇幾睇可以睇明大學 d 野甚至有大學收佢地
你估智商較低甚至弱智個 d 人
一日付出 24 小時去溫
可唔可以咁樣呢? [quote]Originally posted by [i]kyleung[/i] at 2005-4-23 15:55:
聰明重要
2yV9|#a[/v? ? [ ?$\
世界各地個 d 天才兒童
... [/quote]y"R"Z_.M9?%YI4F