娛樂滿紛 26FUN's Archiver

sfxc0000 發表於 2005-4-25 02:41 PM

由好至壞:F>M>L>B>S
!J gn)bBRy'{ *C }]`(^_3Z%z5M
F:我最接受呢一個. 雖然可能好多人認為佢影響左L同M的關係, 但作為一個朋友,
7FvT1V s-]8^ YN/b    我認為佢係應該講出真相. 做朋友是不可隱瞞朋友的:)-d1dw)i&o1^,Y.@B
L:雖然佢係為左愛情而做出呢d行為, 但係都唔應該出賣自己肉體..KSC.{FR2Q?
   當出賣自己肉體時, 就如同出賣自己私愛人, 但L好值得同情:(n [+uAqO.q
M:當知道自己私女友做出呢d行為, 分手是一件無可厚非的事.
S:j~;Z*p4m,Pa    但佢就冇給予L解釋, 所以佢都好唔o岩:(#G)M3_/pB&s+|
B:明知L極之需要過河, 竟然坐地起價, 其實同S一樣咁賤格, y } lfc@a:q[%jz
   不過因為冇肉體交易, 所以好S少少:mad:
n{7??rw)r,NNY S:一定係最壞o個個啦, 因為知道L需要錢而提出同L做不道德的交易:mad:

F.king 發表於 2005-4-25 03:41 PM

M, L, B, S are doing something for themselves(Bsa;Nm9TbZ#fV
M is for his pride
mF%V(\E L is for visiting her lover
dC[PhZXbj B is for money|rQpfk
S is for sex
&Hn7A` bT? except F, he can't get anything
8axZ"~LV?'[ but he just did something wrong for friends/n&c tt X1T(@1tM
therefore, I wound like to support F
7T5LD'C#K\#Q#@6v Actually, in the world, there is so many this kind of friends surround us and I think we should not lose them. they always do something for us without gain anything
Uf7n0n]@z4k#\ kh+ZN#A&l^8I)f
from good to bad \)R1Iev
F >L> B> S>M

dexter 發表於 2005-4-25 06:01 PM

玩過啦, hehe

sfxc0000 發表於 2005-4-25 06:03 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]dexter[/i] at 2005-4-25 06:01 PM:
+H,^'B3I!I)?!b 玩過啦, hehe [/quote]
Q'D9s@ ^%J 其實我上堂都玩過~~
yK)v Al PBd 不過內容有少少唔同:D:D

ssFCoRn 發表於 2005-4-25 09:15 PM

L = 為左自己love既人寧願犠牲..[我都會咁做]
#K7r-~&NW0e [ M = 因佢係比F誤導所以就比第2佢啦2{-_8RUrx~\UK4D#l
B = 一個為自己利益既船夫, 正常hk人係甘 Fqb,C~6^/]] Kg
F = 唔知全情話比M知誤導左吖M
'K6u^ pCsT1[ S = 知道有人需要錢度河, 開出不道德條件[呢條P...都算..K啦]

crap 發表於 2005-4-25 09:30 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]sfxc0000[/i] at 2005-4-25 08:03 PM:
4b? G4~ f,D9Yk6t
:b1EN ?#at%R 其實我上堂都玩過~~
0c7\*Xy[j6H 不過內容有少少唔同:D:D [/quote]
4P7@l+{ rv2L
&Gnu2?P,[:]/r#O 答案唔係重點,{ nP7V1HP{5J`
點樣分釋先係重點:D

singdotcom 發表於 2005-4-25 10:59 PM

最高就代表我最唔LIKE既人物: (我當$20只係好少錢)}Yh`M ZaJ8P,}
h,L0v D s(q K
L - 要過河有大把方法, 只係為左咁小事就同人上床, 愛一個人又點會咁易同其他男人上床, 成件事都係由佢呢個決定引起yM9z#WL
)a,od{I Z*n
S - 看中別人的弱點而作出不道德的交易去滿足自己私慾, 最賤格, 仲要以為用$20就昆到條女, 好cheap! 但係條女又真係比佢昆到喎!6v b5W,~ s$\ J&a
J:{_U'|#Wf
M - 愛一個人應該要包容佢, 就算佢做錯都唔可以飛佢, 何況佢唔係害你
Lf8j'q?[$} y0qAj.?5`m Z#SC
B - 呢D冇良船主都係衰架啦, 但係呢d人到處都係, 呢個人對呢件事起唔到關鍵作用
(S L(d1t7l'F
5A \FB\(Jhc u F - 佢講或唔講都會有佢個理由支持佢. 唔講, 咁m唔知就最幸福. 講, 就比m知情權, 等佢好好解決呢個問題

jason williams 發表於 2005-4-25 11:27 PM

have answer right now?

crap 發表於 2005-4-26 12:00 AM

準時12:00:lol:
ftrb7w] NO2c0t2rR*_
[color=LimeGreen][b][u][size=10]第二階段:[/size][/u][/b][/color]
hiURH3EjE
$T/B*Z!b#r-W [size=5][b][color=Red]M = 道德[/color][/b]
rc%wp.UL [b][color=Green]B = 事業[/color][/b] [ M"YZA:H&Y-u
[b][color=Purple]L = 愛情[/color][/b] d },AQDK
[b][color=Blue]S = 性[/color][/b]
6x7^vPM$e [b][color=Brown]F = 友情[/color][/b][/size]
"pA5[h5i!Aj 9@ P!~&L p0C,Bw0R
根據原註, 大家排的次序是你們心底覺得呢5樣既重要性, 準嗎?/X3R!swc
+[;\9]0`Bs
準不準不重要, 現在關心的是:):m WFqY*PD'S
1) 把道德跟事業排在附近的朋友, 你們認為此兩者可以共存嗎?
$Y7LO2y2h-_7f&qE 2) 把友情跟愛情排在附近的朋友, 你們又認為此兩者可以共存嗎?
P7g9R+a&M$Y 3) 把愛情跟性排在兩極的朋友, 你們在現實中真可以以愛為大前題去找女友嗎?
2ByRKdi
L!I9B_:[0Tz1S 即使沒有如此排位, 但有興趣分釋的朋友也不妨跟大家分享一下, 第一階段沒回應的朋友也可以參與回應第二階段:D
dp[9f7bi 'sv,u9xp&[2[ln
[[i] Last edited by crap on 2005-4-26 at 02:14 AM [/i]]

風火雷電 發表於 2005-4-26 12:12 AM

F-佢將佢知嘅野講比佢朋友知,當佢係朋友先會講,等佢自己諗清楚*o*wC&?G z!Y
L-為左愛,完全冇條件地付出,不過......真係值得???PS)|T[A ]0k.LaJ
B-一般商人(奸商)做法,冇野好講-.-}U'Pg]7\-v5}(\
S-依個賤人,見人地需要錢,就要人地同佢過夜嚟滿足自己\"/4az"n `w6V,rV
M-原全冇諗過對方對佢嘅付出,話分就分,冇"L"嘅付出,又邊有曾經開心嘅日子丫>﹏<

風火雷電 發表於 2005-4-26 12:15 AM

打字太慢=.=s?u P/TL4b PT6@
打完出到嚟已經有答案-.-

jason williams 發表於 2005-4-26 12:25 AM

quite accuate wow

dawrf 發表於 2005-4-26 12:35 AM

B F S M L

F.king 發表於 2005-4-26 06:21 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]crap[/i] at 2005-4-26 12:00 AM:
B9pY!Gv`;w$kW 準時12:00:lol:
OD+Dc9zg vam+H I^ 5TSd]~/MOk4G
[colo ... [/quote]Well, the analysis is quite suit to me%l]{}x }]W+O ]O
I had posted my answer before, and I am in this case
M`3`/m6{:}-Zq&LZ
q2d}6[7B!X {I#U 2) 把友情跟愛情排在附近的朋友, 你們又認為此兩者可以共存嗎?
*}8NnZ:k-y;^ V F'q^ c!I0j
I believe this is very hard to be togetherUl6D6OUY P
but I still trust that both of them can be together

yuzhiliang111 發表於 2005-4-26 10:54 AM

1)道德跟事業:如果一個人連道德都沒有的話就連做人的起碼準則都沒有,這種人還會有或配有事業嗎?/K?#{z&z
    2)友情跟愛情:有時候有情和愛情會互相衝突,你所愛的人不喜歡你的好朋友不希望你和他們交往。這實在是一件令人頭痛的事,有首歌不是唱過:“一邊是友情一邊是愛情,左右都不是爲難了自己。”人生有時就是如此魚與熊掌不可兼得,到底該怎樣選擇沒有固定的模式也沒有評判的標準。只有當事人自己覺得最合適的方式才可以!
.`3[M vg{     3) 現在的社會金錢與權利至上,有許多人爲了錢和權忽略了感情更不要説是愛了!要知道愛是什麽東西都換不來的,沒了金錢和權力不要緊只要心中有愛就會有出路!人們往往忽略了這一點,愛是人類與生俱來的一種美好的本能。只有多用這種美好的本能人才會活得更精彩,試想一下人世間少了爾虞我詐,多了愛世界也會變得更美好。所以我認爲在現實生活中以愛為大前提去找女朋友是可行的是必行的!

jason williams 發表於 2005-4-27 04:19 PM

i oppositely think that if u wanna be v rich in business, u must need to put off yr moral!!!
7U n]$J$e*n;Z`7mO/c7Q%a 奸商奸商ma!4Tl'FthOP

D8|oG9k7Hm4?q1liu just look through some rich business man, they employ see II to work in the construction site, after the construction finished, they call police themselves to catch them, so that they can save the salary payment!!! is it 9? yes!!! but stand from the boss, they have made much more profits to their business!
{ C&aHY$l(g A for 出賣 fds or closest relatives or wife/husband, dun need to say la, see it in newspaper everyday already, if $$$ is included, this kind of problwm is easily existing!!! easy for us to see clearly about 人性!!`5c^;o:USE
!d s2AV'c?*pZ
so, i dun agree than no moral will no business! but is it correct? i dun think so, but where we living in? is a material and snobby business world, if u can't give up yr moral, dun do business!!! ^z |q4fH
wY iXT{,W4r\+E
i quite like this psycho game, as each of these 5 elements are also holding to each other strongly in fact!!! funny

老鬼X 發表於 2005-5-1 06:49 PM

BSLMF

ricojohny 發表於 2005-5-1 07:42 PM

最好bfslm最衰
)GR8Gu1~ meIS [ b貪錢沒罪
(^7d%wf QCXn f都無吹水,爆堅野XX/S[ [^^
s襯火打劫 VwHX,P7r b&R
l為求目的,出賣靈魂
)`s+_@$o&N:mDV m衰窮,無錢自己過去搵l

頁: 1 [2]

Powered by Discuz! Archiver 7.0.0  © 2001-2009 Comsenz Inc.