吳建仁 發表於 2005-6-9 12:29 PM
[quote]Originally posted by [i]Charcoal_henry[/i] at 2005-6-9 12:18 PM:
同意到極點~
其實克勤既唱功... [/quote]
如果單以音域計, 克勤應該比學友更廣.
但係克勤唔及學友, 正係因為"感情"問題.
聽一聽佢兩個唱嘅"李香蘭"就知有一種分別.
至於踩鋼線唱歌,
對於克勤黎講,
困難嘅只係"踩鋼線", 唔係"唱歌"
就好似譚校長可以一面跑步一面唱歌而面不改容咁.
因為"唱歌"對佢地呢種級數嘅人黎講, 易過食生菜.
[[i] Last edited by 吳建仁 on 2005-6-9 at 12:35 PM [/i]]
cwc_tkd 發表於 2005-6-9 12:36 PM
[quote]Originally posted by [i]吳建仁[/i] at 2005-6-9 12:29 PM:
如果單以音域計, 克勤應該比學友更... [/quote]
同意呀~~佢成日都唔夠投入~
同埋唔夠放.(演唱會就一時時啦~~)
吳建仁 發表於 2005-6-9 12:44 PM
[quote]Originally posted by [i]cwc_tkd[/i] at 2005-6-9 12:36 PM:
同意呀~~佢成日都唔夠投入~
同埋唔夠放.(演唱會就一時時啦~~) [/quote]
冇錯.
如果克勤可以放開懷抱, 唔執著於"零瘕疵"嘅話, 可能會更好.
sniper 發表於 2005-6-9 12:59 PM
克勤出哂名唱歌冇感情啦, 剩係識震音, 我一d都唔欣賞佢
justin714 發表於 2005-6-9 01:04 PM
連克勤都未夠學友既水平
咁學友咪好恐怖>.<
有冇佢地唱得好既幾隻歌推介呀??
Charcoal_henry 發表於 2005-6-9 02:05 PM
[quote]Originally posted by [i]cwc_tkd[/i] at 2005-6-9 12:36 PM:
同意呀~~佢成日都唔夠投入~
同埋唔夠放.(演唱會就一時時啦~~) [/quote]
[quote]Originally posted by [i]sniper[/i] at 2005-6-9 12:59 PM:
克勤出哂名唱歌冇感情啦, 剩係識震音, 我一d都唔欣賞佢 [/quote]
我唔係咁同意wor~
係, hacken係好似感情唔夠explicit咁, 我覺得咁樣係因為佢唱歌實在太輕鬆所致, 令人感覺唔到佢好"肉緊", 好有感情咁, 但係我唔覺得佢係唔投入wor~ 其實我覺得感情外露同內斂係唱法既分別jie, 我相信要hacken唱到好似eason同基仔都一定無問題, 相反則不能矣, 但係hacken咁唱會好唔自然..... 不過各有各好~ 其實欣賞hacken既同時, 我都覺得eason同基仔好好架
同埋我覺得有陣時eason同基仔既"感情激蕩", 係因為唱得好辛苦~ 而hacken就好少會好似斷氣咁~
abc123shing 發表於 2005-6-9 02:11 PM
錄音係.....錄左幾十次出黎的效果
如果d 歌手唱live 有cd 咁好聽
d 人就唔會話而家d 歌唔識唱歌la
克勤唱live 唱到cd 既效果先係好波
cwc_tkd 發表於 2005-6-9 03:43 PM
[quote]Originally posted by [i]abc123shing[/i] at 2005-6-9 02:11 PM:
錄音係.....錄左幾十次出黎的效果
如果d 歌手唱live 有cd 咁好聽
d 人就唔會話而家d 歌唔識唱歌la
克勤唱live 唱到cd 既效果先係好波 [/quote]
係呀,我覺得佢同eason同學友唱現場都好好~
不過佢地ge歌路唔係好同,
舉例:要克勤唱eason ge"阿士匹靈"佢會唱得好核突,
而要eason同學友唱克勤ge"六呎風雲"一定冇佢唱得咁好,
所以分返開黎睇,佢地各有各好,只係風格有差異
但係我就不太欣賞基仔了~
jaykfc110 發表於 2005-6-9 03:52 PM
[quote]Originally posted by [i]sniper[/i] at 2005-6-9 12:59 PM:
克勤出哂名唱歌冇感情啦, 剩係識震音, 我一d都唔欣賞佢 [/quote]
我都係咁話..冇感情仲要賴有感情咁law.
你地唔發覺仲almost首首歌都係一樣唱法ga咩..真係cd機ar.一部機丫ma
不過我同意克勤係有唱歌同靚聱..只不過係我覺得好悶
我反而覺得eason好全面..佢把聲唱歌唱得好自然都好聽eg. "shall we talk" "時光倒流二十年"
show 唱功,假音又得 e.g "反高潮" , "黑夜不再來"
快歌都得~e.g"打得火熱"(經典la~) or "衝口而出"
你諗下克勤唱"打得火熱"會點...:o
相反eason唱"我不會唱歌"我覺得都不會太差law
月月鳥 發表於 2005-6-9 04:51 PM
[積極回應者+]
Charcoal_henry 發表於 2005-6-9 10:45 PM
[quote]Originally posted by [i]jaykfc110[/i] at 2005-6-9 03:52 PM:
我都係咁話..冇感情仲要賴有感情... [/quote]
唔.....
簡單d黎講, hacken既歌藝(講唱歌唔走音同清晰,[b]走音[/b]係指"好明顯去唔到個音或者係完全唔compatible果d")應該俾eason同基仔好, 因為hacken真係好少好少"走音"而eason同基仔都會
而要hacken用eason同基仔咁"轉key", "激動"地演譯(suppose唔係走音), 應該都無問題, 因為只係控制情緒方面加d功夫
不過要eason同基仔好似hacken live唱到尤如播碟咁, 就應該無咩可能~
see the point?~
阿感 發表於 2005-6-9 11:10 PM
古巨基唱現場太過用力,就算係慢歌/柔情d o既歌,都會好用力去唱,表現過份激動
o的方面eason好好多
個人最鐘意克勤,佢同eason各有各好
Kev 發表於 2005-6-9 11:24 PM
講真你地識唔識唱歌?
我覺得有時d野唱過至知...
好似有幾位人兄都講得好岩...
而大部份人都淨以歌路去評論...
咁其實都冇錯既.. 聽歌麻... 自己合心水就得啦..
我自己就覺... 佢地各有各啦... d歌都唔同...
叫佢地互唱大家d歌必各有味道... 因人而已姐...
你鍾意聽就=好...
如果要好似上面咁每樣功夫都比既話...
一定冇得比架喎...
人地外國男高音唱到杯都粹...
有人話好聽... 有人話唔好... 難道咁樣就等於佢地唱功差咩..?
當然不是^.^
牛仔 發表於 2005-6-9 11:29 PM
我係克勤o既超級fans~~但我都覺得佢d感情唔係咁好~~
佢d輕重音感情會好d....而佢低音都ok啦~~聽佢唱[相愛很難]就知..開頭冇乜聲..唔夠響架~!!
同埋唔知點解克勤呢排係唔係懶左呢~~我一聽完學友o既[活出生命live]~覺得學友勁過克勤~
好驚~~但講真~~佢地個個人o既作風都唔同....
上面有朋友講得arm呀..叫克勤唱[啊士匹靈]克勤都唱得冇果隻feel~~
叫學友.eason or 基仔唱返克勤首[Victory]..佢地都唱得唔到個feel啦~~!!!
講把聲響~~都係克勤同學友~~!!!
都係個人意見姐~~
牛仔 發表於 2005-6-9 11:34 PM
其實大家識唔識分[走音]同[反聲]架~~!!!
eddiema 發表於 2005-6-10 01:52 AM
小弟就好少發言既.....
加上我唔係好識唱歌既.....有咩得罪唔好介意..
我自己覺得就唔洗講野都知學友勁到無得頂...學牛仔話..聽完佢個活出生命live就知...
唱個首傷追人同原唱差幾班....
克勤由出到至e家唱功無乜改變...都係咁勁....係識做人左姐..
咁即係話..同學友最少都差半班....
eason佢技巧係高d 既...佢可以演繹好一般既歌變到你會鍾意...
其實以上幾個我都係幾鍾意...因為佢地有唔同既風格....
有時真係好難去分邊個好既....
victoro 發表於 2005-6-10 01:26 PM
May be we can distinguish them between "variety of skills" and "quality".
Eason must be the 1st in "variety of skills". You will like his style of "playing" his voice and the music. Yes, this is a kind of high quality as well.
For Hacken, we seldom see his "varity of skills". You can say that he is soft or without heart. But it doesn't mean that he lacks of it, its just his way to express his songs these years. Its another kind of mature and his own style. You couldn't find another one who can compatible with him in his field. For the quality, I guess everyone will agree that his live concert is equal to his CD. Its amazing and obviously not Eason and Leo Koo could compatible with.
For Leo Koo... I like his songs in 90s but not now. It seems that he always like to show his skills in front of those new singers and tell them he is good in singing. well.... he is not bad, but still a long way to go if he wanna reach the level of Hacken or Eason.
阿感 發表於 2005-6-11 12:22 AM
[quote]Originally posted by [i]Kev[/i] at 2005-6-9 11:24 PM:
講真你地識唔識唱歌?
我覺得有時d野... [/quote]
我不會唱歌:P
Ken Hung 發表於 2005-6-11 03:54 AM
我就覺得克勤有用感情唱歌, 例子有:偷偷摸摸, 留多一分鐘, 回首等等
不過,有時覺得可能他某d位把聲唱得唔夠"苦", 感情不是太出la,
好似candy 首"三國誌", eason首"綿綿"敢,唱得就夠"苦"了.
ken1 發表於 2005-6-11 04:08 AM
我的睇法:eason>古巨基>克勤..!